臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

由於資訊科技與通訊傳播的進步，促進了虛擬團隊型態的發展，使得在不同地點的人們得以一起完成任務或工作，也迫使企業必須重新思考組織結構，以適應全球化腳步發展。
在不同時間、不同地點共同完成一份任務的新工作概念迅速的在企業間蔓延，許多針對於虛擬團隊的研究也因應而生，但絕大部份都是針對於虛擬團隊成員間溝通媒體的選擇、電腦輔助群體工作等議題進行研究，有關於虛擬團隊與團隊績效的相關研究則是明顯不足。
本研究針對於虛擬團隊之團隊結構對於團隊績效之影響進行分析，深入探討團隊結構影響團隊績效的過程中會牽涉到的團隊運作過程。而虛擬團隊運作過程會牽涉到知識管理相關活動，例如資訊的收集與傳遞、知識的分享等等，在探討團隊績效過程中，並且針對於相關的知識管理活動進行探討。
研究對象為中山網路大學碩士學分班學生，各組運作完全以虛擬團隊方式進行，網路大學並提供即時討論室與非同步群組討論板做為各組溝通工具。
在研究方法採觀察法並輔以內容分析法進行資料分析，將非同步群組討論板成員的溝通內容進行編碼，部份無法由群組溝通內容收集之資料則以問卷調查方式進行。研究結果歸納出二十四個命題，並提出以虛擬團隊之結構、團隊運作與學習績效、學習滿意度與知識分享等變項之整合性路徑分析模型，供學術界進行虛擬團隊整體性研究之參考。

Due to the progress in information and communication technologies, virtual teams have been widespread developed and adopted. People in different time zones and long-distance places can accomplish the same mission together with the help of virtual tools. It thus forces enterprises to review their structures and systems in their organization for accommodating to globalization economic.
The concepts of accomplishing task via virtual team are spreads widely and rapidly in the business circle. It evoked many researches but most of these focused on the issues of communication among virtual team members or the computer-aided of forming groups, etc. There are few researches relative to virtual teams structure and their performances.
In this study, we try to explore how the structure of virtual team influences their performances and discover whether the operational process affects the performances. The operational process in a virtual team will also be involved with knowledge management activities such as information gathering & dissemination and knowledge sharing. In this thesis, we explore the relationship among the virtual teams’ structure, operational process, performances and knowledge sharing.
The observation groups are 10 virtual teams from a class of Cyber University of NSYSU (http://cu.nsysu.edu.tw). Survey and content analysis research method were adopted to develop and analysis the datum collection and analysis. The finding of this study has proposed an integrated model, which was constructed by the concepts of virtual team’s structure, team process, performances and knowledge sharing. This model may offer a concept as a reference for further research of virtual teams.

目錄I
圖目錄III
表目錄V
第一章、緒論1
第一節、研究背景1
第二節、研究動機2
第三節、研究目的3
第四節、研究流程4
第五節、論文架構5
第二章、文獻探討6
第一節、虛擬團隊6
一、團隊的定義6
二、虛擬團隊與傳統團隊的差異7
三、虛擬團隊的組成元素9
四、小結11
第二節、團隊結構12
一、領導關係13
二、團隊角色15
三、團隊的組成17
四、小結18
第三節、團隊運作19
一、團隊溝通型態19
二、團隊成員信任關係22
三、團隊凝聚力23
四、團隊決策24
五、團隊衝突與解決27
六、小結29
第四節、知識管理相關文獻30
一、知識與知識管理的定義30
二、知識管理活動31
第五節、任務型態35
第三章、研究方法37
第一節、研究對象37
第二節、研究架構與研究方法的選擇38
一、研究架構38
二、研究方法的選擇39
三、資料搜集方法40
四、研究設計的執行41
第三節、內容分析法42
一、類目建構43
二、信度檢定45
第四節、統計分析方法46
第四章、資料分析與研究發現48
第一節、資料整理48
第二節、資料分析結果與命題建構50
一、團隊結構部份50
二、團隊運作部份67
三、知識管理活動與團隊合作滿意度、團隊學習績效部份77
四、整體性分析部份80
第三節、其他研究發現88
第五章、結論與建議90
第一節、研究成果90
第二節、研究貢獻92
第三節、研究限制93
第四節、後續研究方向94
參考文獻95
中文部份95
英文部份96
附錄100

中文部份王石番，傳播內容分析法：理論與實證，第二版，台北：幼獅出版社，1991。朱楠賢，團體決策在管理過程中功能之研究，國立政治大學未出版碩士論文，1984。呂婉瑜，功能性角色對虛擬團隊效能之影響，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士班論文，2000。邱皓政，量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析，台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2000。陳永隆，「企業員工e-Learning的發展趨勢」，英柏騰「數位週報」，http://www.giga-tv.com/giga/article_que?no=02883586438&ser=3247086007，2001年。陳耀民，NGT在公眾參與之應用－柴山土地議題為例，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士班論文，2001。楊玉琪，成員互動行為對虛擬團隊合作績效影響之研究，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士班論文，2001。楊孝榮，內容分析：社會及行為科學研究法，台北：東華出版社，1993。劉常勇，「知識管理與企業發展」，智慧財產權管理與專利應用研討會，高雄，http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu/paper/paper23.doc，1999，頁1-10。鄭懷超譯，Lipnack & Stamps著，虛擬團隊：前瞻明日成功組織新趨勢，商周出版，1997。羅文輝，精確新聞報導，台北：正中出版社，1991。英文部份Alavi, M. & Leidner, D., “Knowledge Management System: Emerging Views and Practives from the Field,” Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999.Belbin, R. M., Team roles at work, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993.Berelson, B., Content analysis in communication research, New York: Free Press, 1952.Blake, R. R. & Mouton, J.S., The Managerial Grid, Houston: Gulf, 1964.Bolster, A. S. Jr., “Toward a more effective model of research on teaching,” Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 1983, pp.294-308.Butler, J. K. & Cantrell, R. S., “A Behavioral Decision Theory Approach to Modeling Dyadic Trust in Superiors and Subordinates,” Psychological Reports, August 1984, pp. 19-28.Davenport, T. H. & et. al., “Successful Knowledge Management Projects,” Sloan Management Review, Winter 1998, pp. 43-57.Davenport, T. & Prusak, L., Working Knowledge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Drew, S., “Building Knowledge Management into Strategy: Making Sense of a New Perspective,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1999, pp. 130-136.Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J.M. & Donnelly Jr., J.H., Organizations, 8th ed., Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin, 1994, p.323.Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E. C. & Argote, L., “Current Thinking About Group: Setting the Stage for New Ideas,” in P.S. Goodman & Associates, Designing Effective Work Groups, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp.15-16.Guzzo., R. A. & Shea, G. P., “Group Performance and Intergroup Relations in Organizations,” in Dunnette, M.D. & Hough, L.M., eds., Handbook of Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2nd edition, vol. 3, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992, pp. 288-290.Hacker, M. E. & Kleiner, B. M., “Identifying Critical Factors Impacting Virtual Work Group Performance,” Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management, 1996, pp. 196-200.Harrison, E. F., The Managerial Decision-Making Process, 4th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1995, pp. 1-19.Holsti, O. R., Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1969.Hosmer, L. T., “Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organization Theory and Philosophical Ethics,” Academy of Management Review, April 1995, pp. 379-403.Kirkpatrick, S. A. & Locke, E. A., “Leadership: Do Traits Matter?,” Academy of Management Executive, May 1991, pp.48-60.Krippendorff, K., “Theories and Analytical Constructs: Introduction,” in G. Gerbner et al., (eds.), The analysis of Communication Content, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980.Lai, H. C. & Chu, T. H., “Knowledge Management: A Review of Theoretical Frameworks and Industrial Cases,” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference, 2000.Larson, L. L., Hunt, J. G.. & Osborn, R. N., “The Great Hi-Hi Leader Behavior Myth: A Lesson from Occam’s Razor,” Academy of Management Journal, December 1976, pp. 628-641.Lipnack, J. & Stamps, J., “Virtual Teams: The New Way to Work,” IEEE Engineering Management Review, Winter 1999, pp. 90-95.Lipnack, J. & Stamps, J., Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997.Maglitta, J., “Know-How, Inc”, Computer world, Jan. 1996, pp. 74-76.McGrath, J. E., Group: Interaction and Performance, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ, 1984.Mullen, B. & Cooper, C., “The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration,” Psychological Bulletin, March 1994, pp. 210-227.Niederman, F. & Beise, C. M., “Defining the Virtualness of Groups, Teams and Meetings,” SIGCPR ’99, ACM 1999, pp. 14-18.Nonaka, I., “A Dynamic Theory of organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science, Vol.15, No.1, 1994, pp.14-37.Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H., The knowledge-creating company, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995.Pondy, L. R., “Organization Conflict: Conecpts and Models,” Administrative Science Quarterly, September 1967, p. 302.Robbins, S. P. 1998. Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications, 8th edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Sonnenberg, F. K., “Trust Me…Trust Me Not,” Industry Week, August 16, 1993 pp.22-28.Summers, I., Coffelt, T., & Horton., R.E., “Work-Group Cohesion,” Psychological Reports, October 1988, pp. 627-636.Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P. & Futrull, D., “Work Team: Applications and Effectiveness,” American Psychology, 45(2), 1990, pp.120-133.Susman, G. I., Autonomy at Work: A socialtechnical analysis of participative management. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1976.Thomas, K. W., “Conflict and Negotiation Process in Organizations,” in Dunnette, M.D. and Hough, L.M. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd., vol. 3, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992, pp. 651-717.Watson-Manheim M. B. & Belanger F., “Exploring Communication-Based Work Process in Virtual Work Environments,” Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002.Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S. & Garud, R., “Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Indetification in a Virtual Organization,” Organization Science, 10:6, 1999, pp. 777-790.Wiig, K. M., Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking about Thinking, Schema Press, Texas, 1995.Yin, R. K., CASE STUDY RESEARCH Design and Methods, 2nd ed., New York：SAGE Publications, 1994.Yuki, G.. & Van Fleet, D. D., “Theory and Research on Leadership in Organizations,” in M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., vol. 3 (Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992), P. 150.