跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.168) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/05 22:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:羅義鵬
研究生(外文):Yi-Peng Lo
論文名稱:轉置成本,信任,與資訊分享因子對供應鏈之影響研究
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Switching Cost, Trust, and Information Sharing on Supply Chains
指導教授:林福仁林福仁引用關係
指導教授(外文):Fu-ren Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系研究所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:英文
論文頁數:94
中文關鍵詞:資訊分享信任多重代理人系統轉置成本供應鏈管理
外文關鍵詞:information sharingmulti-agent systemswitching costtrustSupply chain management
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:255
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:42
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
在現今的社會中,隨著資訊科技的發展,公司之間的商業行為也越來越複雜,而在多變的環境中,如何改善整體供應鏈的效能,是一項嚴肅且關鍵的課題。在本研究中,我們試圖從轉置成本、信任機制與資訊分享等因素來探討這個問題。
首先,我們提出一個有關轉置成本、信任機制與資訊分享對供應鏈效能的關係模式。為驗證這個模式的正確性,我們模擬了一個供應鏈的環境,並利用這樣的關係模式建構出一個廠商決策的機制。我們觀察了不同訂單需求狀況對此模式的影響,以及其關係變動的情況;此外,我們也觀察了不同資訊分享障礙程度、不同轉置成本與信任機制傾向的影響;最後,我們也探討了不同商品價格與不同技術穩定度對整個供應鏈結果的影響。
With rapid development of information technology, the company can find and communicate with new partners easily, which makes the relation more complex and unstable. How to improve the performance of the supply chain is an important issue. In this study, we try to discuss the problem from the three factors including switching cost, trust and information sharing.
First, we propose a conceptual model of switching cost, trust, information sharing and supply chain performance. The performance indexes include the average fulfillment rate, average stock cost, and average cycle time. Second, in order to verify the model, we construct a simulation environment of supply chain and construct a decision mechanism based on the conceptual model. Final, we observe the effect and variation of the different order demand environment, the different information sharing threshold, different propensity of switching cost and trust, and different product price and different producing technology.
論文提要 I
致謝 II
中文摘要 III
英文摘要 IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF FIGURES VIII
LIST OF TABLES IX

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 RESEARCH MOTIVATION AND OBJECTIVES 1
1.2 THESIS ORGANIZATION 2
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 3
2.1 SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT 3
2.2 INFORMATION SHARING 4
2.2.1 The levels of information sharing 4
2.2.2 The information sharing and firm performance 5
2.3 SWITCHING COST 5
2.3.1 Types and variables of switching cost 6
2.3.2 The switching costs and information sharing 8
2.3.3 The switching costs and firm performance 8
2.4 TRANSACTION COST THEORY 9
2.5 TRUST 11
2.5.1 Types and antecedents of trust 11
2.5.2 Trust and information sharing 14
2.5.3 The trust and firm performance 14
2.6 SIMULATION 15
2.7 THE MULTI-AGENT SYSTEM 16
2.8 SWARM SIMULATION PLATFORM 17
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 19
3.1 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 19
3.2 RESEARCH METHOD 20
3.2.1 Simulation model 20
3.2.2 Decision mechanisms 23
(1) Switching cost 23
(2) Trust 26
(3) Information sharing 30
3.2.3 Evaluation criteria 33
(1) In-time order fulfillment rate (iofr) 33
(2) Average inventory cost (aic) 33
(3) Average order cycle time rate (aoctr) 34
3.2.4 Summary 34
(1) Decision mechanisms 34
(2) Evaluation criteria 35
CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 36
4.1 EXPERIMENTAL SETTINGS 36
4.2 EXPERIMENTS 39
4.2.1 Experiment A 39
4.2.2 Experiment B 40
4.2.3 Experiment C 41
4.2.4 Experiment D 42
CHAPTER 5 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 44
5.1 EXPERIMENT A 44
5.1.1 Comparison with A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 44
5.1.2 The relation of A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 47
5.1.3 Summary 53
5.2 EXPERIMENT B 54
5.2.1 Comparison with B-1-1, B-1-2, B-1-3, and B-1-4 54
5.2.2 Comparison with Experiment B-2 57
5.2.3 Summary 58
5.3 EXPERIMENT C-1 59
5.3.1 Comparison with C-1-1, C-1-2, C-1-3, and C-1-4 59
5.3.2 Comparison between Experiments C-1 and C-2 62
5.3.3 Summary 64
5.4 EXPERIMENT C-3 64
5.4.1 Comparison with C-3-1, C-3-2, C-3-3 and C-3-4 65
5.4.2 Comparison between Experiments C-2 and C-3 68
5.4.3 Comparison between Experiments C-1 and C-3 69
5.4.4 Summary 71
5.5 EXPERIMENT D 72
5.5.1 Comparison with D-1, D-2, D-3, and D-4 72
5.5.2 Summary 76
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 78
6.1 CONCLUSIONS 78
6.2 RESEARCH LIMITATION 80
6.3 FUTURE WORK 81
REFERENCES 82
APPENDICES 86
APPENDIX A. THE COMPARISON BETWEEN INFORMATION SHARING LEVEL UPGRADING AND DOWNGRADING 86
Experiment A 86
Experiment B-1 87
Experiment C-1 87
Experiment C-3 88
Experiment D 89
APPENDIX B. THE RATIO OF SWITCHING COST OVER TRUST 91
Experiment A 91
Experiment C-1 92
Experiment C-3 92
Experiment D 93
Ali, F. F., Pauline, S.P. Ng., and William, L. C., “Building a successful e-business: the FedEx story”, CACM, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 84-89, 2003.
Aulakh P. S., Kotabe M., Sahay A., ”Trust and performance in cross border marketing relationships: a behavioral approach”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 27, No. 5, pp. 1005-1032, 1996.
Bakos, J. Y. and Kemerer, C. F., “Recent applications of economic theory in information technology research”, Decision Support Systems, December, pp. 365-386, 1992.
Ball, M. O., Ma, M., Raschid, R. and Zhao, Z., “Supply Chain Infrastructures: System Integration and Information Sharing”, SIGMOD Record, Vol. 31, No. 1, March 2002.
Basu, A. and Kumar, A., “Research commentary: Workflow management issues in e-business”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No 1, pp. 1-14, 2002.
Becerra, M. and Gupta, A.K., “Trust within the organization: Integrating the trust literature with agency theory and transaction costs economics”, Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 177-203, 1999.
Beggs, A. and Klemperer, P., ”Multi-Period Competition with Switching Costs”, Econometrica, 1992.
Bond, A. H. and Gasser, L., “Readership in Distributed Artificial Intelligence”, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988.
Dajun, D. and Katia, D.,“Agent-Facilitated Real-Time Flexible Supply Chain Structuring” AA ''98, 1998.
Dyer, J. H., “Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 535-556, 1997.
Durfee, E.H., Lesser, V.R. and Corkill, D.D., “Trends in Cooperative Distributed Problem Solving”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 63-83, March 1989.
Gehrig, T. and Stenbacka, R., “Information sharing in banking: A collusive device?”, CEPR Discussion Papers, 2001.
Hess, M. and Ricart, J. E., “Managing customer switching costs: A framework for competing in the networked environment”, IESE, 2002.
Hitt, L. M. and Chen, P.-Y., “Switching cost and brand loyalty in electronic markets: evidence from on-line retail brokers”, Proceedings of the twenty first international conference on Information systems, 2000.
Jeffry H. D. and Wujin C., “The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea”, Organization Science, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57-68, 2003.
Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K. and Wooldridge, M., “A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development”, In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Journal, N.R. Jennings, K. Sycara and M. Georgeff (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7-38, 1998.
Julander, C. and Söderlund, M., “Effects of Switching Barriers on Satisfaction, Repurchase Intentions and Attitudinal Loyalty”, Working Paper Series in Business Administration, Inventoryholm School of Economics, 2003.
Kasuga, N. and Torii, A., “Long-term Business Relationships between Consignor and Trucking Carrier in Japan”, IPTP Discussion Paper Series, 1999.
Klemperer, P., “Markets With Consumer Switching Costs”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987.
Klemperer, P.,” Multi-period competition with switching costs”, Econometrica, 1992.
Klemperer, P., “Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade”, Review of Economic Studies, 1995.
Lee, H.L., and Billington, C., “The evolution of supply-chain-management models and practice at Hewlett-Packard”, Interfaces Vol.25, No.5, pp.42-63, 1995.
Lin, F.-r., and Hwang, S.-H., “The Evolution of Supply Chain Structure in Electronic Commerce”, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Management (Volume I), TaoYuan, Taiwan, pp.408-414, January 1999.
Lin, F.-r., Sung, Y.-w., and Lo, Y.-p., “Effects of Trust Mechanisms on Supply Chain Performance Using Multi-agent Simulation and Analysis”, The First Workshop on Electronic Business, Barcelona, Spain, December 2002.
Lin, F.-r., Tan, G.W., and Shaw, M.J., “Modeling Supply-Chain Networks by A Multi-Agent System”, Proceedings of the 31rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 5, pp. 105-114, 1998.
Lin, F.-r., Yang, M-c., and Pai, Y-h., “A Generic Structure for Business Process Modeling”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 8, No.1, pp.19-41, 2002.
Lingnau, A., and Drobnik, O., “Simulating Mobile Agent Systems with Swarm”, Proc. 1st Int''l Symposium on Agent Systems and Applications and 3rd Int''l Symposium on Mobile Agents (ASA/MA''99), 1999.
MacDuffie, J. P. and Helper, S., “Creating Lean Suppliers: The Honda Way”, California Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp.118-151, Summer 1997.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., and Schoorman, F.D., “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of Management Review”, Vol.20, No.3, pp. 709-734, 1995.
Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R. and Zaltman, G.., “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, pp. 81-101, January 1992.
Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D., “The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 20-38, 1994.
Parunak, H. V. D., “The DASCh Experience: How to Model a Supply Chain”, ICCS''98, 1998.
Seidmann and Sundararajan, “Building and Sustaining Interoganizational Information Sharing Relationships: The Competitive Impact of Interfacing Supply Chain Operations with Marketing Strategy”, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp. 205-222, Atlanta, Georgia, December 1997.
Seidmann and Sundararajan, “Sharing logistics information across organizations: thchnology, competition and contracting”, Operations management, 1997.
Shin, N., “The Impact of Information Technology on Firm Performance: the Importance of Strategic Choice”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2001.
Simon, H. A., “Models of Bounded Rationality”, Vol. 2, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982.
Smith, A. D. and Aldrich, H.E., "The Role of Trust in the Transaction Costs Economics Framework: Transaction contexts and Governance Structures in U.S. Manufacturer-Supplier Relations", Academy of Management Conference, Miami, FL., 1991.
Swaminathan, J., Smith, S. F., and Sadeh, N., “Modeling Supply Chain Dynamics: A Multiagent Approach”, Decision Sciences, 1998.
Williamson, O.E., “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications”, New York: The Free Press, 1975.
Zucker, L. G. “Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8, pp. 53-111, 1986.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊