跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.64) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/26 11:13
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李家慶
研究生(外文):Chia-Ching Lee
論文名稱:階段式購併、內部資源與企業成長選擇權
論文名稱(外文):Sequential Acquisition, Resources, and Value of Growth Options
指導教授:陳忠仁陳忠仁引用關係
口試委員:郭瑞祥林博文
口試日期:2011-06-21
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:商學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:一般商業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:英文
論文頁數:50
中文關鍵詞:階段式購併成長選擇權價值實質選擇權寬裕資源
外文關鍵詞:Sequential AcquisitionValue of Growth OptionsReal OptionsOrganizational Slack
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:299
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
企業在考慮擴張事業版圖時,透過購併的方式進行是最快的方法。過去許多研究透過不同理論闡述購併對公司績效的影響,然卻少有學者關注購併的過程中,企業所採取的方法有所不同,以往多採一次性購併,但近來越來越多階段式購併手法,將對公司績效帶來不同的影響。因此本研究特別針對階段式購併手法探討,藉由實質選擇權理論及資源基礎觀點來比較購併方式的差異是否會影響動態的評量方式—成長選擇權價值。
本研究在資料蒐集方面,以2001年至2010年在美國地區上市公司發生的購併事件為主,以SDC和Compustat資料庫為主要資料來源進行研究,對於企業進行階段式購併和一次性購併的行為與成長選擇權價值之關係做深入探討。然而,在探討此關係時應考量到公司內部資源多寡,因資源多寡將影響組織中管理階層的決策及策略走向。研究結果顯示,企業採行階段式購併所產生的成長選擇權價值優於一次性購併。然而,當公司負債比例越低(即內部擁有充裕的資源可供運用),則採取階段式購併的作法有助於提升購併後的成長選擇權價值,相對地負債比例高(公司資源貧乏時)應採取一次性購併以提升成長選擇權之價值。
本研究最後提供了實務上的策略意涵,即企業面臨購併決策時,應詳加考量內部資源彈性以做出最適決策,藉此極大化購併後的綜效。


Acquisition has been a common strategy when enterprises consider expanding their horizons. In previous research, many concentrated on the firm performance after acquisitions in various manners. However, we tried to make comparisons between two sorts of acquisition behavior—one-time acquisition and sequential acquisition, especially focusing on the dynamic performance evaluation method based on value of growth options.
According to data collected from SDC and Compustat from 2001 to 2010 in the United States, we examined the relationship between sequential acquisition and value of growth options, contingent on the amount of resources available within a company. The result implies that sequential acquisitions could have a better value of growth options given ample resources within the firm. Besides, it also shows that the more resources firms have, the more possible they are likely to take sequential acquisitions and the higher value of growth options there will be. On the contrary, those lack of resources should take one-time acquisitions to gain higher value of growth options. We finally come to realize the decision of management on sequential acquisition could have an impact on the synergy after acquisitions, and we tried to display the strategic insight for management that they may refer to when facing acquisition decisions.


CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………1
1.1 Research Background ................................................................................... 1
1.2 Research Purpose .......................................................................................... 4
1.3 Research Procedure ...................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER 2 THEORY AND HYPOTHESES………..……….…..7
2.1 Literature Review ......................................................................................... 7
2.2 Theoretical Background ............................................................................. 10
2.2.1 The Real Options Theory ................................................................... 10
2.2.2 The Resource-Based Theory .............................................................. 14
2.3 Hypotheses ................................................................................................. 17
2.3.1 Sequential acquisition and Value of Growth Options ......................... 17
2.3.2 Moderating Effect of Organizational Resources—Organizational Slack ........................................................................................................................ 22
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY....25
3.1 Research Structure ....................................................................................... 25
3.2 Variable Measurement ................................................................................. 26
3.2.1 Dependent Variable ............................................................................. 26
3.2.2 Independent Variable .......................................................................... 26
3.2.3 Moderator Variable ............................................................................. 27
3.2.4 Control Variables ................................................................................ 28
3.3 Data Collection and Sample ........................................................................ 31
3.4 Statistical Method ........................................................................................ 33
3.4.1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis .................................. 33
3.4.2 Regression Analysis ............................................................................ 34
CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH RESULT……………………………..36
4.1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis .......................................... 36
4.2 Regression Analysis .................................................................................... 38
4.2.1 Direct Effect of Sequential acquisition and Value of Growth Options 38
4.2.2 Moderating Effect of Organizational Slack ........................................ 39
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION……………..41
5.1 Research Conclusion .................................................................................. 41
5.2 Managerial Implication............................................................................... 44
5.3 Limitation and Future Direction ................................................................. 45
References……………………………………………………………….47


Barney, J. B., 1991. ‘Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage’. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.

Bourgeois, LJ., 1981. ‘On the measurement of organizational slack’. Academy of Management Review, 6: 29-39.

Bowman, E. H. and Hurry, D., 1993. ‘Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process’. Academy of Management Review, 18(4): 760-782.

Bradley, M., Desai, A., and Kim, E. H., 1988. ‘Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms’. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1), 3-40.

Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., and Nobel, R., 2010. ‘Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions’. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 5-20.

Bromiley, P., 1991. ‘Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance’. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 37-59.

Brush, T. H., 1996. ‘Predicted change in operational synergy and post-acquisition performance of acquired businesses’. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, 1-24.

Capron L., 1999. ‘The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions’. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 987-1018.

Chang, S. C., Chen, S. S., and Lai, J. H., 2008. The Wealth Effect of Japanese-US Strategic Alliances. Financial Management (Blackwell Publishing Limited), Vol. 37 Issue 2, 271-301

Cheng, J., Kesner, I., 1997. ‘Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: the impact of resource allocation patterns’. Journal of Management, 23: 1-18.

Darrow, A. L. and Kahl, D. R., 1982. ‘A comparison of moderated regression techniques considering strength of effect’. Journal of Management, 8(2), 35-47.

Das, T. K. and Teng, B. S., 2000. ‘A resource-based theory of strategic alliances’. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31-61.

Efroymson, M. A., 1960. ‘Multiple regression analysis’. Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers.

Folta, T. B. and Miller, K. D., 2002. ‘Real options in equity partnerships’. Strategic Management Journal, 23(1): 77-88.

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., and Black, W., 1998. ‘Multivariate Data Analysis’. (5th) p. 25-56 New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Harzing, A-W., 2002. ‘Acquisitions versus greenfield investments: International strategy and management of entry modes’. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 211-227.

Hennart, J-F. and Reddy, S. B., 2000. ‘Digestibility and asymmetric information in the choice between acquisitions and joint ventures: where''s the beef?’. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 191-193.

James, A. D., 2002. ‘The strategic management of mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry: developing a resource-based perspective’. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 14, No. 3.

Kogut, B., 1991. ‘Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire’. Management Science, 37(1): 19-33.

Kumar, M. V. S., 2005. ‘The value from acquiring and divesting a joint venture: a real options approach’. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 321-331.

Kunc, M. H. and Morecroft, J. D. W., 2010. ‘Managerial decision making and firm performance under a resource‐based paradigm’. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 1164-1182.

Kutner, M. H., Neter, J., Nachtsheim, C. J., and Wasserman, W., 2004. ‘Applied Linear Regression Models’ (4th edition). McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Lin, Z., Yang, H., and Arya, B., 2009. ‘Alliance partners and firm performance: resource complementarity and status association’. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 921-940.

McGrath, R. G., 1997. ‘A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments’. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 974-996.

McGrath, R. G. and Nerkar, A., 2004. ‘Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms’. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1-21.

Miller, K. and Leiblein, M., 1996. ‘Corporate risk-return relations: Returns variability versus downside risk’. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 91-122.

PengCheng, Z., 2011. ‘Persistent performance and interaction effects in sequential cross-border mergers and acquisitions’. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 21: 18-39.

Ramanathan, K., Seth, A., and Thomas, H., 1997. ‘Explaining joint ventures, alternative theoretical perspectives’ In P. W. Beamish and J. P. Killing, ‘Cooperative strategies’, Vol. 1. North American perspectives (p. 51-85). San Francisco, California: New Lexington Press.

Reuben M. B. and David A. K., 1986. ‘The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 6, 1173-1182.

Reuer, J. J. and Leiblein, M., 2000. ‘Downside risk implications of multinationality and international joint ventures’. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 203-214.

Reuer, J. J. and Koza, M. P., 2000. ‘Asymmetric information and joint venture performance: Theory and evidence for domestic and international joint ventures’. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1): 81-88.

Rosenzweig, P. M. and Singh, J. V., 1991. ‘Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise’. Academy of Management Review, 16: 340-361.

Seth, A., 1990. ‘Value creation in acquisitions: A re‐examination of performance issues’. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2): 99-115.

Sharfman M., Wolf G., Chase R., and Tansik, D., 1988. ‘Antecedents of organizational slack’. Academy of Management Review, 13: 601-614.

Tony W. T. and Jeffrey J. R., 2006. ‘Firm and industry influences on the value of growth options’. Strategic Organization, Vol. 4(1): 71-95.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top