跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.107) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/18 06:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:曾峻緯
研究生(外文):June-Wei Zeng
論文名稱:審計委員會與審計品質之關聯性研究
論文名稱(外文):Audit Committee and Audit Quality
指導教授:林有志林有志引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yu-Chih Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:會計系研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:60
中文關鍵詞:審計意見審計品質審計委員會
外文關鍵詞:audit committeeaudit qualityaudit opinion
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:966
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本文研究上市公司設立審計委員會是否其對審計品質會有所提升,以及上市公司是否會因為設立審計委員會期間越長,監督效果越佳使得財務報表更具可靠性進而提升審計品質。

研究樣本取自2008年到2010年設立審計委員會之上市公司共2,155筆樣本資料做為研究對象。若會計師之獨立性越高,越不受客戶壓力的因素而被迫出具標準式無保留意見,因此在其他條件不變之下,審計品質與會計師出具審計意見型態有關。本研究以審計意見作為審計品質之代理變數測試審計委員會與審計品質是否有關聯性,再進一步測試設立審計委員會期間之長短是否與審計品質有關聯性。

實證結果顯示,設立審計委員會與審計品質並無顯著關聯性,推論審計委員會所帶來的效益不僅只有財務方面,更可能的是公司整體經營績效;審計品質與審計委員會設立期間長短顯著負相關,推論上市公司受法規所限制若會計出具保留意見則公司會被強制要求變更交易,且查核報告意見可能是審計委員會與會計師妥協的結果。
This study examines whether the establishment of audit committees would contribute the audit quality and whether the longer the establishment of audit committees the better oversight effects.

The empirical tests are conducted using TEJ database for firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange with fiscal year ends between 2008 and 2010. The final sample consists of 2,155 firm years. The audit quality is proxied by the issuance of non standard unqualified opinions. In addition, I test the association between the length of audit committee establishment and audit quality.

Empirical results indicate that the establishment of audit committees is not positively associated with audit quality and the length of audit committee establishment is negatively associated with audit quality. The results imply that audit opinions may be compromised between auditors and audit committee.
中文摘要------------------------------------------------------------------------i
英文摘要-----------------------------------------------------------------------ii
誌謝--------------------------------------------------------------------------iii
目錄---------------------------------------------------------------------------iv
表目錄-------------------------------------------------------------------------vi
圖目錄------------------------------------------------------------------------vii
一、緒論---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 ----------------------------------------------- 1
1.2 研究目的------------------------------------------------------ 3
1.3 研究架構與研究流程-------------------------------------------- 3
1.3.1 研究架構------------------------------------------------------ 3
1.3.2 研究流程------------------------------------------------------ 4
二、文獻探討------------------------------------------------------------------ 5
2.1 審計品質之定義------------------------------------------------ 5
2.1.1 審計品質之衡量方法-------------------------------------------- 7
2.2 審計委員會----------------------------------------------------12
2.2.1 審計委員會相關文獻--------------------------------------------13
三、研究方法------------------------------------------------------------------16
3.1 研究假說之建立------------------------------------------------17
3.1.1 審計委員會與審計品質------------------------------------------17
3.1.2 審計委員會成立期間與審計品質----------------------------------18
3.1.3 其他影響審計品質因素------------------------------------------19
3.2 變數定義------------------------------------------------------20
3.2.1 應變數--------------------------------------------------------20
3.2.2 研究變數------------------------------------------------------20
3.2.3 控制變數------------------------------------------------------20
3.3 實證模型------------------------------------------------------23
3.4 資料來源與樣本選取--------------------------------------------24
四、實證結果------------------------------------------------------------------27
4.1 敘述性統計----------------------------------------------------27
4.2 相關係數分析--------------------------------------------------30
4.3 實證結果------------------------------------------------------34
五、敏感性分析----------------------------------------------------------------41
六、結論與建議----------------------------------------------------------------46
參考文獻----------------------------------------------------------------------49
1.王克京,2009,公司治理與審計委員會制度之研究,國立雲林科技大學會計系,
碩士論文。
2.王文宇,2006,公司法論,第3版1刷,元照出版公司。
3.王端鎂,2011,台灣依證券交易法設置審計委員會制度實證研究,國立交通大學
管理學院科技法律學程,碩士論文。
4.汪進揚、陳盈伶,2009,非審計服務對審計品質影響之研究:新揭露門檻下之實
證,真理財經學報,第21期,頁61-94。
5.吳琮璠、黃娟娟,2009,公司治理機制是否影響會計師查核意見?,企業管理學
報,第83期,頁65-98。
6.陳昶宇,2009,審計品質對盈餘品質之影響─博達事件前後比較分析,國立臺北
大學會計學系,碩士論文。
7.張晉源、林有志,2011,企業選擇設置審計委員會之經濟性決定因素,高苑學報,
第17卷,第2期,頁53-67。
8.黃齡慧,2005,我國上櫃公司設置審計委員會決定因素探討,淡江大學會計學系
碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
9.葉璨增,2008,從公司治理論我國監察人與審計委員會制度,國立雲林科技大學
會計系,碩士論文。
10.廖秀梅、洪筱雯,2010,非審計服務、會計師任期與審計品質,當代會計,第
11卷,第2期,頁151-178。
11.劉嘉雯、王泰昌,2008,會計師任期與審計品質之關連性研究,管理評論,第
27卷,第4期,頁1-28。
12.賴英照,2011,股市遊戲規則─最新證券交易法解析,再版2刷,台北市著者發
行。
13.蘇振文,2008,公司之內控機制-以監察人為中心兼論審計委員會制度之設計,
國立臺北大學法律學系,碩士論文。
14.Baxte, P., and J. Cotter,2009,”Audit committees and earnings
quality”,Accounting and Finance,Vol. 49(2),pp. 267-290,June.
15.Becker, C., M. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. Subramanyam,1998,”The Effect
of Audit Quality on Earnings Management”,Contemporary Accounting Research,
Vol. 15(1),pp. 1-24,Spring.
16.Carcello, J. V., and T. L. Neal,2000,”Audit Committee Composition and
Auditor Reporting”,The Accounting Review,Vol. 75(4),pp. 453-467,October.
17.Chan, K. H. and D. Wu,2011,”Aggregate Quasi Rents and Auditor Independence:
Evidence from Audit Firm Mergers in China”,Contemporary Accounting
Research,Vol. 28(1),pp. 175-213,Spring.
18.Chen, J. P., S. Chen, and X. Su.,2001,”Profitability regulation, earnings
management,and modified audit opinions:Evidence from China”,Auditing,Vol.
20,pp. 9-30,Autumn.
19.Chen, S., S. Y. J. Sun, and D. Wu,2010,”Client importance, institutional
improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor
level analysis”,The Accounting Review,Vol. 85(1),pp. 127-158.
20.DeAngelo, L. ,1981,”Auditor size and audit quality”,Journal of
Accounting & Economics,Vol. 3,pp. 183-99,December.
21.DeFond, M., T. J. Wong, and S. Li.,2000, ”The impact of improved auditor
independence on audit market concentration in China”,Journal of Accounting
and Economics,Vol. 28(3), pp. 269–305.
22.Dopuch, N., and D. Simunic,1982,”Competition in auditing: An assessment,
fourth symposium on auditing research”,University of Illinois,pp. 401-450.
23.Forst, C.,1994,”Uncertainty-modified audit reports and future
earnings”,Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,Vol. 13,pp. 22-35.
24.Ghosh, A., and D. Moon,2005,”Auditor Tenure and Perceptions of Audit
Quality”,The Accounting Review,Vol. 80(2),pp. 585-612,April.
25.Ismailm, H., Iskandar, T. M., Rahmat, M. M.,2008,”Corporte Reporting
Quality,Audit Committee and Quality of Audit”,Malaysian Accounting
Review,Vol. 7(1),pp.21-42.
26.Marra, A., Mazzola, P., Prencipe, A.,2011,”Board Monitoring and Earnings
Management Pre- and Post-IFRS”,The International Journal of
Accounting,Vol.46(2),pp. 205-230, June.
27.Masyitoh, O. C., Adhariani, D.,2010,”The analysis of determinants of going
concern audit report”,Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing,Vol.
6(4),pp. 26-37,April.
28.McMullen, D. A., and K. Raghunandan,1996,”Enhancing Audit Committee
Effectiveness”,Journal of Accountancy,Vol. 182(2),pp. 79-81,August.
29.Palmrose, Z.,1988,”An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service
quality”,The Accounting Review,Vol. 63(1),pp. 55-73,January.
30.Pincus, K., M. Rusbarsky, and J. Wong,1989,”Voluntary formation of
corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms”,Journal of Accounting and
Public Policy
31.Reynolds J., J. Francis,2001,”Does size mater? The influence of large
clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions”,Journal of Accounting
& Economics,Vol. 30,pp. 375-400.
32.Ruzaidah, R., and M. I. Takiah,2004, ”The Effectiveness of Audit Committee
in Monitoring the Quality of Corporate Reporting”,A Chapter in Corporate
Governance: An International Perspective,pp. 154-175.
33.Sharma, V. D., Sharma, D. S., and Ananthanarayanan, Umapathy,2011,”Client
Importance and Earnings Management: The Moderating Role of Audit
Committees”,Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,Vol. 30(3),
pp. 125-156,August.
34.Simnnic, D. A.,1984,”Auditing, Consulting, and Auditor
Independence”,Journal of Accounting Research,Vol. 22(2),pp.
679-702,Autumn.
35.Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein,1987,”Product differentiation in auditing:
Auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issues”,The Canadian
Certified General Accountant Research Foundation.
36.Song, J., and B. Windram,2000,”The Effectiveness of the Audit Committee:
Experience from UK, Working Paper”,12th Asian-Pacific Conference on
International Accounting Issues, pp. 21-24,October.
37.Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong,1993,”Perceived auditor quality and the
earnings response coefficient”, Accounting Review,Vol.68(2),pp.
346-67,April.
38.Watts, R. and J. Zimmcrmain,1986,Postitive Accounting Thoery,Prentice Hall
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.,Vol.8(4),pp. 239-265.
39.Willingham, J. J., and P. D. Jacobson,1985,”A research Response to the
Dingell Hearings”,The Auditor’s Report,pp. 1-4.
40.Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., and DaDalt, P. J.,2003,”Earnings Management and
Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee”,Journal
of Corporate Finance,Vol. 9, pp. 295-316.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top