跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.11) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/24 07:31
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林衍慶
研究生(外文):Yen-Ching Lin
論文名稱:庫藏股與實質選擇權
論文名稱(外文):Stock Repurchase and Real Option
指導教授:姜一銘姜一銘引用關係
指導教授(外文):I-Ming Jiang
口試委員:劉裕宏洪瑞成
口試委員(外文):Yu-Hong LiuJui-Cheng Hung
口試日期:20160707
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:財務金融暨會計碩士班(財務金融學程)
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:一般商業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:36
中文關鍵詞:庫藏股實質選擇權訊號理論
外文關鍵詞:Stock RepurchaseReal OptionSignal Theory
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:197
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
公司在決定是否執行庫藏股時(Stock Repurchase),有許多的考量,因此出現了許多探討執行因素的假說。其中,訊號理論是一個被廣泛研究的假說。Dann (1981)、Vermaelen (1981)、Asquith and Mullins(1986)以及Comment and Jarrell (1991)的研究都支持了訊號理論。而Grullon(2004)的研究反對了訊號理論。
本文鑒於訊號理論為庫藏股執行假說為最常討論的議題,而多數研究多會以異常報酬的形式證明或推翻此理論,但異常報酬僅是代表市場的認同,其實另一方面也可能經理人認為股價低估而執行庫藏股,但因市場不認同而沒有異常報酬。所以,本文期待能以不同的方式驗證這個假說,更加強調的是經理人的動機,即執行庫藏股是否是基於對股價的低估,而非結果,即股價是否上漲。
本文視執行庫藏股為公司對自己本身的投資案,由於此類投資案的價值具有高度不確定性(Uncertainty)以及不可回復性(Irreversibility),並非傳統上以淨現值(Net Present Value)大於零就投資如此簡單。因此,期待透過訊號理論的假說,以實質選擇權(Real Option)模擬出經理人在公司股價低估下,買回庫藏股的時機,再對模型參數做實證,若參數顯著且與市場方向相符,則可以藉與以往不同的實證方式支持訊號理論。

This paper takes real option approach to model how companies consider exercising share repurchase when stock price are undervalued. Companies in deciding whether to execute the stock repurchase, there are many considerations, so there were many factors to explore the implementation of the hypothesis and there are many Share Repurchases Hypothesis. Signal Theory is one of the most discussed and widely studied. The researches of Dann (1981), Vermaelen (1981), Asquith and Mullins (1986) and Comment and Jarrell (1991) support the signal theory while Grullon (2004)’s against the signal theory. Most verifications use abnormal return. However, in this paper I want to verify the motivation, not reactions about share repurchase. Therefore, I take real option approach to model how companies consider exercising share repurchase. Then the model’s parameter is verified. If parameter’s direction consistent with market direction. It supposed to be a successful evidence for the Signal Theory.
目錄
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
第一章、前言 1
第二章、文獻回顧 3
2.1:實質選擇權(Real option)與淨現值法(Net Present Value, NPV) 3
2.2:庫藏股制度與相關法令說明 5
2.3:庫藏股(Stock Repurchase) 的執行假說 8
第三章、模型 11
3.1:模型假設 11
3.2:公司未來獲利確定性 13
3.3:公司未來獲利隨機性 14
第四章、實證 17
4.1:模型結果 17
4.2:假設 17
4.3:資料 18
4.4:方法 19
4.5:結果 20
第五章、結論 21
參考文獻 22
附錄一 24
附錄二 26
附錄三 28



1. Auerbach, A. J., 1986. The Dynamic Effects of Tax Law Asymmetries. Review of Econmic Studies53, 205-226.
2. Comment, R., and G. Jarrell., 1991. The relative signaling power of Dutch-auction and fix-price self-tender offers and open-market share repurchase. Journal of Finance46, 1243-1271.
3. Chuan-Chuan Ko., 2011. The venture capital entry model on game options with jump-diffusion process. Int. J. Production Economics134, 87-94.
4. Dann, L. Y., 1981. Common stock repurchase: An analysis of returns to shareholders and bondholders. Journal of Financial Economics9, 113-138.
5. David Ikenberry, Josef Lakonishok, Theo Vermaelen., 1995. Market underreaction to open market share repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics39, 181-208.
6. Edward Yardeni , Joe Abbott , Mali Quintana., 2016. Stock Market Indicators: S&P 500 Buybacks & Dividends. Yardeni Research, 1-12.
7. George W. Fenn and Nellie Liang., 2001. Corporate payout policy and managerial stock incentives. Journal of Financial Economics60, 45-72.
8. George W. Fenn and Nellie Liang., 1997. Good News and Bad News About Share Repurchases. FEDS Paper No. 4.
9. Grullon G and Michaely, R., 2004. The information content of share repurchase programs. Journal of Financial59, 651-680.
10. Gustavo Grullon and David L. Ikenberry., 2000. What Do We Know about Stock Repurchases? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance13, 31-51.
11. Jensen, M C., 1986. Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. America Economic Review76, 323-329.
12. Josef Lakonishok and Theo Vermaeken., 1990. Anomalous Price Behavior Around Repurchase Tender Offers. The Journal of Finance45, 455-477.
13. Laurie Simon Bagwell., 1991. Share repurchase and takeover deterrence. The RAND Journal of Economics22, 72-88.
14. Michael C. Jensen., 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review76, 323-329.
15. Myers, S. C., 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics5, 147-176.
16. Paul Asquith and David W. Mullins, Jr., 1986. Signalling with Dividends, Stock Repurchases, and Equity Issues. Financial Management15, 27-44.
17. Pugh, W. and J. Jahera., 1990. Stock Repurchases and Excess Returns: An Empirical Examination. The Financial Review25, 127-142.
18. Robert MacDonald and Daniel Siegel., 1986. The Value of Waiting to Invest. The Quarterly Journal of Economics101, 707-728.
19. Trigeorgis, L. and S. P. Mason., 1987. Valuing managerial flexibility. Midland Corporate Finance Journal5, 14-21.
20. Theo Vermaelen., 1981. Common Stock Repurchases and Market Signaling. Journal of Financial Economics9 139-183.
21. Vafeas, Nikos, and O. Maurice Joy., 1995. Open Market Share Repurchases and the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis. cEonomics Letters48, 405-410.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top