跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.14) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/27 05:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:潘嘉良
研究生(外文):Pan, Chia-Liang
論文名稱:負面勞資關係的宣告效果
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Negative Labor Relations Announcement
指導教授:王冠婷王冠婷引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wang, Kuan-Ting
口試委員:王冠婷李永全林育志
口試委員(外文):Wang, Kuan-TingLee, Yung-ChanLin, Yu-Chih
口試日期:2015-05-25
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:亞洲大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:49
中文關鍵詞:企業社會責任勞資關係事件事件研究法
外文關鍵詞:Corporate Social ResponsibilityLabor Relations EventsEvent Study
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:220
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:11
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要在探討台灣上市公司為負面勞資關係事件宣告對股價的影響,實證發現董事長內部化、董監事酬勞佔稅前淨利比率和公司規模對負面勞資關係事件發生有顯著正向的影響,外資持股比率則對負面勞資關係有顯著負向的影響。市場對於負面的勞資關係事件宣告有顯著負面的股價反應,董事長內部化愈高的公司,負面勞資關係事件發生會有較大的負累積異常報酬發生,而外資持股比率和獲利能力愈高也會有較大的負累積異常報酬發生。
This study investigate the effects of negative labor relations events on stock prices for Taiwan's listed companies with the sample period of 2002 to 2014. Firstly, we analyze factors that influence the negative labor relations events employ with the logistic model. We conclude that chairman internalize, compensation of directors and supervisors to net income before tax and firms size have significant positive influence on the probability negative labor relations event, but significant negative the foreign ownership.
After the announcement effect of negative labor relations events, the negative labor relations events have a negative stock price reaction. The impact of the negative labor relations events announcement effect, chairman internalize have a greater negative cumulative abnormal returns, and higher foreign ownership and profitability will have a greater negative cumulative abnormal returns.

目 錄
第一章 緒論 I
第一節 研究動機 I
第二節 研究目的 8
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 企業社會責任與公司價值 11
第二節 企業社會責任與經營績效 15
第三節 企業社會責任事件的宣告效果 16
第三章 資料來源與研究設計 19
第一節 資料來源 19
第二節 研究設計 20
第四章 實證結果與分析 25
第一節 影響負面勞資關係事件的因素 25
第二節 負面勞資關係事件的宣告效果 29
第三節 影響負面勞資關係事件宣告效果的因素 32
第五章 結論與建議 35
參考文獻 37


表 目 錄

表1負面勞資關係事件年度分配表 19
表2 研究變數衡量 21
表3 變數敘述統計 26
表4 變數相關係數表 27
表5影響負面勞資關係事件的因素迴歸結果 29
表6勞資關係事件的宣告效果 30
表7不同窗口累積異常報酬檢定 32
表8影響負面勞資關係宣告效果的迴歸結果 34


圖 目 錄

圖1 勞資關係事件宣告平均異常報酬走勢圖 31
圖2勞資關係事件宣告平均累積異常報酬走勢圖 31



參考文獻
方世榮、黃瓊瑤、陳育成(2011), 組織企業社會責任回應模型, 管理與系統, 第十八卷第四期: 551-580.
池祥萱、繆文娟、莊瑩臻(2014), 1.企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎?來自全球500大公司的證據, 「管理學報」, 第三十一卷第一期:1-19.
張元 (2011), 社會責任公司有較高的股票報酬嗎?,「輔仁管理評論」, 第十八卷: 79-118.
黃瓊瑤, 王癸元,張鳳真(2013), 企業社會責任事件宣告與股價異常報酬之研究, 「當代會計」, 第十四卷第二期: 175-204.
Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 447-465.
Anderson, J. & Smith, G. (2006). A great company ban be a great investment. Financial Analysts Journal, 86 -93.
Anginer, D., Fisher, K. L. & Statman, M. (2008).Stocks of admired companies and despised ones, Working Paper.
Antunovich, P., Laster, D. & Mitnick, S. (2000). Are high-quality firms also high-quality investments? Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 6(1): 1-6.
Bagnoli, M. & Watts, S. (2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Dconomics and Management Strategy, 12:419-445.
Barnea, A. & Rubin A. (2005).Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between owners.Working paper.
Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R. & Hasan, I. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder’s value: an event study analysis. Working Paper.
Bhattacharya, C. B. & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1):9-24.
Brammer, S. & Pavelin, S. (2004). Building a good reputation. European Management Journal, 22(6):704-713
Brammer, S. & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3): 435-455.
Brammer, S., Brooks, C. & Pavelin, S. (2005). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35:97-116.
Clinebell, S. K. & Clinebell, J. M. (1994).The effect of advanced notice of plant closings on firm value. Journal of Management, 20: 553-564.
Damiano-Teixeira, K. M. & Pompermayer, M. M. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Profile and diagnosis of 797 programs developed in Brazil. Business and Society Review, 112 (3): 343-367.
Dowling, G. (2006). In practice, how good corporate reputations create corporate value, Corporate Reputation Review, 9(2):134-143.
Driver, C., & Thompson, G. (2002). Corporate governance and democracy: the stakeholder debate revisited. Journal of Management and Governance, 6(2):111-130.
Dunfee, T. W. (2003). Social investing: mainstream or backwater? Journal of Business Ethics, 43: 247-252.
Freeman, E. R. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Gomes, A. (2000). Going public without governance: managerial reputation effects. The Journal of Finance, 55(2):615-646.
Graddy, D. B. & Strickland, T. H. (2007).Public information as a deterrent to environmental infractions.Applied Economics. 39 (15): 1961-1972.
Hannon, J. & Milkovich, G. (1996). The effect of human resource reputation signals on share prices: an event study. Human Resource Management, 35:405-424.
Hess, D., Rogovsky, N. & Dunfee, T. W. (2002). The next wave of corporate community involvement: corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 44(2):110-125.
Hillenbrand, c. & Mondy, K. (2007). Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: two separate concepts or two side of the same coin? Corporate Reputation Reviews,10 (4) :261-277.
Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29:781–789.
Levis , J. (2006). Adoption of corporate social responsibility codes by multinational companies. Journal of Asian Economics, 17:50-55.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006).Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4): 1–18.
McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1): 117-127.
Neu, D., Warsame, H. & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3): 265-282.
Perrini, F. & Tencati, A. (2006). Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 296 -308.
Rozin, P. & Royzman, E. B. (2001).Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5 (4): 296-320.
Schuler, D. A. & Cording, M. (2006).A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3):540-558.
Shahin, A., & Zairi, M. (2007).Corporate governance as a critical element for driving excellence in corporate social responsibility.International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(7): 753-770.
Shefrin, H. & Statman, M. (2003).Style of investment expectation. The Handbook of Equity and Style Management, Coggin & Fabozzi eds. New York: Wiley.
Shen, C. H., & Chang, Y. (2009). Ambition versus conscience, does corporate social responsibility pay off? the application of matching methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1):133-153.
Takeda, F. & Tomozawa, T. (2008).A change in market responses to the environmental management ranking in Japan. Ecological Economics, 67 (3): 465-472.
Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 62(3): 1139-1168.
Tucker, L. and Melewar, T. C. (2005). Corporate reputation and crisis management: the threat and manageability of anti-corporatism. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4): 377-386.
Worrell, D., Davidson, W. N. &Sharma , V. N. (1991). Layoff announcements and stockholder wealth. Academy of Management Journal, 34:662-678.
Yamaguchi, K. (2008). Reexamination of stock price reaction to environmental performance: A GARCH application. Ecological Economics, 68 (1-2): 345-352.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top