跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.138) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/06 11:02
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張天寧
研究生(外文):Tiam-Ning Chang
論文名稱:行駛中四行程機車使用酒精汽油排放空氣污染物之特徵
論文名稱(外文):The Regulated Pollutants Emitted from Used 4-Stroke Motorcycle Fueled Two Commercial Gasoline blended Ethanol
指導教授:米孝萱米孝萱引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsiao-Hsuan Mi
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:嘉南藥理科技大學
系所名稱:環境工程與科學系暨研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:環境工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:113
中文關鍵詞:乙醇汽油引擎怠速酒精汽油
外文關鍵詞:single spark motor engineidlingalcohol
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:786
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:83
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究為探討台灣地區行駛中四行程機車實車使用酒精汽油之適用情況,針對不同比例乙醇,分別以未添加及添加10%及30%體積比於台灣現有兩公司(T公司、F公司)市售九五無鉛汽油中(E10、E30)做為基本實驗用燃料。以四行程機車,在不同行駛速度:怠速惰轉、30及50km/hr操作條件下,針對每種燃料油之引擎排放傳統性污染物CO、HC及CO2進行採樣分析。
研究結果顯示,所有未添加酒精之市售汽油機車引擎於怠速惰轉條件下所排放之CO、HC及CO2之濃度均高於混摻10%及30%乙醇之油品所排放之污染物濃度。實驗結果中未混摻之T95-E0及F95-E0所排放CO平均濃度為2.44、3.82%,較市售九五無鉛汽油混摻10%乙醇所排放CO平均濃度為1.15%(T95-E10)、1.84%(F95-E10)及混摻30%乙醇所排放CO平均濃度為0.35%(T95-E30)、0.78%(F95-E30)平均濃度為高。顯示混摻乙醇之無鉛汽油可獲得較佳之污染減排效果。
比較兩款市售油品添加乙醇在不同行駛速度下研究結果中:顯示行駛速度30km/hr測試條件下CO平均濃度分別為0.12、0.1%;50km/hr測試條件下CO平均濃度皆為0.1%,皆比未混摻之T95-E0及F95-E0所排放CO平均濃度有極大的削減量,以上的結果顯示T公司與F公司於乙醇混摻30%行駛於50km/hr條件下,CO污染排放均有顯著降低的情況。
關鍵字:酒精汽油、怠速、汽油引擎、乙醇
Abstract
This study was aimed to access the generation or depletion of air pollutants including carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide emitted from the exhaust of 4-stroke motor engine simulating idling, 30 and 50 km/hr, respectively, cruising speed conditions. The commercial 95-LFG were purchased and obtained from two petroleum companies, CPC and Formosa, in Taiwan. Alcohol, the purity higher than 99.5%, was used as fuel additive blended with two target gasolines in 10, 30% vol. to test in this study.
The results of those data reveal that the emission concentration of CO, HC and CO2 of commercial 95-LFG fuels all are higher than with blending alcohol fuels. Among different blending gasolines, the exhausts of CO average concentration of T95-E30 and F95-E30 (0.35% and 0.78%, respectively) have much lower emission potentials. Adding more alcohol in commercial 95-LFG will increase the combustion efficiency in single spark motor engine.
In compare with the CO concentration emitted from these target fuels blending with cruising speeds. Higher cruising speed, T95-E30 and F95-E30 all will reduce more CO under 50 km/hr than 30 km/hr. However, even adding more alcohol in commercial 95-LFG still have more CO emission potential under idling condition.

Keyword: alcohol, idling, single spark motor engine.
目 錄
摘 要 I
Abstract III
致謝 IV
目錄 V
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 XI
一、前言 1
二、文獻回顧 3
2-1機車排放空氣污染 3
2-2機車引擎之運轉特性 3
2-2-1機車污染之形成機制 5
2-2-2油料對機車引擎污染排放之影響 7
2-2-3機車引擎啟動負荷對污染物排放之影響 8
2-2-4機動車輛排放量推估控制 12
2-2-5影響汽油引擎污染排放之因素 13
2-3汽油品質參數 16
2-3-1無鉛汽油辛烷值 16
2-3-2重組油與裂解油 18
2-3-3乙醇之介紹 18
三、實驗設備與方法 24
3-1研究架構 24
3-2機車排氣採樣方法 24
3-3機車廢氣採樣設備簡介 27
3-3-1分析儀器 27
3-3-2分析儀器操作流程 27
3-3-3採樣流程 27
3-4採樣設備之品保與品管 32
四、結果與討論 33
4-1機車引擎實驗用油特性 34
4-2市售汽油在不同速度條件下污染排放情形 35
4-2-1四行程機車怠速條件下污染排放濃度 35
4-2-2四行程機車時速30km/hr條件下污染排放濃度 38
4-2-3四行程機車時速50km/hr條件下污染排放濃度 42
4-2-2四行程機車時速30km/hr條件下污染排放濃度 40
4-2-2四行程機車時速30km/hr條件下污染排放濃度 40
4-3市售汽油傳統性汙染物污染排放情形 46
4-4啟動方式不同各汙染物污染排放情形 55
4-5市售九五汽油與市售汽油添加乙醇增減率比較 58
4-5-1怠速的條件下 58
4-5-2時速30km/hr的條件下 62
4-5-3時速50km/hr的條件下 66
4-6各油品燃燒效率之探討 70
4-6-1怠速的條件下 70
4-6-2時速30km/hr的條件下 72
4-6-3時速50km/hr的條件下 74
4-6-4冷熱啟動的條件下 76
4-7溫室氣體排放減量探討 77
4-7-1怠速的條件下 77
4-7-2時速30km/hr的條件下 79
4-7-3時速50km/hr的條件下 81
五、結論與建議 83
5-1結論 83
5-2建議 85
參考文獻 86
1.交通部全球資訊網-交通統計-機動車輛登記數(2009)網址:http://www.motc.gov.tw/mocwebGIP/wSite/lp?ctNode=162&xq_xCat=13
2.陳維新、江金龍,「空氣污染與控制」,高立圖書公司,台北 (2004)。
3.彭柏鈞,「都會區機車行車型態與空氣污染物特性之調查」,國立成功大學環境工程學系,碩士論文 (2003)。
4.Fang, C. C.; Chen, I. S.; Hung, I. F., “Analysis of Polycyclic AromaticHydrocarbons in the Exhaust of motorcycles”, The 1996 International Conference on Aerosol Science and Technology, Chungli, pp.777-788 1996.
5.黃靖雄,「現代低公害省油汽車排氣污染控制技術及裝置」,全華科技圖書出版(2002)。
6.交通部統計處,「台灣地區老舊車輛使用狀況調查報告」(1995)。
7.環保署委託研究計畫期末報告,「研擬機器腳踏車冷車行車型態排氣污染測試方法及程序」(1999a)。
8.Henein, N. A. , M.K. Tagomri. “Cold-start hydrocarbon emissions in port-injected gasoline engines.” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 25(6): 563-593 (1999).
9.Goodfellow, C. L., G., R. A. Hawkins, M. J., McArragher, J. S. (1996). “European Programme on Emissions”, Fuels and Engine Thchnologies (EPEFE) – Gasoline Aromatics/E100 Study. SAE961072
10.Westerholm, R.; Alsberg, T. E.; Frommelin, A. B.; Strandell, M. E.; Rannug, U.; Winquist, L.; Grigoriadis, V.; Egeback, K., “Effect of Fuel Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Content on the Emission of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Other Mutagenic Substances from a Gasoline-fueled Automobile”, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp.925-930, 1988.
11.Westerholm, R.; Almen, J.; Li, H.; Rannug, U.; Rosen, A., “Exhaust Emissions from Gasoline-Fuelled Light Duty Vehicles Operated in Different Driving Conditions: A Chemical and Biological Characterization”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 26B, No. 1, pp.19-89, 1992
12.Pedersen, P. S.; Ingwersen, J.; Nielsen, T.; Larsen, E., “Effects of Fuel, Lubrication, and Engine Operating Parameters on Emissions of Polycyclic Aromatic Htdrocarbons”, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.71-79, 1980.
13.Westerholm, R.; Alsberg, T. E.; Frommelin, A. B.; Strandell, M. E.; Rannug, U.; Winquist, L.; Grigoriadis, V.; Egeback, K., “Effect of Fuel Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Content on the Emission of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Other Mutagenic Substances from a Gasoline-fueled Automobile”, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp.925-930, 1988.
14.Sjögren, M.; Li, H.; Rannug, U.; Westerholm, R., “A Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Chemical Composition and Physical Characteristics of Ten Diesel Fuels”, Fuel, Vol. 74, No. 7, pp.983-989, 1995.Summers, J, C.; Silver R. G., “Catalytic Control Issues Associated with the Use of Reformulated Gasolines”, SAE Paper 902070, 1990.
15.Honda, T.; Yamamura, T.; Kato, Y.; Saito, S.; Ishii, T., “Factor Analysis and Derivation of an Experimental Equation on Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emissions from Automobiles”, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 13, No. 9, pp.1077-1081, 1979.
16.Summers, J, C.; Silver R. G., “Catalytic Control Issues Associated with the Use of Reformulated Gasolines”, SAE Paper 902070, 1990.
17.Karvounis, E.; Assanis, D. N., “The Effect of Inlet Distribution on Catalytic Conversion Efficiency”, International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp.1495-1504, 1993.
18.Bryne, H.; Norbury, J., “Stable Solutions for a Catalytic Converter”, Journal of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp.789-813, 1994.
19.Bj?琀eseth, A.; Ramdahl, T., “Handbook of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons”, Vol. 1, Mercel Dekker Inc., New York and Basel, 1983.
20.Broz, J.; Grabic, R.; et al., “The Effect of Oils on PAH, PCDD, PCDF, and PCB Emissions from a Spark Engine Fueled with Leaded Gasoline”, Chemosphere, Vol. 41, pp.1905-1911, 2000.
21.Rogge, W. F.; Hidleman, L. M.; Mazurek, M. A.; Cass, G. R.; and Simoneit, B. R. T., “Sources of Fine Organic Aerosol. 2. Non-catalyst and Catalyst-Equipped Automobiles and Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks”, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.636-651, 1993.
22.Schilderman, P.; Hoogewerff, J. A.; Vanschooten, F. J.; Mass, L. M.; Moonen, E.; Vanos, B.; Vanwijnen, J. H.; Kleinjans, J., “Possible Relevance of Pigeons as an Indicator Species for Monitoring Air Pollution”, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 322-330, 1997.
23.Tuominen, J.; Salomaa, S.; Pyysalo, H.; Skytta, E.; Tikkanen, L.; Nurmela, T.; Sorsa, M.; Pohjola, V.; Sauri, M.; Himberg, K., “Polynuclear Aromatic Compounds and Genotoxicity in Particulate and Vapor Phases of Ambient Air: Effect of Traffic, Season, and Meteorological Conditions”, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp.1228-1234, 1988.
24.Eng, J. A.; Leppard, W. R.; Najt, P. M.; Dryer, F. L., ”The Effect of Fuel Composition on Hydrocarbon Emission from a Spark Ignition: iso-Octane/Toluene and n-Octane/Toluene Fuel Mixtures”, SAE Paper 982557, 1998.
25.石油季刊,第40卷第3期,頁94-95, 2004。
26.Sinor, J. E. and Bailey, B. K., “Current and Potential Future Performance of Ethanol Fuels”, SAE Technical Paper 930376, Society of Automotive Engineers.
27.Nadim, Farhad., Zack, Peter., Hoag, George E. Hoag, Shili Liu., “ United States experience with gasoline additives”, Energy Policy 29, pp. 1-5, 2001.
28.Abdel-Rahman, A. A. And Osman, M. M., “Experimental Investigation on Varying the Compression Ratio of SI Engine Working Under Different Ethanol-Gasoline Fuel Blends”, International Journal of Energy Research, 21, pp. 31-40, 1997.
29.顏本河,「乙醇替代燃料之引擎測試與評估」,國立成功大學航空太空工程學系碩士論文,1992。
30.黃俊宏,「汽油添加酒精作為汽車燃料之可行性研究」,國立台灣大學機械工程研究所碩士論文,1992。
31.謝煒東,「乙醇-汽油混合燃料之燃燒特性、污染分析及引擎測試」,國立成功大學機械工程學系碩士論文,2000。
32.王建鴻,「乙醇替代燃料對於汽油引擎排放廢氣中醛酮類化合物之研究」,國立成功大學環境工程系碩士論文,2000。
33.陳婉菁,「機車使用汽醇燃料排放揮發性有機物及臭氧前驅物分析研究」,國立中興大學農業機械工程學系碩士論文,2002。
34.Al-Hasan, M., “Effect of ethanol-unleaded gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emission”, Energy Conversion and Management 44, pp. 1547-1561, 2003.
35.Fikret Yü ksel, Bedri Yüksel, “The use of ethanol-gasoline blend as a fuel in an SI engine”, Renewable Energy 29, pp. 1181-1191, 2004.
36.Chan-Wei Wua, Rong-Horng Chenb, Jen-YungPu a, Ta-Hui Lina, “The in.uence of air-fuel ratio on engine performance and pollutant emission of an SI engine using ethanol-gasoline-blended fuels”, Atmospheric Environment 38, pp. 7093-7100, 2004.
37.Robert K. Niven, “Ethanol in gasoline:environmental impacts and sustainability review article”, Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, pp. 535-555, 2005.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top