臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文建構一個納入環境特質的內生成長模型，檢視政府在採用統收統支或專款專用兩種不同的制度下改變環境政策，對經濟社會的均衡成長率及環境品質會有何種影響。根據本文的研究，我們得到以下的結論：

一、不論是在統收統支或是專款專用的制度下，政府提高環境稅率對污染減量，維護環境品質皆會有正面的助益。但對於經濟成長的影響則呈現不確定的狀況，必須視污染外部性的大小而定。

二、在統收統支的制度下，政府追求經濟成長而實施的綠色刺激政策存在一最適的支出比例。此外，綠色支出比例的上升對於污染減量，維護環境品質則會有正面的助益。

三、在專款專用的制度下，政府增加生產性的政府支出對經濟成長有正面的影響，但並不會加劇環境品質的惡化。

In this thesis, environmental pollution is introduced both as a joint product and as a source of disutility in an endogenous growth model. We examine how the steady-state growth rate and the environmental quality react following the variation of environmental policy under two different regimes, the general taxation or earmarked taxation. According to the research of this thesis, we get the following conclusions：
First, either the general taxation or the earmarked taxation, the raise of environmental taxes has a positive effect on the environmental quality. However, the impact of the steady-state growth rate is ambiguous, depending on whether the pollution externality is great or not. Second, under the general taxation, the government has the optimal green stimulus policy on the steady-state growth rate. And the expansion of the green expenditure has a positive effect on the environmental quality. Third, under the earmarked taxation, the raise of government productive expenditure has a positive effect on the steady-state growth rate, but does not affect the environmental quality.

目錄
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與文獻回顧．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．1
第二節 本文架構．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．9
第二章 統收統支的總體經濟效果分析
第一節 廠商．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．11
第二節 家計單位．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．13
第三節 政府部門．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．15
第四節 生態系統．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．16
第五節 動態競爭均衡．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．16
第六節 均衡的存在性與動態安定性．．．．．．．．．．．．．．19
第七節 政府環境政策對長期均衡的經濟效果．．．．．．．．．．21
第八節 數值模擬分析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．24
第三章 專款專用的總體經濟效果分析
第一節 廠商．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．32
第二節 家計單位．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．34
第三節 政府部門．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．36
第四節 生態系統．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．37
第五節 動態競爭均衡．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．37
第六節 均衡的存在性與動態安定性．．．．．．．．．．．．．．39
第七節 政府環境政策對長期均衡的經濟效果．．．．．．．．．．41
第八節 數值模擬分析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．45
第四章 結論　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　51
參考文獻
一、 中文部分　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　53
二、 英文部分　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　54

壹、中文部分
朱澤民、郭迺鋒、楊浩彥、葉黛萲與王嘉齡 (2001)，「台灣地區綠稅稅制設計之研究」，台北：行政院經濟建設委員會

徐世勳 (2002)，《我國綠色租稅改革的社經影響評估(II)》，行政院國家科學委員會研究成果報告

陳智華 (2008)，「社會地位、環境政策與經濟成長」，《應用經濟論叢》，頁84:1-26

陳智華、謝智源 (2008)，「污染管制與經濟成長：一個不完全競爭的總體模型」，《經濟論文叢刊》，36:357-392

陳智華、蕭文宗、謝智源 (2003)，「內生化勞動休閒決策下污染與經濟成長的關係」，《經濟研究》，39:147-172

黃士權 (2002)，「綠色租稅改革下『統收統支』與『專款專用』對我國環境與經濟影響之一般均衡分析」，碩士論文，國立台灣大學農業經濟研究所

黃春興 (1992)，「長期經濟成長與最適污染稅率」，《經濟論文》，21:31-61

溫麗琪、李盈嬌，「我國徵收能源稅可行性分析」，行政院環境保護署委託中華經濟研究院撰寫

熊秉元 (1999)，「專款專用和經濟理論」，《經社法制論叢》，23，199-217

蕭代基等 (2009)，《綠色稅制改革之研究》，行政院稅負改革研究報告

蕭代基與葉淑琦 (1998)，《綠色稅制改革-OECD最新環境稅報告》，台灣地球日出版社


貳、英文部分
Acemoglu, D., & Guerrieri, V. (2006). Capital deepening and non-balanced economic growth (No. w12475). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of development economics, 104, 184-198.

Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth, 1995.McGraw0Hill, New York.

Barro, R. J., Mankiw, N. G., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Capital mobility in neoclassical models of growth (No. w4206). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Bartolini, S., & Bonatti, L. (2002). Environmental and social degradation as the engine of economic growth. Ecological Economics, 43(1), 1-16.

Benhabib, J., & Farmer, R. E. (1996). Indeterminacy and sector-specific externalities. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37(3), 421-443.

Blundell, R., Meghir, C., & Neves, P. (1993). Labour supply and intertemporal substitution. Journal of Econometrics, 59(1), 137-160.

Bosworth, B., & Collins, S. M. (2003). The empirics of growth: An update.Brookings papers on economic activity, 2003(2), 113-206.

Bovenberg, A. L., & de Mooij, R. A. (1997). Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth. Journal of Public Economics, 63(2), 207-237.

Bovenberg, A. L., & Smulders, S. (1995). Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model.Journal of Public Economics, 57(3), 369-391.

Bovenberg, A. L., & Smulders, S. A. (1996). Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth model. International Economic Review, 861-893.

Browning, E. K. (1975). Why the social insurance budget is too large in a democracy. Economic inquiry, 13(3), 373-388.

Buchanan, J. M. (1963). The economics of earmarked taxes. The Journal of Political Economy, 457-469.

Byrne, M. M. (1997). Is growth a dirty word? Pollution, abatement and endogenous growth. Journal of Development Economics, 54(2), 261-284.

Den Butter, F. A. G., & Hofkes, M. W. (1995). Sustainable development with extractive and non-extractive use of the environment in production. Environmental and Resource Economics, 6(4), 341-358.

Elbasha, E. H., & Roe, T. L. (1996). On endogenous growth: the implications of environmental externalities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31(2), 240-268.

European Environment Agency (2000a), Recent Developments in the Use of Environmental Taxes in the European Union, pp.1-9.

European Environment Agency (2000b), Environmental Taxes: Recent
Developments in Tools for Integration.

Faig, M. (1995). A simple economy with human capital: transitional dynamics, technology shocks, and fiscal policies. Journal of Macroeconomics, 17(3), 421-446.

Futagami, K., Morita, Y., & Shibata, A. (1993). Dynamic analysis of an endogenous growth model with public capital. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 607-625.

Goetz, C. J. (1968). Earmarked taxes and majority rule budgetary processes. The American Economic Review, 128-136.

HSBC (2009), A Climate for Recovery：The colour of stimulus goes green.Page.45

Kneller, R., Bleaney, M. F., & Gemmell, N. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 74(2), 171-190.

Ligthart, J. E., & van der Ploeg, F. (1994). Pollution, the cost of public funds endogenous growth. Economics Letters, 46(4), 339-349.

McCleary, W. (1991). The earmarking of government revenue: a review of some World Bank experience. The world bank research observer, 6(1), 81-104.

OECD (1991), Recommendation of the Council: On the Use of Economic Instruments in Environmental Policy.

OECD (1997), Environmental Taxes and Green Tax Reform, OECD, Paris.

Pearce, D. (1991). The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. The economic journal, 938-948.

Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The journal of political economy, 1002-1037.

Rosendahl, K. E. (1997). Does improved environmental policy enhance growth?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(3), 341-364.

Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The review of economics and statistics, 387-389.

Smulders, S., & Gradus, R. (1996). Pollution abatement and long-term growth.

European Journal of Political Economy, 12(3), 505-532.