跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.19) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/01 21:48
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃淑萍
研究生(外文):HUANG, SHU-PING
論文名稱:應用TOC產出會計訂定企業接單策略-以純IC測試廠為例
論文名稱(外文):Application of TOC Throughput Accounting in the Company to Formulate the Order Acceptance Strategy -The Case of Testing Industry
指導教授:張盛鴻張盛鴻引用關係
口試委員:李榮貴吳庭瑜
口試日期:2013-05-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:明新科技大學
系所名稱:工業工程與管理系碩士班
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:43
中文關鍵詞:限制理論產出會計
外文關鍵詞:Thinking Processes, TP
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:343
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:32
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
電子封裝測試業(IC Packaging and Testing Industry)位於半導體產業鏈的後段,若沒有完整的封裝加測試的整體連貫性服務,純測試廠容易受到同業的競爭搶單而降價,形成紅海惡性競爭的經營艱難局勢。個案公司為世界級IC測試服務業的領導廠商,其營收與毛利在這幾年也陷入逐漸下滑的境地。對於一個毛利與淨利大幅下降的成熟型企業而言,似乎只能在產品成本,例如降低直接材料、直接人工成本或製造費用,以及減少管銷費用上努力。個案公司在這方面已經做得淋漓盡致,對於毛利與淨利的下滑似乎也無計可施。因此,本研究對個案公司進行先導研究,應用Dr. Goldratt所提倡的思維程序(Thinking Processes, TP)持續改善(Process of Ongoing Improvement, POOGI)階段一:要改變什麼?(What to Change?)確認其陷入「部門目標與公司目標不一致」的核心衝突(Core Conflict)與現況問題確認,階段二:要改變成什麼?(To What to Change to?)為個案公司設計未來願景的策略構想;經由此二階段研究顯示,核心衝突以及公司其他考慮短期利益的措施,讓公司陷入無利可圖的境地。階段三:如何改變?(How to Cause the Change?)本研究擬根據先導研究的結論,針對個案公司目前的接單策略(Order Acceptance Strategy)進行分析,並以TOC五個專注步驟的前三步驟為公司建構以產出會計為核心思維的接單策略,並比較三種成本計算模式對這類成熟型企業的獲利影響,以期為個案公司找到最佳的接單策略,設計可以兼顧短期價格及長期毛利的配套策略構想,使公司體質強健、永續經營,邁向穩定獲利的未來。關鍵詞:限制理論、思維程序、接單策略、產出會計、電子封裝測試業
IC Packaging and Testing Industry located at the back-end of the semiconductor industry chain, pure testing plant is easy to fall into a competition of price reduction and operating in a difficult situation gradually if there is no full service in package and testing to fulfill customer’s demand.The case company is a global leading provider of semiconductor back-end services; it also falls into the situation of a gradual decline in revenue and gross profit in these few years. For a mature business that gross profit and net profit sharp dropped, it seems only can put efforts on the cost of the product, such as a reduction in direct materials, direct labor costs or manufacturing costs, as well as to reduce the cost of management and marketing. The case company in this category has been done thoroughly, seems nothing to do for the decline in gross profit and net profit.
Therefore, this research make a pilot study for the case company that apply Dr. Goldratt advocated thinking processes to continuous improve first step:What to Change? to confirmed current situation and core conflict into a "departmental goals with corporate goals inconsistent". In the second step of the thinking process:To What to Change to? Design the strategy of the future vision for the case. Via these two-step studies shows that the measures of the core conflict as well as other considering short-term profits allows the company into an unprofitable situation. In the third step of the thinking process:How to Cause the Change? This research base on the conclusion of the pilot study and analysis the Order Acceptance Strategy of the case company to construct the Order Acceptance Strategy by the core thinking of the Throughput Accounting with the top three steps of the TOC five focusing steps. Comparing the three costing model profit influences of such mature companies to find out the best acceptance strategy, to design a great strategy that could cover the prices in the short term and gross margin in the long term, that the company will strong the constitution, sustainable development, towards a stable and profitable future.
Keywords:Theory of Constraint、Thinking Processes、Order Acceptance Strategy Throughput Accounting、IC Packaging and Testing Industry

目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖 目 錄 V
表 目 錄 VI
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 8
1.3 研究範圍與限制 8
第二章 文獻探討 10
2.1限制理論 10
2.2 TOC持續改善方法 11
2.3 TOC的五個專注步驟 12
2.4傳統會計原則與TOC產出會計 14
第三章 研究方法 17
3.1步驟一、指出系統的限制:找出系統瓶頸之所在 18
3.2步驟二、如何充分利用系統限制:找出公司未能充分利用瓶頸的原因 18
3.3步驟三、所有非限制單位全力配合限制單位的決策:建立解決配套方案 20
第四章 個案探討 22
4.1找出系統限制 22
4.2如何利用限制 24
4.2.1 現況營收接單順序 24
4.2.2邊際毛利模擬接單順序 27
4.2.3產出會計模擬接單順序 29
4.2.4產出會計加入考慮現況因素之接單模式 33
4.3所有非限制單位全力配合限制單位的決策 35
第五章 結論與未來方向 39
5.1 研究結論 39
5.2 未來研究方向 39
參考文獻 41


Atwater, B., & Gagne, M. L. (1997). The theory of constraints versus contribution margin analysis for product mix decisions. Journal of Cost Management, January/Feburary, 6-15.
Bell, Janice, Swain, Monte, Bell, Jan, & Ansari, Shahid. (1998). The Theory of Constraints and Throughput Accounting (1 ed.): McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Blackstone Jr, J. H. (2010). A Review of Literature on Drum-Buffer-Rope, Buffer Management and Distribution. In: J. F. Cox III, & J. G. Schleier Jr., Theory of Constraints Handbook New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cooper, Marjorie J., & Loe, Terry W. (2000). Using the Theory of Constraints' Thinking Processes to Improve Problem-Solving Skills in Marketing. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2), 137-146.
Corbett, Thomas. (1998). Throughput Accounting: The North River Press Publishing Corporation.
Cox III, James, & Schleier , John (2010). Theory of Constraints Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dettmer, H. William. (2007). The Logical Thinking Process: A Systems Approach to Complex Problem Solving. ASQ Quality Press.
Goldratt, E.M. (1998). the constraints management handbook. The CRC Press, pp.258-294.
Goldratt, E.M. (1994). It's Not Luck. Gower, England.
Goldratt, Eliyahu M, & Cox, Jeff. (1986). The goal: a process of ongoing improvement. New York, NY: North River Press.
Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Theory of Constraints: The North River Press Publishing Corporation.
Goldratt, Eliyahu M., & Cox, Jeff. (1986). The goal: a process of ongoing improvement. North River Press.
Harris, Mary S., & MullerIII, Karl A. (1999). The market valuation of IAS versus US-GAAP accounting measures using Form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1-3), 285-312.
Hwang, Yunn-Jin, Huang, Chia-Ling, & Li, Rong-Kwei. (2011). Using Simplified
Drum-Buffer-Rope to Rapidly Improve Operational Performance: A Case Study in China. Production & Inventory Management Journal, 47 No.1, 79-92.
Kim, S., Mabin, V.J., & Davies, J. (2008). The theory of constraints thinking processes:retrospect and prospect. International Journal of Operations &Production Management, vol.28(No.2), pp.155-184.
M.Goldratt, Eliyahu, & Cox, Jeff. (1996). 目標: 天下文化.
Massood, Yahya-Zadeh. (1998). Product-Mix Decisions Under Activity-Based Costing With Resource Constraints And Non-proportional Activity Costs. The Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol.14(No.4), pp.39-45.
Moss, Hollye Kay. (2002). The application of the theory of constraints in service firms. (Ph.D. dissertation), Clemson University, South Carolina, United States.
Noreen, E., Smith, D., & Macke, J. T. (1995). The Theory of Constraints and Its Implications for Management Accounting. MA:North River Press Incm.
Reid, Richard A, & Cormier, James A. (2003). Applying the TOC TP: A case study in the service sector. Managing Service Quality, 13(5), 349-369.
Sambasivan, Murali, & Soon, Yau Wen. (2007). Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), 517-526.
Shi, G., Chang, S.-H., & Zhang, W. (2010). Challenges of Beijing road transportation system: An extended application of TOC think processes. Paper presented at the The 3rd International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE), Miami, Florida USA.
Swain, Monte, & Bell, Jan. (2002). The theory of constraints and throughput accounting.
王心怡. (2006). 成本與管理會計: 三民書局.
王銘祿. (2006). 限制理論之有效產出運用於成本管制之探討. (碩士), 逢甲大學, 台中市.
李昆憲. (2006). 限制理論應用與IC TRAY銷售策略之研究. (碩士), 交通大學, 新竹市.
李虹慧. (2005). 以產出為基準的決策支援系統. (碩士), 交通大學, 新竹市.
李榮貴、張盛鴻. (2005). TOC限制理論-從有限到無限. 台北縣: 中國生產力中心.
林智崇. (2000). 限制理論產出會計成本制度之探討與應用. (碩士), 交通大學, 新竹市.
馬嘉應. (2003). 成本與管理會計導論: 五南圖書出版公司.
高德拉特. (2002). 絕不是靠運氣:創造事業與人生的雙贏 (周怜利, Trans.). 台北市: 天下遠見.
陳杰聰. (2005). IC載板產業實施限制理論之績效評估─以景碩公司為例. (碩士), 淡江大學.
陳美月, 張中民, & 汪玉玫. (2007). 成本會計學管理決策與績效評估(下): 台灣西書出版社.
陳朝傑. (2007). 限制理論產出會計應用於訂單決策-以TFT LCD產業為例. (碩士), 交通大學, 新竹市.
黃運金. (2010). 以實務驗證TOC營運管理解決方案之可行性及有效性. (工業工程與管理學系博士論文), 國立交通大學, 新竹市.
維基百科. (2012). 一般公認會計原則. from http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%80%E8%88%AC%E5%85%AC%E8%AA%8D%E6%9C%83%E8%A8%88%E5%8E%9F%E5%89%87
劉興棟. (2000). 晶圓廠代工產品訂單組合策略研究. (碩士), 交通大學, 新竹市.
嚴永海, 張盛鴻, 杜瑩美, & 李榮貴. (2005). 限制理論在產品組合的應用─以導線架廠為例. 明新學報31期, 147-160.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top