臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

地球能源枯竭，太陽能是重要的替代能源，太陽能產業中兩種技術:新興太陽能與聚光型太陽能快速蓬勃發展，未來前景仍被看好，市場成長潛力吸引大量資金的投入，太陽能產業為技術密集型產業，對於廠商投入研發或投資者進行投資，技術優劣的判別會影響到選擇投資的標的物。本研究利用專利計量探討研發組合及社會網絡分析探討知識流動等兩種方法選擇優良的投資標的物，專利組合由技術吸引力、技術相對地位與專利相對優勢所構成，知識流動由專利相對引用傾向所測量。成本效率比可以了解技術的普及能力，專利組合可以判斷技術的優劣與公司在各個技術領域的研發強度，知識流動可以發現技術輸出者與接收者，進而判斷技術的領先者與追隨者。

Nowadays, there is energy depletion on earth; solar cell is an important alternative energy. Emerging PV and Concentrator PV growth rapidly, the prospects of these two technologies are great, and the potential of market demand attract a lot of capital investing. Solar industry is a technology-intensive industry, so how to evaluate the technology will affect manufacturers or investors to make decision for investing or R&D in solar industry. In this study, we use Patentmeatrics to measure the R&D Portfolio and social network analysis exploring the knowledge flow to choose the great investment. There are three component of the patent portfolio; technology attractiveness、relative patent position and relative patent advantage. We can measure knowledge flow by using relative citation propensity. We can understand the whether the technology is universal or not through the ratio of cost efficiency, patent portfolio can evaluate the technology and the strength of company in the specific technical field, knowledge flow can recognize who is exporter or importer of knowledge, and then decide who are the leader and follower.

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究動機 2
1.3研究提問與目的 4
1.4研究範疇 6
1.5.論文章節架構 7
第二章文獻探討 8
2.1專利資訊 8
2.1.1專利資訊的種類 8
2.2專利計量 11
2.3專利組合 12
2.4技術知識流 14
2.5社會網絡分析 15
2.6專利引用分析 16
第三章研究方法 18
3.1資料蒐集 19
3.2資料分析 24
第四章太陽能專利計量分析結果 28
4.1新興與接面型太陽能之光電技術分析 29
4.2.成本效益分析 31
4.3專利組合分析 32
4.4知識流分析 45
4.5結合研發組合與知識流分析之結果 47
第五章結論及建議 49
5.1 結論 49
5.2 建議 51
參考文獻 52

一、中文部分
1.阮明淑, & 梁峻齊. (2009). 專利指標發展研究. 圖書館學與資訊科學, 35(2).
2.翁順裕. (2010). 探討技術網絡之社群結構與位置關係-以保險商業方法專利為例. 管理學報, 27(5), 437-458.
3.賴奎魁, 吳曉君, & 張善斌. (2005). 建立產業專利分類系統-共同引証分析的觀點. 管理學報, 22(2), 261-276.
二、英文部分
1.Afuah, A. (2003). Redefining firm boundaries in the face of the internet: are firms really shrinking? Academy of management review, 28(1), 34-53.
2.Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for" lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The quarterly journal of economics, 488-500.
3.Bernstein, J. I. (1988). Costs of production, intra-and interindustry R&D spillovers: Canadian evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 324-347.
4.Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. The journal of political economy, 637-654.
5.Boulding, W., & Staelin, R. (1990). Environment, market share, and market power. Management Science, 36(10), 1160-1177.
6.Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2005). Knowledge networks from patent data Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 613-643): Springer.
7.Brockhoff, K. K. (1992). Instruments for patent data analyses in business firms. Technovation, 12(1), 41-59.
8.Brockhoff, K. K., Ernst, H., & Hundhausen, E. (1999). Gains and pains from licensing—patent-portfolios as strategic weapons in the cardiac rhythm management industry. Technovation, 19(10), 605-614.
9.Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research policy, 35(4), 463-480.
10.Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from innovation. Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, MA.
11.Damodaran, A. (2002). Investment valuation, 2. Aufl., New York, 817.
12.Demarest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management. Long range planning, 30(3), 321-384.
13.Domowitz, I., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B. C. (1986). Market structure and cyclical fluctuations in US manufacturing: National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.Ernst, H. (1997). The use of patent data for technological forecasting: the diffusion of CNC-technology in the machine tool industry. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 361-381.
15.Ernst, H. (1998). Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(4), 279-308.
16.Ernst, H., Fabry, B., & Soll, J. H. (2004). Enhancing market-oriented R&D planning by integrated market and patent portfolios. Journal of Business Chemistry, 1(1).
17.Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
18.Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J. Econ., 4, 1661-1707.
19.Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools: National Bureau of Economic Research.
20.Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and statistics, 81(3), 511-515.
21.Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research policy, 32(8), 1343-1363.
22.Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1998). Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 49(12), 1101-1114.
23.Hu, A. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2001). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan”, Working Paper 8528. Paper presented at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.Hu, A. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan. International journal of industrial organization, 21(6), 849-880.
25.Huang, Z., Chen, H., Yip, A., Ng, G., Guo, F., Chen, Z.-K., & Roco, M. C. (2003). Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5(3-4), 333-363.
26.Hufker, T., & Alpert, F. (1994). Patents: a managerial perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 3(4), 44-54.
27.Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1-2), 105-136.
28.Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577-598.
29.Kajikawa, Y., & Takeda, Y. (2009). Citation network analysis of organic LEDs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(8), 1115-1123.
30.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard--Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
31.Mogee, M. E. (1997). Patent analysis methods in support of licensing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Technology Transfer Society... Annual Meeting, International Symposium and exhibit.
32.Nagaoka, S. (2007). Assessing the R&D management of a firm in terms of speed and science linkage: Evidence from the US patents. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(1), 129-156.
33.Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155.
34.Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research policy, 26(3), 317-330.
35.Pavitt, K. (1985). Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems. Scientometrics, 7(1), 77-99.
36.Pegels, C. C., & Thirumurthy, M. (1996). The impact of technology strategy on firm performance. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 43(3), 246-249.
37.Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual review of sociology, 57-76.
38.Podolny, J. M., & Stuart, T. E. (1995). A role-based ecology of technological change. American journal of sociology, 1224-1260.
39.Podolny, J. M., Stuart, T. E., & Hannan, M. T. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991. American journal of sociology, 659-689.
40.Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of documentation(25), 348-349.
41.Rivette, K. G., & Kline, D. (2000). Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Massachusetts.
42.Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic management journal, 22(4), 287-306.
43.Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. (1992). Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information: Springer.
44.Schmoch, U. (1995). Evaluation of technological strategies of companies by means of MDS maps. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4), 426-440.
45.Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? The Journal of Marketing, 46-55.
46.Spence, A. M. (1973). Time and communication in economic and social interaction. The quarterly journal of economics, 651-660.
47.Sternitzke, C., Bartkowski, A., & Schramm, R. (2008). Visualizing patent statistics by means of social network analysis tools. World Patent Information, 30(2), 115-131.
48.Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 668-698.
49.Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), 193-224.
50.Thompson, P. (2006). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: evidence from inventor-and examiner-added citations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 383-388.
51.Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on(1), 28-45.
52.Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.B. (2002). Patents, Citations and Innovations-A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 19-50.
53.Van Den Bosch, F. A., Volberda, H. W., & De Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization science, 10(5), 551-568.
54.Von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., & Rost, K. (2005). Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research policy, 34(10), 1591-1607.
55.Wasserman, S., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1994). Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 171): Sage Publications.
56.Wu, C.-Y., & Mathews, J. A. (2012). Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea, and China. Research policy, 41(3), 524-540. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.007
57.Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(1), 37-50.

三、網路部分
1.NREL, http://www.nrel.gov/
2.WIPO, http://www.wipo.org