中文部分
王保進（2003）。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究（二版）。台北：心理。
王保進（2004）。多變量分析套裝程式與資料分析。台北：高等教育。
白孟巧（2010）。評量調整措施對學習障礙學生閱讀理解評量表現之影響。未出版之
碩士論文，國立台中教育大學特殊教育學系碩士班，台中。
何華國（2001）。特殊兒童心理與教育（三版）。台北：五南。
余民寧（2005）。教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量。台北：心理。
余民寧（2008）。教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量（二版）。台北：心理。
吳明隆（2009）。結構方程模式AMOS的操作與應用（二版）。台北：五南。
李佳玲（2010）。學校段考試題之全方位設計評估：以國小自然與生活科技為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系碩士班，嘉義。李茂能（2007）。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。台北：心理。
孟瑛如（2010）。看見特殊，看見潛能－特殊生教師家長貼心手冊。台北：心理。
林筱汶、陳明聰（2006）。語音調整策略對不同能力學生數學文字題解題表現成效之研究。載於嘉義大學特殊教育學系主編，國立嘉義大學2006年特殊教育國際學術研討會論文集（頁113-131）。嘉義：國立嘉義大學。
邱皓政（2005）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北：五南。
柯華葳（1999）。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。行政院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作小組。
洪碧霞、林素微、江秋坪、張秋芳（1996）。國民小學三、四年級數學標準參照測驗題庫建立之研究。測驗年刊，43，81-102。胡永崇（2005）。學習障礙學生的評量調整措施。屏師特殊教育，10，1-9。涂釋仁（2006年1月24日）。國文教育::>_<::考試目標是什麼？聯合報，第十五版。
國立教育研究院籌備處（主編）（2009）。國民小學數學教師手冊第七冊。臺南市：翰林出版事業股份有限公司。
康軒文教事業（2003）。國小數學教師手冊第八冊。台北市：康軒文教事業股份有限公司。
張春興（1992）。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華書局。
張惠娟（2009）。全方位設計評量試題編製檢核表建構之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系碩士班，嘉義。教育部（2007）。國民小學及國民中學學生成績評量準則。2007年5月1日教育部台參字第0960061341C號令修正公布。
教育部（2009）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域。台北：教育部。
郭生玉（1996）。心理與教育測驗（第十版）。台北：精華書局。
陳明聰、張靖卿（2004）。特殊教育工作者對身心障礙學生測驗調整意見之調查研究。特殊教育與復健學報，12，55-80。陳寬裕、王正華（2010）。結構方程模型分析實務AMOS的運用。台北：五南。
曾思瑜（2003）。從「無障礙設計」到「通用設計」—美日兩國無障礙環境理念變遷與發展過程。設計學報，8（2），57-76。鈕文英（2009）。特殊學生合理教學評量調整決策流程之建構。載於中華民國特殊教育學會（主編），成長與茁壯——中華民國特殊教育學會2009年刊（171-204頁）。彰化：編者。
黃巧雲、陳明聰、陳政見（2007）。語音合成與人工錄音對國小高年級低閱讀能力學生數學文字題解題表現差異之研究。載於台東大學特殊教育學系主編，特殊教育學術研討會論文集（頁81-106）。台東：國立台東教育大學特殊教育學系。
黃芳銘（2002）。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北：五南。
楊順惠（2005）。九年一貫課程實施前後對數學能力的影響分析－以高雄市為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立中山大學社會科學院高階公共政策碩士學程碩士在職專班碩士論文，高雄。楊瑞智（1998）。國小數學實驗課程整數乘除算則的教材處理。載於台灣省國民學校教師研習會（主編），國民小學數學科新課程概說（高年級）（頁98-113）。台北：台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
劉亭妤、陳明聰、陳政見（2008）。不同電腦化試題呈現方式對國小五年級學生在自然科成就測驗表現影響之研究 。載於台東大學特殊教育學系，特殊教育學術研討會論文集（頁47-54）。台東：國立台東教育大學特殊教育學系。
翰林主編（2008）。國民小學數學指引第八冊。臺南市：翰林出版事業股份有限公司。
總統府（2009）。特殊教育法。台北市：總統府。
謝秋梅（2004）。考試調整對學習障礙學生考試表現之探討。台東特教，20，59-65。謝堅（2000）。實驗課程中四則運算教材的設計。載於台灣省國民學校教師研習會（主編），國民小學數學科新課程概說（高年級）（頁78-97）。台北：台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
鍾素香（2002）。彈性調整考試評量方式是否落實於學習障礙學生（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告編號：NSC90-2413-H-110-003）。台北：中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。
羅啟宏（1992）。臺灣省均衡地方發展之研究。未出版之碩士論文，中國文化大學地學研究所，桃園。外文部分
Beddow, P. A., Kettler, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2007). Item accessibility and modification
guide. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. Retrieved August 20, 2010 from the
World Wide Web:
http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/Documents/pdf/LSI/Item_Accessibility_and_Modificati
on_Guide.pdf.
Bernacchio, C., & Mullen, M. (2007). Universal Design for Learning. Education & Training, 31(2), 167-169.
Bolt, S. E. (2004). Using DIF analyses to examine several commonly-held beliefs about testing accommodations for students with disabilities. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA. Retrieved August 20, 2010 from the World Wide Web:
http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/Presentations/NCME04bolt.pdf.
Bolt, S. E., & Thurlow, M. L. (2004). Five of the most frequently allowed testing accommodations in state policy. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 141-152.
Bolt, S. E., & Thurlow, M. L. (2006). Item-level effects of the read-aloud accommodation for students with reading disabilities (Synthesis Report 65). Paper presented at the National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED495897).
Brown, P. J., & Augustine, A. (2001). Screen reading software as an assessment accommodation: Implications for instruction and student performance. Paper
presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2010). Perspectives on large-scale assessment, universal design, and universal design for learning. MA: CAST. Retrieved August 27, 2010 from the World Wide Web:
http://www.cast.org/publications/statements/assessment/index.html.
Council of chief state school officers. (2003a). Quality control checklist for Procession, Scoring, and Reporting. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 29, 2010 from
the World Wide Web:
http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2003/Quality_Control_Checklist_Scoring_2003.pdf.
Council of chief state school officers. (2003b). Quality control checklist for item development and test form construction. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August
29, 2010 from the World Wide Web:
http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/ItemandTestDevQCChklst.pdf.
Clauser, B. E., & Mazor, K. M. (1998). Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,
17(1), 31-44.
Dolan, R. P., Hall, T. E., Banerjee, M., Chun, E., & Strangman, N. (2005). Applying principles of universal design to test delivery: The effect of computer-based
read-aloud on test performance of high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(7). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ848517).
Eagleton, M. B. (2008). Universal design for learning. Retrieved August 23, 2010 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ebscohost.com/uploads/thisTopic-dbTopic-1073.pdf.
Elbaum, B. (2007). Effects of an oral testing accommodation on the mathematics performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 40(4), 218-229.
Elliot, S. N., & Roach, A. T. (2002). The impact of providing testing accommodations to students with disabilities. New Orleans, LA: Annual Convention of American Educational Research Association.
Elliot, J., Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., & Erickson, R. (1997). Providing Assessment Accommodations for Students with Disabilities in State and District Assessment.
(NCEO Policy Directions/Issue 7). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Boudousquie, A., Copeland, K., Young, V., Kalinowski, S., & Vaughn, S. (2006). Effects of Accommodations on High-Stakes Testing for Students With Reading Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(2), 136-150.
Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., O'Malley, K., Copeland,K., Mehta, P., Caldwell, C. J., Kalinowski, S., Young, V., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Effects of a Bundled Accommodations Package on High-Stakes Testing for Middle School Students
with Reading Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75(4), 447-463.
Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Practice, 16, 174-181.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Capizzi, A. M. (2005). Identifying appropriate test accommodations for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(6), 1-9.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Eaton, S. B., Hamlett, C., Binkley, E., & Crouch, R. (2000). Using objective data sources to enhance teacher judgments about test
accommodations. Exceptional Children, 67, 67-81.
Hambelton, R. K., & Rogers, H. J. (1995). Item Bias Review. ERIC/AE Digest. Retrieved August 3, 2010 from the World Wide Web: http://www.edmeasurement.net/resources/itembias.html.
Hanna, E. I. (2005). Inclusive design for maximum accessibility: a practical approach to universal design. (PEM Research Report 05-04). Retrieved August 3, 2010 from
the World Wide Web:
http://www.pemsolutions.com/downloads/research/PracAppUnivDesign_rr0504.pdf.
Helwig, R., & Tindal, G. (2003). An Experimental Analysis of Accommodation Decisions on Large-Scale Mathematics Tests. Exceptional Children, 69(2), 211-225.
Helwig, R., Rozek-Tedesco, M. A., & Tindal, G. (2002). An oral versus a standard administration of a large-scale mathematics test. Journal of Special Education, 36(1),
39–47.
Huynh, H., & Barton, K. (2006). Performance of students with disabilities under regular and oral administration of a high stakes reading examination. Applied Measurement in
Education, 19, 21-39.
Huynh, H., Meyer, J. P., & Gallant, D. J. (2004). Comparability of Student Performance Between Regular and Oral Administrations for a High-Stakes Mathematics Test.
Applied Measurement in Education, 17(1), 39-57.
Johnson, E. S. (2000). The Effects of Accommodations on Performance Assessments. Remedial And Special Education, 21(5), 261-267.
Johnstone, C. J. (2003). Improving validity of large-scale tests: Universal design and student performance (Technical Report 37). Minneapolis, MN: University of Johnstone, C. J., Altman, J., & Thurlow, M. L. (2006). A state guide to the development of universally designed assessments. Paper presented at the National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED495885).
Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (1997). Psychological testing: principles, applications, and issues (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Ketterlin-Geller, L., Yovanoff, P., & Tindal, G. (2007). Developing a new paradigm for conducting research on accommodations in mathematics testing. Exceptional Children, 73, 331-347.
Kim, D.H., Schneider, C., & Siskind, T. (2009). Examining Equivalence of Accommodations on a Statewide Elementary Level Science Test. Applied Measurement in Education, 22, 144-163.
Kosciolek, S., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2000). Effects of a reading accommodation on the validity of a reading test (Technical Report 28). Minneapolis, MN: University of
Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved August 27, 2010 from the World Wide Web:
http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Technica128.htm.
Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97–114.
Laitusis, C. C. (2010). Examining the impact of audio presentation on tests of reading comprehension, Applied Measurement in Education, 23, 153-167.
Lerner, J. W., & Johns, B. (2009). Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities (eleventh edition). Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
Mayer, R. E.(1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York:Freeman.
McLaughlin, M. J., & Nolet, V. (2004). What every principal needs to know about special education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
McKevitt, B. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2003). Effects and Perceived Consequences of Using Read-Aloud and Teacher-Recommended Testing Accommodations on a Reading
Achievement Test. School Psychology Review, 32(4),583-600.
Meloy, L. L., Deville, C., & Frisbie, D. A. (2002). The effect of a read-aloud accommodation on test scores of students with and without a learning disability in
reading. Remedial and Special Education, 23 (4), 248-255.
National Center on Educational Outcomes (2010). Universally Designed Assessments. University of Minnesota: National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved August 27, 2010 from the World Wide Web:
http://www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/TopicAreas/UnivDesign/UnivDesignTopic.htm.
National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2000). Principals and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved May 30, 2010 from the World Wide Web:
http://standards.nctm.org/.
Nichols, P., Harms, M., & Walsh, C. (2006). Universal design. Retrieved May 30, 2010 from the World Wide Web:
http://www.pemsolutions.com/downloads/BULLET1_0606.pdf.
Ofiesh, N., Rojas, C., & Ward, R. (2006). Universal design and the assessment of student learning in higher education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(2), 173-181.
Phillips, S. E. (1994). High-stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(2), 93-120.
Popham, W. J. (2006). Mastering Assessment: A self-service system for educators. New York: Routledge.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Russell, M., Hoffmann, T., & Higgins, J. (2009). A universally designed test delivery
system. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 42(2), 6-12.
Sireci, S. G., Li, S., & Scarpati, S. (2005). Test accommodation for students with disabilities: an analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational
Research, 75(5), 457-490.
Spinelli, C. G. (2005). Classroom Assessment for Students in Special and General Education. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Susan, C. (2002). A Primer on Ways To Explore Item Bias. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED463307).
Thurlow, M. L., Elliott, J. L., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2002). Testing students with disabilities. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Thompson, S. J., Johnstone, C. J., Anderson, M. E., & Miller, N. A. (2005). Considerations for the development and review of universally designed assessments
(Technical Report 42). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved August 27, 2010 from the World Wide Web:
http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Technical42.htm.
Thompson, S. J., Johnstone, C. J., & Thurlow, M. L. (2002). Universal design applied to large scale assessments (Synthesis Report 44). Minneapolis, MN: Universal of
Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 3, 2010 from the World Wide Web:
http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis44.html.
Thompson, S. & Thurlow, M. (2002). Universal design assessments: Better tests for everyone! (Policy Directions No. 14). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota,
National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 3, 2010 from the World Wide Web: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Policy14.htm.
Tindal, G. (2002). Accommodating mathematics testing using a videotaped read aloud administration. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Tindal, G., Heath, B., Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P., & Harniss, M. (1998). Accommodating Students with Disabilities on Large-Scale Tests: An Experimental Study. Exceptional Children, 64(4), 439-450.
Wainer, H., & Braun, H. I. (Eds.). (1988). Test validity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weston, T. J. (2002) The Validity of Oral Accommodation in Testing. NAEP Validity Studies.
Wolf, M. K., Griffin, N., Kao, J. C., Chang, S. M., & Rivera, N. M. (2009). Connecting policy to practice: Accommodations in states’ large-scale math assessments for
English language learners (CRESST Report 765). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). Retrieved March 23, 2011 from the World Wide Web:
http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED507755.pdf.
Zuriff, G. E. (2000). Extra examination time for students with learning disabilities: An examination of the maximum potential thesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(1), 99-117.