跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.123) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/17 04:02
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:潘俊賢
研究生(外文):Jyun-Sian Pan
論文名稱:Ohlson修正式會計模型之研究
論文名稱(外文):Research On Ohlson’s Model Of Modified Cash Accounting
指導教授:張福星張福星引用關係
指導教授(外文):Fu Hsing Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:會計系研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:38
中文關鍵詞:修正式現金會計模型應計項目現金盈餘
外文關鍵詞:Cash EarningsAccrualsModified Cash Accounting
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:503
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究係探討由Ohlson[2007]所提出之修正式現金會計模型(Modified Cash Accounting)。由於現金流量表無法提供有底線數字的結果可與損益表之淨利比較分析差異、評估會計盈餘品質與經營績效,且企業管理當局常基於企業整體利益或其經理人自身利益之考量,運用某些方法或程序介入財務報表編製過程並影響財務報告之結果,以達成其所預定之盈餘目標的行為,常見的手法是透過裁決性應計項目之變動,因此修正式現金會計模型的運用,主要係針對現金流量表之問題加以修正,模型中透過對現金定義放寬,可消除應計項目,並將直接法編製之現金流量表內容,改造彙編成修正式現金會計基礎之損益表,其最終結果得以計算現金盈餘,稱之為現金盈餘表。

現金盈餘與淨利間的差異即為淨應計項目,由於Ohlson推論淨應計項目與成長間存有正向關係,而國內目前尚未有Ohlson修正式現金會計模型之運用研究,因此本文利用現金盈餘與淨利可計算淨應計項目,並擬以我國上市電子公司財務資料為研究樣本,研究期間自民國94年至95年為止共2個年度,資料取自於台灣經濟新報資料庫(TEJ)之財務資料庫,透過統計單變量迴歸分析,用以驗證淨應計項目與成長間是否存有正向關係,實證分析結果亦支持應計項目與成長兩者確實存有正向關係。
This study is research on Ohlson’s model of modified cash accounting as Ohlson [2007]. Because that statement of cash flows lacks a clear “bottom-line” directly comparable to net income to assessment accounting earnings quality and firm’s performance. And management often thinks about firm’s earnings targets or Self-interest Behavior. Then use some methods or procedures to get involved in the financial and influence the result of the financial report, to reach the behavior of the earnings targets. The common tactics are change of discretionary accruals. So the application of the modified cash model is mainly revising to the question of the cash flow statement. Through defining broader of cash in the model can to eliminate all accruals and re-creation cash flow statement content. It works like a regular income statement on a cash and approximate cash equivalent basis. Finally, the derivation of the bottom-line for the cash earnings statement is referred to as MCA’s (net) comprehensive cash earnings.

The difference among the cash earnings and net income is called net accrual. Ohlson inference that the net accrual and growth have positive relation and about application research of modified cash accounting model has not yet at present. Appliance difference of cash earnings and net income to calculate the net accrual. Then this text planned to regard financial materials of electronics industry as the sample of Taiwan. The Empirical data are obtained from the Taiwan Economic Journal Data Bank (TEJ) amounted to 2years since 2005 till 2006. Use statistical regression analysis to test hypothesis. Empirical results of study are the association between net accrual and growth is positive significantly.
目錄
摘要 I
英文摘要 II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 V
壹、緒論 1
貳、Ohlson MCA與實例試算 4
第一節 修正式現金會計模型(MCA) 4
第二節 舉例試算現金盈餘 15
參、研究方法 18
第一節 研究假說 18
第二節 變數衡量與實證模型 18
第三節 研究期間與資料來源 19
肆、實證研究結果 21
迴歸分析 21
伍、結論與建議 23
第一節 研究結論 23
第二節 研究建議 23
參考文獻 24
中文部份 24
英文部份 25
附錄一 以聯發科95年合併報表為例試算綜合現金盈餘 27
參考文獻
中文部份
1.王萬成、高祥�琚A2002,裁決性應計項目、衍生性金融商品與損益平穩化,         
 2002 財務金融學術研討會。
2.方冠智,2004,現金流量資訊攸關性之研究,東吳大學會計學系研究所未出
版之碩士論文。
3.李英麟,2001,盈餘、現金流量與應計項目預測未來現金流量能力之研究,  
中原大學會計系研究所未出版之碩士論文。
4.李哲儒,2001,我國企業盈餘管理手法之研究,台灣省稅務研究月刊88 期。
5.吳怡君,1994,盈餘對未來盈餘及現金流量預測能力之研究,台灣大學會計 
學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
6.沈維民,1997,企業盈餘之管理:以「會計方法選用」和「應計項目認列」  
為例,管理評論,第16卷,第1期:11-38。
7.林玟汎,2003,應計項目、現金流量與公司價值,國立中山大學財務管理學
系研究所未出版之碩士論文。
8.林有志,2004,分析師對應計項目持續性認知之研究。會計與公司治理,第1
卷,第1期:25-45。
9.洪慧娟,2001,應計項目與未來現金流量預測之研究,國立成功大學會計系
研究所未出版之碩士論文。
10.張懿心,2000,現金流量與應計項目增額資訊內涵之研究,國立成功大學會
計系研究所未出版之碩士論文。
11.黃志暉,2004,現金流量組成項目資訊有用性之研究,國立成功大學會計系
研究所未出版之碩士論文。
12.鄭淩淇,1999,裁決性應計項目的資訊內涵,中原大學會計系研究所未出版
之碩士論文。
13.賴育芝,2000,現金流量增額資訊內涵之探討,國立交通大學經營管理研究
所未出版之碩士論文。
14.羅筱靖,2001,應計項目、現金流量與公司價值,中原大學會計系研究所未
出版之碩士論文。



英文部份
1.Barth, M., and A. Hutton. 2004. Analyst earnings forecast revisions and the pricing of accruals. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (1): 59-96.
2.Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1998. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 99-126.
3.Burgstahler, D., J. Jiambalvo, and T. Shevlin. 2002. Do stock prices fully reflect the implications of special items for future earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (3): 585-612.
4.Collins, D., and P. Hribar. 2000. Earnings-based and accrual-based market anomalies: One effect or two? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (1): 101-123.
5.Dechow, P. and C. Schrand. 2004. Earnings Quality. The Research Foundation of CFA Institute. Charlottesville, Virginia.
6.DeFond, M., and M. Hung. 2003. An empirical analysis of analysts’ cash flow forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics 35 (1): 73-100.
7.Degeorge, F., J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business 72: 1-33.
8.Desai, H., S. Rajgopal, and M. Venkatachalam. 2004. Value-glamour and accruals mispricing: One anomaly or two? The Accounting Review 79 (2): 135-155.
9.Doyle, J., R. Lundholm, and M. Soliman. 2003. The predictive value of expenses excluded from pro forma earnings. Review of Accounting Studies 8 (2-3): 145-174.
10.Elliott, J., and J. D. Hanna. 1996. Repeated accounting write-offs and the information content of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 34 (supplement): 117-134.
11.Fairfield, P., J. Whisenant, and T. Yohn. 2003. Accrued earnings and growth: Implications for future profitability and market mispricing. The Accounting Review 78 (1): 353-371.
12.Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 1987. Statement of cash flows. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95. Norwalk, CT.
13.Gu, Z., and T. Chen. 2004. Analysts’ treatment of nonrecurring items in street earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 38 (1-3): 129-170.
14.Hayn, C. 1995. The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (1): 125-153.
15.Hribar, P., and D. Collins. 2000. Earnings-based and accrual-based market anomalies: One effect or two? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (1): 101-123.
16.McVay, S. 2006. Earnings management using classification shifting: An examination of core earnings and special items. The Accounting Review 81 (3): 501-531.
17.Moehrle, S. 2002. Do firms use restructuring charge reversals to meet earnings targets? The Accounting Review 77 (2): 397-413.
18.Nurnberg, H. 2006. Perspectives on the cash flow statement under FASB statement No. 95. Occasional paper series, Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis. Columbia University.
19.Ohlson, J. 2006. A practical model of earnings measurement. The Accounting Review 81 (1): 271-279.
20.Ohlson, J.2007. On The Analysis of Firms’Cash Flows. Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis.
21.Penman, S. 2006. Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. Third edition. McGraw Hill.
22.Richardson, R., R. Sloan, M. Soliman, and I. Tuna. 2006. The implications of accounting distortions and growth for accruals and profitability. The Accounting Review 81 (3): 713-743.
23.Sloan, R. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review 71 (3): 289-315.
24.Wasley, C., and J. S. Wu. 2006. Why do managers voluntarily issue cash flow forecasts? Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2): 389-429.
25.Xie, H. 2001. The mispricing of abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 76 (3): 357-373.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top