臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究使用數值方法探討加勁土體平面應變試驗之應力應變行為、體積應變行為及加勁材料張力應變行為，以平面應變試驗結果驗證數值模型之正確性，數值方法採用二維(2D)與三維(3D)分析模式，首先建立二維分析模型，以平面應變試驗結果校正數值參數後，建立三維分析模型，三維分析模型由二維分析模型轉換(等值斷面法)而來。藉由比較二維與三維分析結果，觀察加勁材料於平面應變方向之尺寸效應對分析結果之影響，以評估二維與三維分析模式之限制及適用性。最後進行試體盒尺寸之參數分析，並以覆蓋率及強度比之方法預測複合土體強度。由數值分析結果得知，本文數值模型模擬平面應變試驗具有良好之模擬結果，以及藉由參數分析結果，可預測不同試體盒大小以及不同覆蓋率狀態下之複合土體強度，經由多組數值試驗證實，此模式有良好之預測結果。

The study discussed the stress-strain behavior and volumetric-strain behavior of reinforced soil, and the tension-strain of reinforcement at plane strain test by numerical method. The numerical model was also verified from the laboratory data of the plane strain test. The numerical method adopted the analytic model of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) modes. First phase is to construct the 2D analytic model, and correct the parameters by the laboratory result of the plane strain test. Then 3D model was developed from converting the 2D analytic model to 3D version by equivalent cross-section method. The results indicated that the effect of analytic result upon the size effect of reinforcement at plane strain direction by comparing the analytic result between 2D and 3D modes, and to estimate the restriction and appropriateness of 2D and 3D analytic models. At last, changing the size of container to proceed with parameter study, and predict the strength of composite soil by the methods of cover ratio and strength ratio. The numerical analysis shows that the plane strain tests have good simulate in this research. Moreover, the different sizes of container and the different cover ratio of the strength of composite soil are predictable by results obtained from parameter study. Consequently, this method has good prediction result through the proof of many numerical tests.

摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 IX
符號表 XVII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機及目的 1
1.2 研究方法 2
1.3 研究內容 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1 加勁土壤簡介 5
2.2 地工格網與土壤之互制行為8
2.2.1 地工格網簡介 8
2.2.2 互制行為 10
2.2.3 影響互制行為之因子 11
2.3 加勁土壤的穩定分析方法 14
2.3.1 極限平衡法 14
2.3.2 工作應力法 15
2.4 加勁土體分析模型 17
2.4.1 分離法 17
2.4.2 均質法 18
2.5 加勁土體數值分析討論 20
第三章 平面應變試驗與FLAC程式 23
3.1 平面應變試驗介紹 23
3.1.1 平面應變試驗設備介紹 27
3.1.2 平面應變試驗過程及內容 30
3.1.3 平面應變試驗結果 33
3.2 FLAC程式介紹 35
3.2.1 FLAC內建材料模型 37
3.2.2 內建元素 40
3.2.3 FLAC案例介紹 45
第四章 發展二維數值模型 47
4.1 土壤模型 47
4.2 加勁材料模型 53
4.3 邊界情況設定 55
4.4 平衡準則 59
4.5 FISH語言 60
4.5.1 Duncan雙曲線模式 60
4.5.2 平面應變摩擦角 62
4.5.3 加勁材料與側壁 63
4.5.4 加壓系統 65
4.6 數值分析流程 69
4.6.1 建立分析模型 69
4.6.2 參數設定 71
4.6.3 程式流程 78
4.7 二維數值模型分析結果 80
4.7.1 未加勁土體分析結果 80
4.7.2 加勁土體分析結果 85
第五章 發展三維數值模型 99
5.1 建立三維數值模型 99
5.1.1 建立分析模型 100
5.1.2 驗証二維數值模型 103
5.1.3 建立GTA試驗數值模型 106
5.2 三維數值模型分析結果 112
第六章 數值模型討論與GTA試驗參數分析128
6.1 數值模式討論 128
6.1.1 土體內部行為 128
6.1.2 加勁材料張力行為 134
6.1.3 二維與三維分析之討論 140
6.2 GTA試驗參數分析 143
6.2.1 參數分析規劃 143
6.2.2 參數分析結果討論 146
6.2.3 複合土體強度之預測 157
第七章 結論與建議 165
7.1 結論 165
7.2 建議 167
參考文獻 168
附錄A 176
附錄B 177
附錄C 178
附錄D 179
附錄E 184
作者簡歷 187

1.林上源，「應變率對地工加勁材基本性質影響之探討」，私立中原大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2000)。
2.陳天健、陳榮河，「加勁擋土牆異向性分析法之研究」，第七屆大地工程學術研討會，台北金山活動中心，第751-758頁，(1997)。
3.陳天健，「加勁擋土牆靜動態行為之均質化分析」，國立台灣大學土木工程研究所，博士論文，(1998)。
4.陳聰嘉，「以大型直接剪力試驗探討聚酯（PET）格網/土壤界面剪力行為之研究」，國立暨南國際大學土木工程學系，碩士論文，(2006)。
5.謝坤宏，「地工格網於砂土圍壓下拉出互制行為之探討」，私立中原大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(1999)。
6.劉柏儀，「以大型平面應變試驗儀探討加勁土體行為之研究」，國立暨南國際大學土木工程學系，碩士論文，(2006)。
7.Allen, T. M., “Determination of Long-Term Tensile Strength of Geosynthetics: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Geosynthetics ’91, Atlanta, Vol. 1, pp. 351-379, (1991).
8.Atkinson, J. H., “An Introduction to the Mechanics of Soils and Foundations,” McGraw-Hill, (1993).
9.Boyle, S. R., “Deformation Prediction of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls,” Ph.D. Dissertation, university of Washington, (1995).
10.Boyle, S.R., Gallapher, M., and Holtz, R.D., “Influence of Strain Rate, Specimen Length and confinement on Measured Geotextile Properties,” Geosynthetics International, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 205-225, (1996).
11.Bergado, D. T., and Teerawattanasuk, C., “2D and 3D numerical simulations of reinforced embankments on soft ground,” Journal of Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 26, pp. 39-55, (2008).
12.Chou, Nelson N.S., “Performance Predictions of The Colorado Geotextile Test Walls” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls, p. 315, (1992).
13.Claybourn, Alan F., Wu, Jonathan T.H., “Failure Loads of The Denver Walls by Current Design Methods” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls, p. 61, (1992).
14.Chen, R.H., and Chen, T.C., “Numerical Simulation of Dynamic Behavior of Soil with Reinforcement,” Sixth International Conference on Geosynthetics, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 1083-1086, (1998).
15.Chung, W., and Cascante, G., “Experimental and numerical study of soil-reinforcement effects on the low-strain stiffness and bearing capacity of shallow foundations,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, V. 25, N. 3, pp. 265-281, (2007).
16.Duncan, J. M., and Chang, C-Y., “Nonlinear Analysis of stress and Strain in Soils,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol, 96, No. SM5, September, (1970).
17.Duncan, J. M., P. Byrne, K. S. Wong, and P. Mabry, “Strength, Stress-Strain and Bulk Modulus Parameters for Finite Element Analyses of Stresses and Movements in Soil Masses,” Berkeley, College of Engineering, Report No. UCB/GT/80-01, (1980).
18.Elias, V., and Christopher, B., “Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls andReinforced Soil Slopes: Design and Construction Guideline,” Publication No. FHWA-SA-96-071, FHWA, US Dept. of Transportation, (1996)
19.FHWA., “Performance Test for Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Including Effects of Preloading,” FHWA-RD-01-118, 270p, (2001).
20.Filz, G. M., and Smith, M. E., “Net Vertical Loads on Geosynthetic Reinforcement in Column-Supported Embankments,” Proceedings of Sessions of Geo-Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA, February, (2007).
21.Harrison, W.J., and Gerrard, C.M., “Elastic Theory Applied to Reinforced Earth,”Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation, ASCE, Vol 98, pp. 1325-1345, (1972).
22.Han, J., and Gabr, M. A., “Numerical Analysis of Geosynthetic-Reinforced and Pile-Supported Earth Platforms over Soft Soil,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 1, pp. 44-56, (2002).
23.Hinchberger, S. D., and Rowe, R. K., “Geosynthetic reinforced embankments on soft clay foundations: predicting reinforcement strains at failure,” Journal of Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 21, 3, pp. 151-175, (2003).
24.Hatami, K., and Bathurst, R.J., “Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions,” Journal of Canada Geotechnical, V. 42, pp. 1066-1085, (2005).
25.Huang, J., “Coupled Mechanical and Hydraulic Modeling of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Column-Supported Embankments,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kansas, (2007).
26.Itasca Consulting Group Inc., “Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua,” Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. Volume I, II, III, IV, (1999).
27.Itasca Consulting Group Inc., “Fast Lagrangian analysis of Continua in 3 dimensions: FLAC3D version 2.10.,” Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., (2002).
28.Koerner, R. M., “Designing with Geosynthetics,” 4th Edition, PrenticeHall,Englewood Cliffs, New Jeresy, USA, p. 783, (1998).
29.Jewell, R. A., “Links between the Testing, Modelling, and Design of Reinforced Soil,” Proc. Int. Symp. Earth Reinforcement Practice, Fukuoka, Japan, Balkema, pp. 755-772, (1993).
30.Lee, K. L., “Triaxial Compressive Strength of Saturated Sand Under Seismic Loading Conditions,” Dissertation presented to the University of California, Berkeley, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, (1965).
31.Lade, P., “The Stress-Strain and Strength Characteristics of Cohesionless Soils,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California, August, (1971).
32.Ling ,H. I., Wu, J. T. H., and Tatsuoka, F., “Short-term Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Geotextiles under Typical Operational Conditions,” Journal of Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 11, pp. 185-219, (1992).
33.Lesniewska, D., “Classification of Reinforced Soil Structures Based on Their Possible Failure Mode,”Proceedings of the International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 401-406, (1996).
34.Lee, W. F., “Internal Stability Analyses of Geosynthetic Reinforced Retaining Walls,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, (2000).
35.Ling, H. I., and Liu, H., “Finite Element Studies of Asphalt Concrete Pavement Reinforced with Geogrid,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 129, No. 7, pp. 801-811, (2003).
36.Lo, S. R., “Application of Numerical Modeling to the Design of Reinforced Soil Walls for Infrastructure Projects – Some Australian Experiences,” GeoAsia, pp. 193-203, (2004).
37.Liu, H. L., Ng, C. W. W., and Fei, K., “Performance of a Geogrid-Reinforced and Pile-Supported Highway Embankment over Soft Clay: Case Study,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironment Engineering, Vol. 133, 12, pp. 1483-1493, (2007).
38.McGown, A., Andrawes, K. Z., and Kabir, M. H., “Load Extension Testingof Geotextiles Confined in Soil”, 2nd International Conference on Geotextiles, 3, pp. 793-798, (1982).
39.Miyamori, T., Iwai, S. and Makiuchi, K., “Frictional Characteristics ofNon-Woven Fabrics,” Third International Conference On Geotextiles, Vienna,Vol. 3, pp. 701-705, (1986).
40.Moroto, N. and Hasegawa, A., “Anisotropic Elastic Stress Formulae Applicable to Reinforced Earth,” Journal of Soils and Foundations, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 172-178, (1990).
41.McGown, A., Yogarajah, I. and Yeo, K. C., “Choice of Soil Properties for Limit State Analysis of Reinforced Soil Retaining Structures,” Retaining Structures, Proceedings of Conference on Retaining Structures, Cambridge, C. R. I. Clayton, ed., Thomas Telford Publishers, London, pp. 529-540, (1993).
42.Romstad, K.M., Herrmann, L.R., and Shen, C.K., “Integrated Study of Reinforced Earth – I: Theoretical Formulation,”Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 102, pp. 457-471, (1976).
43.Schlosser, F., and Long, N. T., “Recent Results in French Research on Reinforced Earth,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. CO3, pp.223-237, (1972).
44.Teerawattanasuk, C., Bergado, D.T., and Kongkitkul, W., “Analytical and numerical modeling of pullout capacity and interaction between hexagonal wire mesh and silty sand backfill under an in-soil pullout test,” Journal of Canada Geotechnical, Vol. 40, pp. 886-899, (2003).
45.Vidal, H., “Keynote Address-The Development and Future of Reinforced Earth,” Proceedings of a Symposium on Earth Rainfoucement, ASCE, Annual Convention, Pittsburgh, Apr, (1978).
46.Vermeer, P. A., and R. de Borst, “Non-Associated Plasticity for Soils, Concrete and Rock,” Heron, 29(3), pp. 3-64, (1984).
47.Wong, K. S., and Duncan, J. M., “Hyperbolic Stress-Strain Parameters for Nonlinear Finite Element Analyses of Stresses and Movements in Soil Masses,” Report No. TE 74-3, University of California, Berkeley, July, (1974).
48.Wu, T.H., “Behavior of Soil-Geotextile Composites and Its Application to Finite Element Analysis,” Geosynthetics’89, San Diego, USA, pp. 365-372, (1989).
49.Wilson-Fahmy, R. F., Koerner, R. M., and Fleck, J. A., “Unconfined andConfined Wide Width Testing of Geosynthetics,” Geosynthetic SoilReinforcement Testing Procedures, Standard Technical Publication 1190, ASTM, (1993).
50.Yang, Z., “Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Reinforced Sand,” Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, (1972).