跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.172) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/11 02:48
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:吳仲修
研究生(外文):Chung-Hsiu Wu
論文名稱:財會主管異動原因與異常應計數
論文名稱(外文):Reasons for CFO Turnover and Abnormal accruals
指導教授:許書偉許書偉引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shu-Wei Hsu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:57
中文關鍵詞:財會主管異動原因異常應計數盈餘管理
外文關鍵詞:Reasons for CFO turnoverAbnormal accrualsEarnings management
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:545
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
近年來,由於財務報表舞弊案件頻傳,財會主管在公司中所扮演的角色也開始受到關注。政府與相關機構也開始立法規範財會主管之相關法律責任與懲處規範。財會主管負責公司財務報表編製之工作,其最瞭解公司內部財務資訊。因此,本研究探討在財會主管異動前後,財會主管是否運用其財務報導的裁決權操縱盈餘以獲取私利,並分析不同的異動原因是否也會影響財會主管操控異常應計數之情形。
本研究以2000至2005上市櫃公司為樣本,其中財會主管有異動之公司為381筆,財會主管未異動之公司為2,946筆,總樣本數為3,327筆,本研究以此兩組樣本比較其異常應計數之變化。另外,並進一步區分不同財會主管異動原因為離職、晉升與退休,再探討不同異動原因其對於異常應計數變動幅度的影響是否有所不同。
本研究結果發現,在未區分財會主管異動原因情況下,發現財會主管有異動之公司,其異常應計數減少之幅度與財會主管未異動之公司未有顯著差異。進一步區分財會主管異動原因後,財會主管晉升後其異常應計數變動量有顯著向下減少,但其餘異動原因其異常應計數變動量減少幅度與財會主管未異動之公司無顯著差異。
The role of CFO in the corporate has gained the attentions from academia and regulations because of the fraudulent financial reporting in recent years. CFO is one of the top management in corporations and is responsible for the function of financial reporting. Therefore, in addition to the knowledge about firm’s operations, CFO has discretionary power given by accounting standards over financial reporting. This study investigates whether CFOs use their discretionary power to benefit themselves on the events of CFO turnover.
The sample includes all listed firms in Taiwan over 2000 to 2005, and consists of 381 CFO turnover events, and 2,946 non-CFO turnover events. This study compares the change of abnormal accruals between turnover and non-turnover observations around the year of turnover. In addition, this study further classified the reasons for CFO turnover into dismal, promotion, retire, and categories.
The results show that, the change of abnormal accruals has no difference between turnover and non-turnover observations when the reasons for CFO turnover are not further classified. Once the reasons for turnover are controlled, the change of abnormal accruals reduces significantly after CFO promotion. However, the reduction is not observed in other categories.
目錄
謝 辭 .................................................I
摘 要 .................................................II
Abstract.................................................III
目錄 .................................................IV
圖目次 .................................................V
表目次 .................................................VI

第壹章 緒論 .........................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機.......................................1
第二節 研究目的 .........................................2
第三節 論文架構 .........................................4
第貳章 文獻探討 .........................................6
第一節 高階主管異動與公司經營績效............................6
第二節 盈餘管理 .........................................8
第三節 高階主管異動與盈餘管理之關聯...........................10
第參章 研究方法與設計.......................................13
第一節 研究假說 .........................................13
第二節 研究模型 .........................................15
第三節 變數定義 .........................................17
第四節 研究期間與選樣標準...................................22
第肆章 研究結果與分析.......................................24
第一節 敘述統計量 .........................................24
第二節 多變量分析 .........................................28
第三節 額外測試 .........................................35
第伍章 結論與建議 .........................................45
第一節 研究結論 .........................................45
第二節 研究貢獻 .........................................45
第三節 研究限制與建議...................................... 46
參考文獻 .................................................47

圖目次
圖一 觀念性架構圖 .........................................3
圖二 研究架構圖 .........................................5

表目次
表一 高階主管異動理論.......................................7
表二 高階主管異動對於績效之影響...............................8
表三 高階主管異動原因與盈餘管理動機 .........................12
表四 變數定義與衡量.........................................22
表五 公司財會主管異動原因之分類..............................23
表六 公司財會主管有異動之分佈................................24
表七 樣本敘述統計量 .................................26
表八 相關係數表 .........................................27
表九 財會主管異動與異常應計數之廻歸結果.......................29
表十 區分財會主管異動原因與異常應計數之廻歸結果................33
表十一 財會主管異動前兩年與前三年之廻歸結果....................36
表十二 財會主管異動與異常應計數之廻歸結果......................39
表十三 區分財會主管異動原因與異常應計數之廻歸結果...............42
表十四 公司財會主管異動原因之分類.............................44
李建然、許書偉及陳政芳,2003,非審計服務與異常應計數之關聯性研究,會計評論,第37期(7月):1-30。
張慈恬,2006,財務主管更換對盈餘管理行為之影響,私立朝陽科技大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
黃旭輝,2006,經理人異動與股東財富效果,管理評論,第25卷,第一期(1月):23-45。
Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do nonaudit service compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78: 611-639.
Bartov, E. 1993. The timing of assets sales and earnings manipulation. The Accounting Review 66 (October):840-855.
Baker, G P., M C. Jensen, and K J. Murphy. 1988. Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. Theory. Journal of Finance 47(July):593-616.
Beneish, M. 1997. How do managers benefit from earnings overstatement? Working paper, Indiana University.
Bartov, E. F., F. Gul., and J. Tsui. 2000. Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (December):421-452.
Becker, C. L., M. L. Defond, J. Jiambalvo and K. R. Surbramanyam. 1998. The effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (Spring):1-21.
Burgstahler, D. and I. Dechev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (April):99-126.
Chung, H., and S. Kallapur. 2003. Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Account Review 78 (April):931-955.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1988. Managerial competition, information costs, and corporate governance: The use of accounting performance measures in proxy contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10 (June):3-36.
Dechow, P. M. and R. G. Sloan. 1991. Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14 (January):51-89.
Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (April):193-225.
DeFond, M. L. and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (January):145-176.
Denis, D. J., and D. K. Denis. 1995. Performance changes following top management dismissals. The Journal of Finance 50 (September):1029-1057.
Fee, C. E., and C. J. Hadlock,. 2004. Management turnover across the corporate hierarchy. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (February):3-38.
Gibbs, M. 1995. Incentive compensation in a corporate hierarchy. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19 (March):247-277.
Gilson, S. C. 1989. Management turnover and financial distress. Journal of Financial Economics 25 (December):241-262.
Gillett, P. R., and N. Uddin. 2005. CFO Intentions of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Pratice & Theory 24(May):55-75.
Geiger, M. A. and D. S. North. 2006. Does hiring a new CFO change things? An investigation of changes in discretionary accruals. The Accounting Review 81 (December):781-809.
Graham, J. R., R. H. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2006. The economic implication of Corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40 (January):3-73.
Healy, P. M. 1985. The effects of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (September):85-107.
Healy, P. M. and J. M. Wahlen. 1999. A review of earnings management literature and its implications for stanDCArd setting. Accounting Horizons 13 (December):365-383.
Huson, M. R., P. H. Malatesta., and R. Parrino. 2004. Mangerial succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 74 (August):237-275.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, Agency Costs, and Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October):305-360.
McNichols, M. and P. Wilson. 1988. Evidence of earnings management from the provision for bad debts. Journal of Accounting Research 26 (January):85-107.
Mian, S. 2001. On the choice and replacement of chief financial officers. Journal of Financial Economics 60 (April):143-175.
Murphy, K. J. and J. L. Zimmerman. 1993. Financial performace surrounding CEO turnover. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16 (September):273-315.
Menon K. and D. D. Williams. 2004. Former Audit Partners and Abnormal Accruals. The Accounting Review 79 (October):1095-1118.
Parrino, R.. 1997. CEO turnover and outside succession: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 46 (November):165-197.
Payne, J. L. and S. W. Robb 2000. Earnings Management:The Effect of Exante Earnings Exceptations. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finanace 15:371-391.
Reynolds, K. and J. Francis. 2001. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30:375-400.
Teoh, S., I. Welch, and T. J. Wong. 1998. Earnings management and the post-issue underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50 (October): 63-99.
Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman. 1978. Toward a Positive Theory as Determination of Accounting Standard. The Accounting Review 53:112-134.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top