跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.63) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/10 12:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林正坤
研究生(外文):Cheng-Kun Lin
論文名稱:我國上市櫃公司自願設置審計委員因素之研究
論文名稱(外文):Economic Determinants for Voluntary Audit Committee Appointments
指導教授:胡為善胡為善引用關係
指導教授(外文):HU, WEI SHAN JOHN
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:會計研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:41
中文關鍵詞:自願性揭露公司治理審計委員會
外文關鍵詞:Audit CommitteeCorporate governanceDisclosure of information
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:569
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:108
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要目的係探討我國上市櫃公司管理當局自願性設置審計委員會之動機。我國公司法是採董事會、監察人雙軌制,引進審計委員會制度,外界難免對於監察人與審計委員會兩者的功能是否重疊產生質疑。國外審計委員會制度已實行多年,有鑑於國外企業組織、資本結構等大環境與國內的差異,本研究以國內有獨立董事之上市櫃公司,篩選後計450 家上市櫃公司為樣本,根據年報中得出審計委員會之相關資訊。
本研究使用多變量Logit 迴歸進行資料分析。預期影響管理當局設置審計委員會的因素:資本結構、成長性、獨立董事比例、管理者所有權、公司規模、董事長兼任總經理、籌措資本與新上市櫃公司等。研究結果顯示當公司規模較大與未來成長性較高的公司,管理當局較有動機自願設置審計委員會。
This study attempts to examine the incentives of the managers in the publicly listed companies which implemented the Audit Committee appointment system voluntarily in Taiwan. The Business Law in Taiwan adopts double-track system including the board of directors and supervisors. Some professors and specialists expressed their concern over the overlapping functions of having the Audit Committee and the supervisory system
concurrently. Although the Audit Committee appointment system has been implemented in other countries for many years, yet it has just been initiated in Taiwan recently. Since the external environment such as capital market and business operations are different between Taiwan and well-developed countries, the effectiveness and results of the Audit Committee in Taiwan is expected to be different from those of other countries. This work employs the relevant data on the Audit Committee from each company’s annual
report for 450 publicly listed companies.
This study uses Logit regression model to examine the determinants for voluntary Audit Committee of publicly listed companies which having independent directors. The factors affecting a company to appoint an Audit Committee include debt ratio, growth opportunities, the ratio of independent directors to total directors, management ownership, firm size, the Chairman of the board pluralizing CEO, capital raising, and the initial public offerings. The empirical results indicate that the larger the size and the more potential growth of a company is, the more possible the company having a voluntary Audit Committee is.
目錄
第一章緒論............................................................................................................ 1
第一節研究背景與動機........................................................................................ 1
第二節研究目的.................................................................................................... 3
第三節研究流程.................................................................................................... 4
第貳章文獻探討.................................................................................................... 6
第一節審計委員會................................................................................................ 6
第二節管理當局自願性揭露動機之相關理論.................................................... 9
第三節國內外相關實證研究...............................................................................11
第參章研究方法.................................................................................................. 14
第一節研究假說.................................................................................................. 14
第二節研究設計與變數定義.............................................................................. 18
第三節研究期間、資料蒐集與樣本選取.......................................................... 22
第肆章實證結果與分析...................................................................................... 25
第一節各變數敘述性統計資料分析.................................................................. 25
第二節LOGISTIC 迴歸分析................................................................................ 27
第伍章結論與建議.............................................................................................. 33
第一節研究結論.................................................................................................. 34
第二節研究限制.................................................................................................. 36
第二節對後續研究者之研究建議...................................................................... 37
參考文獻.............................................................................................................. 38
表目錄
【表2-1】美國審計委員會設立之歷程表......................................................... 7
【表2-2】審計委員會國內外相關文獻.............................................................11
【表2-3】設置審計委員會之相關研究結果整理............................................ 13
【表3-1】樣本公司產業別審計委員會設置情況............................................ 23
【表3-2】研究樣本篩選情況............................................................................ 23
【表3-3】樣本明細表........................................................................................ 24
【表4-1】各自變數依設置審計委員會與否分類之敘述統計量彙總表........ 26
【表4-2】自變數PEARSON 相關係數表.......................................................... 28
【表4-3】LOGISTIC 迴歸模式彙總表.............................................................. 29
【表5-1】實證結果彙總表................................................................................ 33
【表5-2】各自變數依設置審計委員會與否分類之平均數檢定.................... 35
圖目錄
【圖1-1】研究流程圖......................................................................................... 5
參考文獻
一、國外部份
Adams, M.: 1997, “Determinants of Audit Committee Formation in the Life
Insurance Industry: New Zealand Evidence”, Journal of Business Research
38(2): 123-129.
Antle, R. and A. Smith. 1986. “An Empirical Investigation of the Relative
Performance Evaluation of Corporate Executives.” Journal of Accounting
Research(Spring):1-39.
Birkett, B.S.Fall 1986.“A Recent History of Corporate Audit Committees.”
The Accounting Historians Journal 13(2):109-124.
Bradbury, Michael E.. 1990, “The Incentives for Voluntary Audit Committee
Formation.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. Vol. 9, Iss. 1;
p.19(18pages)
Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, and T. L. Ncal. 2002.“ Disclosures in
Audit Committee Charters and Reports.” Accounting Horizons 16
(December): 291-304.
Chow, A. W.April 1982.“The Demand for External Auding: Size, Debt and
Ownership Influences.” The Accounting Review 57(2):272-291.
Coase, R. H., 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.”Economica,Vol.4:386-405.
Collier, P.: 1993, “Factors Affecting the Formation of Audit Committees
in Major UK Listed Companies.” Accounting and Business Research
23(91A):421-430.
Collier, P. and A. Gregory: 1999, “Audit Committee Activity and Agency
Costs”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 18: 311-332.
Copeland, T. and D. Galiai. 1983. “Information Effects on the Bid Ask
Spread.” The Journal of Finance. Vol.38, Iss.5; p.1457
Crawford,J.G.1987,“An Empirical Investigation of the Characteristics of
Companies with Audit Committees”, Doctoral Dissertation, University of
Alabama.
Davidson Ⅲ, W.N.,Xie, B.,and Xu, W., 2004, “Market Reaction to Voluntary
Announcements of Audit Committee Appointments: The Effect of Financial
Expertise.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. Vol. 23, Iss. 4;
p.279
Diamond, D. 1985. “Optimal Release of Information by Firm.” The
Journal of Finance. Vol.40, Iss.4; p.1071
Eichenseher,J.W.and Shields,D.1985,“Corporate Director Liability and
Monitoring Preferences”, Journal of Accounting and Public
Policy,Vol.4,No.1,pp.13-31.
Frankel, R., M. Johnson. and D. J. Skinner. 1999,“An Empirical Examination
of Conference Calls as a Voluntary Disclosure”, Journal of Accounting
Research (Spring):133-150.
Glosten, L.,and P.Milgrom. 1985. “Bid, Ask and Transaction Prices in a
Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed Traders.” Journal of
Financial Economics:71-100.
Holthausen, R. W., and Verrecchia, R. E., 1990, “The Effect of
Informativeness and Consensus of Price Volume Behavior”, The Accounting
Review 65, 191-208
Jesen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm:Managerial
Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial
Economics 3:305-360.
Klein, A., 2002, “Economic Determinants of Audit Committee
Independence,” The Accounting Review 77, 435-453
Mautz, R. K. and Neumann,F.L.1970.“ Corporate Audit Committees”,
University of Illinois, Urbana.
Mautz, R. K. and Neumann,F.L.1977.“ Corporate Audit Committees: Policies
and Practices,” Ernst & Ernst, New York.
Mautz, R. K. and Neary, R. D. October 1979. “Corporate Audit Committee
─quo Vadis?” Journal of Accountancy 148(4):83-88.
McMullen, D. A., 1996, “Audit Committee Performance: An Investigation of
the Consequences Associated with Audit Committees, Auditing,” A Journal
of Practice & Theory 15, 87-103
Menon, K. and J.D. Williams: 1994, “The Use of Audit Committees for
Monitoring,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 13: 121-139.
Patton, A., and J. C. Baker, 1987(November-December),“Why Won`t Directors
Rock the Boat?,” Harvard Business Review:10-18.
Pincus, K.,Rusbarsky, M.,and Wong,J.Winter 1989.“Voluntary Formation of
Corporate Audit Committees among NASDAQ Firms.” Journal of Accounting
and Public Policy 8(4):239-265.
Rajgopal, S., Venkatachalam, M., Jiambalvo, J., 1999. “Is Institutional
Ownership Associated with Earnings Management and the Extent to which
Stock Prices Reflect Future Earnings.” Working Paper, University of
Washington at Seattle.
Smith Jr., C. W.,and Warner, J. B. June 1979. “On Financial Contracting:
An Analysis of Bcovenants.” Journal of Financial Economics
7(2):117-161.
Spence A. M., 1974. “Market Signaling.” Harvard University Press:
Cambridge MA.
Verrecchia, R. 1983. “Discretionary disclosure.” Journal of Accounting
and Economics(December):179-94.
Willekens, M., Bauwhede,H.V.,and Gaeremynck, A., 2004, “Voluntary Audit
Committee Formation and Practices among Belgian Listed Companies.”
International Journal of Auditing. Vol. 8, Iss. 3; p. 207
Williamson, O. E., 1975. “Markets and Hierarchies:Analysis and Antitrust
Implications:A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization,” New
York, NY :The Free Press.
Xie, B., Davidson Ⅲ, W.N., and DaDalt, P.J.,2003,“Earnings Management
and Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee,”
Journal of Corporate Finance 9,295-316.
二、國內部份
江承儒,2003,「審計委員會獨立性與專業性對盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
李建然,1997,「影響台灣上市公司自願性盈餘預測行為因素之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所博士論文。
蔡幸儒,2002,「法人說明會資訊內涵及影響管理當局召開行為動機之研究」,國立臺北大學會計研究所碩士論文。
蘇裕惠,1999,歐美及東亞各國審計委員會制度之分析探討,會計研究月刊,第163 期,155-161 頁。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top