跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.209) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/29 05:54
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:郭育誠
研究生(外文):YU-CHEN KUO
論文名稱:控制股東特性對私募增資宣告效果之相關研究
論文名稱(外文):Private Equity Offerings and Controlling Shareholder’s Personal Interest
指導教授:翁鶯娟翁鶯娟引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ying-Jiuan Wong
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:62
中文關鍵詞:私募增資控制股東個人利益假說訊息釋放假說
外文關鍵詞:Private placementControlling shareholdersPersonal benefitSignaling
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:807
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:21
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要研究企業在進行私募的這一行為上,是否會以全體股東的利益為優先考量而不是以控制股東的利益為主。研究發現當控制股東以個人利益為考量時,符合個人利益假說,市場投資者不會因為企業宣告私募增資而有異常報酬產生,不具任何宣告效果。當控制股東不以個人利益為考量時符合市場訊息釋放假說,市場投資者會因為企業宣告私募增資而有異常報酬產生,具宣告效果。
進一步研究私募增資短期間內異常報酬率與財務比率之關係,發現股票淨值比、財務幹桿比率、預期報酬率、控制股東質押比、現金流量請求權與累積異常報酬率有顯著相關。當私募增資宣告下,若股票淨值比越高累積異常報酬越低,財務幹桿比率越高累積異常報酬越高,預期報酬率越高累積異常報酬越高,控制股東質押比越大累積異常報酬越低,現金流量請求權越多累積異常報酬越高。
The purpose of this study is that the enterprise’s private placement announcement is under way, whether it takes whole shareholders' benefits into consideration first not the benefits of controlling shareholders.
In this research, it is found that as Controlling shareholders take personal benefits into consideration first, and it meets personal interest hypothesis. Marketing investors don't have abnormal return when the private placement announcements are declared. It doesn't possess any announcement effect.
But oppositely, as Controlling shareholders don't take personal benefits into consideration first, and it meets signaling hypothesis. Marketing investors could have abnormal return because enterprises claim private placement. It possesses announcement effect.
For further research, the relationship between abnormal return and financial ratio in the short term of the announcement of private placement is found that Price-Book Ratio、financial leverage ratio 、Prior Return、stock pledge ratio of controlling shareholder、 and Free Cash Flow right is relevant obviously to cumulative abnormal return.
As the announcement of private placement is declared, the results below are as follows.
1. While Price-Book Ratio is increasing, cumulative abnormal return is decreasing.
2. While financial leverage ratio is increasing, cumulative abnormal return is increasing as well.
3.While Prior Return is increasing,cumulative abnormal return is increasing as well.
4. While stock pledge ratio of controlling shareholder is increasing, cumulative abnormal return is decreasing.
5. While Free Cash Flow right is increasing, cumulative abnormal return is increasing as well.
目錄 ii
圖目錄 iii
表目錄 iii
中文摘要 iv
Abstract v
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景及動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 我國私募現況 8
第二節 控制股東相關文獻 13
第三節 私募增資與異常報酬相關文獻 19
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節 研究架構 26
第二節 研究方法 28
第三節 研究假設與變數操作性定義 34
第四章 實證結果分係 41
第一節 敘述性統計分析 41
第二節 單因子分係 43
第三節 共線性分係 45
第四節 迴歸分析 46
第五章 結論與建議 53
第一節 研究結論 53
第二節 研究限制與建議 55
參考文獻 56
1.台灣經濟新報資料庫( Taiwan EconomicJournal, TEJ )
2.台灣證券交易所的公開資訊觀測站(http://newmops.tse.com.tw/)
3.卓越商情資料庫 (http://ebds.anyan.com.tw/)
4.中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會(http://www.sfi.org.tw/)
5.周寶蓮(1984),會計盈餘與現金流量對股票報酬影響之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
6.林嘉慧(2007),「台灣上市公司私募股權現況與績效之探討」,東吳大學,企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
7.洪麗芳(2004),股權結構、財務決策與公司績效關聯性之研究,中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
8.翁淑育(2000),台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
9.高立志(2007),控制股東控制權與現金流量請求權偏離對公司價值影響相關性研究,國立高雄第一科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
10.梁信翔(2005),董監事質押比率之研究,國立臺灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。
11.許加昂(2000),董監質押比率與公司經營績效、融資政策、股利政策關聯性之研究,台灣大學會計所碩士論文。
12.許惠雲(2006),台灣上市上櫃公司私募股權中之私人利益,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
13.陳明宏(2005),控制股東股權結構與現金增資長期績效關聯性之研究,國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。
14.陳鴻崑(2009),公司股票購回與控制股東個人利益之研究,台灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。
15.劉言鼎(2008),私募異常報酬與交易量之決定因素,朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士研究所碩士論文。
16.劉綠萍(2003),董監事股權質押的代理問題與公司價值關聯性之研究,國立台北大學企業管理學研究所未出版博士論文。
17.蔡信夫、鍾惠民、林詩韻,(2003),控制股東代理問題與盈餘資訊內涵之關聯性研究─以台灣上市公司為例,當代會計,4 (2), 143-168.
18.Admati, A., Pfleiderer P.( 1988), "A theory of intraday Patterns: Volume and price variability", Review of Financial Studies, 1, 3~40.
19.Banz, R.W. (1981), "The relationship between return and market value of common stocks", Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3-18.
20.Barclay, M. J. & Holderness, C.G. (1989), "Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporation", Journal of financial Economics, 25, 271-395.
21.Barclay, M. J., Holderness C.G. & Sheehan D. P. (2001), "The Block Pricing Puzzle", working paper, University Rochester.
22.Barclay, M. J., Holderness C.G. & Sheehan D. P. (2003), "Private Placement and Managerial Entrenchment", working paper, SSRN.
23.Chan,K.,C.,Nai-fu chen(1991), "Structural and return characteristics of small and large firms", Journal of Finance,46,1467-1484
24.Chen, Y. and S. Hu(2001), " The controlling shareholder’s personal stock loan and firm performance" , working paper, National Taiwan University.
25.Cronqvist, H. & Nilsson, M. (2004), "The Choice Between Rights Offerings andPrivate Equity Placements", Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming.
26.Cronqvist, H., and M. Nilsson( 2003), "Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis ,38, 695-719.
27.Cronqvist, H., and M. Nilsson(2005), " The choice between rights offerings and private equity placements", Journal of Financial Economics 78, 375-407.
28.Demsetz, H., & Lehn K. (1985), " The Structure of Corporate Ownerships: Causes and Consequences", Journal of Political Economy, 93 ,1155-1177.
29.Dyck, A., and Zingales, L.( 2004), "Private benefits: An international comparison", Journal of Finance ,59, 537-600.
30.Evidence from Private Equity Finacings, Journal of Financial Economics, 23, 3-28.
31.Fama, E. F. & Jensen M. C. (1983), " Separation of Ownership and Control", Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
32.Fama, E.F. and K.R. French (1993), "Common Risk Factors in The Returns on Stocks and Bonds", Journal of Financial Economics, 33, No. 1, 3-56.
33.Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver D. Hart (1987). "Vertical Integration and the Distribution of Property Rights", In Assaf Razin and Efraim Sadka (eds.), Economic Policy in Theory and Practice, London: Macmillan Press.
34.Harris, M., and A. Raviv(1988), " Corporate finance: voting rights and majority rules", Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 203-235.
35.Haugen, R. and W. Baker(1996), "Commonality in the determinants of expected stock returns, " Journal of Financial Economics ,41, 401-439.
36.Hertzel, M. & Rees, L. (1998), " Earnings and Risk Changes Around Private Placements of Equity" , Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 13 (1), 21-35.
37.Hertzel, M. & Smith, R.L. (1993), "Market Discounts and Shareholder Gains for Placing Equity Privately", Journal of Finance, 48 (2), 459-485.
38.Hertzel, M., Lemmon, M., Linck, J. S., & Ress, L. (2002), " Long-tern Performance Following Private Placements of Equity", Journal of Finance, 57, 2595-2617.
39.Hwang, J. H. (2005), "Private benefits-Ownership vs Control", working paper.
40.Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976), " Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
41.Jensen, M. C.( 1986), "Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeover", American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.
42.Krishnamurthy, S., Spindt, P., Subramaniam,V. & Woidtke, T. (2004),"Does Investor Identity Matter in Equity Issues? Evidence from Private Placements", Journal of Financial Intermediation, 14 (2), 210-238.
43.Kyle, A.S.( 1985), " Conitinuous auctions and insider trading", Economterica, 53, 1315~1336.
44.La Porta, R., F.Lopez-de-Silanes, A.Shleifer(1999), "Corporate ownership around the world ", Journal of Finance ,54,471-517.
45.La Porta, R., F.Lopez-de-Silanes, A.Shleifer, and R.Vishny( 1998), "Law and finance" , Journal of Political Economy, 106,1113-1155.
46.La Porta, R., F.Lopez-de-Silanes, A.Shleifer, and R.Vishny(2000), "Investor protection and corporate governance" , Journal of Finance Economics, 58,3-27.
47.Mikkelson, W. M. & Partch, M. M. (1986), " Valuation Effects of Security Offerings and The Issuance Process" , Journal of Financial Econoics, 15, 523-553.
48.Myers, S. C. & Majluf, N. S. (1984), "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investor Do Not Have", Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187-221.
49.Reinganum, M., R. (1983), "The anomalous stock market behavior of small firms in January: Empirical tests for tax-loss selling effects", Journal of Financial Economics, 13(1), 89-104.
50.Rosenberg,Barr,Kenneth Reid,and Ronald Lanstein(1985), "Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency" , Journal of Portfolio Management ,11,9-17.
51.Shleifer, A. & Vishny R. W. (1986) ,"Large Shareholders and Corporate Control", The Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488.
52.Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny(1997), "A survey of corporate governance", Journal of Finance ,52 , 737-783
53.Spiess, D.K., Affleck-Graves, J.( 1995), "Underperformance in Long-Run Stock Returns Following Seasoned Equity Offerings", Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 243-267.
54.Stulz, R. M. (1988), " Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and The Market for Corporate Control", Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 25-54.
55.Wruck, K. H. (1989), " Equity ownership concentration and firm value", Journal of Financial Economics ,23(1), 3-28.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 自我導向學習、人格特質、創造力與工作績效關聯性之研究-以中華電信公司的業務經理為例
2. 股市投資人之人格特質與投資決策因素關係之研究-以高雄地區某證劵公司投資人為例
3. 組織溝通、激勵制度與領導風格對組織承諾之關聯性研究-以組織氣候為中介變數
4. 臺灣房地產市場下方風險之研究-以中古屋及預售屋為例
5. 探討影響自有品牌購買意願之因素及涉入的角色
6. 綠色資訊科技採行意向研究-計劃行為理論之應用
7. 消費者涉入與顧客關係傾向對顧客抱怨行為之關聯性研究-以關係品質為中介變數消費者涉入與顧客關係傾向對顧客抱怨行為之關聯性研究-以關係品質為中介變數
8. 組織變革、心理契約與員工工作態度關聯性之研究─以高雄港公司化為例
9. 私募股權基金入主銀行之財務績效與公司治理及其對公司獲利能力之影響
10. 股權私募的宣告及定價與公司價值的變化
11. 服務創新活動對會員滿意度與忠誠度關聯性之研究-以高雄市勞工之友會會員為例
12. 以計畫行為理論探討離島民眾醫療利用行為與可近性滿意度之研究─以IDS醫療計畫為例
13. 影響工作滿意度之因素探討-以自我監控為干擾變數
14. 情緒勞務、組織公平與自我效能對組織承諾之關聯性研究-以員工工作滿意度為中介變數
15. 個人學習、團隊學習、團隊文化對績效影響研究-以台灣事務機產業F公司銷售團隊為例