跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.181) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/15 09:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳佑慈
研究生(外文):Yu-Tzu Chen
論文名稱:以蛋白質於真核細胞之位置預測蛋白質交互作用
論文名稱(外文):Protein-protein interaction prediction enhancement using subcellular localization
指導教授:洪炯宗洪炯宗引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jorng-tzong Horng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:資訊工程研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:電資工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:英文
論文頁數:32
中文關鍵詞:交互作用蛋白質預測位置
外文關鍵詞:protein interactionpredictionsubcellular localization
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:148
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
預測蛋白質之間的交互作用是一個重要而且研究相當完整的議題。大多數生物作用產生必須經歷蛋白質交互作用,異常的交互作用可能與某些神經系統症候群有關,因此,指出蛋白質之間是否有關連是必要的。
發生交互作用的蛋白質組,應該落在細胞中相同的位置。目前已存在的方法,大多建立於以蛋白質序列或是特定片段的信號來預測交互作用,很少將蛋白質的位置列入特性。而我們建立一個整合系統,能夠以蛋白質落在真核細胞中的位置為基礎,預測是否產生交互作用。我們取用蛋白質序列的組成、蛋白質的區塊、在細胞中的位置來建構這個系統。我們建立不同的模組來預測交互作用,依照輸入蛋白質組的位置選取其所屬位置的模組。我們的方法提高了蛋白質交互作用的預測效能,若有更完整的蛋白質交互作用以及位置資訊,將得到更高準度的預測。
Protein–protein interactions are importance for almost every process in living cell. Abnormal interactions may have implications in a number of neurological syndromes. Therefore, it is crucial to recognize the association and dissociation of protein molecules. Current available computational methods of prediction of protein–protein interaction extract information from amino acid sequence or signal peptide. There are few method consider subcellular localization information. The method presented in this paper is based on the assumption that two proteins should appear on same subcellular localization to perform interaction. We develop an integrated system which based on a learning algorithm-support vector machine to predict protein–protein interactions. We construct training models for different subcellular localization. Each test protein pair request one training model to predict according to its localization. This method is take protein sequence composition, protein domains and subcellular localization information as features. The prediction ability of our method is better than other sequence-based protein–protein interaction prediction methods. In addition, a more complete data of protein-protein interactions and subcellular localizations can enhance the prediction ability of the method.
摘要 ……………………………………………………………………………………IV
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………V
Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………………………VI
List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ VII
List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ VIII
Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Motivation ................................................................................................................... 5
1.3 Goal ............................................................................................................................. 5
Chapter 2 Related Works ....................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Related tools ................................................................................................................ 6
2.2 Recent tools of prediction of protein-protein interactions .......................................... 7
2.3 Comparison of the prediction tools ........................................................................... 12
Chapter 3 Materials and methods ....................................................................................... 13
3.1 Data Sources ............................................................................................................. 13
3.2 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 15
3.3 Performance evaluation …………………………………………………………… 20
Chapter 4 Results .................................................................................................................. 21
4.1 Subcellular localization distribution ......................................................................... 21
4.2 Prediction performance of each dataset .................................................................... 23
4.3 Prediction without DDI feature ................................................................................. 26
Chapter 5 Discussion ............................................................................................................ 27
References .............................................................................................................................. 30
1.Young, K.H., Yeast two-hybrid: so many interactions, (in) so little time. Biol Reprod, 1998. 58(2): p. 302-11.
2.Lee, C., Coimmunoprecipitation assay. Methods Mol Biol, 2007. 362: p. 401-6.
3.Han, J.D., et al., Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol, 2005. 23(7): p. 839-44.
4.Pellegrini, M., et al., Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1999. 96(8): p. 4285-8.
5.Enright, A.J., et al., Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature, 1999. 402(6757): p. 86-90.
6.Ogmen, U., et al., PRISM: protein interactions by structural matching. Nucleic Acids Res, 2005. 33(Web Server issue): p. W331-6.
7.Espadaler, J., et al., Prediction of protein-protein interactions using distant conservation of sequence patterns and structure relationships. Bioinformatics, 2005. 21(16): p. 3360-8.
8.Brown, K.R. and I. Jurisica, Online predicted human interaction database. Bioinformatics, 2005. 21(9): p. 2076-82.
9.Huang, C., et al., Predicting protein-protein interactions from protein domains using a set cover approach. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform, 2007. 4(1): p. 78-87.
10.Shen, J., et al., Predicting protein-protein interactions based only on sequences information. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007. 104(11): p. 4337-41.
11.Pitre, S., et al., PIPE: a protein-protein interaction prediction engine based on the re-occurring short polypeptide sequences between known interacting protein pairs. BMC Bioinformatics, 2006. 7: p. 365.
12.Guo, Y., et al., Using support vector machine combined with auto covariance to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008. 36(9): p. 3025-30.
13.Zaki, N., et al., Protein-protein interaction based on pairwise similarity. BMC Bioinformatics, 2009. 10: p. 150.
14.Xia, J.F., X.M. Zhao, and D.S. Huang, Predicting protein-protein interactions from protein sequences using meta predictor. Amino Acids, 2010.
15.Soong, T.T., K.O. Wrzeszczynski, and B. Rost, Physical protein-protein interactions predicted from microarrays. Bioinformatics, 2008. 24(22): p. 2608-14.
16.Blum, T., S. Briesemeister, and O. Kohlbacher, MultiLoc2: integrating phylogeny and Gene Ontology terms improves subcellular protein localization prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 2009. 10: p. 274.
17.Raghavachari, B., et al., DOMINE: a database of protein domain interactions. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008. 36(Database issue): p. D656-61.
18.Yu, C.S., et al., Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins, 2006. 64(3): p. 643-51.
19.Smith, T.F. and M.S. Waterman, Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol, 1981. 147(1): p. 195-7.
20.Keshava Prasad, T.S., et al., Human Protein Reference Database--2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res, 2009. 37(Database issue): p. D767-72.
21.Liu, L., et al., Prediction of protein-protein interactions based on PseAA composition and hybrid feature selection. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2009. 380(2): p. 318-22.
22.Hunter, S., et al., InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res, 2009. 37(Database issue): p. D211-5.
23.Finn, R.D., et al., The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res, 2010. 38(Database issue): p. D211-22.
24.Salwinski, L., et al., The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004. 32(Database issue): p. D449-51.
25.Mewes, H.W., et al., MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004. 32(Database issue): p. D41-4.
26.CORTES, C. and V. VAPNIK, Support-Vector Networks. Machine Leaming, 1995. 20(3): p. 273-297.
27.Zaki, N., S. Deris, and H. Alashwal, Protein-Protein Interaction Detection Based on Substring Sensitivity Measure. Inter J of Biomedical Sciences, 2006. 1: p. 148-154.
28.Chen, X.W. and M. Liu, Prediction of protein-protein interactions using random decision forest framework. Bioinformatics, 2005. 21(24): p. 4394-400.
29.Deng, M., et al., Inferring domain-domain interactions from protein-protein interactions. Genome Res, 2002. 12(10): p. 1540-8.
30.Schwikowski, B., P. Uetz, and S. Fields, A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat Biotechnol, 2000. 18(12): p. 1257-61.
31.Michael, W.M., Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling signals: two for the price of one. Trends Cell Biol, 2000. 10(2): p. 46-50.
32.Shoemaker, B.A. and A.R. Panchenko, Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part I. Experimental techniques and databases. PLoS Comput Biol, 2007. 3(3): p. e42.
33.Balzer, E. and E.G. Moss, Localization of the developmental timing regulator Lin28 to mRNP complexes, P-bodies and stress granules. RNA Biol, 2007. 4(1): p. 16-25.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top