|
The main purposes of this study was to explore the decision making process for players of national volleyball team in Taiwan. The process were to constructed and evaluated criteria and indicators, the optimal ranking, and the decision making model for players of different positions for national volleyball team. Methods: the expertise interview was used to establish “The Analytic Hierarchy Process Questionnaire for Players’ Evaluating Performance of national volleyball team”, and Analytic Hierarchy Process was utilized to evaluate weights for criteria and indicators of elite volleyball players. There were totally four criteria and fifteen indicators for setters, four criteria and fourteen indicators for spikers, and three criteria and ten indicators for liberos. Results: Weights for setters, spikers, and liberos of criteria and indicators, and the players’ optimal ranking were figures out. Eventually, the results comparing to the final list of 2011 Asian Men's Volleyball Championship was indicated a selection rate that was 100% consistent. This would be significant reference materials for decision making process in the future. Conclusions: these founding of this study not also providing brief strategies and priorities for volleyball criteria and indicators, but new directions for managing applications, analysis, and research for decision makers of Taiwanese volleyball.
|