臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

美國唱片協會(RIAA)與美國電影協會(MPAA)希望創造比數位千禧年著作權法案(DMCA)更有效率打擊盜版的法案，因此於2011年時催生了「禁止網路盜版法案」(SOPA)與「保護智慧財產權法案」(PIPA)。由於政府與著作權人控制少數幾家網際網路服務業者(ISP)遠比控制大眾來的容易，因此新法案的頒布往往都是更加重了ISP業者的監督責任。然ISP並非實質內容的提供者，要求第三方的ISP來負擔這多出來的管理成本是否合理？
本論文試圖探索美國相關網路著作權法案，其立法過程的合理性及重要性，以及ISP業者在不同時期角色的轉變，最後建議臺灣有關部會在未來進行立法或修法時，應更審慎評估與制訂。

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) unceasingly urge the U.S. government to promulgate stricter anti-piracy legislation to combat the worse situation of piracy on the Internet. Under the pressure of related interest groups, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) proposed by the congress in 2011 attempt to coerce the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to be the anti-piracy initiators. It is much easier to control the ISPs rather than the general public on the Internet; therefore, the new draft bills place the heavier burden of online supervision on the ISPs. However, many people criticize that it is unreasonable for ISPs to bear such burdens and costs to oversee the piracy activities.

This paper attempts to analyze the U.S. copyright legislation against the online piracy and to explore the changing roles of ISPs in this decade. Besides, this paper also discusses Taiwan’s law who influence of U.S. copyright legislation. Thus, this paper will suggest the Taiwan’s competent authority to take cautious steps responding the move of possible legislation in the future.

目 錄
書名頁 i
論文口試委員審定書 ii
授權書 iii
中文摘要 vii
英文摘要 viii
誌 謝 ix
目 錄 x
表目錄 xii
圖目錄 xiii
第一章 緒論 1
一、 研究背景 1
二、 研究動機 3
三、 研究問題 5
四、 研究目的 5
第二章 網路服務提供者之類型 7
一、 連線服務提供者 8
二、 快速存取服務提供者 8
三、 資訊儲存服務提供者 9
四、 搜尋服務提供者 9
第三章 DMCA前網路著作權相關法院案例 10
一、 Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe, Inc 10
二、 Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Servs. Co. 11
三、 Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Frena 13
四、 Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc. 14
五、 Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. MAPHIA 15
六、 Marobie FL, Inc. v. National Ass'n of Fire Equip. Distributors 16
七、 小結 17
第四章 數位千禧年著作權法案（DMCA） 18
一、 數位千禧年著作權法案相關背景與規定 18
二、 DMCA後網際網路相關著作權案例 28
1. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. 29
2. ALS Scan v. Remarq Communities, Inc. 30
3. Hendrickson v. eBay 31
4. Ellison v. Robertson 33
5. Field v. Google 34
6. Viacom v. YouTube 35
三、 DMCA立法之檢討 36
第五章 後DMCA時代PIPA與SOPA法案 39
一、 保護智慧財產法案（PIPA）與停止網路盜版法案（SOPA） 39
二、 SOPA法案內容簡述 40
1. 司法部發動之程序（第102條） 41
2. 著作權人發動之程序(第103條) 44
三、 SOPA是否解決DMCA未能解決之問題 47
第六章 我國法制評析 52
一、 網路服務提供者之免責事由 52
二、 我國案例評析 58
1. 網際光華螞蟻市場案 58
2. 真理大學案 59
三、 未來的立法展望 60
第七章 結論與建議 66
一、 結論 66
二、 建議 68
三、 研究限制 70
參考文獻 71

表目錄
表 一：PIPA與SOPA贊成與反對的勢力與理由 50

 
圖目錄

圖 1.通知取下與反通知回復之流程圖 25
圖 2網路服務提供者通知與取下流程圖 57

中文部分：
Lessig, L. (2011)。Remix，將別人的作品重混成賺錢生意 (譯者葉心嵐) 臺北市：大是文化。
李治安(2010)。當法律漫步在雲端。法學新論，25，49-65。
章忠信(1999)。美國一九九八年數位化千禧年著作權法案簡介。萬國法律，107，25-42.
章忠信(2008)。網路服務提供者著作權侵害責任限制之立法思考與方向。律師雜誌， 347，28-44。
章忠信(2009)。二○○九年新修正著作權法簡析--網路服務提供者之責任限制。月旦法學，173，5-24。
章忠信(2009)。智慧局新擬著作權法修正草案之討論。著作權筆記，2009年3月5日，http://www.copyrightnote.org/eclqna/clqna.php?op=showcontent&id=45
陳曉慧(2011)。網際網路與著作權。臺北市。經濟部智慧財產局。
陳聰富(2008)。論侵權行為法之違法性概念。月旦法學雜誌，155，155-195。
曾勝珍(2009)。著作權間接侵害責任之探討─2009年新展望。東海大學法學研究，31，189-240。
曾勝珍(2010)。論網路著作權之侵害(第二版)。臺北市：元照。
楊智傑(2010)。著作權法理論與實務。臺北市：新學林。
楊智傑(2011)。資訊法。臺北市：五南。
葉志良(2012)。著作權法三振條款制度對著作權平衡保護的影響。資訊社會研究，22，79-115。
劉靜怡(2011)。網路內容管制與言論自由─以網路中介者的角色為討論重心。月旦法學雜誌，192，63-80。
蕭宏宜(2007)。以刑法保護著作權？法學新論，143，92-112。
蕭宏宜(2008)。從DMCA看P2P的法律責任問題。法學新論，8-58。
蕭雄淋(2010)。著作權法論。臺北市: 五南。
賴文智、王文君(2008)。Web2.0環境對著作權法治的再思考。智慧財產權月刊，119，5-20。
賴文智、王文君(2012)。從美國SOPA看網路著作權侵害防治立法的困境。智慧財產權月刊，167，6-32。
顏上詠(2008)。從Kuro與ezPeer司法爭訟個案來看網路音樂產業之管理法制分析。 月旦法學雜誌，163，138-172。

 
英文部分：
Albanesius, C. (2011). Will Online Piracy Bill Combat 'Rogue' Web Sites or Cripple the Internet? Retrieved June 11, 2012, from PC Magazine, Nov.1, 2011: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2395653,00.asp
Ammori, M. (2011). Controversial Copyright Bills Would Violate First Amendment–Letters to Congress by Laurence Tribe and Me. Retrieved August 26, 2012, from Marvin Ammori and Friends, Dec. 8, 2011: http://ammori.org/2011/12/08/controversial-copyright-bills-would-violate-first-amendment-letters-to-congress-by-laurence-tribe-and-me/
Barrett, B. (2012). What Is SOPA? Retrieved June 11, 2012, from Gizmodo, Jan. 17, 2012: http://gizmodo.com/5877000/what-is-sopa
Blue, V. (2012). Say ‘hello’ to CISPA, it will remind you of SOPA. Retrieved June 11, 2012, from CNET, Apr. 13, 2012: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57413627-93/say-hello-to-cispa-it-will-remind-you-of-sopa/
Bretan, J. (2003). Harboring Doubts About the Efficacy of § 512 Immunity Under the DMCA. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 18 (1), 43-67.
Bridy, A. (2012). Copyright Policymaking as Procedural Democratic Process: A Discourse-Theoretic Perspective on ACTA, SOPA, and PIPA. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 30, 153-164.
Dachis, A. (2012). All About PIPA and SOPA, the Bills That Want to Censor Your Internet. Retrieved June 11, 2012, from Lifehacker, Jan. 18, 2012, http://lifehacker.com/5860205/all-about-sopa-the-bill-thats-going-to-cripple-your-internet
David Sohn, A. M. (2011). The Stop Online Piracy Act: Summary, Problems and Implications. Retrieved April 13, 2013, from Center For Democracy & Technology, Nov. 15, 2011: https://www.cdt.org/paper/sopa-summary
Ernesto (2011). Filmmaker: BitTorrent Pirates Help Us Get More Exposure. Retrieved July 18, 2013, from TorrentFreak, Dec. 14, 2011: http://torrentfreak.com/filmmaker-bittorrent-pirates-help-us-get-more-exposure-111214/
Haley, S. (2012). Top 5 reasons to support SOPA. Retrieved June 11, 2012, from VentureBeat, Jan. 19, 2012: http://venturebeat.com/2012/01/19/top-5-reasons-to-support-sopa/
Halliday, J. (2011). Google boss: anti-piracy laws would be disaster for free speech. Retrieved August 26, 2012, from The Guardian, May 18, 2011: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/may/18/google-eric-schmidt-piracy
Hollaar, L. A. (2002). Legal Protection of Digital Information. Danvers: BNA Books.
Lemley, M. et al (2011). Don't Break the Internet. Retrieved April 13, 2013, from Stanford Law Review: http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/dont-break-internet
Levine, D. S. (2012). Bring in the Nerds: Secrecy, National Security, and the Creation of International Intellectual Property Law. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 30, 105-151.
Litman, J. (2006). Digital Copyright. New York: Prometheus Books.
Mantel, B. A. (2011). The Google Police: How The Indictment of The Pirate Bay Presents A New Solution to Internet Piracy. University of Miami Business Law Review, 20, 77-112.
Masnick, M. (2012). As SOPA/PIPA Becomes Toxic, Frantic Congress Test Runs Dropping DNS Blocking Provisions. Retrieved June 11, 2012, from Techdirt, Jan. 11, 2012: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120111/09293817377/as-sopapipa-becomes-toxic-frantic-congress-test-runs-dropping-dns-blocking-provisions.shtml
McCullagh, D. (2012). FBI: We need wiretap-ready Web sites - now. Retrieved June 11, 2012, from CNET, May 4, 2012: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57428067-83/fbi-we-need-wiretap-ready-web-sites-now/
McCullagh, D. (2012). How CISPA would affect you (FAQ). Retrieved June 11, 2012, from CNET, Apr. 27, 2012: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57422693-281/how-cispa-would-affect-you-faq/
McCullagh, D. (2012). How SOPA would affect you: FAQ. Retrieved June 11, 2012, from CNET, Jan. 18, 2012: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57329001-281/how-sopa-would-affect-you-faq/
McCullagh, D. (2012). MPAA chief: SOPA and Protect IP back from the grave? Retrieved June 11, 2012, from CNET, Apr. 5, 2012: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57410236-281/mpaa-chief-sopa-and-protect-ip-back-from-the-grave/
McCullagh, D. (2012). MPAA’s former tech policy chief turns SOPA foe. Retrieved June 11, 2012, from CNET, Apr. 6, 2012: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57410674-281/mpaas-former-tech-policy-chief-turns-sopa-foe/
Pallante, M. A. (2013). The Next Great Copyright Act. Columbia Journal of Law &The Arts, 36(3), 315-344.
Patry, W. (2009). Moral Panics and The Copyright Wars. New York: Oxford.
Patry, W. (2011). How to Fix Copyright. New York: Oxford.
Plovnick, H. L. (2001). Making Waves In Statutory Safe Harbors: Reevaluating Internet Service Providers' Liability for Third-Party Content and Copyright Infringement. Roger Williams University Law Review, 7, 215-245.
Protalinski, E. (2012). After denouncing SOPA and PIPA, how can Facebook support CISPA? Retrieved June 11, 2012, from ZDNet, Apr. 12, 2012: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/facebook/after-denouncing-sopa-and-pipa-how-can-facebook-support-cispa/11700
Rossini, C. & Opsahl, K. (2012). TPP Creates Legal Incentives For ISPs To Police The Internet. What Is At Risk? Your Rights. Retrieved August 30, 2012, from Electronic Frontier Foundation, Aug. 24, 2012: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/08/tpp-creates-liabilities-isps-and-put-your-rights-risk
Sandoval, G. (2013). The head of the Copyright Office says the law is broken — but can she fix it in time? Retrieved July 15, 2013, from The Verge, Mar. 20, 2013: http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/20/4126936/copyright-register-today-will-embark-on-mission-to-overhaul-us
Savitz, E. (2012). Web Darkness, The Day After: Why The SOPA Protests Matter. Retrieved April 12, 2013, from Forbes, Jan. 19, 2012: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ciocentral/2012/01/19/web-darkness-the-day-after-why-the-sopa-protests-matter/
Schwartz, M. J. (2012). SOPA Backers Lose Ground. Retrieved April 13, 2013, from INTEROP, Jan. 19, 2012: http://www.informationweek.com/security/government/sopa-backers-lose-ground/232500136
Vieira, G. (2012). Why Most Investors Should Support SOPA. Retrieved June 11, 2012, from Benzinga, Jan. 18, 2012: http://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/12/01/2270436/why-most-investors-should-support-sopa
Yen, A. C. (2000). Internet Service Provider Liability for Subscriber Copyright Infringement, Enterprise Liability, and the First Amendment. Georgetown Law Journal, 88, 1833-1893.
Yu, P. K. (2012). The Alphabet Soup of Transborder Intellectual Property Enforcement. Drake Law Review Discourse, 16-33.