跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.31) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/10/18 04:56
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃庭甄
研究生(外文):Ting-Jen Huang
論文名稱:平衡計分卡於技術服務績效管理之應用-以日月光研發實驗室為例
論文名稱(外文):Application of Balanced Scorecard to Performance Management of Technical Services: Using ASE R&D Laboratories as an Example
指導教授:陳泰良陳泰良引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:義守大學
系所名稱:工業工程與管理學系碩士班
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:95
中文關鍵詞:平衡記分卡、關建績效指標、實驗室
外文關鍵詞:Balanced Scorecard、Key Performance Indicators(KPI)、Laboratory
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:1248
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
目前平衡計分卡的應用研究大抵皆以營利或非營利機構本體為對象,少有針對企業內部組織進行探討者。本研究著眼於具有特定功能與定位的企業內部組織應用平衡計分卡原則之績效評核,因作者實際參與該組織此項自發性活動之評估、制定與推動,因此得以清楚掌握該組織及其運作狀況的確切資訊。
本研究以日月光集團研發中核心產方案處所轄屬之四個實驗室為對象,應用平衡計分卡原則定義適當的財務、顧客、內部流程、創新學習等四大構面策略目標及相對應的關鍵績效指標,以問卷調查方式進行SPSS統計分析軟體,做描述性統計分析、信度分析、因素分析、單因素差異分析等方法找出建構平衡計分卡的方向與實際方法,依重要性排序後,訂出公司策略目標關鍵因子,並針對各項關鍵因子進行討論,擬定出日月光研發實驗室技術服務的經營策略及具體行動,提出研究結論與未來研究方向的建議。
最後借由平衡計分卡,以平衡計分卡的精神來引導組織將資源聚焦、並使策略落實執行,藉此提升員工基礎精神,使其組織更有系統的進行學習與成長。本研究所構建之經營策略及具體行動可用於技術服務部門進行績效管理,對於電子製造業,特別是包含多個實驗部門的績效管理最為適用,也可應用於其它相關產業。
Most of researches performed on Application of Balanced Scorecard focus currently on the object of profit-seeking or nonprofit-seeking organization itself, but discuss rarely into internal organization of enterprise. This thesis study will however, focus specifically on internal organization of enterprise having specific functionality as well as orientation and the principle of Balanced Scorecard applied thereby to performance management in particular. By writer’s personally participating in the evaluation, institution and promotion of such spontaneous activity implemented in the internal organization of enterprise, the detailed information with respect to the practical status of implementation of Balanced Scorecard is therefore, acquired quite accurately.
This thesis study aims to research specifically on the objects of four R&D Laboratories established under ASE Group and applies principle of Balanced Scorecard to determine appropriately the objective and/of strategy for four main factors in terms of finance, customer, internal process and innovation & learning, and corresponding Key Performance Indicators (KPI) thereof, and furthermore, by implementing the way of questionnaire survey, to perform SPSS on software and in the analysis of the method of descriptive statistics, reliability, factor and single-factor variance, figure out the substantial direction and practical method for establishment of Balanced Scorecard. After sorting the results of the foregoing by importance, the key factors in the overall business strategy and objective thereof can be accordingly indentified and moreover, respect key factor will be further discussed so as to form the operational strategies and specific measures taken by ASE R&D Laboratory for technical services and accordingly, set forth the conclusion of research performed and suggestions for advanced study thereafter.
Based eventually on the Balanced Scorecard, it is expected significantly to lead the organization to focus on the resource and realize the implementation of strategy pursuant to the essence of Balanced Scorecard so as to help organization with learning and growing much systematically. The operational strategies and specific measures established under this thesis study is expected to be applied by the division of technical services to performance management and particularly, them most suitably apply to the performance management incorporating multiple laboratories in the electronics manufacturing industry and might as well, to other relevant industries.
目錄I
表目錄II
圖目錄III
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景1
第二節 研究動機4
第三節 研究目的5
第四節 研究範圍與限制5
第五節 研究方法與架構7
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 平衡計分卡概述9
第二節 平衡計分卡相關研究13
第三節 績效管理與平衡計分卡的聯結15
第四節 平衡計分卡的實施16
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究對象18
第二節 技術服務之平衡計分卡25
第三節 技術服務績效指標設定27
第四節 問卷設計37
第五節 資料分析方法38
第四章 研究分析
第一節 研發實驗室各構面之分析41
第二節 關鍵績效指標的產出44
第三節 關鍵績效指標差異性結果分析47
第五章 研究結果與討論
第一節 研究結果60
第二節 討論63
第六章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結果與結論66
第二節 研究建議69
參考文獻71
附錄78
表目錄
表2.1 企業生命週期各階段財務構面之考量與策略12
表3.1 日月光研發實驗室機械與可靠度特性服務項目及相關設備23
表3.2 日月光研發實驗室熱傳特性服務項目及相關設備23
表3.3 日月光研發實驗室材料特性服務項目及相關設備24
表3.4 日月光研發實驗室試片前處理與破壞分析服務項目及相關軟體與設備24
表3.5 日月光研發實驗室數值模擬服務項目及相關軟體25
表3.6 日月光研發實驗室技術服務平衡計分卡之績效指標36
表4.1 樣本分佈表40
表4.2 熱傳實驗室各個構面之分析41
表4.3 材料實驗室各個構面之分析42
表4.4 化學實驗室各個構面之分析43
表4.5 績效評估制度認知程度各構面信度與效度分析41
表4.6 績效衡量指標重要性程度信度與效度分析47
表4.7 個案對實驗室的績效評估制度目的很明確知覺分析49
表4.8 制定績效衡量指標時之考量依據知覺分析49
表4.9 集團績效共同性重要性分析50
表4.10 財務構面之重要性分析51
表4.11 顧客構面之重要性分析51
表4.12 內部流程構面之重要性分析52
表4.13 學習成長構面之重要性分析52
表4.14 平衡計分卡四構面之重要性分析53
表4.15 不同服務年資在實驗員績效衡量指標之變異數分析53
表4.16 不同服務年資在平衡計分卡四構面之變異數分析54
表4.17 不同服務年資在平衡計分卡顧客構面有明顯差異之因素表55
表4.18 不同學歷在實驗員績效衡量指標之變異數分析56
表4.19 不同學歷在平衡計分卡四構面之變異數分析56
表4.20 不同學歷在平衡計分卡各構面有明顯差異之因素表57
表5.1 差異性分析匯整60
表5.2 績效評估制度認知程度匯整61
表5.3 制定績效指標衡量依據匯整61
表5.4 平衡計分卡構面匯整62
表5.5 個人背景項在平衡計分卡上差異之匯整63
表6.1 平衡計分卡指標重要性排序65
表6.2 日月光研發實驗室技術服務的經營策略及具體行動66
表6.3 不同年資、學歷樣本特徵對平衡計分卡四個構面之指標差異67
圖目錄
圖1.1 平衡計分卡四大構面之績效指標及因果鏈3
圖1.2 平衡計分卡與組織願景與策略之結合3
圖1.3 研究流程架構7
圖2.1 顧客構面核心量度之間的因果鏈12
圖2.2 企業對顧客的價值量度13
圖2.3 企業內部流程價值鏈13
圖3.1 半導體產業供應鏈及台灣主要半導體企業位置圖19
圖3.2 主要半導體封裝型式示意圖19
圖3.3 日月光集團研發中心組織示意圖21
圖3.4 日月光核心產品方案處組織示意圖21
圖3.5 日月光研發實驗室技術服務之平衡計分卡26
圖3.6 日月光研發實驗室技術服務平衡計分卡策略目標之因果關係27
中文部份
[1]王月雲(2007),以平衡計分卡提昇學校會計行政績效之研究,遠東學報,24(4),389-397。
[2]朱炫璉、鄭珍如(2007),某政府機關績效管理制度之實證研究-平衡計分卡及層級分析法之應用,管理學報,24(6),689-705。
[3]何屏東(2005),平衡計分卡於非營利組織應用之探索性規劃與設計-以空軍總部主計署為例,主計季刊,46(1),50-70。
[4]吳安妮(1990),九O年代管理會計之變革-談績效評估未之方向及架構,管理會計月刊,58,58-59。
[5]吳安妮(2001),探索實施平衡計分卡可能遭遇之問題,會計研究月刊,183,63-75。
[6]吳安妮(2003),平衡計分卡在公務機關實施之探討,研考雙月刊,27(5),45-61。
[7]吳泓怡、彭家亮(2003),應用平衡計分卡評估企業導入ISO 9000電子化流程實務績效之探討-以S公司為例,2003知識與價值管理學術研討會論文集,92-99。
[8]周春切(2005),以平衡計分卡觀點建構資訊電子業績效管理系統之研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學管理學院高階管理碩士在職專班。
[9]於泳泓(2002),從台灣企業成功導入平衡計分卡實例談企業現狀剖析與導入架構檢核」,會計研究月刊,198,16-25。
[10]林俊彥、林宜玄、郭宗賢、郭彥穀(2006),以平衡計分卡與策略地圖探討高等教育學校經營與領導的新挑戰,學校行政雙月刊,43,34-52。
[11]林玲圓、婁文信、吳愛玉(2007),平衡計分卡應用於台灣畜產業之績效評估,2007企業經營管理學術研討會論文集。
[12]林聖薇(2005),以平衡計分卡觀念建構非營利組織部門績效衡量模式之研究-以某綜合大學教務處為例,聯大學報,2,303-311。
[13]徐純慧、遊建榮、喩琬真(2006),平衡計分卡運用於IC智慧卡業者策略管理之研究,2006電子商務與數位生活研討會論文集。
[14]翁福榮(2006),學校經營策略指標之建構-以平衡計分卡為例,教育經營與管理研究集刊,2,125-144。
[15]翁福榮、廖春文(2005),全面品質管理與平衡計分卡在學校經營策略應用之整合模式探討,臺中教育大學學報:教育類,19(2),99-126。
[16]張嘉行、彭雅惠、王克睦(2003),供應鏈管理部門實施「平衡計分卡」之個案分析,商管科技季刊,4(3),309-330。
[17]梁鐿徽、陳正義、王秋燕(2008),建構高中職資訊部門平衡計分卡績效衡量指標之研究,資訊管理展望,10(1),45-67。
[18]莊尚志、邱妍禎(2008),平衡計分卡與績效管理,彰銀資料,57(7),4-17。
[19]許祐寧、王惠玄、黃焜璋(2007),公立醫療機構導入平衡計分卡過程之案例研究,2007當前會計理論與實務研討會論文集。
[20]陳美惠、張石柱、楊美慧(2004),非營利組織績效指標建構之探討—以國防部財務中心為例,國防管理學報,25(2),17-28。
[21]傅慰孤(2003),以平衡計分卡觀點探討國防部門績效管理模式,平衡計分卡在政府部門的運用研討會論文集,行政院研究發展考核委員會,55-71。
[22]楊錦洲(2007),運用於政府機構之平衡計分卡的修正模式,法制論叢,40,103-122。
[23]蔡明田、莊立民(2003),以平衡計分卡觀點探討個案公司企業策略與績效衡量管理系統之連結,產業與管理論壇,4(2),143-168。
[24]賴逸少、葉昶麟、張效銓、莊嘉祿、連榮義(2005),錫球衝擊測試系統的發展與建立,機械工程學會第二十二屆全國學術研討會論文集,649-653,國立中央大學,中壢市。
[25]謝序偉、簡立建、譚大純(2005),以策略觀點探討醫療機構績效管理:以高雄榮民總醫院為例,經營管理論叢,1(2),41-58。
英文部份
[1]Abran, A. and Buglione, L. (2003), A multidimensional performance model for consolidating balanced scorecards, Advances in Engineering Software, 34(6), 339-349.
[2]Ahn, H. (2001), Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report, Long Range Planning, 34(4), 441-461.
[3]Atkinson, A.A., Balakrishnan, R., Booth, P., Cole, J.M., Groot, T., Malmi, T., Roberts, H., Uliana, E., and Wu, A. (1997), New directions in management accounting research, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 79-108.
[4]Band, W. (1990), Performance metrics keep customer satisfaction programmes on track, Marketing News, 24(11), 12.
[5]Bontis, N., Dragonetti, N.C., Jacobson, K., and Roos, G. (1999), The knowledge toolbox: a review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources, European Management Journal, 17(4), 391-402.
[6]Brewer, P. (2002), Putting strategy into the balanced scorecard, Strategic Finance Magazine, 83(7), 44-52.
[7]Butler, A., Letza, S.R., and Neale, B. (1997), Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy, Long Range Planning, 30(2), 242-253.
[8]Crabtree, A.D. and DeBusk, G.K. (2008), The effects of adopting the balanced scorecard on shareholder returns, Advances in Accounting, 24(1), 8-15.
[9]Daft, R.L. and Wan, T.-H. (2007), Organization Theory and Design: A Modern Introduction, Bangkok, Thailand: Thomson Learning.
[10]Davis, S. and Albright, T. (2004), An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance, Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 135-153.
[11]Eccles, R.B. and Pyburn, P.J. (1992), Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance, Management Accounting, 74(4), 41-44.
[12]Evans, H., Ashworth, G., Gooch, G., and Davies, R. (1996), Who needs performance management? Management Accounting, 74(11), 20-25.
[13]Fernandes, K.J., Raja, V., and Whalley, A. (2006), Lessons from implementing the balanced scorecard in a small and medium size manufacturing organization, Technovation, 26(5-6), 623-634.
[14]Fisher, J. (1992), Use of performance measures, Journal of Cost Management, 6(1), 31-38.
[15]Folan, P. and Browne, J. (2005), A review of performance measurement: towards performance management, Computers in Industry, 56(7), 663-680.
[16]Gaiss, M. (1998), Enterprise performance management, Management Accounting, 80(6), 44-46.
[17]García-Valderrama, T., Mulero-Mendigorri, E., and Revuelta-Bordoy, D. (2009), Relating the perspectives of the balanced scorecard for R&D by means of DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1177-1189.
[18]Gordon, D. and Geiger, G. (1999), Strategic management of an electronic patient record project using the balanced scorecard, Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 13(3), 113-123.
[19]Griffiths, J. (2003), Balanced scorecard used in New Zealand government departments and crown entities, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(4), 70-79.
[20]Halpern, W. and Richman, C. (2002), Balanced scorecard tool drives performance, Association Management, 54(2), 26-27.
[21]Hendricks, K., Menor, L., and Wiedman, C. (2005), The balanced scorecard: to adopt or not to adopt? Ivey Business Journal, 7, 1-9.
[22]Hoffecker, J. and Goldenburg, C. (1994), Using the balanced scorecard to develop company-wide performance measures, Journal of Cost Management, 8(3), 5-17.
[23]Hoque, Z. (2003), Total quality management and the balanced scorecard approach: a critical analysis of their potential relationships and directions for research, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(5), 553-566.
[24]Itter, C.D. and Larcker, D.F. (1998), Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 205-238.
[25]Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992), The balanced scorecard–measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 71-79.
[26]Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996a), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
[27]Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996b), Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy, California Management Review, 39(1), 53-79.
[28]Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996c), Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system, Harvard Business Review, 3-13.
[29]Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2001), The Strategy Focused Organization, Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
[30]Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2004), Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes, Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
[31]Kaufman, R. (1988), Preparing useful performance indicators, Training and Development Journal, 42(9), 80-83.
[32]Lai, Y.-S. (2008), ASE Central Labs overview, ASE Technology Journal, 1(1), 2-6.
[33]Lawton, R. (2002), Balance your balanced scorecard: categories of measures should reflect key values of both organizations and customers, Quality Progress, 35(3), 66-71.
[34]Lee, J.Y. (1987), Management Accounting Changes for the 1990s, Artesia, CA, USA: McKay Business Systems.
[35]Letza, S.R. (1996), The design and implementation of the balanced business scorecard: an analysis of three companies in practice, Business Process Re-engineering & Management Journal, 2(3), 54-76.
[36]Lohman, C., Fortuin, L., and Wouters, M. (2004), Designing a performance measurement system: a case study, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 267-286.
[37]Maltz, A.C., Shenhar, A.J., and Reilly, R.R. (2003), Beyond the balanced scorecard: refining the search for organizational success measures, Long Range Planning, 36(2), 187-204.
[38]Maskell, B.H. (1991), Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing: A Model for American Companies, New York, NY, USA: Productivity Press.
[39]Michalska, J. (2005), The usage of the balanced scorecard for the estimation of the enterprise’s effectiveness, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 162-163, 751-758.
[40]Mooraj, S., Oyon, D., and Hostettler, D. (1999), The balanced scorecard: a necessary good or an unnecessary evil? European Management Journal, 17(5), 481-491.
[41]Nealy, A. (2003), Gazing into the crystal ball: the future of performance measurement, Perspective on Performance, 2(2), 12-13.
[42]Niven, P.R. (2002), Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results, New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
[43]Nørreklit, H. (2000), The balance on the balanced scorecard–a critical analysis of some of its assumptions, Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 65-88.
[44]Nørreklit, H. (2003), The balanced scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the balanced scorecard, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(6), 591-619.
[45]Olson, E.M. and Slater, S.F. (2002), The balanced scorecard, competitive strategy, and performance, Business Horizons, 45(3), 11-16.
[46]Olve, N.-G., Roy, J., and Wetter, M. (1999), Performance Drivers: A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard, Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
[47]Otley, D. (1999), Performance management: a framework for management control systems research, Management Accounting Research, 10, 363-382.
[48]Papalexandris, A., Ioannou, G., Prastacos, G., and Soderquist, K.E. (2005), An integrated methodology for putting the balanced scorecard into action, European Management Journal, 23(2), 214-227.
[49]Robbins. S.P. (1990), Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Applications, New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
[50]Sandström, J. and Toivanen, J. (2002), The problem of managing product development engineers: can the balanced scorecard be an answer? International Journal of Production Economics, 78(1), 79-90.
[51]Simons, R.L. (1995), Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal, Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
[52]Stivers, B.T., Covin, T.J., Green, N., and Smalt, S. (1998), How nonfinancial performance measures are used, Management Accounting, 79(8), 44-49.
[53]Tong, H.-M. and Lai, Y.-S. (2007), Today’s state-of-the-art integration, Advancing Microelectronics, 34(3), 26-31.
[54]Van Veen-Dirks, P. and Wijn, M. (2002), Strategic control: meshing critical success factors with the balanced scorecard, Long Range Planning, 35(4), 407-427.
[55]Wallace, B. (1998), Studying the balanced scorecard, Management, 45(7), 44-45.
[56]Yang, C.-C., Cheng, L.-Y., and Yang, C.W. (2005), A study of implementing balanced scorecard (BSC) in non-profit organizations: a case study of private hospital, Human Systems Management, 24, 285-300.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. [23]蔡明田、莊立民(2003),以平衡計分卡觀點探討個案公司企業策略與績效衡量管理系統之連結,產業與管理論壇,4(2),143-168。
2. [22]楊錦洲(2007),運用於政府機構之平衡計分卡的修正模式,法制論叢,40,103-122。
3. [20]陳美惠、張石柱、楊美慧(2004),非營利組織績效指標建構之探討—以國防部財務中心為例,國防管理學報,25(2),17-28。
4. [18]莊尚志、邱妍禎(2008),平衡計分卡與績效管理,彰銀資料,57(7),4-17。
5. [17]梁鐿徽、陳正義、王秋燕(2008),建構高中職資訊部門平衡計分卡績效衡量指標之研究,資訊管理展望,10(1),45-67。
6. [15]翁福榮、廖春文(2005),全面品質管理與平衡計分卡在學校經營策略應用之整合模式探討,臺中教育大學學報:教育類,19(2),99-126。
7. [14]翁福榮(2006),學校經營策略指標之建構-以平衡計分卡為例,教育經營與管理研究集刊,2,125-144。
8. [12]林聖薇(2005),以平衡計分卡觀念建構非營利組織部門績效衡量模式之研究-以某綜合大學教務處為例,聯大學報,2,303-311。
9. [10]林俊彥、林宜玄、郭宗賢、郭彥穀(2006),以平衡計分卡與策略地圖探討高等教育學校經營與領導的新挑戰,學校行政雙月刊,43,34-52。
10. [6]吳安妮(2003),平衡計分卡在公務機關實施之探討,研考雙月刊,27(5),45-61。
11. [4]吳安妮(1990),九O年代管理會計之變革-談績效評估未之方向及架構,管理會計月刊,58,58-59。
12. [1]王月雲(2007),以平衡計分卡提昇學校會計行政績效之研究,遠東學報,24(4),389-397。
13. [2]朱炫璉、鄭珍如(2007),某政府機關績效管理制度之實證研究-平衡計分卡及層級分析法之應用,管理學報,24(6),689-705。
14. [25]謝序偉、簡立建、譚大純(2005),以策略觀點探討醫療機構績效管理:以高雄榮民總醫院為例,經營管理論叢,1(2),41-58。