一、中文部分
王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧(2008)。教育測驗與評量-教室學習觀點。台北:五南。
教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程試辦工作輔導手冊:Q&A問題與解答篇。台北市:教育部。
陳柏熹、黃宏宇、王文中(2008)。題組之相關特性對電腦化適性測驗測量精準度的影響。測驗學刊,55(1),129-150。二、英文部分
Andrich, D. (1985). A latent trait model for items with response dependencies: implications for test construction and analysis. In S. Embretson (Ed.), Test design: contributions from psychology, education, and psychometrics (pp. 245-273) . New York, NY: Academic Press.
Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R., & Wang, W.-C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1-23. Allen, S., & Sudweek, R. R. (2001). Identify and managing local item dependencies in context-dependent item sets. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
Bishop, Y. M. ML, Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bradlow, E.T., Wainer, H., & Wang, X. (1999). A Bayesian random effects models for testlet. Psychometrika, 64(2), 153-168.
Chen, W. & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indices for item pairs using item response theory. Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265-289.
Chou, Y.-T. & Wang, W. (2010). Checking Dimensionality in Item Response Models With Principal Component Analysis on Standardized Residuals. Educational and Psychological Measurement,70(5), 717-731.
DeMars, E. (2006). Application of the Bi-factor Multidimensional Item Response Theory Model to Testlet-Base Test. Journal of Educational Measurement,43(2), 145-168.
Ferrara, S., Huynh, H., & Baghi, H. (1997). Contextual characteristics of locally dependent open-ended item clusters on a large-scale performance assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 123-144.
Ferrara, S., Huynh, H., & Michaels, H. (1999). Contextual explanations of local dependence in item clusters in a large-scale hands-on science performance assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 119-140.
Haladyna T. M. (1992). Context-Dependent Item Sets. Educational Measurement: Issue and Practice, 11(4), 21-25.
Huynh, H., Michaels, H. & Ferrara, S. (1995, April). Statistical procedures to identify clusters of items with local dependency. In H. Huynh (Chair), Technical advances in partial credit models and their applications to performance assessments. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
Hambleton, R.K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: principles and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Hambleton, R.K. (1989). Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In R. L. Linn(Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed.)(pp. 147-200). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
Hambleton, R.K., & Jones, R.W. (1994). Comparsion of empirical and judgmental procedures for detecting differential item functioning. Educational Research Quarterly, 18, 23-26.
Lee, Y. (1998). Examining the suitability of an IRT-based testlet approach to the construction and analysis of passage-based items in an EFL reading comprehension test in the Korean High School Context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Lee G., Brennan R. L., & Frisbie D. A. (2000). Incorporating the testlet concept in test score analyses. Educational Measurement: Issue and Practice, 19(4), 9-15.
Linacre, J. M. (2001). WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program. Chicago, IL: WINSTEPS.com.
Lee, Y. (2004). Examining passage-related local item dependence (LID) and measurement construct using Q3 statistics in an EFL reading comprehension test. Language Testing, 21(1), 74-100.
Lisa A. Keller, Hariharan Swaminathan, & Stephen G.Sireci. (2003). Evaluating Scoring Procedures for Context-Dependent Item Sets. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(3), 207-222.
Mehrens, W.A. & Lehman, I.J. (1978). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
Muraki, E. & Lee, Y. (2001). Detecting local item dependency in the TOEFL reading comprehension section: an application of the fullinformation item factor analysis. Draft research report. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
Pommerich, M. & Segall, D. O. (2008). Local Dependence in an Operational CAT: Diagnosis and Implications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(3), 201-223.
Rosenbaum, P.R. (1988). Item bundles. Psychometrika, 53, 349-59.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response patten of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 17, 1-100.
Sheehan, K. M., Ginther, A., & Schedl M. (1999). Understanding performance on the TOEFL reading comprehension section: A tree-based regression approach. Paper presented at annual conference of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Stamford, CT.
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L. & Mooney J.A. (1989). Trace lines for testlets: a use of multiple-categorical response models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 247-260.
Thissen, D., Billeaud, K., McLeod, L., & Nelson, L. (1997, August). A brief introduction to item response theory for items scored in more than two categories. Paper presented at the National Assessment Governing Board Achievement Levels Workshop, Boulder, CO.
Wilson, M., & Adams, R. (1995). Rasch models for item bundles. Psychometrika, 60, 181-198.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago, IL: MESA.
Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. N. (1987). Item clusters and computer adaptive testing: A case of testlets Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185-201.
Wainer, H., & Lewis, C. (1990). Toward a psychometrics for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 1-14.
Wainer, H., & Thissen, D. (1996). How is reliability related to the quality of test scores? What is the effect of local dependence on reliability? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15, 22-29.
Wainer, H., Bradlow, E.T. & Du, Z. (1999). Testlet response theory: an analog for the 3-PL. In W.J. van der Linden & C.A.W. Glas (Eds.) , Computerized adaptive testing (pp. 245-269). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Wainer, H., Bradlow, E. T., & Du, Z. (2000). Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3-PL useful in adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C.A.W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 245-270). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Wang, W. C., & Wilson, M. R. (2005). The Rasch testlet model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 126-149.
Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R., & Haldane, S. A. (2007). ACER ConQuest version 2.0: Generalised item response modelling software [Computer software and manual]. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
Yen, W. M. (1984). Effects of local item dependence on the fit and equating performance of the threeparameter logistic model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 125-145.
Yen, W. M. (1993). Scaling performance assessments: Strategies for managing local item dependence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(3), 187-213.
Zenisky, A. L., Hambletom, R. K., & Stephen S. G.(2002). Identification and Evaluation of Local Item Dependencies in the Medical College Admissions Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39(4), 291-309.