跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.182) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/27 05:59
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳在舜
研究生(外文):Tzai-Shuen Chen
論文名稱:參考點依賴偏好對風險選擇的影響
論文名稱(外文):How does reference-dependent preference affect choice under uncertainty?
指導教授:黃貞穎黃貞穎引用關係黃景沂黃景沂引用關係
指導教授(外文):Cheng-Ying HuangChing-I Huang
口試委員:林明仁袁國芝
口試日期:2011-07-01
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:經濟學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:經濟學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:30
中文關鍵詞:參考點依賴圖形化介面彩券風險損失趨避
外文關鍵詞:Reference-DependentGraphic User Interfacelotteryriskloss aversion
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:879
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
人的選擇行為往往受到他作決定當下的參考點所影響,然而,對於這個參考究竟如何形成,始終沒有定見。以往人們多認為參考點是一個固定不動的狀態,不過近來有學者認為,允許參考點是一個隨機、非固定的信念,能夠解釋更多觀察到的行為。這裡我們使用一種圖形化介面的彩券來探討,對於同樣的選擇,當受試者位於不同的參考點上,其反應是否也會跟著產生變化。我們希望透過視覺的簡化,讓受試者可以更專注於價值評估上,進而得到更多個人化的資料以及更精確的結論。

Reference point plays a key role in subjects'' decision-making while people make their choices.
The theories of reference point formation, however, still need to be verified.
Here we employ lottery tickets with Graphic User Interface to explore the choice behavior under uncertainty.
We are curious about whether people would alter their behavior while the reference point was changed, for example,
while they were asked to decided the equivalent lottery compared with a sure pay off or to decided the certainty equivalent of a lottery.
With the help of Graphic User Interface, we hope to reduce the complexity of lottery tickets and make subjects concentrate
their attention on the evaluation process.
Therefore, we could collect more individual data from heterogeneous subjects and come to a definite conclusion about reference point.

中文摘要i
英文摘要ii
目錄iii
圖目錄iv
表目錄v
1 緒論1
1.1 展望理論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 參考點的形成. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2 實驗設計與方法5
2.1 受試者. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2 實驗介面. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3 題目設計. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.4 誘因相容機制. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.5 實驗流程. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3 模型與實驗預測15
4 實驗結果19
5 結論與討論25
參考文獻26
附錄28
A 模型推導28

Abeler, Johannes, Falk, Armin, Goette, Lorenz, and Huffman, David (2011), “Reference
points and effort provision”, American Economic Review, 101(2), 470–92,
URL: http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.101.2.470.
Allais, M. (1953), “Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique
des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole americaine”, Econometrica, 21(4), 503–
46, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1907921.
Camerer, Colin F. (2003), “Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field”,
in George Loewenstein Colin F. Camerer and Matthew Rabin (eds.), Advances
in Behavioral Economics, chapter 5, 148–161, Princeton University Press.
Currim, Imran S. and Sarin, Rakesh K. (1989), “Prospect versus utility.”, Management
Science, 35(1), 22–41, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631962.
Daniels, Richard L. and Keller, L. Robin (1990), “An experimental evaluation of
the descriptive validity of lottery-dependent utility theory”, Journal of Risk
and Uncertainty, 3, 115–134, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00056368,
10.1007/BF00056368.
Farber, Henry S. (2008), “Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The
case of new york city taxi drivers”, The American Economic Review, 98(3),
1069–82, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29730106.
Genesove, David and Mayer, Christopher (2001), “Loss aversion and seller behavior:
Evidence from the housing market.”, Quarterly Journal of Economics,
116(4), 1233–60.
Hack, Andreas and Lammers, Frauke (2008), “The role of expectations in the
formation of reference points over time”, Unpublished.
Harless, David W. and Camerer, Colin F. (1994), “The predictive utility of
generalized expected utility theories.”, Econometrica, 62(6), 1251–89, URL:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951749.
Hey, John D. and Orme, Chris (1994), “Investigating generalizations of expected
utility theory using experimental data.”, Econometrica, 62(6), 1291–1326, URL:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951750.
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., and Thaler, Richard H. (1990), “Experimental
tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem.”, Journal of Political
Economy, 98(6), 1325–48, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937761.
Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979), “Prospect theory: An analysis of
decision under risk.”, Econometrica, 47(2), 263–91.
Koszegi, Botond and Rabin, Matthew (2007), “Reference-dependent risk attitudes.”,
American Economic Review, 91(4), 1047–73.
Lattimore, Pamela K., Baker, Joanna R., and Witte, Ann D. (1992), “The influence
of probability on risky choice: A parametric examination”, Journal
of Economic Behavior & Organization, 17(3), 377 – 400, URL: http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268195900152.
Odean, Terrance (1998), “Are investors reluctant to realize their losses?”, The
Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775–98, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/117424.
Plott, Charles R. and Zeiler, Kathryn (2005), “The willingness to pay-willingness
to accept gap, the ”endowment effect,” subject misconceptions, and experimental
procedures for eliciting valuations”, The American Economic Review, 95(3),
530–45, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132728.
Rabin, Matthew (2000), “Risk aversion and expected utility theory: A calibration
theorem.”, Econometrica, 68(5), 1281–92.
Smith, Alec (2008), “Lagged beliefs and reference-dependent utility.”, .
Thaler, Richard (1980), “Toward a positive theory of consumer choice”, Journal
of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60, URL: http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167268180900517.
Von Neumann, John and Morgenstern., Oskar (1944), Theory of Games and Economic
Behavior., Princeton University Press.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top