跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.110) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/05/03 20:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林建州
研究生(外文):anton lin
論文名稱:電子零組件製造業外包活動、外包關係管理、組織文化與組織績效關係之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship among Outsourcing, Subcontracting Network Management, Organization Culture and Organizational Performance in Electronic Components Manufacturing Industry
指導教授:丁志宏丁志宏引用關係
指導教授(外文):jhding
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:南台科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:80
中文關鍵詞:外包活動外包關係管理組織文化電子零組件製造業
外文關鍵詞:outsourcingsubcontracting network managementorganizational cultureelectronic components manufacturing industry
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:396
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
本研究以外包作為主題,探討電子零組件製造業,在現行已實施外包活動的公司,從事外包活動之事前規劃考量的策略因素,及該策略因素與組織績效關係;另研究執行外包活動時,採用何種外包關係管理,及外包關係管理與組織績效關係;最後,探討不同組織文化傾向下,與外包活動及外包關係管理與組織績效之個別關係。
本研究採用問卷調查法進行實證資料之蒐集,除進行描述性統計分析、信度分析以了解各構面變數外;並以迴歸分析,了解各構面的因果關係。問卷主要透過「台灣新報」企業資料庫,以電子零組件製造業作為實證研究的對象,總計發放176份問卷,共計回收74份,回收率為42%。本研究有以下之研究發現:
1.外包活動項目以生產製造活動所佔比例最高,其它依序為研發設計、人力培訓、行銷企劃、運輸儲運、品管取樣、資訊系統、器材維修、勞務協力。.
2.外包活動與組織績效,具顯著相關,在決策外包活動事前規劃,將非核心競爭力之活動外包,可提高組織績效;而將交易成本較高的活動外包,則會降低組織績效;因資源依賴強弱所決策的外包活動,對組織績效無顯著性的影響。
3.外包關係管理與組織績效,具顯著相關,在事後外包關係管理中,以科層機制的關係管理,可以提高組織績效;以市場機制的關係管理,則會降低組織績效;而以關係機制的關係管理,對組織績效,顯示無顯著性的影響。
4.組織文化特性與外包活動具顯著相關,且愈傾向於官僚特性的組織文化公司,愈支持外包活動策略。
5.組織文化特性與外包關係管理具顯著相關,且愈傾向於官僚特性的組織文化公司,愈支持外包關係管理之管制。
6.組織文化特性與組織績效具顯著相關,且愈傾向於官僚特性及創新特性的組織文化公司,愈會有較高的組織績效。
The theme of this study is outsourcing. Firstly in this paper, the strategic factors considered by the manufacturers in the electronic parts and components industry that outsource jobs and the relationship between those factors and organizational efficiency are discussed. Then the management strategies for outsourcing relationships adopted by the manufacturers, the relationship between the management and organizational efficiency as well as how different organizational cultures are respectively related to outsourcing, outsourcing relationship management and organizational efficiency are explored.
In this study, the questionnaire survey method is employed for real-life data collection, and to study each compositional variable, both descriptive analysis and reliability analysis are performed. Also, the regression analysis is carried out to analyze the interactions between the compositional variables. To search for our target survey objects, which are the manufacturers in the electronic parts and components industry, the company database of Taiwan News was used as the primary source. In total, 176 copies of questionnaire were distributed and 74 were returned, resulting in a 42% return rate. The findings of this study include the following:
1. Among all the functions, the most often outsourced is Production. The next in line is R&D and then Personnel Training, Marketing, Transportation & Logistics, Quality Control Sampling, Information Technology, Repair & Maintenance, and Labor Cooperation.
2. There is a significant relationship between outsourcing and organizational efficiency. Outsourcing non-core functions can help improve organizational efficiency while outsourcing functions with high transaction costs can decrease it. The outsourcing of resource-demanding functions has no obvious effect on organizational efficiency.
3. There is a notable relationship between outsourcing relationship management and organizational efficiency. Managing outsourcing relationships through a hierarchical mechanism can help improve organizational efficiency while managing through a market mechanism can decrease it. Managing outsourcing relationships through a relationship mechanism brings no obvious effect on organizational efficiency.
4. The culture of an organization has a dominant effect on outsourcing decisions. Companies with a hierarchical culture tend to support an outsourcing decision.
5. The culture of an organization has a dominant effect on outsourcing relationship management. Companies with a hierarchical culture tend to support taking control of outsourcing relationship management.
6. The culture of an organization has a dominant effect on organizational efficiency. Companies with a hierarchical or innovation-oriented culture tend to have higher organizational efficiency.
摘要……………………………………………………………………………Ⅱ
目次………………………………………………………………………………….…………Ⅷ
表目錄………………………………………………………………………….Ⅺ
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………………ⅫⅠ
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………..1
1.1 研究背景與動機…………………………………………………….1
1.2 研究目的…………………………………………………………….3
1.3 研究流程…………………………………………………………….3
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………..5
2.1 外包………………………………………………………………….5
2.2 外包活動…………………………………………………………….7
2.2.1外包活動決策模式…………………………………………….7
2.2.2核心競爭力觀點……………………………………………….13
2.2.3資源依賴觀點………………………………………………….14
2.2.4交易成本觀點………………………………………………….16
2.3 外包關係管理……………………………………………………….19
2.4 組織文化…………………………………………………………….26
2.5組織績效觀點………………………………………………………..31
第三章 研究設計與方法……………………………………………………..34
3.1研究架構……………………………………………………………..34
3.2構面因素操作性定義與衡量方法…………………………………..35
3.3研究假設……………………………………………………………..40
3.4問卷調查……………………………………………………………..42
3.5研究對象與抽樣設計……………………………………………….46
3.6研究分析方法……………………………………………………….47
第四章 研究結果與討論……………………………………………………..49
4.1問卷回收與樣本資料分析…………………………………………..49
4.2信度分析……………………………………………………………..51
4.3敘述性統計分析……………………………………………………..58
4.4迴歸分析……………………………………………………………..62
第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………..67
5.1研究結果……………………………………………………………..67
5.2研究結果整理………………………………………………………..68
5.3管理意涵……………………………………………………………..69
5.4研究限制……………………………………………………………..71
5.5後續研究建議………………………………………………………..71
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………..72
附錄 研究問卷…………………………………………………………………80
中文部份
1.王志剛,"批量式生產委外決策分析:成本效益觀點",碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學工業管理系,2006。
2.王聖富,"零售廠商核心競爭力連鎖型式之選擇",碩士論文,元智大學管理研究所,2003。
3.余峻瑜 譯(2003),企業外包致勝:高效率低成本的委外經營模式。台北:台灣培生教育。
4.吳秉恩,組織行為學。台北:華泰文化出版公司,1991。
5.吳思華,交易成本理論及其在企業經營策略與組織管理上之涵義,中華民國管理科學學會,民國77年。
6.吳思華,策略九說,麥田出版社,民國85 年。
7.吳萬益,林清河,"企業研究方法",台北華泰圖書出版公司,2000。
8.吳萬益,林清河,企業研究方法,台北華泰。
9.李政遠,企業核心能力、服務策略與服務傳送系統對顧客終身價值影響之研究—汽車產業個案研究,碩士論文,中原大學,2003。
10.林秀霞,組織相依性、信任、機會主義與組織合作關係影響之研究,碩士論文,國立台北大學,2005
11.林東清,資訊管理-e 化企業的核心競爭能力,台北市智勝文化事業有限公司,2002。
12.林建良,賴梅君,康慈欣,陳權洋,外包關係管理之維護-以衛署豐原醫院為例,碩士論文,國 立 雲 林 科 技 大 學,2003。
13.林惠敏,"探討觀光旅館業的組織文化對組織績效之關聯性研究以高雄地區為例",碩士論文,南華大學旅遊事業管理研究所,2006。
14.林麗娟,「國際合作策略與競爭優勢之研究」行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告 ,1997。
15.林希武,"企業研發委外影響因素之探討",碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學國際企業學系,2004。
16.林晉寬,”從資源基礎理論探討資源特性與成長策略之關係”,博士論文,國立政治大學企業管理研究所,民國83 年6 月。
17.河野豐弘,改造企業文化,台北:遠流出版社,1992初版。
18.河野豐弘,初版,改造企業文化,台北,遠流出版社,1992。
19.社團法人中華採購管理協會、 許振邦,"採購與供應管理",台北智勝。
20.張福榮,「電子化供應鏈管理:e Business觀點」,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司,2004。
21.陳柏州,"童書數位出版外包製作的類型暨其考量因素之研究",碩士論文,南華大學出版事業管理研究所,2006。
22.陳郁雯, “「外包」,再造競爭優勢” ,人力發展月刊第75期,民國2000。
23.陳郁雯,「外包」,再造競爭優勢,人力發展月刊第75期,民國89年。
24.陳琇玲 譯,創造競爭優勢-7大經營挑戰與5大成功法寶,台北:先覺出版股份有限公司,2001。
25.陳敬群,"外包類型影響因素之研究-在台日系企業之實證",碩士論文,國立東華大學企業管理研究所,2003。
26.彭朱如,醫療產業中跨組織合作關係類型與管理機制之研究,博士論文,政治大學企業管理研究所,民國八十七年。
27.黃河川,企業工作委外程度之影響因素分析-以國內生物科技廠商為例,未出版之碩士論文,國立成功大學工業管理研究所,台南市2002。
28.新村敏,楊平吉編譯, “外包業務管理”。台北:台華工商圖書出版公司 ,1988。
29.新村敏,楊平吉編譯,外包業務管理,台北:超越企管顧問股份有限公司 ,民國83年。
30.楊世瑩,「SPSS統計分析實務」,台北:旗標出版股份有限公司,2005。
31.楊長春,「策略聯盟夥伴間行為、信任與聯盟績效相關之研究」,碩士論文,淡江大學國際企業研究所,1998。
32.經理人 vol.200701, Tue, 27 Feb, 2007。
33.蔡慶陞,"台灣電子零組件產業外包策略之研究-以志豐電子為例",碩士論文,銘傳大學,2006。
34.盧娜 譯(2001),企業外包模式:如何利用外部資源提升競爭力。台北:商周出版。
35.蕭靜芳,"台灣中小企業委外運籌合作夥伴關係與電子化程度對國際行銷績效影響之研究",碩士論文,真理大學,2004。
36.鍾明鴻編譯,林正明校訂,"外包管理實務-如何降低外包成本暨管理作業要點",台北超越企管。
37.魏宗崙,"產業特性、組織因素及協同商務管理推動程度與組織績效關係之研究",碩士論文,南台科技大學,2005。
38.蘇洺賢,我國非營利組織之跨組織合作關係類型及管理機制探討,碩士靜宜大學,2000。


英文部份
1.Ansoff, H. I.(1979), “Strategic Management” ,London:Macmillan.
2.Arrow Kenneth(1974),“ The Limits of Organization”, New York: Norton.
3.Barney, J. B. (1986),” Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? Academy of Management Review”, 11, 656-665.
4.Barney, J.B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, “Journal of Management”, 17, pp.99-120.
5.Bourantas, D., (1989), "Avoiding Dependence on Suppliers and Distributors",”Long Range Planning”, Vol. 22, pp.140- 149。
6.Campbell, J. D. (1995), “Outsourcing in Maintenance Management a Valid Alternative to Self-provision”,”Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering”, 1(3), 18-23.
7.Chandler, A., D. (1990), Scale and Scope: “The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism.Cambridge: Harvard University Press”.
8.Cheon, M.J., V. Grover, and James T.C. Teng,( 1995), “Theoretical Perspectives on the Outsourcing of Information Systems”,”Journa1 of Information Technology”, Vol. 10, pp. 209-219.
9.Christensen, J.F. and N.J. Foss (1997),” Dynamic Corporate Coherence and Competence-based Competition:Theoretical Foundations and Strategic Implications. In Aime Heene and Ron Sanchez, editors, Competence-based Strategic Management”, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
10.Christopher, M. and Jüttner, U.(2000), “ Developing Strategic Partnerships in the Supply Chain: a Practitioner Perspective”,” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management”, Vol. 6, pp.117-127.
11.Coase, R. H. (1937), “The nature of the firm. Economica N. S. “, 4, 386-405. Reprinted in.
12.Contractor, F. J. and P. Lorange (1988), “Why Should Firms Cooperate? The Strategy and Economics Basic for Cooperative Venture”, In Contractor, F. J. & P. Lorange (Ed)”,”Cooperative Strategic in Iinternational Business, Lexington: D.C. Heath and Company”.
13.Corbett, M. F.(1996), ”Outsourcing as a Strategic Tool”, “Canadian Business Review”, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 14-16.
14.De Leo(1994), “Understanding the Roots of Your Competitive Advantage From Product/Market Competition as a Multiple-layer Game”, “Competence-Based Competion”,ch. 2, pp.35-55.
15.Denison, D. R.(1990),“Corporate Culture & Organizational Effectiveness,”New York:Wiley.
16.Dietrich, G. S.(1994), “The Capabilities of Market-driven Organizations”,” Journal of Marketing”, Vol.58, No.4, pp. 37-52.
17.DiRomualdo, A. & Gurbaxani, V. (1998), “Strategic Intent for IT Outsourcing. Sloan Management Review”, 39( 4), 67-80.
18.Domberger, S.(1998), “The Contracting Organization: A Strategic Guide to Outsourcing”,New York: Oxford University Press.
19.Domberger, S.(1998), “The Contracting Organization: A Strategic Guide to Outsourcing”,Oxford University Press, New York.
20.Duncan, N., (1998), “Beyond Opportunism: A Resource-based View of Outsourcing Risk. Proceedings of the HICSS”, 31 (6).
21.Eric Sislian(,2000) ,Ahmet Satir," Strategic Sourcing: A Framework and a Case Study", “ISM Artices Resources”.
22.Essig, M (2000), “ Purchasing Consortia as Symbiotic Relationships: Developing the Concept of “ Consortium Souring”,” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply management, Vol. 6, pp. 13-22,.
23.Fine, C.H. , and D.E. Whitney.(1996)," Is the Make-Buy Decision Process a Core Competence?" , Working paper, “Massachusetts Insitute of Technology”.
24.Gordan, K.A.(1994),“Outsourcing Information Technolosy - Why does It Make Sence? Fortnightly”, pp.27-31
25.Grant, R. M. (1991), “The Resources-based Theory of Competitive Advantage:Implications for Strategy Formulation”,” California Management Review”, Vol.33 Iss.3, Spring, pp.114-135.
26.Greer, C. R.; Youngblood, S. A. & Gray, D. A. (1999), “Human Resource Management Outsourcing: The Make or Buy Decision”, “The Academy of Management Executive”, 13 (3), 85-98.
27.Hamel﹐G. and Prahalad C.K(1994)﹐” Competing for the future”.
28.Hofstede, G.(1980). “Culture,s Consequences:International Differences in Work-Related Values,” London:Sage.
29.Hussey, D. and Jenster, P. (2003), “Outsourcing: The Supplier Viewpoint. Strategic Change”, 12(1), 7-20.
30.James, D. (1992), “Outsourcing: The New Gospel. Business Review Weekly (Melbourne Victoria)”, 13, 46-52.
31.Jayatilaka, B., Schwarz, A., & Hirschheim, R.(2003),“Determinants of ASP Choice: an Integrated Perspective”,”European Journal of Information Systems”, 12(3), 210-224.
32.JD Hunger and TL Wheelen(1996), “Proposed Outsourcing Matrix.” Copyright © 1996 by Wheelen and Hunger Associates.
33.Johnson, Jean L.(1999),“Strategic Integration in Industrial Distribution Channels: Managing the Interfirm Relationsh as a Strategic Asset”,” Journal of a Academy of Marketing Science”,27(1)pp.4-18.
34.Kasouf, Chickery J. and Celuch, Kevin G.(1997),“Interfirm Relationships in the Supply Chain: The Small Supplier’s View”,”Industrial Marketing Management”, 26,pp.475-486.
35.Klaas, B. S., McClendon J. M. and Gainey T. W. ( 1999),” HR Outsourcing and Its Impact: The Role of Transaction Costs. Personnel Psychology”, 52(1), 113-136.
36.Labbs, Jennifer J.(1993),“ Successful Outsourcing Depends on Critical Factors,” “Personnel Journal”, pp.51-60.
37.Lacity, M. C. & Hirschheim, R (1993),“The Information Systems Outsourcing Bandwagon. Sloan Management Review”, 35(1), 73-86.
38.Lacity, M. C. & Hirschheim, R (1993), “The Information Systems Outsourcing Bandwagon. Sloan Management Review”, 35(1), 73-86.
39.Lacity, M.C., Willcocks. L. and Feeny D.(1996), “The Value of Selective IT Outsourcing,”Sloan Management Review,,, pp.7-18.
40.Lankford, W. M & Parsa, F. (1999),” Outsourcing: a Primer. Management Decision” , 37 (4), 310-318.
41.Lever, S.(1997), “An Analysis of Managerial Motivation Behind Outsourcing Practices in Human Resources,” “Human Resource Planning”, Vol. 20, pp.37-47.
42.Lever,S.(1997), “An Analysis of Managerial Motivation Behind Outsourcing Practices in Humal Resources”,”Human Resource Planning”,Vol.20,pp.37-47.
43.Linder, J. C., Cole, M., & Jacobson, A. L. (2002), “Business Transformation Through Outsourcing. Strategy & Leadership”, 30(4), 23-29.
44.Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992).,”Determinants of Information Technology Outsourcing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis”,”Journal of Management Information Systems : JMIS”, 9 (1), 7.
45.Lyons, M.P.(1991),“Joint-Venture as Strategic Choice”,” A Literature Review”, “Long Range Planning”, 24(4),pp.130-144.
46.Milgrom, P. and R. John(1992),”Economics, Organization and Management, New Jeresey”:Pretice-Hall.
47.Minoli, D. (1995),” Analyzing Outsourcing”, New York: McGraw-Hill.
48.Moore , J.(1998), “Outsourcing Plant Automation in a Dicey Proposition,” Instrument Society of America, Vol. 45, No. 10 , pp. 235-245.
49.Nabeel, A. & Al-Qirim, Y. (2003). “The Strategic Outsourcing Decision of IT and e-Commerce: The Case of Small Business in New Zealand”,” Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications”, 5(3), 32-56.
50.Ouchi, W.G and M. K. Bolton(1988), “ The Logic of Joint Venture and Development”,” California Management Science” , 30, pp.9-33.
51.Pagnoncelli, D. (1993), “Managed Outsourcing: A Strategy for a Competitive Company in the 1990s”,” Management Science”, 31(7), 15-22.
52.Perry, C. R.(1997), “Outsourcing and Union Powe”r,” Journal of Labor Research”, pp.521-534.
53.Petrock, F.(1990), “Corporate culture enhances profits,” “HR magazine”, 35 (11):64-66.
54.Pfeffer, J . and Salancik, G. R.(1978),”Organization Design-The Case for a Coalitional”
55.Powell, W. W.(1990), “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization”,” Research in Organizational Behavior”, Vol. 12, 295-338.
56.Quinn, J. B. (1999), “Strategic Outsourcing: Leveraging Knowledge Capabilities”,” Sloan Management Review”, 40(4), 9-21.
57.Quinn, J. B., & Hilmer F. G. (1994),”Strategic Outsourcing. Sloan Management Review”, 35(4), 43-55.
58.Quinn, J. B., & Hilmer F. G. (1994),”Strategic Outsourcing. Sloan Management Review”, 35(4), 43-55.
59.Quinn, J. B.(1999), “Strategic Outsourcing: Knowledge Capabilities”,” Sloan Management Review”, pp.9-21.
60.Rindfieish&Heide(1997), “Outsourcing and Its Impact:The role of Transaction Costs”,” Personnel Psychology”, Vol. 52, pp113-136.
61.Robbins, S. P.(1990), “Organization theory:Structure,Desing,and Application”,” New Jersey:Prentice-Hall”.
62.Robbins, S.P. (1998),”Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.”
63.Sako(1992), In Bidault, F. , C. Despres and C. Butler(1998), “The drivers of Cooperation between Buyers and Suppliers for Product Iinnovatio”n,” Research Policy”, Vol.26, pp.719-732.
64.Schein, E. H.(1992). “Organizational Culture and Leadership,” (2nd ed).San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
65.Selznick, P, (1957), “Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation”, New York: Harper & Row.
66.Sharpe, M.(1997), “Outsourcing, Organizational Competitiveness and Work”,” Journal of Labor Research”, Fall 1997, Vol.18, No.4, pp.535-549.
67.Sharpe, M.(1997), “Outsourcing, Organizational Competitiveness and Work”,” Journal of Labor Research”, Fall 1997, Vol.18, No.4, pp.535-549.
68.Slaughter, S& S Ang(1996), “Employment Outsourcing in Information System”,”Commmunications of The ACM”,Vol.39,pp.47-54.
69.Stafford, E.R.(1994),“Using Co-operative Strategies to Make Alliances Work”, ” Long Range Planning”,27(3),pp. 64-74.
70.Stafford, Edwin R. (1994), “Using Co-operative Strategies to Make Alliances Work”, “Long Range Planning”, 27(3), pp. 69-70.
71.Teng, J. T. C., M. J. Cheon and V. Grove(1995), “Decisions to Outsource Information Systems Functions”, “Decision Science”, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 75-103.
72.Terrence, E. D., &. Kennedy, A. A. (1982),“Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading”, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
73.Venkartaman, N. and V. Ramanujam (1986), “Measurement of Business Performance on Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approach”,” Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 801-814
74.Venkatesan, R. (1992),”Strategic Sourcing: To Make or not to Make”,”Harvard Business Review “, 70(6), 98-107.
75.Wallach, E. J. (1983),”Individuals and Organizations:The Cultural Match. Training and Development Journal”, 37, 29-36.
76.Williamson O. E. and Winter S. (1991),” The nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, Development.”,NY: Oxford University Press, 18-33.
77.Williamson, O.E., (1975),”Markets and Hierarchies”, New York : Free Press
78.Williamson, O.E., (1979), "The Goverance of Contractual Relationships " ,”Journal ofLaw and Economic (22)”, pp 232~261
79.Williamson, O.E., (1985), “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism”, New York: The Free Press.
80.Zhu, Hsu, and Lillie (2001) ,”Outsourcing - a Strategic Move: The Process and the Iingredients for Success. Management Decision”, 39(5), 373-378
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top