跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.223) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/29 15:09
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:LE HOANG
研究生(外文):LE HOANG
論文名稱:臺灣低矮街屋一樓屋後鋼筋混凝土開口外牆反復載重行為
論文名稱(外文):Cyclic behavior of squat reinforced concrete walls with openings typical of the first story backside exterior walls of row houses in Tai
指導教授:歐昱辰歐昱辰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yu-Chen Ou
口試委員:鄭敏元邱建國Fu-Pei HsiaoYung-Chih WangYu-Chen Ou
口試委員(外文):Min-Yuan ChengChien-Kuo ChiuFu-Pei HsiaoYung-Chih WangYu-Chen Ou
口試日期:2019-07-10
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:營建工程系
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:190
中文關鍵詞:Reinforced concreteLow-rise buildingsSquat wallsOpeningsLateral strengthPerforated RC wallRC wall with openings
外文關鍵詞:Reinforced concreteLow-rise buildingsSquat wallsOpeningsLateral strengthPerforated RC wallRC wall with openings
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:227
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:5
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
During the several current decades, Modern buildings are interested in design to resist lateral loads due to wind and earthquake. For both low-rise buildings or high-rise buildings, a large amount capacity of strength and stiffness by shear wall commonly are sufficiently provided into these types of building for resisting lateral forces. In particular of Taiwan practical design, the architecture purposes and service requirement such as the pass-way, lighting, ventilation of low-rise housing in were interested, these modern street housing trend to be made of perforated reinforced concrete walls (PRCW). Although it is implied that the behavior of shear wall in-plane is as well as strongly influenced in resistance later loading. However, the history damages of the front-side and back-side of Taiwanese street house using large opening ways on the first floor, as evidenced by the fact that the several previous earthquakes were enabled to cause most damages and collapse for the first floor. This phenomenon destruction of these such low-rise buildings also happened in many high seismic areas in the world with the same trend design. In addition, because of the widespread application of perforated RC wall for modern buildings, at the beginning of the 1980s, the seismic behavior of these such walls were interested the significant researchers. The previous reports and research results presented that the strength and ductility of PRCW are influenced due to the size and location of openings in the wall.
The presence provisions for evaluating shear strength capacity of the perforated RC wall, as far as we know, only provide approximated methods or analysis model, but do not precisely guide the evaluation methods for calculation. Besides, the experimental investigations on shear walls with openings was published by the number of researches and reports, but the test specimens just focused on the small-scale of PRCW. It is impressed that the more advantage of this study was the test of large-scale specimen, an experimental program of six RC wall specimens with one door and one window were tested under lateral cyclic load, then to develop a simplified provision to estimate the shear strength capacity of the perforated RC wall. From the significant experimental observations and this study test, the segments between openings normally showed the failure modes meanwhile other segments with fewer cracks was not failed. Moreover, these failure segments trended to show independently behavior under the cyclic loading. Based on the first failure of a segment between openings, this study provision is set up due to force-deformation behaviors of all segments between the openings. Actually, the proposed model conservatively predicts the lateral strength of the test specimen, but the proposed provision may estimate the failure mode of segments between openings. The considered segments should be modified based on the main crack observation, to develop a better model in future.
To deeply understand the seismic effects to the structural RC frame, an experimental plan was proposed to investigate the behavior of a large specimen with 2 bays - 2 stories. Under the influence of lateral cyclic loading, the part wall with openings observed relevant seismic behavior as the previous test of 5 small walls. The measured results of the 2nd test shown the abundant deformation that was contributed by the first floor, a very necessary understanding about the behavior of the 1st-floor structure is discussed to indicate that the evaluation of perforated RC wall strength is also important for seismic design.
During the several current decades, Modern buildings are interested in design to resist lateral loads due to wind and earthquake. For both low-rise buildings or high-rise buildings, a large amount capacity of strength and stiffness by shear wall commonly are sufficiently provided into these types of building for resisting lateral forces. In particular of Taiwan practical design, the architecture purposes and service requirement such as the pass-way, lighting, ventilation of low-rise housing in were interested, these modern street housing trend to be made of perforated reinforced concrete walls (PRCW). Although it is implied that the behavior of shear wall in-plane is as well as strongly influenced in resistance later loading. However, the history damages of the front-side and back-side of Taiwanese street house using large opening ways on the first floor, as evidenced by the fact that the several previous earthquakes were enabled to cause most damages and collapse for the first floor. This phenomenon destruction of these such low-rise buildings also happened in many high seismic areas in the world with the same trend design. In addition, because of the widespread application of perforated RC wall for modern buildings, at the beginning of the 1980s, the seismic behavior of these such walls were interested the significant researchers. The previous reports and research results presented that the strength and ductility of PRCW are influenced due to the size and location of openings in the wall.
The presence provisions for evaluating shear strength capacity of the perforated RC wall, as far as we know, only provide approximated methods or analysis model, but do not precisely guide the evaluation methods for calculation. Besides, the experimental investigations on shear walls with openings was published by the number of researches and reports, but the test specimens just focused on the small-scale of PRCW. It is impressed that the more advantage of this study was the test of large-scale specimen, an experimental program of six RC wall specimens with one door and one window were tested under lateral cyclic load, then to develop a simplified provision to estimate the shear strength capacity of the perforated RC wall. From the significant experimental observations and this study test, the segments between openings normally showed the failure modes meanwhile other segments with fewer cracks was not failed. Moreover, these failure segments trended to show independently behavior under the cyclic loading. Based on the first failure of a segment between openings, this study provision is set up due to force-deformation behaviors of all segments between the openings. Actually, the proposed model conservatively predicts the lateral strength of the test specimen, but the proposed provision may estimate the failure mode of segments between openings. The considered segments should be modified based on the main crack observation, to develop a better model in future.
To deeply understand the seismic effects to the structural RC frame, an experimental plan was proposed to investigate the behavior of a large specimen with 2 bays - 2 stories. Under the influence of lateral cyclic loading, the part wall with openings observed relevant seismic behavior as the previous test of 5 small walls. The measured results of the 2nd test shown the abundant deformation that was contributed by the first floor, a very necessary understanding about the behavior of the 1st-floor structure is discussed to indicate that the evaluation of perforated RC wall strength is also important for seismic design.
ABSTRACT
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
LIST OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES ix
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1. Historical background
1.2. Problem definition
1.3. Objective and Scope
1.4. Organization
CHAPTER 2 PREVIOUS RESEARCH AND LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Reinforced concrete wall
2.2.1. Reinforced concrete wall
2.2.2. Failure modes
2.3. Previous researches
CHAPTER 3 EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM 1
3.1. Specimen design
3.2. Material
3.3. Construction of specimens
3.4. Test setup
3.4.1. Instrumental setup
3.4.2. Test setup and applied loading
3.5. Experimental observation
3.5.1. Wall W1
3.5.2. Wall W2
3.5.3. Wall W3
3.5.4. Wall W4
3.5.5. Wall W5
3.6. Discussion of the test result
CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM 2
4.1. Specimen design
4.2. Material properties
4.2.1. Concrete
4.2.2. Reinforcement bars
4.3. Construction of specimen
4.4. Test setup
4.5. Experimental observation
CHAPTER 5 SHEAR STRENGTH EVALUATION
5.1. Shear strength evaluation of segment
5.2. Deformation
5.3. Axial load
5.4. Proposed provision and experimental verification
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION
6.1. Conclusion
6.2. Future work
REFERENCE
APPENDIX A STRAIN GAUGE READING OF THE INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS
A.1 Histories of strain gauge in reinforcement bars of specimen W1
A.2 Histories of strain gauge in reinforcement bars of specimen W2
A.3 Histories of strain gauge in reinforcement bars of specimen W3
A.1 Histories of strain gauge in reinforcement bars of specimen W3
A.5 Histories of strain gauge in reinforcement bars of specimen W5
APPENDIX B STRAIN GAUGE READING OF THE LARGE SPECIMEN
B.1 Histories of strain gauge in reinforcement bars of boundary column C1
B.2 Histories of strain gauge in reinforcement bars of boundary column C2
B.3 Histories of strain gauge in reinforcement bars of boundary column C3
B.4 Histories of strain gauge in horizontal reinforcement bars of wall web
B.5 Histories of strain gauge in vertical reinforcement bars of wall web
APPENDIX C EXPERIMENTAL TO CALCULATED LATERAL STRENGTH
C.1 Proposed model
C.2 Model 1
C.3 Model 2
C.4 Model 3
1. American Concrete Institute, ACI 318-14 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (Metric). 2014: American Concrete Institute.
2. Park, R. and T. Paulay, Strength and Deformation of Members with Shear, in Reinforced Concrete Structures. 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 270-345.
3. Ono, M. and I. Tokuhiro, Experimental Studies on Elasto-Plastic Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Framed Shear Walls with Various Kinds of Openings. Reports of the Faculty of Engineering, Kinki University in Kyushu. Science and technology section, 1985. 14: p. 33-63.
4. Ono, M., Effects of Parameters of Framed Shear Walls with an Opening on Failure Behaviors. Summaries of technical papers of Annual Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan. Structures II, 1994. 1994: p. 283-284.
5. Ono, M. and I. Tokuhiro, Study on Estimate of the Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Framed Shear Walls with Opening. Concrete Research and Technology, 1996. 7(2): p. 53-64.
6. Ono, M. and I. Tokuhiro, Experimental Studies on Elasto-Plastic Behaviors Reinforced Concrete Framed Shear Walls of Different Wall Thickness with Opening. Summaries of technical papers of Annual Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan. Structures II, 1989. 1989: p. 599-600.
7. Ono, M. and I. Tokuhiro, Experimental Studies on Elasto-Plastic Behaviors of Shear Walls with Different Wall Thickness. Reports of the Faculty of Engineering, Kinki University in Kyushu. Science and technology section, 1989. 18: p. 31-39.
8. Tokuhiro, I. and M. Ono, 2066 Experimental Studies on Elasto-Plastic Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls with Opening Except in Center. Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute, 1987. 9(2): p. 385-390.
9. Ono, M. and I. Tokuhiro, A proposal of reducing rate for strength due to the opening effect of reinforced concrete framed shear walls. Journal of structural and construction engineering, 1992(435): p. p119-129.
10. Ono, M. and I. Tokuhiro, Study on Estimate of the Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Framed Shear Walls with Opening. Concrete research and technology, Japan Concrete Institute, 1996. 7(2): p. 53-64.
11. Ono, M. and I. Tokuhiro, Study on Estimate of the Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Framed Shear Walls with Opening (in Japanese). Concrete Research and Technology, 1996. 7(2): p. 53-64.
12. Institute, J.A., AIJ Standard for Structural Calculation of Reinforced Concrete Structures. 8th ed. 2010. 525.
13. A. Kitano, O.J., Y. Goto, Experimental study on the strengthening and repair of R/C wall-frame structures with an opening by CF-Sheets or CF-Grids, in CICE 2004. 2004. p. 631-642.
14. Zhang, L., J.O. Jirsa, and P.M.F.S.E. Laboratory, A Study of Shear Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beam-column Joints. 1982: Phil M. Ferguson Structural Engineering Laboratory, the University of Texas at Austin.
15. Yu-Chen Ou, L.H. A study of the methods for predicting the shear strength of reinforced concrete squat walls with opening. in The Thirteenth National Conference on Structural Engineering/The Third National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2016. Taoyuan, Taiwan.
16. Urabe Ai, et al. Experimental Study on shear strength of RC wall with a large opening in Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute. 2009.
17. Yamazaki Chihiro, et al. A Study on the reinforcement for new openings in the existing wall. in Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute 2005. Japan.
18. Fuzii Kazuhisa, et al. Mechanical behavior of R/C framed shear walls with reinforced wall panel beside an opening. in Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute. 2002. Japan.
19. Matsuoka Yoshinori, Esaki Fumiya, and Masayuki Ono. Effect of loading rate on mechanical behavior of R/C framed shear walls with an opening. in Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute. 2003. Japan.
20. Kabeyasawa Toshimi, Kikai Yoshiharu, and Kimura Takumi. Experimental study on reinforcement details of reinforced concrete shear walls with opening. in Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute. 1988. Japan.
21. Kabeyasawa Toshimi, K.T. Ultimate strength reduction of reinforced concrete shear walls with an opening. in Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute 1989. Japan.
22. Takeda Hiroshi and Ohtsuki Kazuo, Reinforcement concrete slender wall: an experimental study on the shear stiffness of reinforced concrete slender walls with vertical opening. 1991, Architectural Institute of Japan. p. 455-459.
23. Masayuki Ono, Tokuhiro Ikuo, and Kuratomi Kazuyoshi, Experimental study on ultimate shear strength of reinforced concrete shear walls with vertical opening. 1992, Architectural Institute of Japan. p. 385-356.
24. Nisiyama Taku and Masayuki Ono, Experimental study on reinforced concrete opening wall above opening periphery ratio 0.4. 1995, Architectural Institute of Japan. p. 47-148.
25. Kanehira Yukichi and Mochizuki Makoto. Degradation behaviors of framed shear walls with an opening subjected to a repeated load at a high speed. in Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute. 2000. Japan.
26. Kumagai Hitoshi, et al., Structural behavior of high strength concrete shear walls. 1990, Architectural Institute of Japan p. 611-612.
27. Minoda Hirohisa , et al., Effect of loading rate on elasto-plastic behaviors of shear walls with opening (part1 and 2). 1998, Architectural Institute of Japan p. 385-392.
28. Aoyama H., et al. Strength and behavior of post-cast shear walls for strengthening of existing reinforced concrete building. in Proc. Of 8th WCEE. 1984.
29. Taylor, C.P., P.A. Cote, and J.W. Wallace, Design of Slender Reinforced Concrete Walls with Openings. 318Reference. 21(47).
30. Li, B., Report: design of reinforced conrete walls with openings. 2005 p. 537.
31. ACI Committee 318, ACI 318-14 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (Metric). 2014: American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills. 503.
32. Julian, C. and M.A. Sergio, Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Walls for Seismic Design of Low-Rise Housing. Structural Journal, 2013. 110(3): p. 11.
33. Bing, L. and C. Qin, Initial stiffness of reinforced concrete structural walls with irregular openings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010. 39(4): p. 397-417.
34. Neuenhofer, A., Lateral Stiffness of Shear Walls with Openings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006. 132(11): p. 1846-1851.
35. Lindeburg, M.R. and K.M. McMullin, Seismic Design of Building Structures: A Professional's Introduction to Earthquake Forces and Design Details. 2011: Professional Publications.
36. Hofbeck, J.A., I.O. Ibrahim, and A.H. Mattock, Shear Transfer in Reinforced Concrete. Journal Proceedings, 1969. 66(2).
37. Mattock, A.H., Shear Friction and High-Strength Concrete. 318Reference, 2001. 11(50).
38. Krolicki, J., J. Maffei, and G.M. Calvi, Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Walls Subjected to Cyclic Loading. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2011. 15(sup1): p. 30-71.
39. Robert Park and Thomas Paulay, Reinforced Concrete Structures. 1975: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
40. Bing Li and Weizheng Xiang, Effective Stiffness of Squat Structural Walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2011. 137(12): p. 1470-1479.
41. Tang, T.O. and R.K.L. Su, Shear and Flexural Stiffnesses of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls Subjected to Cyclic Loading. he Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 2014. 8: p. 18.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top