跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.223) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/08 13:10
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡味娟
研究生(外文):Tsai wei-chuan
論文名稱:自主管理對醫院經營策略及管理之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Impact of Hospital-based Budget Payment on Hospitals' Operation Strategies and Management
指導教授:蔡文正蔡文正引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tsai wen-chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中國醫藥大學
系所名稱:醫務管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:醫管學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:84
中文關鍵詞:醫院自主管理總額預算管理策略
外文關鍵詞:Hospital-Based Self-ManagementHospital-Based Global BudgetStrategic Management
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:607
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:141
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
摘 要
目的:全民健保實施至今,健保局為確保醫療品質,降低醫療成本,及不影響民眾就醫的權益下,提出了自主管理方案,本研究希望了解醫院是、否加入自主管理對醫院成本控制與相關管理策略及顧客導向的因應情形,以探討醫院總額支付制度下,醫院自主管理對於醫院管理的影響。
方法:本研究之對象為醫院評鑑合格之教學醫院,以結構式問卷對樣本醫院進行調查,回收有效問卷60份。本研究除了以描述性統計分析與雙變項分析探討醫院自主管理各項因應策略的意向程度,同時以複迴歸分析,探討醫院自主管理對於醫院相關管理策略之影響,以及其他影響醫院管理策略之因素。
結果:在總額預算制度下,超過一半以上的醫院有參與自主管理之經驗。目前加入自主管理醫院相對於從未加入自主管理醫院在「加強財務及成本管理」策略意向上是較高的。目前加入自主管理醫院相對於從未加入自主管理醫院「顧客導向」策略上有較高的意向。醫學中心和區域醫院相對於地區教學醫院在「增加收入策略」方面意向是較高的。私人醫院相對於公立醫院在「增加收入策略」方面是有顯著的。有設立分院之醫院相對於無設立分院之醫院在「合作性策略」方面有顯著的負相關。在31項策略中最被認同的是「成本意識的建立及內化」,最不被認同採用的是「避免疾病較嚴重者」策略。
結論與建議:整體來說醫院加入自主管理後,醫院在民眾醫療品質及醫院成本控制提昇方面是有較高的意向。因此本研究建議:(1) 醫院在控制成本下應考量對病患權益的影響。(2)醫院應更加強醫療品質相關策略重視程度。(3)對衛生主管機關則建議應留意自主管理對台灣醫療技術水準之發展及醫療生態的改變。

關鍵詞:醫院自主管理、總額預算、管理策略
Abstract
Objectives: To ensure the medical quality, cope with the financial shortfalls, and maintain comprehensive medical benefits to the public, the Bureau of National Health Insurance implemented the hospital-based budget payment (HBBP) program. The purpose of this research is to examine whether joining the HBBP program will affect a hospital’s cost control, customer service, and relative operating strategies. This study further explores the impact of the HBBP program, under the global budget reimbursement system, on the management strategies of participating hospitals.

Method: Using all accredited teaching hospital as a target, sixty hospitals responded to our structural questionnaire. In addition to applying descriptive statistics and multi variable analyses to measure the degrees of intentions for all adjustment strategies regarding the HBBP program, this study employs multiple regressions to explore the influence of HBBP and other related factors on managerial strategies.

Results: Under the global budget reimbursement system, there are more than half of the sample hospitals which have had the experiences of participating in the HBBP program. HBBP- participating hospitals have higher strategic intentions on strengthening financial and cost managements and customer-oriented strategy than those which never enroll in the HBBP program. Relative to local community teaching hospitals, academic medical centers and metropolitan hospitals have higher degrees of intentions for revenue-increasing strategies. Compared with private hospitals, public hospitals also show a higher degree of intention toward revenue-increasing strategies. There exists a negative relationship on the cooperative strategy between sample hospitals with branches and those without branches. Among thirty-one surveyed strategies, the strategy of establishing and internalizing cost consciousness earns the highest consensus, while the strategy of avoiding the catastrophic illness has the lowest consensus.
Conclusions: Overall, this study finds that after joining the HBBP program, the sample hospitals had a higher intention to enhance medical quality to the public and increase cost controls. Therefore, we suggest that: (1) While pursuing cost controls, hospitals should take patients’ rights and benefits into considerations. (2) Hospitals need to pay more attention to the related strategies of improving medical quality. (3) Health service authorities need to observe the effect of the HBBP program on the development of Taiwan medical processes and the allocation of medical resources.

Keywords: Hospital-Based Self-Management, Hospital-Based Global Budget, Strategic Management
目 錄

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景---------------------------------01
第二節 研究目的---------------------------------04
第二章 文獻探討--------------------------------05
第一節 全民健保支付制度--------------------------05
第二節 醫院自主管理之沿革-------------------08
第三節 加拿大之全民健保--------------------------12
第四節 支付制度對醫療服務型態之影響---------------14
第五節 近年來台灣醫療生態之變化-------------------19
第六節 醫療院所因應總額預算的可能方式--------------26
第七節 文獻探討總結------------------------------32
第三章 研究設計與研究方法------------------------33
第一節 研究流程與研究架構-------------------------33
第二節 資料來源與資料分析--------------------35
第三節 變項操作型定義----------------------------37
第四節 統計分析方法服務型態之影響------------------39


第四章 研究結果--------------------------------42
第一節 描述性統計分析----------------------------42
第二節 推論性統計分析分析--------------------45
第五章 討論------------------------------------51
第一節 醫院總額制度下醫院管理策略認同差異探討--------51
第二節 運用改變服務量策略之差異探討------------53
第三節 加強財務成本管理策略之差異探討---------------56
第四節 增加收入策略之差異探討-----------------59
第五節 合作性策略之差異探討------------------------61
第六節 顧客導向策略之差異探討-----------------63
第六章 結論(與建議)-----------------------------64
第一節 結論--------------------------------------64
第二節 建議---------------------------------66
第三節 研究限制-----------------------------------67

參考文獻-----------------------------------------78

附錄一 「調查醫院自主管理的相關因應管理策」問卷------84
附錄二 問卷效度之專家名單------------------------86


表圖目錄
表2-1 醫院卓越計劃與自主管理之比較--------------------9
表2-2 台灣地區醫院與診所家數------------------------20
表2-3 歷年來醫院歇業及新設情形-----------------------22
表3-1 醫院特質變項名稱及操作型定義-------------------37
表3-2 醫院對自主管理策略之意願變項名稱及操作型定義-----38
表4-1 樣本醫院基本特性之描述性分析-------------------68
表4-2 各項策略同意程度分數之描述性分析---------------69
表4-3 參與自主管理情形與樣本醫院基本特性卡方分析表-----70
表4-4 各項策略同意程度分數比較—依自主管理狀態區分表---71
表4-5 各項策略同意程度分數比較—依醫院層級區分---------72
表4-6 各項策略同意程度分數比較—依醫院屬性區分---------73
表4-7 各項策略同意程度分數比較—依是否有分院區---------74
表4-8 各項策略同意程度分數比較—依是否有聯盟醫院區分---75
表4-9 皮爾森相關分析-----------------------------------76
表4-10 各因應管理策略之複迴歸分析-----------------------77

圖2-1 台灣地區醫院與診所家數趨勢圖------------------22
圖2-2 歷年來醫院歇業及新設趨勢----------------------23

圖2-3 歷年來醫院與診所醫師數------------------------23
圖2-4 歷年不同層級醫院家數--------------------------24
圖2-5 歷年不同層級醫院病床數------------------------25
圖3-1 本研究流程------------------------------------33
圖3-2 本研究之研究架構------------------------------34
參考文獻
一、英文部份
Bishop CE, Wallack SS. National health expenditure limits: The case for a global budget process. Mile and Quarterly 1996; 74: 361-76.

Burns LR, Bazzoli GJ, Dynan L, Wholey DR. Managed Care, market stages, and integrated delivery systems: Is there a relationship? Health Affairs 1997; 16: 204-18.

Bell RA. Economics of MRI technology. Journal Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1996; 1: 10-25.

Boutwell RC, Mitchell JB. Diffusion of new technologies in the treatment of medicare population-Implications for patient access and program expenditures. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1993; 9: 62-75.

Bishai, David M , Lang, Hui Chu,. The willingness to pay for wait reduction:the disutility of queues for cataract surgery in Canada ,Denmark,and Spain. Journal of Health Economics 2000; 19(2): 219-30.

Burns LR, Bazzoli GJ, Dynan L, Wholey DR. Managed Care, market stages, and integrated delivery systems: Is there a relationship? Health Affairs. 1997; 16: 204-18

Conrad, D. A. Coordinating patient care services in regional health systems: The challenge of clinical integration. Hospital & Health Services administration, 1993; 38(4), 491-508.

Carr-Hill RA.Efficiency and equity implications of the health care reforms. Social Science & Medicine. 1994; 39: 1189-1201


Ensor T, Amannyazova B. Use of business planning methods to monitor global health budgets in Turkmenista. Bulletin of World Health Organization 2000; 78: 1045-53.

Etter JF, Perneger TV. Health care expenditures after introduction of a gatekeeper and a global budget in a Swiss health insurance plan. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 1998; 52: 370-76.

Gaynor M, Deborah WH. Change, Consolidation, and Competition in Health Care Market. Journal of Economic Perspective 1999; 13: 141-64.

Gill HS, Walter DB. Integrated Delivery System: Strategic implication of levels of care. Chicago: American Hospital Association 1995; P.1-21.

Gnyawali DR, Madhavan R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Journal 2001; 26: 431-45.

Halverson PK, Kaluzny AD et al. Strategic alliances in healthcare: opportunities for the Veterans Affairs healthcare system. Hospital Health Service Administration 1997; 42: 383-410.

Lin HC, Yang MC, Chen CC et al., Opinions of hospital administrators toward the prevalence of patient dumping in Taiwan. Chang Gung Medical Journal 2004; 27: 35-43

Leggat SG, Narine L, Lemieux-Charles L et al., A review of organizational performance assessment in health care. Health Services Management Research 1998; 11: 3-18.

Manton KG, Woodbury MA, Vertrress JC, Stallard E. Use of Medicare Services Before and After Introduction of the Prospective Payment System. Health Service Research. 1993; 28: 269-92

McEvily B, Zaheer A. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 1999; 20: 1133-56.

Michael JL, James DC, Richard PA et al., The effect of PPS on Hospital Product and productivity. Medical Care 1987; 25: 528-38.

McNamee P, Stearns SC, Aging, disability and long-term care expenditures. In: Scott A, Maynard A, Elliott R(editors). Advances in Health Economics. New York: J. Wiley. 2003.

Narver JC, Slater SF. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing 1990; October.

Nohria N, Garcia Pont. Global Strategic Linkages and Industry Structure Strategic Management Journal. 1991, 12, 105-24.

Oliver, C. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15(2), 241-265.

Prashant Kale. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital; Strategic Management Journal, Chichester; Mar 2000; 21, 3; 217

Raju PS, Lonial Subhash C, Gupta, Yash P. and Ziegler, Craig. The relationship between market orientation and performanve in the hospital industry: A structural equations modeling approach. Health care management science 2000; 237-47.

Ransom SB, McNeeley SG, Kruger ML, Doot G and Cotton DB. The effect of capitated and fee-for-service remuneration on physician decision making in gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May; 87(5 Pt 1): 707-10.

Sicotte C, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos AP et al., A conceptual framework for the analysis of health care organizations’ performance. Health Services Management Research. 1998; 11:24-41

Scott WR. Organizations “Rational, Natural, and Open System” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.

Shortell S, Kaluzny, A. Health care management: organisation design and behaviour. 3rd edition. Delmar Publishers, New York. 1994.


Tsai YF. Research on the Relationship Between Market Orientation and Service Quality—An Empirical Assessment of the Medical Industry in Central Taiwan. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge; 2003; 3, 1/2.

Terris MK. Global Budgeting and the control of hospital costs. Journal of Public Health Policy 1991; 12: 61-71.

Tucker LR, Zaremba RA, Ogilvie JR. Related Articles, Links Looking at innovative multihospital systems: how marketing differs. Journal of Health Care Marketing 1992; 12: 8-21.



















二、中文部份

中央健康保險局:全民健康保險統計,2004。

李佳珂、周思源:醫院自主管理操作實務-以中區分局為例。健康保險雜誌 2004;1;60-70。

李美英:全民健康保險競爭環境下醫療策略聯盟之研究。中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究所碩士論文 2000。

李玉春、林蕙卿:全民健保保險支付標準協商模式之檢討與改革之芻議。醫院,1996;29;1-9。

吳明彥:總額制度醫院個別總額預算自主管理之探討。醫院總額支付制度暨個別醫院總額自主管理之探討研討會。台中:中國醫藥大學附設醫院 2003。

張佳琪、黃文鴻:健保支付制度對全髖及全膝關節置換手術醫療利用情形之影響。中華衛誌 2001; 20(6): 413-22

徐享達:公立(營)機構績效不振因素分析兼論署立醫院突破困境因應之道
。醫務管理期刊2001; 2(3): 47-58

陳明進、黃崇謙:全民健保支付制度改變前後公立醫院與財團法人醫院服務量及醫療利益之比較。當代會計 2001; 2(2): 169-94

陳孝平:台灣全民健保問題之診斷與出路之探討。第二屆兩岸五地社會保障學術研討會。澳門:2002。

楊筱慧:在總額預算制度變遷中檢討醫院自主管理方案。國立中正大學社會福利系碩士論文2003。

劉見祥:全民健保支付制度之趨勢。醫院 1999;32:15-20。
盧瑞芬、謝啟瑞,醫療經濟學。學富出版社,2000。
謝啟瑞,健康經濟學。五南圖書出版有限公司,1996。

戴志展、王拔群、宋霖霏、郭乃文、蔡銘修、曾憲彰:鼻中膈鼻道成形術論病例計酬制實施之影響評估。中台灣醫學科學雜誌 2002; 7(3): 165-71

錢慶文、邱瓊慧:醫院因應外在環境變化之能力研究:以闌尾切除術實施論病例計酬制度為例。中華衛誌 1999;18(6):432-44
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top