臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

今日企業環境中，為增加全球市場的競爭力，組織常聚焦於在作業中如何增加效率，然作業上的風險似乎就容易被忽略。我海軍飛航作業中最大的風險就是失事，肇生人員傷亡或裝備損壞，都會嚴重傷害部隊士氣與訓練成果。
海航部隊於海上執行航行落艦作業，可隨艦出海以增加作戰的縱深，攸關反潛戰力的延伸，才能凸顯海軍航空部隊戰力的發揚，這也是我國海航部隊，能鶴立於其他空中兵力的強項之一，而落艦作業高風險操作的特質，是海航部隊不得不面對及克服的。有鑑於此，本研究將從作業風險管理的發展，與軍事上的運用進行文獻探討，進而透過其概念與做法，並輔以失效模式與效應分析及理想解類似度順序偏好兩種評估方法做為研究工具，以掌握海軍航空部隊在落艦作業中的關鍵風險項目。期在有限資源下，透過風險辨識、確認、評估、控制、預防與檢討等步驟，淬鍊出最符合單位的作法及建議，俾提供有效的預防作為，降低落艦作業之風險於最小程度。

Today's business environment, in order to increase the competitiveness of the global market, organizations often focus on how to increase efficiency in the job, then the risk on work seems to be easily ignored. The biggest risk of Navy flight operations is crash, resulting in casualties or equipment damage will jeopardize the troop morale and training profits.
The deck landing operation of naval forces at sea can increase the depth of operations, extend anti-submarine warfare cabibility, and develop the naval aviation combat power to carry forward, which is our naval forces unique capability better then other air forces. But, the high-risk nature of the deck landing operation is the Navy forces needed to confrontand conquer with. Based on this, the study will research Operational Risk Management (ORM) development, and explore the use of the military. Then, through the conceptand practicesof ORM, combined with Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Technique for Order Preferenceby Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis methods as research toolsto understand the key riskitems of deck landing operation. Hopingin the limited resources condition, through risk identification, confirmation, assess, control, prevention and review steps, obtained the ways and recommendations fitting the units demends to provide effective preventives for reducing the deck landing risk to the minimum.

誌謝 I
摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
目錄 V
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
第壹章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景及動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究範圍與限制 2
1.4 研究流程 3
第貳章 文獻探討 4
2.1 海軍落艦作業 4
2.2 作業風險管理(ORM) 5
2.3 失效模式與效應分析(FMEA) 16
2.4 理想解類似度順序偏好法(TOPSIS) 20
第參章 研究方法 24
3.1 研究架構 24
3.2 研究設計 25
3.3 問卷設計 25
3.4 分析方法 26
3.4.1. 失效模式與效應分析(FMEA) 26
3.4.2. 理想解相似度順序偏好法(TOPSIS) 26
第肆章 研究分析與結果 28
4.1樣本屬性分析 28
4.2第一階段問卷結果 29
4.3第二階段問卷結果暨FMEA分析 32
4.4問卷效信度分析 37
4.5應用TOPSIS法於風險值排序 38
4.6風險優先數法(RPN)與TOPSIS法結果之比較 51
4.7訂定高風險項目對策 55
第伍章 結論與建議 64
5.1研究結果 64
5.2研究發現與探討 64
5.3研究建議 65
參考文獻 66
中文部份 66
英文部份 67
附錄一、第一階段問卷 71
附錄二、第二階段問卷 74

行政院研究發展考核委員會. (2009). 風險管理及危機處理作業手冊. 台北: 行政院研考會.
呂奇峰. (2014). 基於夜視鏡飛行初探我國艦儎直升機夜間飛行安全.(未出版碩士論文), 開南大學.
宋樂業. (2006). 直昇機飛航作業人為因素之探討. (碩士), 國立成功大學, 台南市.
李文傑. (2014). 應用TOPSIS分析臺灣地區大眾運輸電子票證優惠實施方式. (碩士), 中華大學, 新竹市.
李進生. (2000). 風險管理的意義. 新竹: 清蔚.
林岳賢. (2012). 運用ORM、FMEA與TRIZ於產品製程改善之研究－以引擎機匣加工為例. (未出版碩士論文), 正修科技大學, 高雄市.
徐仕明. (2008). 國際觀光旅館效率與效能評估模式之建構. (未出版博士論文), 中華大學, 新竹市.
國防部空軍司令部編. (2010). 空軍風險管理手冊(第2部)(第一版). 台北: 國防部空軍司令部.
連捷. (2009). 陸戰戰場風險管理. 陸軍學術雙月刊(495期), 77-92.
陳肇敏. (2005). 從空軍建立作業風險管理機制探討提升飛航安全之作法. (碩士), 台灣大學, 台北.
黃炳麟. (2002). 戰場風險管理之研究-從專案風險管理觀點解析波灣戰爭. (碩士), 國防大學國防管理學院.
黃笙榤. (2013). 整合RCA、FMEA、TRIZ以降低產品失效風險之研究. (未出版碩士論文), 逢甲大學, 台中市.
黃警諒. (2004). 二次波灣戰爭美軍戰場風險管理作為之研究-以誤擊事件為例. 陸軍月刊, 第41卷(第482期), 29-44.
熊勝榮. (2007). 風險管理運用簡介-以美軍為例. 陸軍學術月刊, 43卷(496期), 102-115.
劉東昇. (2014). 結合AHP與TOPSIS的價值探索法求解需求不確定之供應鏈問題. (未出版碩士論文), 國立清華大學, 新竹市.
蔣建中. (2007). 直升機夜間落艦之探討. 海軍學術雙月刊, 41-53.
鄭燦堂. (2010). 風險管理：理論與實務. 臺北: 五南.
薄富爾. (2006). 戰略緒論 (鈕先鍾, Trans.). 台北: 國防計畫局編譯室.
簡志郎. (2003). 模糊理論與TOPSIS法於失效模式與效應分析之應用. (未出版碩士論文), 逢甲大學, 台中市.
魏振育. (2010). 決定關鍵失效因素與解決問題算則之建構. (未出版碩士論文), 國立高雄大學, 高雄市.
Aguarón-Joven, J., Escobar-Urmeneta, M. T., García-Alcaraz, J. L., Moreno-Jiménez, J. M., & Vega-Bonilla, A. (2015). A new synthesis procedure for TOPSIS based on AHP. [Un nuevo procedimiento de síntesis para TOPSIS basado en AHP]. Dyna, 82(191), 11-19. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v82n190.51140
Bonsall, S. (2008). Fuzzy rule-based bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 57(3), 517-528.
Chang, K.-H., & Cheng, C.-H. (2009). Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy
OWA and DEMATEL method. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(2), 113-129.
Chief of Naval Operations. (2010). OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT, OPNAVINST 3500.39C. WASHINGTON, DC.
Chin, K.-S., Wang, Y.-M., Poon, K. K., & Yang, J.-B. (2009). Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Computers & Operations Research, 36(6 ), 1768-1779.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Dingle, L. C. R. E., & Rempfer, M. T. L. (2015). Operational Risk Management (ORM)And the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP). from http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/80n0208/80N-0208_emc-000120-02.pdf
El Bakri, S., Fleury, B., & Le Grevellec, M. (2015). Risk analysis study for patients care in radiotherapy: Learning curve and methodological evolution. Cancer Radiotherapie, 19(6-7), 556-562. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2015.05.023
Erben, R., & Romeike, F. (2006). 藍海上的風險 (黃秀如, Trans.). 台北: 時報文化.
FAA. (2000). FAA System Safety Handbook. USA: FAA.
Ford Motor Company. (1995). Potential Failure Mode and Effect Analysis reference manual (2nd ed.). U.S.: Ford Motor Company.
Garcia, P. A. A., Schirru, R., & Frutuoso E^Melo, P. F. (2005). A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 46(3-4), 359-373.
Gargama, H., & Chaturvedi, S. K. (2011). Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 60(1), 102-110.
Gudale, P., & Naik, V. (2014). Use of FMEA Methodology For Development Of Semiautomatic Averaging Fixture For Engine Cylinder Block. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(5), 12452-12462.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. P. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications survey. New York. NY: Springer-Verlag.
Jiang, Y.-X., Liu, Y.-S., Ying, G.-G., Wang, H.-W., Liang, Y.-Q., & Chen, X.-W. (2015). A new tool for assessing sediment quality based on the Weight of Evidence approach and grey TOPSIS. Science of the Total Environment, 537, 369-376. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.004
Kuo, R.-J., Wu, Y.-H., & Hsu, T.-S. (2012). Integration of fuzzy set theory and TOPSIS into HFMEA to improve outpatient service for elderly patients in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 75(7), 341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2012.05.001
LI, G., BAKER, S. P., GRABOWSKI, J. G., & REBOK, G. W. (2001). Factors Associated with Pilot Error in Aviation Crashes. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72(1), 52-58.
Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828-838.
Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., Q.-H., B., Lin, Q.-L., Dong, N., & Xu, P.-C. (2011). Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4403-4415.
Mandal, S., Singh, K., Behera, R. K., Sahu, S. K., Raj, N., & Maiti, J. (2015). Human error identification and risk prioritization in overhead crane operations using HTA, SHERPA and fuzzy VIKOR method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(20), 7195-7206. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.033
Mandevari, S., Shahriar, K., & Esfahanipour, A. (2014). Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS. Science of the Total Environment, 488, 85-99. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.076
Mentes, A., & Ozen, E. (2015). A hybrid risk analysis method for a yacht fuel system safety. Safety Science, 79, 94-104.
Okul, D., Gencer, C., & Aydogan, E. K. (2014). A Method Based on SMAA-Topsis for Stochastic Multi-Criteria Decision Making and a Real-World Application. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 13(5), 957-978. doi: 10.1142/s0219622014500175
Pitinanondha, T. (2008). Operational risk management (ORM) systems –An Australian study (Doctor of Philosophy), University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2005). Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(9), 986-1004.
Shih, H. S., Shyur, H. J., & Lee, E. S. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7-8), 801-813.
US NAVY. (2015). History of Navy Safety Program. Navy Administration Training Manuals. Retrieved 2015/11/22, 2015, from http://www.tpub.com/content/administration/14167/css/14167_12.htm
Vahdani, B., Salimi, M., & Charkhchian, M. (2015). A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77(1-4), 357-368. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6466-3
Wang, L., Zhang, Z.-X., & Wang, Y.-M. (2015). A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9379-9388. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.056
Wu, C.-M., Hsieh, C.-L., & Chang, K.-L. (2013). A Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Supplier Selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 8. doi: 10.1155/2013/324283
Zhang, S., Sun, B., Yan, L., & Wang, C. (2013). Risk identification on hydropower project using the IAHP and extension of TOPSIS methods under interval-valued fuzzy environment. Natural Hazards, 65(1), 359-373. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0367-2