跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/01 16:50
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:唐自鶴
論文名稱:玻璃纖維/聚丙烯複合材料/發泡鋁夾層結構靜態與疲勞彎矩強度之實驗與分析
論文名稱(外文):Experimental Analysis on Static and Fatigue Bending Strengths of Glass-Polypropylene Composite/Aluminum Foam Sandwich Structures
指導教授:任貽明
指導教授(外文):Yi-Ming Jen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣海洋大學
系所名稱:機械與機電工程學系
學門:工程學門
學類:機械工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:99
中文關鍵詞:聚丙烯玻璃纖維發泡鋁破壞形式三明治夾層結構靜態疲勞
外文關鍵詞:polypropyleneglass fiberaluminum foamfailure modesandwich structurestaticfatigue
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:637
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:125
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本篇論文中,將針對Alporas封閉式發泡鋁之芯材及平衡編織式玻璃纖維/聚丙烯預浸材之面板製作的三明治夾層樑試片進行四點彎矩之靜態、疲勞實驗與分析,以實驗方法探討其在承受彎矩負載下之靜態及疲勞強度。面板疊層方向、芯材厚度以及面板厚度為此實驗之變數。理論上有五種特徵破壞模式,例如:面板伸破壞、局部壓痕破壞及三種芯材剪切破壞,可從理論求得。在五種臨界負載值中最小值對應之破壞模式,此數值為三明治夾層樑在靜態彎矩測試之預測極限負載。此外,冪定律被用來描述最大施加負載與疲勞壽命之間的關係。在本論文中也探討了面板疊層方向之影響、芯材高度及面板厚度之研究。紀錄夾頭位移量與討論由負荷控制之疲勞壽命過程。三明治夾層樑靜態實驗中,芯材厚度越厚其極限負載越高,因為可承受之剪應力最高。實驗結果表示位移範圍幾乎保持不變直到最終疲勞壽命,這意味著大部分的疲勞壽命是花在損傷形成。三明治夾層試片疲勞實驗之最大負載-疲勞壽命曲線圖決定係數皆於0.79以上,表示實驗數據點與擬合直線接近。
In this thesis, the static and bending fatigue strengths of the sandwich beams with glass/polypropylene laminate faces and aluminum foam core were experimentally analyzed. The ply directions of the laminate faces, the core heights, and the face thicknesses were considered as the variables in the experimental program. The critical loads for five considered characteristic failure mode, i.e., face failure, local indentation, and three types of core shear failure, were obtained theoretically. The minimum critical load among the five critical loads corresponding to the five failure modes is the predicted ultimate load for the studied sandwich beams under static bending tests. Furthermore, the power-law model was employed to describe the relationship between the maximum applied loads and the fatigue life data. The effects of the ply directions of the faces, the core heights, and the face thicknesses on the fatigue strength of the studied sandwich beams were also discussed in this thesis. The displacement behavior of the crosshead was recorded and discussed during the load-controlled fatigue life history. Sandwich beam static test, the thicker the core of its limit load is higher, because of the shear stress can withstand the highest. Experimental results show that the displacement range almost remained constant until the final stage of the fatigue test, implying the majority of the fatigue life was spent in the damage initiation. Sandwich specimen fatigue test of the maximum load - fatigue life curve coefficients of determination are carried out in 0.79 above, which means that the experimental data points and fitting close to a straight line.
摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 III
圖目次 V
表目次 IX
符號說明 X
第一章 序論 1
1-1 前言 1
1-2 研究內容 1
1-3 本文架構 1
第二章 文獻回顧 2
2-1 三明治夾層樑之靜態強度分析 2
2-2 三明治夾層樑之疲勞強度分析 5
第三章 靜態行為之理論推導 9
3-1 彈性勁度 9
3-2 三明治夾層樑之靜態破壞模式 9
3-2.1 面板靜態破壞 9
3-2.2 局部壓痕靜態破壞 10
3-2.3 芯材剪切A模式靜態破壞 10
3-2.4 芯材剪切B模式靜態破壞 11
3-2.5 芯材剪切AB模式靜態破壞 11
第四章 實驗內容及程序 19
4-1 材料與試片製作 19
4-1.1 面板製作 19
4-1.2 三明治夾層樑試片製作 19
4-2 三明治夾層樑試片承受四點彎矩之靜態實驗 20
4-3 三明治夾層樑試片承受四點彎矩之疲勞實驗 20
第五章 結果與討論 25
5-1 三明治夾層樑試片靜態實驗結果 25
5-2 三明治夾層樑各種變數負載-位移圖之比較 26
5-3 極限負載與勁度之預測結果 27
5-4 三明治夾層樑試片之疲勞實驗結果 27
5-5 三明治夾層樑試片之疲勞實驗最大負載-疲勞壽命曲線圖及負荷階-疲勞壽命曲線圖 28
5-6 三明治夾層樑試片之疲勞實驗位移-週次圖 28
5-7 三明治夾層樑各種變數之最大負載-疲勞壽命曲線圖比較 29
5-8 三明治夾層樑各種變數之負荷階-疲勞壽命曲線圖比較 29
第六章 結論 83
參考文獻 84


1. C. Chen, A-M Harte and N.A. Fleck,“The plastic collapse of sandwich beams with a metallic foam core,ˮ International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 43,Iss. 6,pp. 1483-1506, 2001.
2. O. Kesler, L.J. Gibson,“Size effects in metallic foam core sandwich beams,ˮ Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 326, Iss. 2, pp. 228–234, 2002.
3. H. Bart-Smith, J.W. Hutchinson, N.A. Fleck, A.G. Evans,“Influence of imperfections on the performance of metal foam core sandwich panels,ˮ International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 39, Iss. 19, pp. 4999–5012, 2002.
4. V. S. Sokolinsky , H. Shen, L. Vaikhanski, S. R. Nutt,“Experimental and analytical study of nonlinear bending response of sandwich beams,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 60, Iss. 2, pp. 219–229, 2003.
5. G. Belingardi, M.P. Cavatorta, R. Duella,“Material characterization of a composite–foam sandwich for the front structure of a high speed train,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 61, Iss. 1-2, pp. 13–25, 2003.
6. C. A. Steeves, N. A. Fleck,“Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending. Part II: experimental investigation and numerical modelling,ˮ International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 46, Iss. 4, pp. 585–608, 2004.
7. J.B. Sha, T.H. Yip,“In situ surface displacement analysis on sandwich and multilayer beams composed of aluminum foam core and metallic face sheets under bending loading,ˮ Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 386, Iss. 1-2, pp. 91–103, 2004.
8. V.L. Tagarielli, N.A. Fleck, V.S. Deshpande,“Collapse of clamped and simply supported composite sandwich beams in three-point bending,ˮ Composites: Part B, Vol. 35, Iss. 6-8, pp. 523–534, 2004.
9. K. Mohan, Y.T. Hon, S. Idapalapati, H.P. Seow,“Failure of sandwich beams consisting of alumina face sheet and aluminum foam core in bending,ˮ Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 409, Iss. 1-2, pp. 292–301, 2005.
10. M. Styles, P. Compston, S. Kalyanasundaram,“The effect of core thickness on the flexural behaviour of aluminium foam sandwich structures,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 80, Iss. 4, pp. 532–538, 2007.
11. D. Schwingela, H.-W. Seeligera, C. Vecchionaccib, D. Alwesc, J. Dittrichc,“Aluminium foam sandwich structures for space applications,ˮ Acta Astronautica, Vol. 61, Iss. 1-6, pp. 326–330, 2007.
12. A. Russo, B. Zuccarello,“Experimental and numerical evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of GFRP sandwich panels,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 81, Iss. 4, pp. 575–586, 2007.
13. A.G. Mamalis, K.N. Spentzas, N.G. Pantelelis, D.E. Manolakos, M.B. Ioannidis,“A new hybrid concept for sandwich structures,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 83, Iss. 4, pp. 335–340, 2008.
14. N.O. Cabrera, B. Alcock, T. Peijs,“Design and manufacture of all-PP sandwich panels based on co-extruded polypropylene tapes,ˮ Composites: Part B, Vol. 39, Iss. 7-8, pp. 1183–1195, 2008.
15. M. Styles, P. Compston, S. Kalyanasundaram,“Finite element modelling of core thickness effects in aluminium foam/composite sandwich structures under flexural loading,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 86, Iss. 7-8, pp. 227–232, 2008.
16. M. Johannes, J. Jakobsen, O.T. Thomsen, E. Bozhevolnaya,“Examination of the failure of sandwich beams with core junctions subjected to in-plane tensile loading,ˮ Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 69, Iss. 9, pp. 1447–1457, 2009.
17. A. Henao, M. Carrera, A. Miravete, L. Castejon,“Mechanical performance of through-thickness tufted sandwich structures,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 92, Iss. 9, pp. 2052–2059, 2010.
18. V.L. Tagarielli, V.S. Deshpande, N.A. Fleck,“Prediction of the dynamic response of composite sandwich beams under shock loading,ˮ International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 37, Iss. 7, pp. 854–864, 2010.
19. Jiang-bo SHA, T. H. YIP, M. H. TEO,“FEM modelling of single-core sandwich and 2-core multilayer beams containing foam aluminum core and metallic face sheets under monolithic bending,ˮ Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, Vol. 21, Iss. 2, pp. 127-138, 2011.
20. J.A.M. Ferreira a, J.D.M. Costa, P.N.B. Reis,“Static and fatigue behaviour of glass-fibre-reinforced polypropylene composites,ˮ Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 31, Iss. 1, pp. 67-74, 1999.
21. M. Burman and D. Zenkert,“Fatigue of foam core sandwich beams—1: undamaged specimens,ˮ International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 19, Iss. 7, pp. 551–561, 1997.
22. M. Burman and D. Zenkert,“Fatigue of foam core sandwich beams—2: effect of initial damage,ˮ International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 19, Iss. 7, pp. 563–578, 1997.
23. H. Judawisastra, J. Ivens, I. Verpoest,“The fatigue behaviour and damage development of 3D woven sandwich composites,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 43, Iss. 1, pp. 35-45, 1998.
24. S.D. Clark, R.A. Shenoi, H.G. Allen,“Modelling the fatigue behaviour of sandwich beams under monotonic, 2-step and block-loading regimes,ˮ Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 59, Iss. 4, pp. 471-486, 1999.
25. A.-M. Harte, N.A. Fleck, and M.F. Ashby,“Sandwich Panel Design Using Aluminum Alloy Foam,ˮ Advanced Engineering Materials, Vol. 2, Iss. 4, pp. 219-222, 2000.
26. A.-M. Harte, N.A. Fleck, M.F. Ashby,“The fatigue strength of sandwich beams with an aluminium alloy foam core,ˮ International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, pp. 499–507, 2001.
27. T. Beck, D. Lohe, and F. Baumgartner,“The fatigue behavior of an aluminium foam sandwich beam under alternating bending,ˮ Advanced engineering materials, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, pp. 787-790, 2002.
28. . N. Kulkarni, H. Mahfuz, S. Jeelani, L.A. Carlsson,“Fatigue crack growth and life prediction of foam core sandwich composites under flexural loading,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 59, Iss. 4, pp. 499–505, 2003.
29. A. El Mahi, M. Khawar Farooq, S. Sahraoui, A. Bezazi,“Modelling the flexural behaviour of sandwich composite materials under cyclic fatigue,ˮ Materials and Design, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, pp. 199–208, 2004.
30. K. Kanny, H. Mahfuz,“Flexural fatigue characteristics of sandwich structures at different loading frequencies,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 67, Iss. 3, pp. 403–410, 2005.
31. E. Bozhevolnaya, O.T. Thomsen,“Structurally graded core junctions in sandwich beams: fatigue loading conditions,ˮ Composite Structures, Vol. 70, Iss. 1, pp. 12–23, 2005.
32. A. Bezazi, S.G. Pierce, K. Worden, El H. Harkati,“Fatigue life prediction of sandwich composite materials under flexural tests using a Bayesian trained artificial neural network,ˮ International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 29, Iss. 4, pp. 738–747, 2007.
33. D. Zenkert, M. Burman,“Failure mode shifts during constant amplitude fatigue loading of GFRP/foam core sandwich beams,ˮ International Journal of Fatigue, , Vol. 33, Iss. 2, pp. 217–222, 2011.
34. Chemami, K. Bey, J. Gilgert, Z. Azari,“Behaviour of composite sandwich foam-laminated glass/epoxy under solicitation static and fatigue,ˮ Composites: Part B, Vol. 43, Iss. 2, pp. 1178–1184, 2012.
35. 葉昱廷,碩士論文-封閉式發泡鋁拉伸、壓縮及剪切性質之實驗與分析,基隆市:國立台灣海洋大學,2012。

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 以有限元素法分析混合負載模式彎矩下玻璃纖維/聚丙烯/發泡鋁夾層樑之界面裂縫行為
2. 以發泡鋁/玻璃纖維強化聚丙烯積層板製作三明治結構二階段累積彎矩疲勞強度之實驗與分析
3. 利用混合負載模式彎矩法分析玻璃纖維/聚丙烯/發泡鋁夾層樑之界面裂縫行為
4. 溫濕度效應對發泡鋁/玻璃纖維強化聚丙烯積層板三明治結構彎矩疲勞強度之影響
5. 同時添加碳奈米管及石墨烯微片對環氧樹脂複合材料疲勞裂縫成長行為之影響
6. 同時添加碳奈米管及石墨烯微片對環氧樹脂複合材料靜態及疲勞強度之影響
7. 封閉式發泡鋁拉伸、壓縮及剪切性質之實驗與分析
8. 碳奈米管/環氧樹脂複合材料兩階段累積疲勞壽命之實驗與分析
9. 鋁合金蜂巢板承受彎矩負荷下之靜態及疲勞強度實驗與分析
10. 利用有限元素分析軸—銷—套筒組合件之接觸疲勞壽命
11. 添加碳奈米管及石墨烯微片於基材中對碳纖維/環氧樹脂複合材料拉伸疲勞性質之影響
12. 同時添加碳奈米管及石墨烯微片對環氧樹脂複合材料在不同溫度下疲勞強度的協同效應
13. 不同溫度下碳奈米管/石墨烯微片/環氧樹脂/複合材料靜態拉伸性質之實驗與分析
14. 預置水中效應對鋁合金蜂巢夾層結構靜態及疲勞強度影響之研究
15. 鋁合金蜂巢夾層板承受週次彎矩負荷下殘餘機械性質之實驗與分析