臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本實驗根據2014年德國Zielke, Dimitri團隊所提出的Backpedot(Back Junction)太陽能電池，我們加以改進製成指叉式Backpedot(Back Contact Back Junction)太陽能電池。從這幾年的PEDOT:PSS/Si異質介面太陽能電池觀察，大部分的接面都處於照光，容易造成部分太陽光被PEDOT:PSS所吸收而無法有效轉換成光電流，除此之外，正接面(Front junction)太陽能電池的背面幾乎無法有效地進行鈍化處理。為了解決這些缺點，PEDOT:PSS必須置於背面形成Back Junction，且須使用較薄的矽塊材，例如150um厚的矽晶片，才能有效地降低載子覆合的機率。在此實驗我們正負電極同時至於背面，使照光面沒有任何的金屬遮蔽效應，大大的提高了照光面積，也同時增加了短路電流(Jsc)。
在電極上，我們選擇指叉式電極，希望可以降低電子到相對應電極間的傳遞距離，且此種圖形的電極可以觀察出不同比例下的激發層對太陽能電池的影響。我們選擇57%、67%以及74%等三種不同PEDOT:PSS所佔的整體面積比，來選出最佳化的結果，而當PEDOT:PSS的面積比為67%時，得到了15.68%的效率，因為在此比例下，少數載子和多數載子的行走距離為三者中最佳化的結果。再者，在維持67%的面積比下，我們將原本的200um的鋁電極線寬，增加到300um，使正負電極間的距離由原本的200um縮減至150um，效率由原本的15.68%增加到17.59%，Fill Factor也從0.544增加到0.601，因為電子到達相對應的電極距離縮短了，所以Fill Factor也變好了。
由BCBJ太陽能電池結構可以看出背光面並沒有完全被電極所覆蓋，仍有裸露出少部分的矽表面，所以我們提出雙面太陽能電池的想法，在背光面的位置架設一面聚光鏡，使太陽能電池面積外的光源經由鏡面的反射至背光面，使電池兩面都可以照光。PEDOT:PSS面積比為67%，鋁電極線寬為300um的指叉式Backpedot太陽能電池背面照光所得到的效率為0.98%，再加上照光面照光後所得到的效率17.59%，當在1.5AM的環境下，兩面同時照光，則理想上我們會得到約18.6%的效率。

This thesis aims at the improvement of back-junction type PEDOT:PSS/Si hybrid solar cells, which was first proposed and demonstrated by Zieke and coworkers with a decent power conversion efficiency.
The limited efficiency of current PEDOT:PSS/Si solar cells were basically due to the facts that the heterojunction was located on the front of the cell, resulting in a parasitic light absorption within the organic material. In addition, the rear surface of those front-junction solar cells was usually poorly passivated. To overcome above difficulties, one must place the PEDOT:PSS on the rear side of the device and the solar cell must be fabricated on a thin Si wafer to reduce carrier recombination. By adapting back contact cross-finger type PEDOT:PSS/Si heterostructures on thin Si wafers, we are able to reduce the shading loss to zero and enhance carrier collection. The absence of the metallization grid on the front side increases the short- circuit current (Jsc) of the cells dramatically.
BackPEDOT cells with cross-finger type electrodes of different back emitter shading ratios were fabricated and tested. An optimized efficiency of 15.7% was achieved from cells with a shading ratio of 67%. It indicates that, at this particular shading ratio, diffusion lengths and carrier collection efficiency were optimized for both majority and minority carriers. By further increasing the width of Al electrodes from 200 um to 300 um and reducing the pitch between anode and cathode from 200 um to 150 um, the Fill Factor and efficiency of the BackPEDOT solar cells were further improved from 0.54 to 0.6 and from 15.7 % to 17.6%, respectively.
Due to the cross-finger type electrodes employed on the devices, the rear side of the cells is not fully covered by the electrodes, which means that there are still exposed organic-silicon junction areas that can absorb sunlight. An efficiency of 1% was measured when the rear side of the solar cell was under 1.5AM illumination. Therefore, in principle, one can expect a total conversion efficiency of 18.6% when both sides of the cell are illuminated simultaneously.

摘要 i
ABSTRACT iii
誌謝 v
目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 ix
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 太陽能電池概1 2 2
1.2.1太陽能電池的起源 2
1.2.2 太陽能電池的發展 2
1.2.3抗反射層的應用 4
1.3文獻回顧 5
1.4研究動機 8
第二章 實驗原理 9
2.1 太陽能電池工作原理 9
2.1.1太陽能電池之等效電路 9
2.1.2太陽能電池的電性參數 12
2.1.3單晶矽太陽能電池 14
2.1.4有機/無機異質接面太陽能電池 16
2.2抗反射層 18
2.2.1抗反射膜的原理與應用20 18
2.2.2增加光路徑 19
2.3接觸電極型太陽能電池 21
2.2.1太陽能電池結構的發展22 21
2.2.2背接面接觸太陽能電池的優點及挑戰23 24
2.2.3背接面接觸太陽能電池的重要參數23 25
2.2.4 Front Surface Field 的應用 26
2.2.5 N型矽塊材 30
第三章 實驗流程 33
3.1 工作機台介紹 33
3.2 實驗步驟 39
3.2.1 Backpedot(Back Junction)製程步驟 39
3.2.2 Cross-Finger Backpedot(CF Backpedot)製成步驟 41
第四章 結果與討論 43
4.1抗反射層的影響 43
4.2 Front Surfce Field(FSF)的影響 46
4.3 CF Backpedot 48
4.3.1不同PEDOT:PSS比例下的結果 48
4.3.2載子路徑長短對Fill Factor的影響 50
4.3.3BCBJ太陽能電池雙面照光 52
第五章 結論 55
參考文獻 56

1. Chapin, D. M.; Fuller, C.; Pearson, G., A new silicon p‐n junction photocell for converting solar radiation into electrical power. Journal of Applied Physics 1954, 25 (5), 676-677.
2. Goetzberger, A.; Hebling, C.; Schock, H.-W., Photovoltaic materials, history, status and outlook. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2003, 40 (1), 1-46.
3. Jackson, P.; Hariskos, D.; Wuerz, R.; Kiowski, O.; Bauer, A.; Friedlmeier, T. M.; Powalla, M., Properties of Cu (In, Ga) Se2 solar cells with new record efficiencies up to 21.7%. physica status solidi (RRL)-Rapid Research Letters 2015, 9 (1), 28-31.
4. Spanggaard, H.; Krebs, F. C., A brief history of the development of organic and polymeric photovoltaics. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2004, 83 (2), 125-146.
5. Khatri, I.; Imamura, T.; Uehara, A.; Ishikawa, R.; Ueno, K.; Shirai, H., Chemical mist deposition of graphene oxide and PEDOT: PSS films for crystalline Si/organic heterojunction solar cells. physica status solidi (c) 2012, 9 (10‐11), 2134-2137.
6. Fan, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Yang, F.; Meng, X., Recent progress in organic–inorganic hybrid solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2013, 1 (31), 8694-8709.
7. Schmidt, J.; Titova, V.; Zielke, D., Organic-silicon heterojunction solar cells: Open-circuit voltage potential and stability. Applied Physics Letters 2013, 103 (18), 183901.
8. Liu, Q.; Khatri, I.; Ishikawa, R.; Fujimori, A.; Ueno, K.; Manabe, K.; Nishino, H.; Shirai, H., Improved photovoltaic performance of crystalline-Si/organic Schottky junction solar cells using ferroelectric polymers. Applied Physics Letters 2013, 103 (16), 163503.
9. Liu, Q.; Ishikawa, R.; Funada, S.; Ohki, T.; Ueno, K.; Shirai, H., Highly Efficient Solution‐Processed Poly (3, 4‐ethylenedio‐xythiophene): Poly (styrenesulfonate)/Crystalline–Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells with Improved Light‐Induced Stability. Advanced Energy Materials 2015, 5 (17), 1500744.
10. Chen, J.-Y.; Yu, M.-H.; Chang, S.-F.; Sun, K. W., Highly efficient poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly (styrenesulfonate)/Si hybrid solar cells with imprinted nanopyramid structures. Applied Physics Letters 2013, 103 (13), 133901.
11. Liu, Q.; Imamura, T.; Hiate, T.; Khatri, I.; Tang, Z.; Ishikawa, R.; Ueno, K.; Shirai, H., Optical anisotropy in solvent-modified poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly (styrenesulfonic acid) and its effect on the photovoltaic performance of crystalline silicon/organic heterojunction solar cells. Applied Physics Letters 2013, 102 (24), 243902.
12. Thomas, J. P.; Zhao, L.; McGillivray, D.; Leung, K. T., High-efficiency hybrid solar cells by nanostructural modification in PEDOT: PSS with co-solvent addition. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2014, 2 (7), 2383-2389.
13. Yang, L.; Cappel, U. B.; Unger, E. L.; Karlsson, M.; Karlsson, K. M.; Gabrielsson, E.; Sun, L.; Boschloo, G.; Hagfeldt, A.; Johansson, E. M., Comparing spiro-OMeTAD and P3HT hole conductors in efficient solid state dye-sensitized solar cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2012, 14 (2), 779-789.
14. Campbell, P.; Green, M. A., Light trapping properties of pyramidally textured surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics 1987, 62 (1), 243-249.
15. Har-Lavan, R.; Joshi, P.; Yaffe, O.; Levine, I.; Cahen, D. In Hybrid, chemically passivated n-type silicon/PEDOT: PSS semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor solar cell, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2011 37th IEEE, IEEE: 2011; pp 002492-002496.
16. Liu, Q.; Ono, M.; Tang, Z.; Ishikawa, R.; Ueno, K.; Shirai, H., Highly efficient crystalline silicon/Zonyl fluorosurfactant-treated organic heterojunction solar cells. Applied Physics Letters 2012, 100 (18), 183901.
17. Zielke, D.; Pazidis, A.; Werner, F.; Schmidt, J., Organic-silicon heterojunction solar cells on n-type silicon wafers: The BackPEDOT concept. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2014, 131, 110-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.05.022i
18. Schmidt, J.; Zielke, D.; Lövenich, W.; Elschner, A. In Organic-silicon heterojunctions: a promising new concept for high-efficiency solar cells, Tech. Digest of the 6th World Conf. Photovolt. Solar Energy Conv., Kyoto, Japan, 2014; p 869.
19. Jäckle, S.; Mattiza, M.; Liebhaber, M.; Brönstrup, G.; Rommel, M.; Lips, K.; Christiansen, S., Junction formation and current transport mechanisms in hybrid n-Si/PEDOT: PSS solar cells. Scientific reports 2015, 5 (13008).
20. Chattopadhyay, S.; Huang, Y.; Jen, Y.-J.; Ganguly, A.; Chen, K.; Chen, L., Anti-reflecting and photonic nanostructures. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2010, 69 (1), 1-35.
21. Nilsson, D.; Jensen, S.; Menon, A., Fabrication of silicon molds for polymer optics. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 2003, 13 (4), S57.
22. Kerschaver, E. V.; Beaucarne, G., Back‐contact solar cells: A review. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2006, 14 (2), 107-123.
23. Granek, F., High-efficiency back-contact back-junction silicon solar cells. Dr. Hut: 2010. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Filip_Granek/publication/43033375
24. Glunz, S. W.; Rein, S.; Warta, W.; Knobloch, J.; Wettling, W., Degradation of carrier lifetime in Cz silicon solar cells. Solar energy materials and solar cells 2001, 65 (1), 219-229.
25. Shockley, W.; Read Jr, W., Statistics of the recombinations of holes and electrons. Physical review 1952, 87 (5), 835.
26. Hall, R. N., Electron-hole recombination in germanium. Physical Review 1952, 87 (2), 387.
27. Aberle, A. G., Surface passivation of crystalline silicon solar cells: a review. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2000, 8 (5), 473-487.
28. Zouari, A.; Arab, A. B., Effect of the front surface field on crystalline silicon solar cell efficiency. Renewable Energy 2011, 36 (6), 1663-1670.
29. Cuevas, A.; Giroult-Matlakowski, G.; Basore, P.; DuBois, C.; King, R. R. In Extraction of the surface recombination velocity of passivated phosphorus-doped silicon emitters, Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 1994., Conference Record of the Twenty Fourth. IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference-1994, 1994 IEEE First World Conference on, IEEE: 1994; pp 1446-1449.
30. Schmidt, J.; Aberle, A. G.; Hezel, R. In Investigation of carrier lifetime instabilities in Cz-grown silicon, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 1997., Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth IEEE, IEEE: 1997; pp 13-18.
31. Schmidt, J.; Cuevas, A., Electronic properties of light-induced recombination centers in boron-doped Czochralski silicon. Journal of Applied Physics 1999, 86 (6), 3175-3180.
32. Glunz, S.; Rein, S.; Lee, J.; Warta, W., Minority carrier lifetime degradation in boron-doped Czochralski silicon. Journal of Applied Physics 2001, 90 (5), 2397-2404.
33. Macdonald, D.; Geerligs, L., Recombination activity of interstitial iron and other transition metal point defects in p-and n-type crystalline silicon. Applied Physics Letters 2004, 85 (18), 4061-4063.
34. Geerligs, L.; Macdonald, D., Base doping and recombination activity of impurities in crystalline silicon solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2004, 12 (4), 309-316.
35. Cuevas, A.; Kerr, M. J.; Samundsett, C.; Ferrazza, F.; Coletti, G., Millisecond minority carrier lifetimes in n-type multicrystalline silicon. Applied Physics Letters 2002, 81 (26), 4952-4954.
36. Saritas, M.; McKell, H. D., Comparison of minority‐carrier diffusion length measurements in silicon by the photoconductive decay and surface photovoltage methods. Journal of applied physics 1988, 63 (9), 4561-4567.