臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著近年來國內混凝土形式的演進，螺旋箍筋透過各種類型的試驗成果，已成為可被接受並使用的箍筋形式。而使用螺箍筋的混凝土柱在試驗結果上顯示，不僅可以減少傳統箍筋在製作上所造成的人為誤差，同時也可以達到減少箍筋使用量並具有相同甚至更佳的效能。
但目前螺箍筋的研究成果，大都針對正方形斷面，對於大型公共建設上，例如橋梁等的較常使用斷面形式，長矩形以及長圓形仍缺少數據來證明螺箍筋的效能。
本研究透過軸壓試驗，反覆載重撓曲試驗，反覆載重剪力試驗，偏心試驗等，來測試螺箍筋以及傳統形式在長矩形以及長圓形斷面上的行為表現，藉以判斷螺旋箍筋在此兩種斷面上的使用性。
根據試驗結果，螺箍筋在長矩形以及長圓形斷面上的表現，仍舊比傳統箍筋的能力好。證明螺旋箍筋亦適用在長矩形以及長圓形斷面上，可使用在大型公共建設上。

Along with the evolution of reinforced concrete’s application in Taiwan, inter-locking spiral has been accepted and used as a type of transverse steel. It is showed that reinforced concrete using inter-locking spiral can not only reduce the artificial error of hoops, but also reduce using the amount of hoops. It is also demonstrated the reinforced concrete using inter-locking spiral can provide more confinement.
The present research of reinforced concrete using inter-locking spiral, is mostly aimed at the squared cross-section. However, the rectangular cross-section and the oval cross-section are used to public construction, is still lacked the data to prove the efficacy.
The research compares the confinement of reinforced concrete, which have rectangular and oval cross- section, using inter-locking spiral and traditional hoops in the same design code. By the three tests, compression test, recyclic tests and eccentric tests, it can be discussed the feasibility of inter-locking spiral on two different cross-sections.
According to the results of experiments, the performance of reinforced concrete which uses inter-locking spiral is better than the one uses traditional hoops. It is showed that inter-locking spiral use on rectangular cross-section and oval cross-section can provide more confinement effect and be used in the public construction.

第1章、 緒論 1
1-1. 前言 1
1-2. 研究動機與目的 1
1-3. 研究大綱 2
第2章、 文獻回顧 5
2-1. 螺箍混凝土柱設計規範 5
2-2. 鋼筋圍束混凝土組成律模式及其應用 8
2-2-1. Kent, D. C., and Park, R. [1] 8
2-2-2. Sheikh, S. A., and Uzumeri, S. M.[2] 10
2-2-3. Mander, J. B.; Priestley, M. J. N.; and Park, R.[3] 11
2-2-4. Légeron, F., and Paultre, P.[5] 14
2-2-5. 賴彥君,2008,五螺箍混凝土柱載重韌性之分析研究[35] 15
2-3. ABAQUS分析理論 16
2-3-1. 蔡明諺,2007,鋼筋混凝土梁柱接頭複合材料補強行為之數值模擬[32] 16
2-3-2. 楊宛蒨,2008,複合材料圍束混凝土柱受軸壓之非線性行為分析[31] 17
第3章、 軸壓實驗規劃與結果 27
3-1. 導論 27
3-2. 試體設計及實驗配置 27
3-2-1. 試體規劃與設計 27
3-2-2. 試體製作 29
3-2-3. 試驗配置 29
3-2-4. 試驗觀察與紀錄 30
3-3. 試驗結果與討論 36
3-4. 小結 40
第4章、 撓曲、剪力、偏心試驗規劃與結果 121
4-1. 前言 121
4-2. 試體規劃與試驗配置 121
4-2-1. 試體規劃設計 121
4-2-2. 試體製作 123
4-2-3. 試驗配置 124
4-2-3-1. 撓曲及剪力試驗配置 124
4-2-3-2. 偏心試驗配置 124
4-2-4. 側力修正 125
4-2-5. 試驗觀察與紀錄 126
4-2-5-1. 撓曲及剪力試驗 126
4-2-5-2. 偏心試驗 128
4-3. 試驗結果 130
4-3-1. 撓曲及剪力試驗結果 130
4-3-2. 偏心試驗結果 132
4-4. 小結 133
第5章、 結論與建議 231
5-1. 結論 231
5-2. 建議 234
參考文獻 235

1.Kent, D.C., and R. Park, “Flexural Members with Confined Concrete, “Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol.97, ST7, Jul. 1971,pp.1969-1990.
2.Sheikh, S.A., and S.M. Uzumeri, “Analytical Model for Concrete Confinement in Tied Column,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE,Vol. 108, ST12, Dec. 1982, pp.2703-2722.
3.Mander, J.B., M.J.N. Priestley, and R. Park, “Observed Stress-Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE, Vol. 114, No.8, Aug. 1988, pp.1827-1849.
4.Chang, G. A., and Mander, J. B., “Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: part I – evaluation of seismic capacity,” Technical Report NCEER-94-0006, NCEER, State University of New York, Buffalo, N.Y., pp. 3-32－3-34,1994.
5.Légeron, F., and P. Paultre, “Uniaxial Confinement Model for Normal and High-Strength Concrete Columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.129, No.2, Feb.2003, pp.241-252.
6.H. Tanaka and R. Park. “Seismic Design and Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns with interlocking Spirals,” ACI Structural Journal / March-April 1993
7.Samuel Yin, K.C. Chang and J.C. Wang, “Experimental Studies of Rectangular Columns with Innovative Spiral Confinements,” The Seventeenth KKCNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, Dec. 13-15, 2004, Thailand.
8.Priestley, M.J.N., and Park, R., ”Strength and Ductility of Bridge Substructures” Road Research Unit Bulletin NO. 71, Bridge Design and Research seminar, Auckland 1984, National Roads Board, Wellinton, New Zealand, 120pp.
9.J.B. Mander, M.J.N. Priestley, and R. Park, Fellow, ASCE, “Theoretical Stress-Strain Model For Confined Concrete.”
10.J. B. Mander, M. J. N. Priestley, R. Park, Fellow (1988). "THEORETICAL STRESS-STRAIN MODEL for CONFINED CONCRETE." Journal of Structural Engineering 114(No. 8): 23.
11.Juan F. Correal, M. S., David Sanders, and Saad EI-Azazy (2007). "Analytical Evaluation of Bridge Columns with Double Interlocking Spirals." ACI Structural Journal: 8.
12.Juan F. Correal, M. S., David Sanders, and Saad EI-Azazy (2007). "Shake Table Studies of Bridge Columns with Double Interlocking Spirals." ACI Structural Journal July-August: 8.
13.Y. L. Yin, C.C. Wang, , J.C. Wang, and C.Y. Liang, “Seismic Cyclic Loading Test of SRC Columns Confined with 5-Spirals,” Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 1-27, May, 2008.
14.ACI318-05. "Buildings Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary." American Concrete Institute.
15.Juan F. Correal, M. Saiid Saiidi, David Sanders, and Saad El-Azazy. “Analytical Evaluation of Bridge Column with Double Interlocking Spirals” ,ACI Structural Journal/May-June 2007,pp 314-323.
16.Juan F. Correal, M. Saiid Saiidi, David Sanders, and Saad El-Azazy. “Shake Table Studies of Bridge Columns with Double Interlocking Spirals” ,ACI Structural Journal/July-August 2007,pp 393-401.
17.Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual (6.9)
18.Abaqus Verification Manual (6.9)
19.CALTRANS, Bridge Design Specifications, Septenber 2004.
20.張國鎮、張順賓、劉光晏、王柄雄，