|
The study is going to research for Chiang peng-lung integrated technical performances in present stage. We hope to find the overcoming strategy by using scientific ways, and collect the integrated analysis of enemies to provide the concrete tactical strategy. The research takes Chiang peng-lung, who stood for our country to be the table tennis training player in 2004 Olympic Game, as the target. And we collect Chiang peng-lung technical and tactics with other world excellent table tennis players in international games from 2001 to 2004. Based on table tennis fundamental technical characteristic, we could divide the main techniques into serve attack phase, receive attack phase, double cutting phase, pushing phase, and mutual attack phase. We watch the video to record every kind of technique form the table tennis record sheet. We calculate overall gaining and losing scores at first, and analyze by using the gray connection analysis. The results are: (1) Chiang peng-lung integrated technical performances in present stage: the highest scores in the item of serve attack phase are backhand side drive, forehand side drive, and forehand side service. But backhand side attacked ones lose more scores in the serve attack phase technique. Backhand side drive is also the item which loses scores easily. The highest scores in the item of receive attack phase are forehand side drive, backhand side push, and backhand side double cut. But backhand side receive attacked ones lose more scores in the receive attack phase technique. In the contentious phase, backhand side pushing phase gains more scores; backhand side pushing phase and forehand side pushing phase also lose much scores. (2) By gray connection analysis, we could find the technical items which affect the score performances in present games are backhand side backhand side (X2), forehand side backhand side (X1), backhand side receive attack phase (X4), backhand side double cutting phase (X6), forehand side double cutting phase (X5), backhand side pushing phase (X8), forehand side pushing phase (X7), backhand side mutual attack phase (X10), forehand side mutual attack phase (X9), and forehand side receive attack phase (X3). So we can know the actively performance of third board’s serve attack phase affects Chiang peng-lung game results a lot. We need to enhance and keep in a planned way. Performances on forehand side serve attack phase and mutual attack phase are not good. We have to make improve to break through the choke point. (3) The gray connection analysis on excellent players in the world can help us to understand how the technical items affect the performance. It can help Chiang peng-lung to compare with games and practices. (4) From the compound review analysis of Chiang peng-lung, we can find that Chiang peng-lung scores on serve attack phase, receive attack phase and contentious phase are lower than Liu cheng-min. Chiang peng-lung performances on the main compound skills didn’t elaborate his advantages, like serve attack phase and backhand side pushing phase. Through the connection analysis, we can know the game Chiang peng-lung was good at backhand side serve attack phase, backhand side receive attack phase, backhand side pushing phase, and forehand side pushing phase when he competed with Liu cheng-min in Olympic Game. So we can find that Chiang peng-lung try to improve the drawback of forehand side mutual attack phase before Olympic Game, but he didn’t perform well on forehand side receive attack phase and backhand side double cutting phase. It could be the reason that he lost.
|