臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

目的：比較修正式制動療法與等量控制傳統復健治療於慢性中風患者之動作缺陷、日常生活功能及生活品質之療效。
設計：實驗組與控制組，介入前後接受測驗，隨機控制試驗。
環境：三所醫院之復健科部。
介入：個案接受三週修正式制動療法或等量控制傳統復健介入，每天進行兩小時治療，並接受約三小時的額外健側手侷限。
成效評量：評量工具依國際功能、失能與健康分類架構組織，評估個案之動作缺陷、日常生活功能及生活品質。
結果：兩組個案接受等量治療，且接受治療以外時間的健側手侷限，相較於傳統復健組，修正式制動療法組於連續性動作表現、基本日常生活功能、社區行動能力，與生理相關層面之自覺生活品質呈現較佳結果。
結論：侷限健側手有助於若干面向之上肢動作與日常生活功能功能。修正式制動療法於動作復原、日常生活功能及回歸社區生活等面向之成效值得後續驗證。

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of modified constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) in comparison with placebo-controlled traditional rehabilitation (TR) on motor impairment, daily function and quality of life.
Design: Two-group design, pre- and post-intervention measures, randomized controlled trial.
Setting: 3 rehabilitation departments.
Participants: Twenty-two chronic patients (at least 6 months post-onset) with unilateral stroke.
Interventions: Patients received either mCIT or placebo-controlled traditional rehabilitation, with 2-hour treatment and restraint of the unaffected upper extremity (UE) for 3 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures: Outcome measures included assessments in the body structure and function domain (the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Graded Wolf Motor Function Test, and Action Research Arm Test and 9-hole Peg Test), the activity domain (FIM and Revised Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale) and the participation domain (Stroke Impact Scale and Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale) in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework.
Results: The average restraint time of the two groups was comparable, and the two groups had similar motor performance in affected extremity after intervention. However, the mCIT group exhibited greater recovery and sustained motor ability in affected UE. Participants in the mCIT group were more independent in basic ADL and mobility in community, and reported better quality of life after treatment especially in domains related to physical function.
Conclusions: mCIT conferred therapeutic benefits on some aspects of motor performance, daily functioning, transition to community, and quality of life, even though both groups received constraint of equal intensity outside the therapy time.

Abstract　 i
Chinese abstract iii
I.Introduction 1
II.Methods
2.1Participants　 3
2.2Outcome measures　 3
2.3Design and intervention　 6
2.4Statistical analysis　 7
III.Results　 8
IV.Discussion
4.1Body structure and function　10
4.2Activity　 12
4.3Participation　 13
4.4Compliance issues　 15
4.5Study limitation　 15
V.Conclusion　 17
VI.Supplementary content
6.1Introduction　 18
6.2Methods
6.2.1Outcome measures　 21
6.2.2Statistical analysis　 21
6.3Results　 23
6.4Discussion　 24
6.5Limitations　 25
VII.References　 27
VIII.Appendices　 35

1.Alberts, J. L., Butler, A. J., and Wolf, S. L. (2004). The effects of constraint-induced therapy on precision grip: a preliminary study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 18, 250-258.
2.Bonifer, N. M., Anderson, K. M. and Arciniegas, D. B. (2005). Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: Efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 1867-1873.
3.Brunnstrom, S. (1970). Movement therapy in hemiplegia. New York: Harper & Row.
4.Caimmi, M., Carda, S., Giovanzana, C., Maini, E. S., Sabatini, A. M., Smania, N., and Molteni, F. (2007). Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, in press.
5.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd. Ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.Dromerick, A. W., Edwards, D. F., and Hahn, M. (2000). Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke, 31, 2984-2988.
7.Duncan, P. W., Propst, M., and Nelson, S. G. (1983). Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Physical Therapy, 63, 1606-1610.
8.Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., and Laster, L. J. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 2131-2140.
9.Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
10.Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
11.Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., and Steglind, S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 13-31.
12.Hamilton, B. B., Granger, C. V., Sherwin, F. S., Zielezny, M., and Tashman, J. S. (1987). A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In Further, M. J. (Ed). Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurements. (pp. 137-147). Baltimore: Brookes.
13.Hamilton, B. B., Laughlin, J. A., Fiedler R. C., and Granger, C. V. (1994). Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26, 115-119.
14.Hatakenaka, M., Miyai, I., Sakoda S. and Yanagihara, T. (2007). Proximal paresis of the upper extremity in patients with stroke. Neurology, 69, 348-355.
15.Kamper, D. G., McKenna-Cole, A. N., Kahn, L. E., and Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2002). Alternations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 702-707.
16.Lang, C. E. and Beebe, J. A. (2007). Relating movement control at 9 upper extremity segments to loss of hand function in people with chronic hemiparesis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21, 279-291.
17.Lin, K-C, Wu, C-Y, Wei, T-H, Lee, C-Y and Liu, J-S. (2007). Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation, in press.
18.Lyle, R. C. (1981). A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 4, 483-492.
19.Ma, H. I., Trombly, C. A., Tickle-Degnen, L., and Wagenaar, R. C. (2004). Effect of one single auditory cue on movement kinematics in patients with Parkinson’s disease. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 530-536.
20.Mark, V. W. and Taub, E. (2002). Constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke hemiparesis and other disabilities. Restorative Neurology and Neurosciences, 22, 317-336.
21.Mathiowetz, V., Weber, K., Kashman, N. and Volland, G. (1985). Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 24-38.
22.Morris, D. M., Taub, E., and Mark, V. W. (2006). Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Europa Medicophysica, 42, 257-268.
23.Morris, D. M., Uswatte, G., Crago, J. E., Cook, E. W., & Taub, E. (2001). The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 750-755.
24.Nouri, F.M. and Lincoln, N.B. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 301–305.
25.Page, S.J., Levine, P., and Leonard, A. C. (2005). Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 19, 27-32.
26.Page, S. J., Sisto, S. A., Johnston, M. V., Bond, Q. (2002). Stroke patients'' and therapists'' opinions of constraint induced movement therapy. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 55-60.
27.Page, S. J., Sisto, S., Johnston, M. V., and Levine, P. (2002). Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: A preliminary study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 16, 290-295.
28.Page, S. J., Sisto, S., Levine, P., and McGrath, R. E. (2004). Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 14-18.
29.Pierce, S. R., Gallagher, K. G., Schaumberg, S. W., Gershkoff, A. M., Gaughan, J. P. and Shutter, L. (2003). Home forced use in an outpatient rehabilitation program for adults with hemiplegia: A pilot study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 17, 214-219.
30.Ploughman, M., and Corbett, D. (2004). Can forced-use therapy be clinically applied after stroke? An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1417-1423.
31.Plummer, A. C. (2003). Constraint-induced therapy and the motor learning literature that underpins its application. Physical Therapy Reviews, 8, 143-149.
32.Rabadi, M. H. and Rabadi, F. M. (2006). Comparison of the Action Research Arm Test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 962-966.
33.Roberts, P. S., Vegher, J. A., Gilewski, M., Bender, A. and Riggs, R. V. (2005). Client-centered occupational therapy using constraint-induced therapy. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 14(3), 115-121.
34.Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis (2nd. Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35.Schepers, V. P. M., Ketelaar, M., van de Port, I. G. L., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., and Lindeman, E. (2007). Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 221-230.
36.Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th. Ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.Suputtitada, A., Suwanwela, N. C., and Tumvitee, S. (2004). Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 87, 1482-1489.
38.Taub, E. (1980). Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: Implication for rehabilitation medicine. In L. P. Ince (Ed.), Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical applications (pp. 371-401). New York: Williams & Wilkins.
39.Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook, E. W., Fleming, W. C., Nepomuceno, C. S., Connell, J. S., and Crago, J. E. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 347-354.
40.Taub, E., Uswatte, G., King, D. K., Morris, D., Crago, J. E., and Chatterjee, A. (2006). A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke, 37, 1045-1049.
41.Uswatte, G. and Taub, E. (1999). Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In Struss, D.T., Winocur, G., Robertson, I. H. (Eds.). Cognitive neurorehabilitation: a comprehensive approach (pp. 215-219). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr.
42.van der Lee, J. H., Beckerman, H., Lankhorst, G. J., and Bouter, L. M. (2001). The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm Test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitative Medicine, 33, 110-113.
43.van der Lee, J. H., Wagenaar, R. C., Lankhorst, G. J., Vogelaar, T. W., Deville, W.L., and Bouter, L. M. (1999). Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke, 30, 2369-2375.
44.Wenzelburger, R., Kopper, F., Frenzel, A., Stolze, H., Klebe, S., Brossmann, A., Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J., Golge, M., Illert, M. and Deuschl, G. (2005). Hand coordination following capsular stroke. Brain, 128, 64-74.
45.Whitall, J., Savin, D. N., Harris-Love, M., & Waller, S. M. (2006). Psychometric properties of a modified Wolf Motor Function Test for people with mild and moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 656-660.
46.Wiesendanger, M., Kaluzny, P., Kazennikov, O., Palmeri, A. and Perriq, S. (1994). Temporal coordination in bimanual actions. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 72, 591-594.
47.Williams, L. S., Weinberger, M., Harris, L. E., Clark, D. O., and Biller, J. (1999). Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 30, 1362-1369.
48.Wittenberg, G. F., Chen, R., Ishii, K, Bushara, K. O., Taub, E., Gerber, L. H., Hallett, M. and Cohen, L. G. (2003). Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: Magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 17, 48-57.
49.Wolf, S. L., Blanton, S., Baer, H., Breshears, J. and Butler, A. J. (2002). Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist, 8(6), 325-338.
50.Wolf, S. L., Catlin, P. A., Ellis, M., Archer, A. L., Morgan, B., & Piacentino, A. (2001). Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke, 32, 1635-1639.
51.Wolf, S. L., Lecraw, D. E., Barton, L. A., and Jann, B. B. (1989). Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head injured patients. Experimental Neurology, 104, 125–132.
52.World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
53.Wu, C-Y, Chen C-L, Tang, S. F., Lin, K-C and Huang, Y-Y. (2007). Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, in press.
54.Wu, C-Y, Chen C-L, Tsai, W-C, Lin, K-C, and Chou, S-H. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of modified constraint-induced movement therapy for elderly stroke survivors: Changes in motor impairment, daily functioning, and quality of life. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 273-278.
55.Wu, C-Y, Lin, K-C, Chen, H-C, Chen, Y-H, and Hung, W-H. (2007). Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on movement kinematics and daily function in patients with stroke: A kinematic study of motor control mechanisms. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, in press.
56.李佳宜、吳菁宜、連倚南、許美慧、林克忠。(2006a)。改良式侷限誘發動作治療於輕中度腦中風患者之成效：運動學分析之研究。職能治療學會雜誌，25-35頁。
57.李佳宜、吳菁宜、連倚南、許美慧、林克忠。(2006b)。改良式侷限誘發動作治療對於腦中風病人之復健成效。台灣醫學，10，429-437頁。
58.黃雅瑛、吳菁宜、林克忠、歐舒欣、呂家豪、游雅文。(2005)。修正之侷限－誘發動作治療對中風患者的臨床表現分析。台灣復健研究與實務，1， 44-53頁。
59.黃雅瑛、吳菁宜、洪維憲、陳嘉玲、林克忠。(2006)。改良式制約誘發運動治療對中風患者療效之運動學分析。台灣醫學，10， 319-327頁。