臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

現今的社會並非是公平的，加上人們總以為好的表現或是工作績效就足以讓人取得權力、升遷無礙，因此只是坐等機會，而不去有效經營自己的職場生涯；但是要能在一個複雜、互相依存的組織內完成任務，需要透過建立權力、使用權力才是有用的生存技能，同時獲得伴隨權力而來的能見度與地位，方能贏得最後的勝利。

這樣的概念，與現今亞洲地區最暢銷的小說《後宮甄嬛傳》內容不謀而合。主角甄嬛在後宮中，靠著自己的步步謀略，才得以在滿是豺狼虎豹的後宮中生存，並透過不斷地建立與使用權力，登上權力最高峰的皇太后寶座。本研究將使用文本分析方法，以此文本作為研究的個案，延續先前權力的動態觀點，並以整合概念作為命題架構，探討組織成員權力生命週期之演化。

最後，本研究結果發現，組織成員透過獲取具有附加價值的關鍵性資源，用以創造往後的網絡位置，以此奠定權力的基礎。接著在此一網絡位置中，組織成員進而為求獲取權力所使用的整合能力必須隨環境前提的改變進行調整，將得以在組織中繼續生存；反之，則將喪失權力，依此推論出組織成員權力週期演化的動態觀點。

Many research found that power as a means to make both ourselves and our organizations more effective and successful now, so it’s very important to understand how power dynamics affect organizations, and perhaps even more critical to understand the problems and potential in managing power.

Moreover, the above issue shared the same value with a Chinese novel “Empresses in the Palace” which describe a women use power strategies and tactics from nobody to somebody in a palace. This research plan use text analysis method to analyses this case with integration concept.

Finally, this research found out that in order to building power fundament, organizational members try to get the critical recourses to create network position. Secondly, organizational members integrate ability have to depend on environmental change; otherwise may be lose power.

目 錄
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究內容 3
第貳章 文獻探討 5
第一節 權力的定義 5
第二節 組織內的權力理論 11
第三節 組織內的政治活動 16
第四節 組織內的權力運用 19
第五節 本研究命題 23
第參章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究方法 27
第二節 分析工具 28
第三節 研究流程 29
第四節 研究對象選擇 30
第肆章 研究內容 33
第一節 個案介紹 33
第二節 初次入宮時期 44
第三節 奠定基礎時期 53
第四節 成為皇太后時期 58
第伍章 結論與建議 69
第一節 研究結論 69
第二節 研究限制 73
第三節 後續研究建議 73
參考文獻 75
中文部分 75
英文部分 77

中文部分
1.夕顏(2013)。后宮甄嬛傳教我的80件事。台北市：高寶。
2.司徒達賢(2005)。管理學的新世界。台北市：天下遠見。
3.吳一凡(2006)。以整合觀點分析《鹿鼎記》之管理行為。國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文，台北市。
4.林錦慧(2011)。Power!：面對權力叢林，你要會耍善良心機(初版)(林錦慧譯)。台北市：時報文化。(原著：Pfeffer, J (2010). Power: Why Some People Have It and Others Don’t.: Andrew Nurnberg Associates International Limited.)
5.流瀲紫(2012)。後宮甄嬛傳 壹。中國：浙江文藝出版社。
6.流瀲紫(2012)。後宮甄嬛傳 貳。中國：浙江文藝出版社。
7.流瀲紫(2012)。後宮甄嬛傳 参。中國：浙江文藝出版社。
8.流瀲紫(2012)。後宮甄嬛傳 肆。中國：浙江文藝出版社。
9.流瀲紫(2012)。後宮甄嬛傳 伍。中國：浙江文藝出版社。
10.流瀲紫(2012)。後宮甄嬛傳 陸。中國：浙江文藝出版社。
11.勁飛、高焱(2013)。職場即後宮：《甄嬛傳》教會我的辦公室賤招。台北市：雅各文創。
12.徐聯恩(1986)。公司內的權力世界(再版)(徐聯恩譯)。台北市：現代管理月刊雜誌社。(原著：MacMillan, I. C. (1978). Strategy Formulation: Political Concepts. Minnesota: West Publishing Company.)
13.唐維敏(1996)。大眾傳播研究方法(唐維敏譯)。台北市：五南。(原著：Jensen, K. B., & Jankowski, N. W. (1991). A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. London: Routledge.)
14.夏春祥(1997)。「文本分析與傳播研究」。新聞學研究，54，141-166。
15.陳筱黠(2008)。沒權力也能有影響力：學會Exchange交涉術，就能影響你的上司、同事及合作夥伴(陳筱黠譯)。台北市：臉譜, 城邦文化。(原著：Cohen, A. R., & Bradford, D. L. 2nd (2005). Influence Without Authority. NY: Wiley.)
16.游美惠(2000)。「內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用」。調查研究，8，5-42。
17.葉漢儀(2009)。以整合觀點分析胡雪巖之管理行為。國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文，台北市。
18.鄒紀孟(2003)。權力規則：中國歷史上的官場遊戲。中國：中國盲文出版社。
19.螺螄拜恩(2013)。甄嬛傳華妃早知道該多好的道理：這些職場地雷千萬不要踩。台北市：高寶。
20.羅毅(2013)。甄嬛教會我的36則職場生存術：職場中「周全自己」，也「周全所有人」的厚黑攻略。新北市：智言館。
21.羅霖(2013)。你沒看懂的後宮甄嬛傳。新北市：人類智庫。

英文部分
1.Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a Minute: Predicting TeacherEvaluations from Thin Slices of Nonverbal Behavior and PhysicalAttractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3),431-441.
2.Astley, W. G., & Sachdeva, P. S. (1984). Structural sources ofinterorganizational power: A theoretical synthesis. Academy ofManagement Review, 9, 104-113.
3.Barthes, R. (1980). “From work to text.” In J. V. Harari (ed.), TextualStrategies: Perspectives in Post-structuralist Criticism (pp. 73-81). London: Methuen.
4.Baum, J. C., & Rowley, T. J. (Eds.). (2002). Companion to Organization:An Introduction. Oxford, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
5.Berger, A. A. (1995). Culture Criticism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.Blau, P. M. (1969). “Differentiation of Power.” In R. Bell, D V. Edwards, & R. H. Wagner (ed.), Political Power. NY: The Free Press.
7.Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal Organizations: A ComparativeApproach. CA: Stanford University Press.
8.Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structure analysis ofindividual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly,29, 518-539.
9.Brass, D. J. (1985). Men’s and Women’s network: A study of interactionpatterns influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal,28, 327-343.
10.Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 441-470.
11.Brass, D. J. (2002). “Intraorganizatioal Power and Dependence” In J. C. Baum, & T. J. Rowley (ed.), Companion to Organization: An Introduction (pp. 138-157). Oxford, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
12.Brehm, J. W. (1989). Psychological Reactance: Theory and Applications. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 72-75.
13.Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104-127.
14.Burt, R. S. (1992). Structure Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.Chamberlain, N. E. (1955). A General Theory of Economic Process. NY: Harper and Brothers.
16.Chaplin, E. (1995). Sociology and Visual Representation. London and New York: Routledge.
17.Cialdini, R. B. (1989). “Indirect tactics of image management: Beyond basking.” In R. A. Giacalone, & P. Rosenfeld (ed.), Impression Management in the Organization (pp. 45-56). NJ: Erlbaum.
18.Cohen, A. R., & Bradford, D. L. (2005). Influence without Authority. NY：Wiley.
19.Crozier, M. (1971). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
20.Crozier, M. (1974). Organizations of the future: Interaction with the external environment. NY: Praeger.
21.Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavior Science, 2, 201-215.
22.Denzin, N. K. (1994). “The Art and Politics of Interpretation” In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 500-515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern Organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24.Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-Dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
25.Fombrun, C. J. (1983). Attributions of power across a social network. Human Relations, 36, 493-508.
26.French J., & Raven, B. (1959). “The Basic of Social Power.” In J. S. Ott (ed.), Classic Reading in Organization Theory (pp. 284-292). Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
27.Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research” In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (ed.), Handbook ofQualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.Hammersley, M. (1990). Reading Ethnographic Research: A Critical Guide. London: Longman.
29.Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. R. (1996). “Some dare call it power.” In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (ed.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 622-641). London: Sage.
30.Hinings, C. R., Hickson, D.J., Pennings, J. M., & Schneck, R. E. (1974). Structural conditions of intraorganization power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 22-44.
31.House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U.S. presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly,36, 364-396.
32.Kanter, R. M. (1979). Power Failure in Management Circuits. Harvard Business Review, 57(4), 65-75.
33.Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2000). Power, Approach, and Inhibition (No.1669). California: Graduate School of Business Stanford University.
34.Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1988). Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluation, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 528-542.
35.Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage.
36.Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342-369.
37.Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Effects of Certain Communication Patterns on Group Performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38-50.
38.Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
39.March, J. G. (1966). “The power of power” In D. Easton (ed.), Varieties ofpolitical theory (pp. 39-70). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40.McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The Inner Experience. NY: Irvington.
41.Mintzberg, H. (1983). “The Power Game and the Players.” In J. S. Ott (ed.), Classic Reading in Organization Theory (pp. 330-337). Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
42.Mintzberg, H. (1984). Power and Organization Life Cycle. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 207-224.
43.Ott, J. S., Shafritz, J. M., & Jang, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). Classic Reading in Organization Theory. Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
44.Parsons, T. C. (1969). Politics and Social Structure. NY: The Free Press.
45.Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The Politics of Organizational Decision Making. London: Tavistock.
46.Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in Organizations. MA: Pitman.
47.Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: politics and influence in organizations. MA: Harvard Business School Press.
48.Pfeffer, J. (2010). Power Play. Harvard Business Review. July-August, 84-92.
49.Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and uses of power in organization decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 453-473.
50.Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Who Gets power-and how they hold on to it: A strategic contingency model of power. Organization Dynamics, 5, 3-21.
51.Schelling, T. C. (1963). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
52.Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organization in Action. NY: McGraw-Hill.
53.Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and Advancement versus Sadness and Subjugation: The Effect of Negative Emotion Expressions on Social Status Conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 86-94.
54.Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1983). Uncertainty, social location and influence in decision making: A sociometric analysis. Management Science, 29, 12-23.
55.Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2002). “Field Research Methods” In J. C. Baum, & T. J. Rowley (ed.), Companion to Organization: An Introduction (pp. 867-888). Oxford, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
56.Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A Behavior Theory of Labor Negotiations. NY: McGraw-Hill.
58.Wolff, H. G., & Moser, K. (2009). Effects of Networking on Career Success: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 196-206.