臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

過去對於代理理論之研究，大部份皆應用於會計、財務、行銷、組織行為等領域，但是尚未有研究以代理理論之架構探討授權契約模式。因此，本研究嘗試以代理理論為基礎，建立一較有系統的整合性分析架構，進而以台灣廠商為實證對象，並以複回歸為資料分析之工具，探討國際技術授權契約模式之關鍵因素。
實證結果顯示被授權技術之複雜性、被授權廠商之關鍵資源依賴授權廠商的程度、授權廠商認為被授權廠商的信賴度、被授權廠商認為授權廠商的信賴度、授權廠商與被授權廠商組織文化間的差距程度等變數皆顯著影響國際技術授權契約模式。

Agency theory has spawned a large amount of recent research in accounting, finance, marketing, organizational behavior and so on. But agency theory hasn’t been applied to international technology licensing, so, based on agency theory, this paper attempts to explore the keys of international technology licensing model. This paper chooses Taiwanese firms to verify the model utilizing statistics method, multiple regression.
　　The result shows that the complexity of the licensing technology, the licensee’s dependence of key resources on the licensor, the licensor’s belief in the licensee, the licensee’s belief in the licensor and the organizational culture difference between the licensor and the licensee are the key factors in the international technology licensing model.

第一章 緒論...........................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機...............................1
第二節 研究目的.....................................3
第三節 研究流程.....................................4
第二章 文獻探討.......................................5
第一節 名詞定義.....................................6
第二節 技術授權與被授權的影響因素...................12
第三節 交易成本理論.................................19
第四節 代理理論.....................................36
第三章研究方法.....................................50
第一節 研究架構.....................................50
第二節 研究假說之建立...............................53
第三節 研究設計.....................................58
第四節 實證變數之操作性定義與衡量...................61
第五節 分析流程.....................................66
第四章 資料分析與實證結果.............................72
第一節 樣本資料分析.................................72
第二節 信度效度檢定.................................77
第三節 模型分析.....................................79
第五章 結論...........................................86
第一節 研究成果暨建議...............................86
第二節 研究限制.....................................88
第三節 未來研究方向.................................89
參考文獻..............................................91
附錄 研究問卷.........................................97

中文文獻
吳青松 (1996), 國際企業管理, 智勝文化事業有限公司。
吳思華 (1996), 策略九說, 臉譜文化事業公司。
沈宣佑 (1997), “信賴感、風險認知程度、與統治機制關聯性之實證研究－以在台合資企業為例－”, 國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文.
柯博瑜(1997), “聯盟資源與企業特性對國際策略聯盟類型選擇之影響”, 國立暨南大學未出版碩士論文。
耿筠 (1997), “高科技產業經理人購買技術行為之研究－以新竹科學工業原區經理人為例”, 國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文.
陳怡之 (1993), “技術移轉策略規劃─契約內容與考慮因素”,保護智慧財產權系列講習會演講資料籍(三), 行政院國科會, 六月, 第22-1 ∼ 13 頁.
黃俊英 (1998), 多變量分析, 第六版, 華泰文化事業公司。
黃鑫德 (1998), “石化廠商向後垂直整合策略之研究：交易成本理論之實證分析”, 國立暨南國際大學國際企業研究所未出版碩士論文.
郭宗明 (1995), “我國廠商國際技術授權需求及特性之研究”, 私立元智工學院管理研究所未出版碩士論文.
葉匡時、蔡敦浩、周德光 (1993), “策略聯盟的發展策略──交易成本的觀點”, 管理評論, 第十二卷, 七月, 第99 ∼ 117頁.
英文文獻
Aaker, David A. & Day, George S. (1983), Marketing Research, 2nd ed., New York, NY: John Wiley.
Akerloff, George (1970), “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality and the Market Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, August, pp. 488-500.
Arrow, K. (1971), Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing, Chicago: Markham.
Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku (1993), “Relative Importance of Firm and Managerial Influences on International Technology Licensing Behaviour”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 4 — 21.
Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku (1992), “Inward Technology Licensing as an Alternative to Internal R&D in New Product Development: A Conceptual Framework”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 9, pp. 156 — 167.
Aulakh, Peter S. & Kotabe, Masaaki & Sahay, Arvind (1996), “Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral Approach”, Journal of International Business Studies, Special Issue, pp. 1005-1032.
Baranson, J. (1966), “Transfer of Technical Knowledge by International Corporations to Developing Economics”, American Economics Review, 56, May, pp. 311.
Barney, J. (1990), “The Debate between Traditional Management Theory and Organizational Economics: Substantial Differences or Intergroup Conflict ? ”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 347 — 359.
Bergen, Mark & Dutta, Shantanu & Orville C. Walker, Jr. (1992), “Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, July, pp. 1 — 24.
Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc. (1982), Management of New Products, Chicago, IL: Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc.
Buckley, P. & Casson, M. (1976), The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, New York: Holmes & Meier.
Cho, K. R. (1988), “Issues of Compensation in International Technology Licensing”, Management International Review, Vol. 28, pp. 70 — 79.
Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1991), Marketing Research: Methodological Foundation, 5th ed., I11, Chicago: The Dryden Press.
Coase, R. H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm”, Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 385 — 405.
Contractor, F. J. (1981), International Technology Licensing, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Contractor, F. & Sagafi-nejad, T. (1981), “International Technology Transfer: Major Issues and Policy Responses”, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57 — 74.
Faber, Jill S. (1986), “Licensing: A success route for marketers”, Pharmaceutical Executive, Vol. 6, January, pp. 49 — 52.
Foster, R. D. (1971), “Organize for Technology Transfer”, Havard Business Review, Nov. / Dec., pp. 110 — 120.
Gold, Beta (1982), “Managerial Considerations in evaluating the rule of licensing in technology development”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 213 — 217.
Goldsmith, M. (1970), Technological Innovation and the Economy, London, UK: Wiley Interscience.
Gupta, Ashok K. and Wilemon, David L. (1990), “Accelerating the Development of Technology-based New Products”, California Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, Winter, pp. 24 - 44.
Hair, Joseph F., Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham and
William C. Blach (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading, 4th eds, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hakam, A. N. and Chang, Z. H. (1988), “Patterns of Technology Transfer in Singapore: The Case of the Electronics and Computer Industry”, Int. J. Technology Management, 3-1/2, pp. 181 — 188.
Hurwicz, Leonid (1972), “On Informationally Decentralized Systems”, Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak, Roy Radner and C. B. MacGuire, eds. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, pp. 297 - 336.
Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 305 — 360.
Jensen, M. & Roeback, R. (1983), “The Market for Corporation Control: Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 5-50.
John, George & Weiss, Allen & Weitz, Bart (1987), “An Organizational Coordination Model of Salesforce Compensation Plans: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Test”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 3, Fall, pp. 373 - 396.
Lal, Rajiv & Srinivasan, V. (1989), “Salesforce Compensation Plans: A Dynamic Perspective”, working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
Leroy, Georges P. (1978), Transfer of Technology within the Multinational Enterprises.
Lowe, Julian & Crawford, Nick (1984), Innovation and Technology
Transfer For The Growing Firm, printed in Great Britain by A. Wheaton & Co. Ltd., Exeter
Lowe, Julian & Crawford, Nick (1984), Technology Licensing and the Small Firm, Vermont: Gower Publishing Company.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986), Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd edit, New York, NY: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston, Inc..
Magee, S. (1977), “Information and the Multinational Corporation: An Appropriability Theory of Foreign Direct Investment”, In the New International Economic Order: The North — South Debate, by J. Bhagwati (ed.), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mansfield E. (1975), “International Technology Transfer: Forms, Resource Requirement and Policy”, American Economic Association, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 372 — 376.
McDonald, D. W. and Leahey, H. S. (1985), “Licensing has a Role in Technology Strategic Planning, Research Management”, Vol. 28, pp. 35 — 40.
OECD (1987), International Technology Licensing: Survey Results.
Parkhe, Arvind (1993), “‘Messy’Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 227 — 268.
Peter, J. Paul (1979), “Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, Feb., pp. 6 — 17.
Rogers, E. M. (1972), “Key Concept and Models Inducing Technological Change for Economic Growth and Development”, Michigan State University Press, pp. 86.
Ross, S. (1973), “The Economic Theory of Agency: The principal’s problem”, American Economic Review, Vol. 63, pp. 134 — 139.
Smith, Tom W., (1983), “The Hidden 25 Percent: An Analysis of Nonresponse on the 1980 General Survey”, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 47, pp. 386 — 404.
Stalk Jr., George (1988), “Time — the Next Source of Competitive Advantage”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66, July — August, pp. 41 — 51.
Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implication, New York: The Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1979), “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.22, pp. 233 — 261.
Williamson, O. E. (1981), “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach”, American Journal of Sociology, pp. 548 — 577.
Williamson, O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: The Free Press.
Wilson, R. (1968), “On the theory of syndicates”, Econometrica, Vol. 36, pp. 119 — 132.
Wind, Yoram and Mahajan, Vijay (1988), “New Product Development: A perspective for re-examination”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 304 — 310.
Zhao, L. and Reisman, A. (1992), “Toward Meta Research on Technology Transfer”, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, Vol. 39, No. 1, Feb., pp. 13 — 21.