臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著科技不斷的創新與資產設備投資相當的昂貴，產品公司將重心移轉至產品的設計與品牌的經營，形成目前全球專業分工的營運模式。產品的製造下單於產能服務廠商，接受其所給予的高品質代工服務，考慮到產能供應的品質與穩定性，大多委託給兩個或多個製造服務廠商，期望能爭取產能服務的時效與降低商機損失的風險。本文定義提供產能進行代工服務為一寡佔市場，以賽局理論分析在考量了產品公司的需求配給的思維後，雙佔產能服務廠商的產能競爭行為，並證明產品公司可透過需求配給機制的設立，提升產能服務廠商產能競爭的強度，進而得到更充裕的產能供應。由於雙重供應來源可提高產能供應的及時性與穩定性，因此需求配給機制的設立必須考慮到產業組織型態的維持。過度的配給調整，可能造成某一廠商經營上的困難，寧可退出市場或是尋找其他客戶，反而使產品公司陷入困境，因此本文為產品公司設計一個最有利的需求配給策略。

Work division in global manufacturing services nowadays necessitates the consideration of quality and stability of capacity supply. Dual or multiple sourcing is used in order to reduce the shock brought about by uncertain events. This study refers to manufacturing service firm as a duopoly industry. Competitive strategy analysis of duopoly manufacturing service firms is made under the consideration of product firms demand allocation point of view.
It is shown that, by setting the demand allocation policy, product firms can raise the coordinated source of capacity. Dual sourcing can increase timely and stable high level of capacity supply. Furthermore demand allocation policies must consider maintaining the type of industrial organization. Adjusting the demand allocation too much will make it difficult for firm’s survival. Therefore, a most favorable demand allocation policy for product firm is designed.

摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 III
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第一章 緒論 1
1.2研究動機 2
1.3問題描述與核心概念 5
1.4 問題定義 8
1.5 論文架構 9
第二章 文獻回顧 10
2.1 雙重供應來源 10
2.1.1前置時間的變異 11
2.1.2物料的品質不確定與動態事件的發生 13
2.1.3匯率波動具不確定性 15
2.2 以服務產能品質競爭的需求配給 17
2.2.1等候理論與rent-seeking game 17
2.2.2動態賽局與隨機過程 22
2.2.3 乘數與加法模型 24
2.2.3.2 雙佔廠商之需求乘數模型 25
第三章 產品公司與雙佔廠商互動模式 28
3.1 概念架構 28
3.2 產能的情境分析與配給調整邏輯 29
3.3 需求配給函式 33
3.3.1考慮最小批量的需求配給 33
3.3.2配給調整量的差距 37
3.3.3忽略最小批量的需求配給 38
3.4 雙佔廠商之競爭均衡 40
3.4.1 firm L 的反應函數 41
3.4.2 firm F 的反應函數 43
3.4.3 alpha對競爭均衡的影響 44
3.5 產品公司最佳決策 47
第四章 數值驗證與策略意涵 51
4.1 需求調整範圍與配給 51
4.2 競爭均衡與最佳 53
4.2.1 競爭均衡解 53
4.2.2 變動對於競爭均衡的影響與firm P 最佳 決策 54
第五章 結論與建議 59
5.1 研究結論與貢獻 59
5.2 未來研究方向 60
參考文獻 61
附錄 64

1.Agrwal, N., Nahmias, S. (1997), “Rationalization of the supplier base in the presence of yield uncertainty,” Production and operation management, Vol. 6(3), pp.291-308.
2.Barla, P. (2000), “ Firm size inequality and market power,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 18(5), pp.693-722.
3.Berger , P., Zeng, A. (2006), “single versus multiple sourcing in the presence of risks,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 57, pp.250–261.
4.Benjaafar, S., Elahi, E., Donohue, K. (2007), “Outsourcing via Service Competition,” Management Science, Vol. 53(2), pp. 241-259.
5.Boyaci, T., Gallego, G. (2004), “Supply Chain Coordination in a Market with Customer Service Competition,” Production and Operations Management, Vol. 13(1), pp.3-22.
6.Cachon, G., Zhang, F. (2007), “Obtaining Fast Service in a Queueing System via Performance-Based Allocation of Demand,” Management Science, Vol. 53(3), pp. 408–420.
7.Carlton, D. W. (1992), “The Rigidity of Prices,” In N.G. Mankiw and D.Romer. (Eds.),New Keynesian Economics, MIT Press, pp.225-240.
8.Chou, Y.-C., & Wu, C.-S. (2002), “Economic analysis and optimization of tool portfolio in semiconductor manufacturing,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 15(4), pp. 447-453.
9.Chou, Y.-C., Cheng, C.-T., Yang, F.-C., & Liang, Y.-Y. (2007), “Evaluating Alternative Capacity Strategies in Semiconductor Manufacturing Under Uncertainty Demand and Price Scenarios,” International Journal of Production Economics, 105, pp. 591-606.
10.Driver, C., Goffinet, F. (1998), “Investment Under Demand Uncertainty, Ex-ante Pricing, and Oligopoly,” Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 13(4), pp. 409-423.
11.Duncan K.H. Fong V. M. Gempesaw J. Ord, K. (2000), “Analysis of a dual sourcing inventory model with normal unit demand and Erlang mixture lead time,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 120, pp. 97-107.
12.Fruhan, WE. (1972), “ Pyrrhic victories in fights for market share,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 50(5), pp.100-108
13.Ganeshan, R., Tyworth, J., Guo, Y. (1999), ”Dual sourcing supply chains: the discount suppliers option,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 35(1), pp. 11-23.
14.Goyal, M., Netessine, S. (2007), “Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment under Demand Uncertainty,” Management Science, Vol. 53(2), pp.192-207.
15.Hall, J., Proteus, E. (2000), “Customer Service Competition in Capacitated Systems,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol.2 (2), pp. 144-165.
16.Hicks, D. A. (1996), “Evolving complexity and cost dynamics in the semiconductor industry,” IEEE Transaction on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 9(3), pp. 294-302.
17.Hutcheson, J. D., & Hutcheson, G. D. (1993), “The economic dynamics of semiconductor manufacturing: is equipment still affordable,” IEEE Transaction on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 5, pp. 107-118.
18.Kelle, P., Miller, P. (2001), “Stockout risk and order splitting,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 71(1), pp.407-415.
19.Kouveils, K. (2000), “Global sourcing strategies under exchange rate uncertainty,” In: Tayur, S., Ganeshan, R., Magazine, M.(Eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, Dordrecht, pp.625-667
20.Liu, L., Shang, W., Wu, S. (2007), “Dynamic Competitive Newsvendors with Service-Sensitive Demands,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol. 9(1), pp. 84-93.
21.McMillan, J. (1990), “Managing suppliers: Incentive systems in Japanese and U.S. industry,” California Management Review 33, pp.38-55.
22.Ranga V. Ramasesh. J., Ord, J., Hayya, J., Pan, A. (1991), “Sole versus Dual Sourcing in stochastic lead time (s，Q) Inventory Models,” Management Science, Vol. 37(4), pp.428-443.
23.Wang, Y., Gerchak, Y. (2001), “Supply Chain Coordination when Demand Is Shelf-Space Dependent,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol. 3(1), pp. 82-87.