參考文獻
中文部分
小林重順，1991，造形構成心理，藝風堂，台北
太田昭雄，河原英介，1987，色彩與配色，新形象，台北
王月青，2001，影響產品價值感之造形元素探討，國立台灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文，台北，p10~17王明顯，1990，工藝概論，新形象，台北
白雲同，2003，行動電話造形特徵對於消費者辨識與分類特性的關係研究，國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所碩士論文，雲林佐口七朗，1990，設計概論，藝風堂，台北
呂明泉，2002，觸覺與視覺對意象差異研究－以塑膠材質咬花為例，國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文，台南李隆盛，1989，工藝材料概說，雄獅，台北
邱永福，1990，造形原理，藝風堂出版社，台北，p78
林彥呈、管倖生，2000，產品色彩與造形搭配相關性之研究，2000年技術與教學研討會特輯，工業設計組，p148~153林昆範，柯凱仁譯，1999，現代色彩學，全華，台北
林加雯，1998，材質質感之視覺意象類型與構成基礎初探，國立雲林科技大學視覺傳達系，第三屆設計【學術研究成果】研討會論文集，p357-362
林書堯，1998，色彩學，三民，台北
林振陽、黃世輝，1990，設計材料，六合，台北
柯超茗，1997，材料視覺與觸覺質感意象的研究，國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所碩士論文，雲林，p97高清漢，1997，當前台灣產品形象定位之探討，國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文，新竹黃俊英，2002，多變量分析，中國經企研究所
朝倉直已，1992，藝術、設計的立體構成，龍溪，台北
張悟非，2003，型態特徵的組成風格形成與認知意象的影響研究，國科會 NSC 91-2213-E-224-024-
張悟非，2002，造形屬性特徵與感官意象之關係研究，國科會 NSC 90-2218-E-224-013-
張建成，2000，使用者對產品造形意象認知的影響因素研究，國立交通大學工業工程與管理學系博士論文，新竹鄭昭明，1993，認知心理學－理論與實踐，桂冠圖書公司
鄭麗玉，1993，認知心理學－理論與應用，五南出版社，台北
鄭首益，2002，雙色配色意象認知的分析與視覺化，國立台灣科技大學設計研究
所碩士論文，台北
楊岳，1988，視角與色面積比對【色相配對知覺】的影響，國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文，台南
廖敏如，2001，塑膠材質透明度在產品感知設計應用之探討，大葉大學設計研究所碩士班碩士論文，彰化，p20
蔡詩怡，2003，汽車造形輪廓之形態特徵辨識與認知之研究，國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所碩士論文，雲林
賴瓊琦，1997，設計的色彩心理，視傳，台北
謝政峰，2002，產品造形屬性特徵對使用者感官意象的影響－以行動電話為例，
國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所碩士論文
Mike Baxter著，張建成譯，1998，產品設計與開發，六合，台北，p40~p43
外文部分
Baxter, M. (1995), Product Design, Practical Methods for the Systematic Development of New Products, Cgapman & Hall, London
Ballesteros, Soledad. (1989), Some determinants of perceived structure: effects of stimulus and tasks. In Bryan E. Sheep & Soledad Ballesteros(Eds). Object Perception: Structure and Processes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 235-263.
Burns, Barbara., & Bryan E. Sheep. (1988), Dimensional interactions and the structure of psychological space: The representation of hue, saturation, and brightness : Perception & Psychophysics, Vol.43, No.5, 494-507
Broadbent, D. E., 1958, Perception and communication, London: Pergamon Press.
Chuang, Min-Chuen & Ma, Yung-Chuan (2001), Expressing the expected product images in product design of micro-electronic products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, p247-p258.
Connor, C. E., Hsiao. S. S., Phillip, J. R., & Johnson, K. O. (1990), Tactile roughness: Neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. Journal of Neuroscience, 10. 3823-3836.
Caron, A. J., (1969), Discrimination shifts in three-year-olds as a function of dimensional salience, Developmental Psychology, 1, p333~p339.
Culbert, S. S., & Stellwagen, W. T. (1963), Tactual discrimination of textures. Perceptual Motor Skills, 16. 545-552.
Gibson, J.J. (1979), The ecological approach to visual perception, boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Garner, W. R., (1974), The processing of information and structure, Potomac, MD:
Lawrenced Erlbaum Associates.
Garner, W. R., (1970), The stimulus in information processing, American Psychologist, 25, p350~p358.
Gibson, E. J., (1969), Principles of perceptual and development, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gibson, E. J. (1969), Principles of perceptual learning and development, New York: Academic Press.
Harada, A. (1998), The Parallel Design Methodology in Kansei Engineering, Report of Modeling the Evaluation Structure of Kansei, p309-316.
Heller, M. A. (1982), Visual and tactual texture perception: Inetrsensory cooperation. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 339-344.
Johnson, K. O., & Hsiao, S. S. (1992), Neural mechanisms of tactual form and textire perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 227-250.
Krampen, M., (1996), “Semiotics in Architecture and Industrial/Product Design,” In Margolin V. and Buchanan R (eds.) The Idea of Design. The MIT Press, Massachusetts, Second Printing, p89-p103.
Krippendorff, 1996, “On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the proposition that “Design is Making Sense (of Thing)” In Margolin V. and Buchanan R. (eds.) The Idea of Design, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, Second Printing, p156-p184.
Kemler, D. G., (1983), Exploring and reexploring issues of integrality, perceptual
sensitivity and dimensional salience, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,
36, p365~p379.
Kemler, D. G., (1982), Classification in young and retarded children: The primacy of
over all similarity relations. Child Development, 53, p768~p779.
Lin, Rungtai, Lin, C. Y., & Wong, Joan (1996), An application of multidimensional scaling in product semantics., International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 18, p193-p204.
Lockhead, G. R., (1966), Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination,
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, p95~p104.
Lockhead, G. R., (1972), Processing dimensional stimulus : A note, Psychological Review, 79, p410~p419.
Muneo, K. & Kim, Kou-Han (1998), Communicating Kansei Design Concept via Artifacts-A Cognitive Scientific Approach., Report of Modeling the Evalution Structure of Kansei, p337-p343.
Nagamachi, M., (1995), Kansei engineering: A new ergonomic comsumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 15, p3-p11.
Odom, R. D., (1978), A perceptual-salience account of decalage relations and developmental change, In L.S. Siegal, & C.J. Brainerd (Eds.), Alternatives to Piage, New York: Academic Press. p111~p130.
Osgood, Charles E., Suci, George J., & Tannenbaum, Gercy H., 1971, The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press.
Rao, A. Ravishankar (1993), Identifying High Level Features of Texture Perception,
CVGIP : Graphical Models and Image Processing, Vol.55, No.3,May, 218-233.
Shepp B. E. & Ballesteros, ed. (1989), OBJECT PERCEPTION Structure and
Process,LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, PUBLISHERS, Hillsdale,
New Jersey, Hove and London, p325~p356.
Shepp B. E., (1983), The analyzability of multi-dimensional objects: Some constraints
on perceived structure, the development of perceived structure, and attention, In
T.J. Tighe & B.E. Sheep (Eds.), Perception, cognition and development,
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p39~p74.
Shepp B. E. & Swartz, K. B., (1976), Selective attention and the processing of integral
and nonintegral dimensions: A development study, Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 22, p73~p85.
Smith, L. B. (1983), Development of classification: The use of similarity and dimensional relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, p150-p178.
Smith, L. B. (1983), Young children’s understanding of attributes and dimensions: A comparison of conceptual and linguistic measures. Child Development, 55, p363-p380.
Smith, L. B. & Kemler, D. G., (1978), Levels of experienced dimensionality in
childrenand adults. Cognitive Psychology, 10, p502~p532.
Smith, L. B. & Kemler, D. G., (1977), Developmental trends in free classification:
Evidence for a new conceptualization of perceptual development, Journal of
Experimental Child Psychology, 24, p279~p298.
Tanoue, C., Ishizaks, K., & Nagamachi M. (1997), Kansei Engineering: A Study on perception of vehicle interior image, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, p115-p128.
Treisman, A. M., (1964), Selective attention in man, British Medical Bulletin, Vol.20, p12~p16.
Treisman, A. M., (1960), Contextual cues in selective listening, Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, Vol. 12, p242~p248.
Tamura, H., Mori, S., & Yamawaki, T. (1978), Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Transactions on System of Man and Cybernetics, 8, 460-473.
Takahashi, Shigeko (1995), Aesthetic Properties of Pictorial Peception, Psychological
Review, Vol.102 ,No.4 , p671- p683
Werner, H., (1948), The comparative psychology of mental development. New York, NK: International Universities Press, Inc.
Wohlwill, J., (1962), From perception to inference: A dimension of cognitive development, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72, p87~p107.
Zwicky, F., (1967), The Morphological Approach to Discovery, Invention, Research and Construction, New Method of Though and Procedure: Symposium on Methodologies, Pasadena, May, p316-p317.