跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.10) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/30 15:11
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林姍蓉
研究生(外文):Shan-Rong Lin
論文名稱:歐洲聯盟職業年金制度之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Occupational Pensions in the European Union
指導教授:卓忠宏卓忠宏引用關係
指導教授(外文):Cho Chung Hung
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:淡江大學
系所名稱:歐洲研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:區域研究學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:中文
論文頁數:164
中文關鍵詞:歐洲歐盟職業年金企業年金退休金
外文關鍵詞:EuropeEuropean UnionOccupational pensionsretirement pension
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:503
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:70
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:8
論文題目:歐洲聯盟職業年金制度之研究 頁數:164頁
校所組別:淡江大學 歐洲研究所碩士班 法政組
畢業時間及提要別:九十二學年度第二學期碩士學位論文提要
研究生:林姍蓉 指導教授:卓忠宏 博士
論文提要內容:
根據歐盟經濟政策委員會的報告指出,再過50年的老年依賴人口將高達53.4%,隨著全世界人口面臨的快速老化、預期壽命的增長與出生率普遍降低改變了社會結構,使得歐盟近幾年來著手強調人口高齡化所面臨的退休年金議題。目前國家公共年金的支出已成歐盟各國的財政負擔,為了使公共年金得以永續性的發展而進行退休年金的改革計劃。而私人年金將扮演著未來退休者收入來源的主要角色。因此歐盟的職業年金發展將愈形重要,在個人工作生涯創造最大價值的同時,若能夠將所得做適當的儲蓄與理財,將能為日後退休的收入保障。對於會員國在歐盟境內的跨國勞工,最終希望歐盟能夠設立一泛歐洲的退休金制度以保障全會員國國民。
歐盟職業年金的發展著重在年金的攜帶性功能,以及會員國間稅制問題。年金的攜帶性和稅制協調將影響著歐盟會員國就業人口的流動率,倘若歐盟執委會的推動成果獲得會員國的重視,並在2年之後成立金融單一市場的同時將職業年金指令納入國內法,對於歐盟「內政與司法」的整合將向前邁進一大步。
本論文以歷史研究方法為主,以演繹與歸納為輔,從文獻參考有關歐盟歷年對職業年金制度所做的努力與推動,主要透過文獻回顧介紹退休金理論基礎,和歐盟職業年金發展歷程作整體性的探討,整合各方的討論與觀點提供建議與參考方向,並評估其成果與影響。
本論文共分五章,具體架構如下:
第一章 緒論
第二章 退休年金理論基礎
第三章 歐盟職業年金發展
第四章 職業年金面臨的挑戰
第五章 結論
Title of Thesis: Occupational Pensions in the European Union
Total Pages: 164
Name of Institute: Graduate Institute of European Studies, Tamkang University
Graduate Date: June, 2004 Degree Conferred: Master
Name of Student: Lin, Shan-Rong Advisor: Dr. Cho, Chung-Hung
Abstract:
According to the Economic Policy Committee’s research, the old dependency ratio will rise to 53.4% by the year 2050. The global aging population, and the prolonged life expectancy, and the reduce of birth rate, have let EU emphasize the retirement pension issues of the aging society. Currently, public pensions have become a state’s financial burden, so EU countries started the pension reform, to maintain a more adequate and sustainable pensions. In this case, private pension play a larger role in retirement income, and the progress of occupational pensions becomes more important. In this reform, one could insure his retirement life by creating the most value during working period, and have his income accumulated and invested properly. The European Commission also expects to establish a pan-european pension fund to secure the cross-border workers and the commonwealth of EU members.
Occupational pensions in the EU focus on the function of portability and the harmonization of tax. If a pension loses its portability or causes double tax while changing jobs cross the states, it may become an obstacle to the labor mobility. If European Commission’s effort is well taken and adverted by member states, and implementing the IORP Directive to their civil law after completing the financial internal market, it will be a big step toward the integration and cooperation of European justice and internal affairs.
The major approach analysis method of this dissertation is historical analysis and inductive method, by reviewing documentary materials on the process and progress of the occupational pensions in the EU, to scrutinize the present of difficulties met, and evaluate their future situation.
The thesis is divided into 5 chapters and the structure is as follows:
Chapter 1 is instruction; Chapter 2 describes the theory of occupational pension; Chapter 3 is about the process and progress of occupational pension in the EU; Chapter 4 describes the obstacles of occupational pensions; and Chapter 5 is the conclusion.
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………1
第二節 研究方法……………………………………………………4
第三節 研究範圍、限制與架構…..………………………………5
第四節 重要名詞詮釋與中英文對照………………………………9
第二章 退休年金理論基礎…………………………………………12
第一節 社會保險與年金保險………………………………………12
第二節 退休年金理論………………………………………………16
第三節 退休年金模式………………………………………………19
第四節 退休金融通方式與給付類型………………………………26
第三章 歐盟職業年金發展…………………………………………38
第一節 退休年金三支柱架構………………………………………38
第二節 職業年金概況………………………………………………52
第三節 職業年金法源依據…………………………………………74
第四節 職業年金攜帶性功能………………………………………88
第四章 職業年金所面臨的挑戰……………………………………99
第一節 職業年金稅制問題…………………………………………99
第二節 會員國稅制概況……………………………………………120
第三節 泛歐洲職業退休基金管理…………………………………133
第四節 會員國運作成效……………………………………………144
第五章 結論…………………………………………………………150
參考書目………………………………………………………………156
圖表目錄
【圖3-1】 歐盟三支柱年金架構圖………………………………....51
【圖3-2】 公共年金支出(佔GDP%)…………………………....59
【圖3-3】 EPC徵對歐盟15 國 2000-2050年金規劃………….…60
【圖3-4】 歐盟15國總人口數(1950-2004)….……………....…62
【圖3-5】 職業年金指令立法程序………………………………....72
【圖4-1】 會員國稅制問題及解決辦法…………………………...109
【圖4-2】 1997年至2000年退休基金成長率…………………...136
【圖4-3】 2005年泛歐洲退休金管理機構架構圖……………….137
【圖4-4】 會員國固定工作者的稅制障礙與解決方式…………..142
【表1】 歐盟職業年金相關詞彙中英對照…………………….....10
【表2-1】 俾斯麥模式與貝佛里奇模式比較………………………...25
【表2-2】 確定給付之過去及未來服務計算公式……….…...…….30
【表2-3】 歐盟15國退休金制度分類表…………………....…...…37
【表3-1】 歐盟退休年金收入來源………….………...…………….42
【表3-2】 歐盟各國第二支柱年金涵蓋標準………………………45
【表3-3】 歐盟第一支柱和第二支柱年金架構摘要……..…….….49
【表3-4】 世界銀行與歐盟退休金三支柱架構模式整理……....…51
【表3-5】 歐盟老年依賴人口比率………..………………………..60
【表3-6】 職業年金發展過程…………………………………..…..73
【表3-7】 歐盟退休金總支出比例………………………………....75
【表3-8】 歐洲退休基金資產總成長……………………………....75
【表3-9】 歐盟會員15國監理方式與機構………………………..81
【表3-10】 歐盟職業年金管理規定……………...…………………84
【表3-11】 三國DB制年金損失的攜帶式規定……………………93
【表3-12】 職業年金計劃與個人年金計劃參與率…………………96
【表3-13】 職業年金與給付方式佔各國比例………………………96
【表3-14】 丹麥、愛爾蘭、英國、荷蘭的工作流動率、工資和年金參與率…………………………..……………………….96
【表4-1】 歐盟15國職業年金稅制概略…………………………103
【表4-2】 歐盟15國職業退休課稅範圍概要………………….…103
【表4-3】 2000年退休基金總資產……………………………….135
【表4-4】 歐盟2002年退休金提供機構之監理單位一覽表……145
【表4-5】 職業年金退休基金與稅制處理的審慎規定………..…146
中文部分
一、 書籍
王泰銓,《歐洲共同體法總論》。台北:三民書局,民國86年。
林萬億,《福利國家─歷史比較的分析》。台北:巨流圖書公司,民國83年3月。
柯木興,《勞工退休金作業手冊》。台北:三民書局,民國76年。
柯木興,《社會保險》。台北:中國社會保險學會,民國85年。
Macarov, David 著,官有桓譯,《社會福利─結構與實施》。台北,雙葉書廊有限公司,民國89年4月。
徐立中,《老人問題與對策》。台北,桂冠圖書股份有限公司,民國78年。
陳聽安,《國民年金制度》。台北:三民書局,民國92年。
符寶玲,《退休基金制度與管理》。台北:華泰書局,民國86年。
梁憲初、冉永萍合著,《社會保險》。台北:五南圖書出版公司,民86年。
葉志誠,《職業年金》。台北:揚智文化,民國92年。
張鍾汝、袁緝輝編著,《社會老年學教程》。台北,水牛出版,民國83年。
張炳煌、邱晃泉合著,《歐洲共同體解讀》。台北:月旦出版社,民82年。
張亞中,《歐洲統合:政府間主義與超國家主義的互動》。台北:揚智文化,民國90年。
郭明正主編,《年金制度及其法律規範》。台北:勞動法與社會法叢書,民國88年6月。
蕭麗卿,《高齡社會的老年年金制度》。台北:三民書局,民國83年。
二、 期刊論文
李俊志,「歐洲經濟暨貨幣聯盟之基本理論與實際」,淡江大學歐研所碩士論文,民92年6月。
林信志,〈國民退休金制度之經濟分析〉,《勞工研究季刊》,第128期,民國86年7月。
周國瑞、邱仕敏、陳恩儀,〈我國企業退休金制度之研究〉,《證卷市場發展季刊》,第13卷第4期,民國91年1月。
周德旺,〈歐洲共同體勞工自由流通權益之研究〉,《美歐月刊》,民國85年7月,第11卷第7期,pp.56-76。
陳登源,〈從社會安全觀點看勞工退休金改制之精神─評論與建議〉,《退休基金季刊》,第3卷第1期,民國91年3月。
蔡紹南節譯,〈全球退休金制度的變革〉,《勞工行政》,第118期,民國87年2月,pp.67-70。
鄭秉文,〈歐盟國家社會養老的制度選擇及其前景〉,《歐洲研究》,第120期,第21卷,民國92年2月,pp.74-91。
謝明瑞,〈國民年金財物規劃之探討〉,《國政研究報告》,財金(研)092-004號,民國92年2月。
英文部分
一、 書籍
Bonoli, Giuliano, The Politics of Pension Reform: Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Buti, Marco, Franco, Daniel & Pench, Lucio R. (eds.), The Welfare State in Europe, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1999.
Castellino, Onorato & Fornero, Elsa (eds.), Pension Policy in an Integrating Europe, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003.
Davis, E. Philip, Pension Funds-Retirement Income Security and Capital Markets: An International Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Eijffinger, Sylvester C. W., & De Haan, Jakob, European Monetary and Fiscal Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Esping-Anderson, Gosta, The three Worlds of welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
George, Victor, & Taylor-Gooby, Peter (eds.), European Welfare Policy, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996.
Holzmann, Robert & Orenstein, Mitchell & Rutkowski, Michal (eds.), Pension Reform in Europe: Process and Progress, Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2002.
Holzmann, Robert & E. Stiglitz, Joseph (eds.), New Ideas about Old Age Security, Washington, DC: The world Bank, 2001.
Katrougalos, George & Lazaridis, Gabriella, Southern European Welfare States, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Kleinman, Mark, A European Welfare State? European Union Social Policy in Context, New York: Palgrave , 2002.
Mortensen, Jorgen, Cross-Border Portability of Pension Rights: An Important Condition for an Integrated Market for Pension Provision, CEPS-Centre for European Policy Studies, May 2003.
OECD’s Insurance Committee, Private Pensions System: Administrative Costs and Reforms, Paris:OECD, 2001.
Schoenmaker, Dirk & Wierts, Peter, “Financial Supervision: Which Model for Europe?” Special Paper 143, July 2002.
Stevens, Leo & Drabbe, Humbert & Dietvorst, Gerry & Kavelaars, Peter Pension Systems in the European Union: Competition and Tax Aspects, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999.
Van Vugt, Joos P.A. & M. Peet, Jan (eds.), Social Security and Solidarity in the European Union, New York: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, 2000.
二、 期刊、學術報告
Andrew Smith, “Simplicity, security and choice: Working and saving for retirement Action on occupational pensions”, Department of Work and Pensions CM5835, June 2003
Angel, Francisco Blanco, “The Spanish public Retirement Pensions System: Principal challenges and recent developments”, international Social Security Review, Vol.55, Issue3, July 2002, pp.57-72.
Bobo, Lawrence, “Social Responsibility, Individualism, and Redistribute Policies”, Social Forum, 6(1) ,1991.
Dale, Jane (ed.), “EU pensions Bulletin: A 2003 review”, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, winter 2002/2003.
Dale, Jane & Schaffer, Dan (eds.), “The Occupational Pensions Directive”, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, June 2003.
Davis. E. Philip, “The European Pension Management Industry”, The Pension Institute, discussion paper PI-0212, October 2002.
European Federation for Retirement Provision(EFRP), A European Institution for Occupational Retirement Provision (EIORP)- A Single License to enable Multi-Nationals to pool their pension liabilities and assets on a tax neutral basis , July 2000.
European Federation for Retirement Provision (EFRP), Activities Report 2000, October 2001.
European Federation for Retirement Provision (EFRP), Activities Report 2001, July 2002.
European Federation for Retirement Provision (EFRP), European Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision , October 2003
European Commission, Adequate and sustainable pensions: Joint report by the Commission and the Council, Luxembourg: Publication Office, September 2003.
European Commission, “Supplementary Pensions in the Single Market; a Green Paper presented by the Commission”, COM(1997)283, 1997
European Commission, “Report of the High Level Panel on the free movement of persons”, Veil Report, 18 March 1997.
European Commission, “Towards a single Market For supplementary pensions, results of the Green Paper on supplementary pensions in the single market”, COM (134) final, Brussels 11 May 1999
European Commission, “COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLAMENT AND THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE the elimination of tax obstacles to the cross-border provision of occupational pensions”, COM(2001).
European Commission, “Progress report to the Ecofin Council in the Impact of ageing population on public pension system”, EPC/ECFIN/581/00, October 2000.
European Commission, “EU pension reform- An overview of the debate and an empirical assessment of the main policy reform options”, Mc Morrow, Kieran & Roeger, Werner, Economic Papers (EPC), No.162, Belgium, January 2002.
European Commission, “Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 June 2003 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision”, Official Journal of the European Union, L235/10, 23/9/2003.
European Commission, “Rebuilding Pensions─Recommendations for European Code of Best Practice for Second Pillar Pension Funds”, 19, November 1999.
European Commission, “Commission pushes for portable occupational pensions”, Social Agenda, Issue N.3, October 2002.
European Commission, “Making pensions portable”, Social Agenda, Issue No.7, December 2003.
European Commission, “Financial Services Action Plan: On track and on time”, Single Market News, No.33, April 2004.
Galer, Rusel, “Prudent Person Rule: Standard for the Investment of Pension Fund Assets”, OECD, November 2002.
Internal Market Directorate-General, “Study on Pension Schemes of The Member States of The European Union”, MARKT/2005/99-EN Rev.2, May 2000.
M.Catenaro, P.C.Rother & Schwab, G., “Ageing and Pensions in the Euro Area Survey and Protection Results”, Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, No.0307, March 2003.
Feldstein, Martin, “The future of Social Security Pension in Europe”, NBER Working Paper, No. 8487, September 2001.
F.I.A. Patel, Chinu (ed.), “Taxation of Occupational Pensions in the European Union”, European Actuarial Consultative Group, April 2004.
Oksanen, Heikki, “Pension Reforms: Key Issues Illustrated with an Actuarial Model”, Economic Papers, No.174, July 2002.
Rother, P.C. & Catenaro, M. &Schwab, G., “Ageing and Pensions in the Euro Area, Survey and Projection Results”, Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, No.0307, March 2003.
Smith, Andrew, “Simplicity, security and choice: Working and saving for retirement Action on occupational pensions”, Department for Work and Pensions(DWP), CM5835, June 2003.
The Private Pensions European and International Team, “Implementing the European Directive on the Activities and Supervision of Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision: a Consultation Paper”, Department for Work and Pensions(DWP), December 2003.
The World Bank, “Averting the Old Age Crisis:Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth”, World Development Report, UK:Oxford University Press.
Vincenzo, Andrietti, “Occupational Pensions and Interfirm Job Mobility in the European Union., Evidence from the ECHP Survey”, 12 January 2001.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top