跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.62) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/18 22:14
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林靖娸
研究生(外文):Ching-Chi Lin
論文名稱:券商推薦利益衝突與其影響因素之分析-分量迴歸之應用
論文名稱(外文):Conflicts of interest in stock recommendations of security firms and analysis of the determinates-an application of quantile regression
指導教授:胥愛琦胥愛琦引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ai-Chi Hsu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:財務金融系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:43
中文關鍵詞:利益衝突資訊內涵分量迴歸
外文關鍵詞:Information contentConflict of interestQuantile regression
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:443
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:90
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
隨著資訊科技的快速發展,投資理財相關的資訊琳瑯滿目,近年來社會大眾也越來越重視理財規劃,散戶投資比重也為各類別中最大者,因而報紙媒體或網站中理財相關的資訊也備受關注,但這些訊息是否具有資訊內涵且能為投資人做出最有利的投資決策?本文以券商投資建議探討分析其資訊內涵為何並以利益衝突指數衡量衝突程度,進而採用分量迴歸方法研究各影響因素在不同利益衝突程度下之影響。 
以事件研究法檢定推薦資訊是否具有資訊內涵,結果顯示發布日前資訊已提早洩漏,有異常報酬存在,發布日後一天有顯著正異常報酬,其資訊具有資訊內涵,但投資人須在發布日後短時間內賣出,否則有報酬遞減的現象產生;另一結果顯示資訊發布日前受多家推薦個股異常報酬高於僅受單家推薦之個股,但發布日後受單家推薦個股表現反而優於受多家推薦者。
以券商自營部門在推薦發布日前後對推薦個股的買賣狀況建構利益衝突指數,並以分量迴歸方法探討之,結果顯示波動性、交易量與值無論在推薦日前後或對利益衝突程度大小均有顯著相關性,而其他影響因素則對中等程度以上之利益衝突有顯著的相關性。透過實證結果可發現,公司規模小、系統風險高、波動性低、內部人持股比例高、交易量與值大、成長機會低之推薦個股較有利益衝突情況存在,因此散戶投資人對此應詳加觀察再決定是否投資買進。
With the rapid development of information technology, a dazzling array of investment-related information provided. In the recent years, people put more and more attention on financial planning. And the retail investors proportion is also the biggest in each category. So the investment-related information of newspaper media or website is concerned. But can these information make the most profit to the investors? This paper analyzes that whether the recommendation of broker have information content and calculate the conflicts of interest index. Last, to analysis the effect of influence factors on different degree of conflict of interest by quantile regression method.

To test information content by event study method and the results is the information has early leaked before the announcement day. And it exist abnormal return. The recommendation has information content. But investors should sell in a short time after the announcement day, otherwise there is diminishing return. Another result shows the performance that the stocks had been recommended by more than one brokerage is better than by single brokerage before the announcement day. But after the announcement day, the recommendations by single brokerage had better performance than the other one.

Constructing the conflicts of interest index and using quantile regression analyze it. The results show that the volatility, trading volume and value are significant related no matter before or after announcement day or any degree of conflict of interest. And other determinants are significant related with the middle and serious conflict of interest. So we can find that the stock are small firm, high systematic risk, low volatility, high insider holding, high trading volume and value, low growth opportunities exist conflict of interest. Investor should observe carefully and then decide whether to buy.
摘要.................................................................I
Abstract............................................................II
誌謝...............................................................III
表目錄...............................................................V
圖目錄..............................................................VI
第一章 緒論..........................................................1
第一節 研究動機..................................................1
第二節 研究目的..................................................3
第三節 研究流程..................................................4
第二章 文獻回顧......................................................5
第一節 資訊內涵文獻..............................................5
第二節 利益衝突文獻..............................................7
第三章 資料樣本與研究方法...........................................10
第一節 資料來源與說明...........................................10
第二節 異常報酬之計算...........................................10
第三節 利益衝突指數.............................................13
第四節 分量迴歸模型.............................................14
第五節 影響因素之實證模型.......................................15
第四章 實證結果與分析...............................................18
第一節 所有受推薦個股資訊內涵實證結果...........................18
第二節 受單家券商推薦與多家券商推薦之異常報酬比較...............20
第三節 利益衝突影響因素之實證分析...............................24
第五章 結論與建議...................................................32
第一節 結論.....................................................32
第二節 建議.....................................................33
參考文獻............................................................34
一、中文部分
池祥萱,沈中華(2010)-證券商股票推薦評等之利益衝突及其影響-本國券商與外資券商之比較,證券市場發展季刊,第22卷第1期,頁 105~137。
池祥萱,蕭君怡(2005)-券商投資評等報告的資訊內涵-本國券商與外資券商的比較,金融風險管理季刊,第1卷第3期,頁27~45。
沈中華,池祥麟,高于婷(2004)-證券商股票推薦之利益衝突及影響,台灣金融財務季刊,第6輯第2期,頁1~20。
莊家彰,管中閔(2005)-台灣與美國股市價量關係的分量迴歸分析,經濟論文,第33卷第4期,頁379~404。
高于婷(2004)-券商利益衝突及其決定因素之分析,私立銘傳大學國際企業所碩士論文。
郭敏華,鄭如君(2009)-券商網路推薦之所言與所行,貨幣觀測與信用評等,第79期,頁21~34。
蕭君澔(2012)-證券商利益衝突現象與投資建議一致性之檢討,國立台北大學企業管理所碩士論文。
盧美君(2000)-由單純策略檢測專家推薦個股之投資績效,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
邱紹卿(2005)-外資投資評等的資訊內涵,國立中興大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
張家桓(1998)-證券商推薦資訊實用性之實證研究,國立台灣大學商學所碩士論文。
陳建成(1999)-股票公開推薦價值與影響因素之研究,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
劉貞芸(2003)-報紙推薦資訊之實證研究-以經濟日報每週精選潛力股專欄為例,私立淡江大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
童郁文(2004)-券商利益衝突決定因素及實際買賣之股票是否存在異常報酬,
國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文。
林妙珊(2008)-網路推薦股值得相信嗎?兼論券商利益衝突及其決定因素,私立南台科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
陳建榮(2008)-投資研究報告資訊內涵之實證研究-以國內某證券公司為例,私立東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部分 
Albert Jr., Robert L. and T. R. Smaby.(1996)-Market response to analyst
recommendations in the ‘Dartboard’ column:The information and price-pressure
effects, Review of Financial Economics, Vol.5:59-74.
Amanda Cowen, Boris Groysberg, Paul Healy(2006)-Which types of analyst firms are more optimistic?, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.41:119-146.
Anup Agrawal and Mark A. Chen(2008)-Do analyst conflicts matter? Evidence from stock recommendations, Journal of Law and Economics Vol.51:503-537.
Ball, Ray and Phillip Brown(1968)-An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.6:159-178.
Barber, B. M., D. Loeffler.(1993)-The ‘Dartboard’ column:Second-hand
information and price pressure , Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.28:273-284.
Barber, B., R. Lehavy, M. McNichols, and B. Trueman.(2001)-Can investors profit from the prophets? Security analyst recommendations and stock returns, Journal of Finance, Vol.56:531-563.
Baber, B., R. Lehavy, and B.Trueman(2004)-Comparing recommendations performance of investment banks and independent research firms, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.85:490-517.
Bauman, W. S., S. Datta, M. E. I. Datt.(1995)-Investment analyst recommendations: A test of the announcement effect and the valuable information effect, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol.22: 659-670.
Beaver, W, H(1968)-The information content of annual earnings announcements, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.6:67-92.
Beneish, M.D .(1991)-Stock price and the dissemination of analysts’ recommendations, Journal of Business, Vol.64:393-416.
Bidwell, C.M.(1977)-How good is institutional brokerage research, Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol.13:26-31.
Chan, K. W, C. Chang and A. Wang(2009)-Put your money where your mouth is: Do financial firms follow their own recommendations?, The Quarterly Review of Ecomomics and Finance, Vol.49:1095-1112.
Amanda Cowen, Boris Groysberg, and Paul Healy(2006)-Which types of analyst firms are more optimistic?, Journal of Accounting &; Economics, Vol.41:119–146.
Desai, H. &; Jain, P.C.(1995)-An analysis of the recommendations of the “superstar” money managers at Barron’s annual roundtable, Journal of Finance, Vol.50:1257-1273.
Ellis, Katrina, Roni Michaely, and Maureen O’Hara.(2004)-Competition in investment banking: Proactive, reactive, or retaliatory?, Cornell University working paper.
Huth, William L. , B. A. Maris(1992)-Large and small firm stock price response to
‘Heard On The Street’ recommendation , Journal of Accounting, Auditing&Finance, Vol.7: 27-47.
James H. Bjerring, Josef Lakonishok, and Theo Vermanelen(1983)-Stock price and financial analysts’ recommendations, Journal of Finance, Vol.38:187-204.
Jegadeesh, N., J. Kim, S. D. Krische, and C. M. C.Lee(2004)-Analyzing the Analysts: When do recommendations add value?, The Journal of Finance, Vol.59:1083-1124.
Lang, M., Lundholm, R.,(1996)-Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior, The Accounting Review, Vol.71:467-492.
Lin and Kuo(2007)-Stock recommendations and analyst conflicts of interest: Evidence from the Taiwan stock market, Web Journal of Chinese Management Review, Vol.10, No2.
Michaely, R. and Womack ,K.L.(1999)-Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations, Review of Financial Studies, Vol.12:653-686.
Paul J. Irvine(2004)-Analysts'' forecasts and brokerage‐firm trading, The Accounting Review, Vol.79:125-149.
Richard Frankel, S.P Kothari, Joseph Weber(2006)-Determinants of the informativeness of analyst research, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.41:29-54.
Shen, C. H. and H. L. Chin(2009)-Conflicts of interest in the stock recommendations of investment banks and their determinants, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysts, Vol.44:1149-1171.
Tom Arnold, John H. Earl, Jr. and David S. North(2007)-Are cover stories effective contrarian indicators?, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol.63:70-75.
Womack, K.L(1996)-Do brokerage analysts’ recommendations have investment value?, Journal of Finance, Vol.51:137-167.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top