跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.17) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/15 19:29
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:段光智
研究生(外文):Doan Quang Tri
論文名稱:建立河川污水排放計量模式作為許可及管理基準-以越南Day/Nhue河次集水區為例
論文名稱(外文):Calculating Capable Wastewater Discharge as Permission and Management for Rivers - Example of the Day/Nhue River Sub-basin, Vietnam
指導教授:陳宜清陳宜清引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chen, Yi-Ching
口試委員:劉豐瑞陳宜清張玉明
口試委員(外文):Kevin Fong-ReyChen, Yi-ChingChong, Nyuk-Min
口試日期:2011-05-19
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大葉大學
系所名稱:環境工程學系碩士班
學門:工程學門
學類:環境工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:英文
論文頁數:206
中文關鍵詞:Day/Nhue流域、水質模式、MIKE 11、污廢水排放許可
外文關鍵詞:Day/Nhue river sub-basinWater quality modelMIKE 11Wastewater discharge permission
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:213
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
在產業發展時期,越南政府把重點放在平衡社會經濟發展以保衛國家與政策,然而污染來自工業、農業、城市、家庭以及工藝村的廢水已經嚴重讓水資源退化,尤其是在Day/Nhue 河流域,因此,本計畫的目的是在計算該河川被許可的污廢水排放量和水質管理。
這項研究發現,越南已實施有利於環境影響評估(EIA)、環境標準、法規和經濟手段的議程,越南也採用別的方法,包括:重整行政組織、增加管理廢水排放的預算、考慮人力資源的開發、處理廢水的方式。然而,在廢水管理的權限上有數量的限制,如:實施不明確的指導方針、環境標準微弱的執行、很淺的處罰違法者、各機構之間管轄權的重疊。此外,在大多數的組織中缺乏資金、設施及人力資源。
針對這條Day/Nhue河,本研究主要採用文獻及水質評價,此外,選擇MIKE11水質模式來模擬計算沿著這條河污染的排放量,根據MIKE11計算的結果評估各河段污染的程度,在現實條件下,當管理者或計劃者在該領域的專門知識不足下使用該模型,本論文提出用查詢表的模型計算,調查表中將建置相關圖表來顯示排放流量的變化,以及上游水流量和污染物的濃度改變後的結果。這些應用將根據不同的計劃而被建置,會帶給使用者方便,協助管理者可以檢討和考慮規劃、許可或規定流域的污廢水排放許可。

During the period of industrial development, the Vietnamese government has focused on the balance of socio-economic development and protection through national and policies. However, pollutants from industrial, agricultural, urban, and domestic and craft villages wastewater have severely degraded water resources, especially the Day/Nhue River Sub-basin. Hence, this study aimed to calculate wastewater discharge capacity as permission and management for this river.
This study found that Vietnam has implemented an environmental agenda favoring the using of environmental impact assessment (EIA), environmental standards, regulation, and economic instruments. Vietnam has also employed methods included restructuring administrative organizations, increasing budgets for wastewater discharge management, considering human resource development, motivation for wastewater treatment, and conducting environmental campaigns with NGOs. However, there are a number of constraints in permission and wastewater management such as unclear guidelines for policy implementation, weak environmental standards enforcement, and low administrative penalties for offenders, overlapping jurisdiction amongst agencies. In addition, there is a lack of finance, facilities, and human resources in most organizations.
This study focused assessment of pollution sources and water quality assessment on the Day/Nhue River. In addition, a water quality model, MIKE 11 was selected to calculate and simulate the transmission ability of pollutants by discharge sources along the river. Based on the results of model calculations assess pollution levels in each river sections. On the other hand, the results of model show also receiving capable of pollutants from discharge sources, the load of BOD5 permission in the longitudinal river section. In real conditions, when the manager and planning not expertise in the field using the model, the thesis proposed using a lookup table of model calculation to investigate the construction of tables about concentration and chart shown changes in discharge flow, water flow to the upstream and the concentration of pollutants. These applications will be built according to the different plans to help for the convenience of users to assist manager can review and consider when planning, licensing or regulating the wastewater discharge permission on this basin.

ABSTRACT iv
中文摘要 vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii
CONTENTS viii
LIST OF FIGURES xi
LIST OF TABLES xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATION xviii
Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Background and Justification 1
1.2. Objectives 3
1.3. Scope of Research 4
1.3.1 Study site 4
1.3.2 Research Content 8
1.3.3 Conditions of River Pollution and Monitoring 9
Chapter 2. LITERATURE REVIEWS 10
2.1 Laws and Regulatories 10
2.1.1 Regulation of Point Sources and Non-Point Source 11
2.1.2 Water Quality Standard 20
2.2 Legal and Institutional Framework in Viet Nam 24
2.2.1 Water Resources Legislations and Agencies 24
2.2.2 Institutional Framework for Environmental Management 26
2.2.3 Institution Arrangement for Wastewater Management 28
2.2.4 Policy and Legislative Framework Context 32
2.3 The Granting of Wastewater Discharge Permits 37
2.4 Management Tools and Instruments 47
2.4.1 Regulations, management procedures and by-law 48
2.4.2 Water Quality Standards 49
2.4.3 Economic Instruments 50
2.4.4 Monitoring Systems 51
2.5 Previous Studies 52
2.5.1 Shanghai Huangpu River, China 52
2.5.2 Lover River, Taiwan 58
2.5.3 Upper Mississippi River Basin, USA 62
Chapter 3. STUDY METHODS 68
3.1 Overview of Water Quality Modeling 68
3.1.1 The Role of Water Quality Modeling in Water Management 69
3.1.2 Introduce Water Quality Modelings 70
3.2 Water Quality Assessment 75
3.2.1 BOD5 Concentration 75
3.2.2 NO3- Concentration 76
3.2.3 Metal Concentration 77
3.3 Pollution Load in the Day/Nhue River Sub-Basin 80
3.3.1 Domestic Pollution 81
3.3.2 Industry 85
3.3.3 Craft Villages 90
3.3.4 Agriculture 91
3.4 Research Methods 93
3.4.1 Study methods suggestion 93
3.4.2 Static equilibrium problem 94
3.4.3 Application of mathematical models 97
3.5 Data Collection 115
3.5.1 Static Equilibrium 115
3.5.2 Mathematical Model 116
Chapter 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 117
4.1 Expected Goals and Results 117
4.1.1. Static Equilibrium 117
4.1.2. Application of Mathematical Model 120
4.2 Proposed Research Procedures and Flow Charts 140
4.2.1 Requirement of the management and wastewater discharge permits 140
4.2.2 Scenario Calculations 145
Chapter 5. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 159
5. 1. Conclusions 159
5. 2. Suggestions 160
REFERENCES 163
APPENDIX A: KEY LEGISLATIONS ON WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 168
APPENDIX B: NUMBER OF NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 172
APPENDIX C: FORMS OF WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT 177
APPENDIX D 184


1.Andersen, L. S. (2003). Introducing water rights in Vietnam, Vietnam-DANIDA water sector program, International working conference on water rights.
2.Alan, K. J. T. (1999). Preliminary assessment of Vietnam’s environment law, Faculty of law National University of Singapore, from: http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/vietnam/reportv.html
3.Alabaster, J. S. and Lloyd, R. (1982). Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Fish. 2nd edition. Published on behalf of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations by Butterworth, London, 361 pp.
4.Canadian Council of Resource and Environment Ministers. (1987). Canadian Water Quality Guidelines. Prepared by the Task Force on Water Quality Guidelines of the Canadian Council of Resource and Environment Ministers, Ottawa.
5.DHI, Water and Environment, (2007). MIKE 11 A modelling System for Rivers and Channels, User Guide and Reference and Manual.
6.European Economic Community. (1992). European Community Environmental Legislation. Volumes 1-7, L2985, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
7.Wu, F. C. (2003). Development of remedial strategies for the Love River Watershed, Thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University.
8.Federal Environmental Protection Agency. (1989). Our National Environmental Goals. Special Publication No. 3. Federal Environmental Protection Agency, Lagos.
9.Federal Government of Nigeria. (1988). Harmful Wastes Decree No. 42 of November 30, 1988. Federal Government of Nigeria, Government Press, Lagos.
10.Foundation for Water Research. (1994). Urban Pollution Management Manual. Report FR/CL0002. Foundation for Water Research, Marlow, Bucks, 129 to 140 pp.
11.Food and Agriculture Organization. (1985). Water Quality for Agriculture. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
12.Federal Environmental Protection Agency. (1991). Proposed National Water Quality Standards. Federal Environmental Protection Agency, Nigeria.
13.Preul, H. C. (1997). Case Study XII - Kingdom of Jordan, in Helmer R. and Hespanhol I. (ed.) Water Pollution Control - A Guide to the Use of Water Quality Management Principles, WHO/UNEP, 433 to 444 pp.
14.Harkening, T. (1994). Danube Integrated Environmental Study. Final Report.
15.International Centre for Environmental Management. (December 2007). Improving Water Quality in the Day/Nhue River Basin: Capable Building and Pollution Sources Inventory, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and Ministry of Construction.
16.International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine. (1991). Konzept zur Ausfüllung des Punktes A.2 des APR über Zielvorgaben. Lenzburg, den 2. Juli 1991 (Methodology to implement item A.2 of the Rhine Action Programme related to water quality objectives, prepared at Lenzbourg on 2 July 1991). PLEN 3/91, International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine against Pollution, Koblenz, Germany.
17.International Union for Conservation of Nature. (1994). Analysis and Synthesis of National Reviews. IUCN European Programme. Final report. The World Conservation Union, Gland.
18.Japan International Co-operation Agency and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. (2004). The study on artisan craft development plan for rural industrialization in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, International Development Center of Japan.
19.Kaohsiung Environmental Protection Bureau. (2009). Water quality protection and monitoring of the Love River. (in Taiwan)
20.Larsen, I. and Ulmgren, L. (1997). Guide to the use of water quality management principles, WHO/UNEP.
21.Linh, N. P. T. and Tien, T. V. (2003). Rural environmental management at central level, Center for Agriculture and Rural Development.
22.Laane, W. and Lindgaard-Jorgensen, P. (1992) Ecosystem approach to the integrated management of river water quality. In: P.J. Newman, M.A. Piavaux and R.A. Sweeting [Eds] River Water Quality. Ecological Assessment and Control. EUR 14606 EN-FR. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
23.Muschack, W. (1990). Pollution of street runoff by traffic and local conditions. Sci. Tot. Envir. National rural clean water supply and sanitation strategy up to year 2020, printed in the Central Fine Art Company. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 93, 419 pp.
24.RCEP (1992) Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Freshwater Quality, Sixteenth Report, Comnd 1966. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 65 to 67 pp.
25.Cruz, R. T. (1994). The Pasig River, Philippines, 315 to 331 pp.
26.Strategic Analysis in Science and Technology. (1992). Research and Technological Development for the Supply and Use of Freshwater Resources I. Krüger Consult AS and Danish Hydraulic Institute. Prepared for the Strategic Analysis in Science and Technology (SAST) Monitoring Programme, Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
27.Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau. (1985). Huangpu River Waste Water Integrated Prevention and Control Planning. Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau, Shanghai.
28.Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration. (2009). Action, guidance, and evaluation of pollution remediation in southern Taiwan. (in Chinese)
29.Thang, N. V. (2002). Environment and environmental impact assessment, Hanoi Agricultural Publisher.
30.Nhan, T. V. and Nga, N.T. (2002). Curriculum Wastewater Treatment Technologies, Science and Technology Publishing House.
31.Task Force. (1994). Strategic Action Plan for the Danube River Basin, December 1994. The Task Force for the Programme.
32.United Nations. (1999). Looking ahead: A United Nations Common Country Assessment of Vietnam, Issued by Vietnamese Government and United Nations.
33.Vollenweider, R. A. (1968). Scientific Fundamentals of the Eutrophication of Lakes and Flowing Waters, with Particular Reference to Nitrogen and Phosphorus as Factors in Eutrophication.
34.Vollenweider, R. A. (1975). Input-output models. With special reference to the phosphorus loading concept in limnology. Schw. Z. Hydrolog, 27, 53 to 84 pp.
35.Vollenweider, R. A. (1976). Advances in defining critical load levels for phosphorus in lake eutrophication. Mem. Dell’Inst. Ital. di Idrobiol., 33, 53 to 83 pp.
36.Huang, Y. C., Yang, C. P., and Tang, P. K. and Lin, Y. J. (Nov 2009). A Study on Water Quality Survey and Simulation for the Love River in Kaohsiung, Proc. 4th NPUST-USTB Symp, B34 to B38 pp.
37.Lung, W. S. (2001). Water quality modeling for waste load allocations and TMDLs, Wiley, New York.
38.World Health Organization. (1984). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, Volume 2, Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information. World Health Organization, Geneva.
39.World Health Organization. (1993). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, Volume 1, Recommendations. 2nd edition, World Health Organization, Geneva.
40.World Health Organization. (1993). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, Volume 1 Recommendations. Second edition, World Health Organization, Geneva.
41.World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Food Agricultural Organization, and United Nation Development Program. (1996). Vietnam Water Resources Sector Review, Report No. 15041-VN.
42.Warford, J. J. (1994). Environment, health, and sustainable development: the role of economic instruments and policies. Discussion paper. Director General's Council on the Earth Summit Action Programme for Health and Environment, World Health Organization, Geneva.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top