跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.54) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/11 17:58
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊俊瑋
研究生(外文):Chun-Wei Yang
論文名稱:應用綠色內涵決策模式評估永續公共工程供應商評選策略
論文名稱(外文):Application of the Green Connotation Decision Model in Evaluating the Sustainable Public Construction Supplier Selection
指導教授:楊志豪楊志豪引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chih-Hao Yang
口試委員:楊志豪李篤華劉朝陽李坤璋
口試委員(外文):Chih-Hao YangDuu-Hwa LeeJau-Yang LiuKuen-chang Lee
口試日期:2015-05-06
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國防大學
系所名稱:財務管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:74
中文關鍵詞:永續公共工程決策試驗與實驗評估法(DEMATEL)網路分析法(ANP)折衷排序法(VIKOR)
外文關鍵詞:Sustainable Public ConstructionDEMATELANPVIKOR
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:524
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:145
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
全球氣候變遷與環境永續發展議題已喚起公共工程對於碳排放的關注,「永續公共工程」乃以生命週期為基礎,發展綠色內涵政策以降低工程生命週期中的資源與能源消耗。因此,永續公共工程供應商選取成為重要課題。本研究目的乃運用多準則決策分析(Multi-Criteria Decision Making, MCDM)結合DEMATEL及ANP方法瞭解「環境政策」、「綠色競爭力」、「綠色技術」及「綠色會計」觀點下,企業社會責任、環境管理系統、經驗成熟度、工程品質、綠色工法採用、綠色材料採用、工程成本估算之準確性、降低環境成本等準則之重要性。進而應用可產生妥協解的VIKOR法,建構永續公共工程供應商評選模式。實證結果顯示在主管機關及業務單位觀點均賦予企業社會責任最高的權重,而整合觀點則最重視綠色工法。本研究成果可提供評估永續公共工程供應商之綠色策略創新方法及協助主管單位建立永續公共工程供應商評選指標,以提高國軍公共工程之效能。
Global concerns over climate change and sustainable development have sparked the consideration of carbon emission in the public construction. Based on life cycle assessment (LCA) method and green connotation development, management of carbon footprint from sustainable public construction contributes to reduction in the environment impact of these energy and water consumption in the construction process. The purpose of this research is to develop a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to realize the green category priority (Environmental Policy, Green Competitiveness, Green Technology, and Green Accounting). Further, we could realize the criteria importance of corporate social responsibility, ISO14001, Experience, Construction quality, Green construction method, Green material, the accuracy of construction cost, Reduce environmental cost. The result showed that the management department and executive organ both provide the corporate social responsibility the highest weight; the integration perspective give Green construction method the highest weight, we considering that they are not the suitable one. This study will develop an optimal green connotation framework of sustainable construction development.
目錄
誌謝 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
目錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 IX
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 4
1.3章節架構 4
1.4研究流程 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
2.1永續發展與永續公共工程的定義及發展 7
2.2永續公共工程供應商選擇之評選觀點及準則 11
2.2.1環境政策 11
2.2.2綠色競爭力 13
2.2.3綠色技術 15
2.2.4綠色會計 17
第三章 研究方法 22
3.1決策實驗室分析法(Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory, DEMATEL) 22
3.2網路分析法(Analytic Network Process, ANP) 24
3.3DEMATEL結合ANP 27
3.4折衷排序法(VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, VIKOR) 30
3.5研究架構 34
3.6供應商評選方案 35
第四章 實證分析 36
4.1 DEMATEL分析 36
4.1.1主管機關DEMATEL分析 37
4.1.2業務單位DEMATEL分析 40
4.1.3整合DEMATEL分析 43
4.2 ANP分析 46
4.2.1主管機關ANP分析 46
4.2.2業務單位ANP分析 50
4.2.3整合ANP分析 54
4.2.4小結 58
4.3 VIKOR分析 59
4.3.1主管機關VIKOR分析 59
4.3.2業務單位VIKOR分析 61
4.3.2整合VIKOR分析 63
第五章 結論與管理意涵 66
參考文獻 69
中文部分 69
英文部分 70
中文部分
1.王世昌(2009)。台灣綠建材之推行成效。建築裝修,1,22-35。
2.邱暉仁、陳振川(2012)。導入綠色內涵工程減碳量化計算。營建知訊,358,17-27。
3.胡天鐘、傅雲瑄(2012)。以新混合式多評準決策模式建構改善網路銀行績效之策略。運籌與管理學刊,11(1),35-49。
4.黃詩穆、王健良、陳中獎(2012)。庇護工場導入ISO14001 環境管理制度之探討。崑山科技大學學報,9,82-93。
5.葉芊玟、林家立(2013)。網路知識分享服務之策略改善模式。運籌與管理學刊,11(1),13-34。
6.管孟忠、張紫雲、黃三麟(2010)。結合DANP之MCDM模型探討公部門之專案執行關鍵成功因素-以文官制度興革規劃方案為例。運籌與管理學刊,9(1),1-19。
7.管孟忠、陳以明、邵秀文(2013)。應用混合式多評準決策方法建構技術創新專案管理能力評價模式。管理資訊計算,2(1),199-220。
8.劉建浩、葉怡廷、莊哲維(2012)。混合模式於航空公司維修外包商選擇。運輸計劃季刊,4(2),135-164。
9.謝浩明、李冠頡(2011)。應用新型多評準決策方法於生活通勤型自行車道系統評估改善之研究-以桃園縣為例。都市交通半年刊,26(1),24-38。
10.行政院公共工程委員會(2008)。永續公共工程-節能減碳政策白皮書。台北市:行政院公共工程委員會。
11.行政院內政部(2013)公有智慧綠建築實施方針及實施日期。台北市:行政院,內政部。
12.行政院公共工程委員會(2012)振興經濟擴大公共建設投資計畫落實綠色內涵執行成果報告。台北市:行政院公共工程委員會。
英文部分
1. Abdelsalam, H. M., & Gad, M. M. (2009). Cost of quality in Dubai: An analytical case study of residential construction projects. International journal of project management, 27(5), 501-511.
2. Al-Tmeemy, S. M. H., Abdul-Rahman, H., & Harun, Z. (2012). Contractors' perception of the use of costs of quality system in Malaysian building construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 827-838.
3. Anojkumar L., Ilangkumaran M. and Sasirekha V. (2014). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 2964-2980.
4. Barthorpe, S. (2010). Implementing corporate social responsibility in the UK construction industry. Property Management, 28 (1), 4-17.
5. Bergek, A. & Berggren, C. (2014). The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A review of energy and automotive industry studies. Ecological Economics, 106, 112-123.
6. Bithas, K., Kollimenakis, A., Maroulis, G., & Stylianidou, Z. (2014). The Water Framework Directive in Greece. Estimating the Environmental and Resource Cost in the Water Districts of Western and Central Macedonia: Methods, Results and Proposals for Water Pricing. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 73-82.
7. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibility of the Businessman. New York: Harper and Row
8. Chen, Y., Okudan, G. E., & Riley, D. R. (2010). Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings. Automation in construction, 19(2), 235-244.
9. Cheng, E. W., Chiang, Y. H., & Tang, B. S. (2006). Exploring the economic impact of construction pollution by disaggregating the construction sector of the input–output table. Building and Environment, 41(12), 1940-1951.
10. Cheng, M. Y., & Ko, C. H. (2003). Object-oriented evolutionary fuzzy neural inference system for construction management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(4), 461-469.
11. Chien K. F., Wu Z. H. and Huang S. C. (2014). Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: Empirical study. Automation in Construction, 45, 1-15.
12. Civic, A., & Vucijak, B. (2014). Multi-criteria Optimization of Insulation Options for Warmth of Buildings to Increase Energy Efficiency. Procedia Engineering,69, 911-920.
13. Demeester L., Qi M., and Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). Plant networks for processing recyclable materials. Manufacturing and Services Operations Management, 15(4), 670-688.
14. Ebrahimnejad S., Mousavi S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Hashemi H. and Vahdani B. (2012). A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36, 4197-4217.
15. Fankhauser, S., Bowen, A., Calel, R., Dechezleprêtre, A., Grover, D., Rydge, J., & Sato, M. (2013). Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 902-913.
16. Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. The DEMATEL Observer, DEMATEL 1976 Report. 1976. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
17. Hori S. and Shimizu Y. (1999). Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control system. Control Engineering Practice, 7(11), 1413-1419.
18. IPCC. (2013). IPCC climate change 2013: The physical science basis: Summary for policymakers IPCC secretariat. Geneva: Intergovernmental panel for climate change.
19. IUCN, U. WWF, 1980: World Conservation Strategy. World Conservation Union, United Nations Environment Programme, Word Wide Fund for Nature, Gland.
20. Jaillon L., Poon C.S. and Chiang Y.H. (2009). Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. Waste Management, 29(1), 309-320.
21. Jia, G., Ni X., Chen Z., Hong B., Chen Y., Yang F. and Lin C. (2013). Measuring the maturity of risk management in large-scale construction projects. Automation in Construction, 34, 56-66.
22. Khandelwal, M. R., & Bakshi, M. S. (2014). The New CSR Regulation in India: The Way Forward. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 60-67.
23. Ko C. H. and Lee S. C. (2014). Enhancing submittal review and construction inspection in public projects. Automation in Construction, 44, 33-46.
24. Lee S. K., Kim K. R. and Yu J.H. (2014). BIM and ontology-based approach for building cost estimation. Automation in Construction, 41, 96-105.
25. Li, Y. Y., Chen, P. H., Chew, D. A. S., & Teo, C. C. (2014). Exploration of critical resources and capabilities of design firms for delivering green building projects: Empirical studies in Singapore. Habitat International, 41, 229-235.
26. Lin, Z., & Jianping, Y. (2011). Risk Assessment Based On Fuzzy Network (F-ANP) In New Campus Construction Project. Systems Engineering Procedia, 1, 162-168.
27. Liou, J. J., Yen, L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2008). Building an effective safety management system for airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(1), 20-26.
28. Lippiatt BC. (1999).Selecting cost-effective green building products: BEES approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(6), 448-55.
29. Lu M.T., Tzeng G.H., and Tang L.L. (2013). Environmental strategic orientations for improving green innovation performance in fuzzy environment - using new fuzzy hybrid MCDM Model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 15(3), 297.
30. Maser, C. and Kirk, C. (1996). Sustainable Development. Florida: Maser, C. and Kirk, C.
31. Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process (Vol. 4922). Pittsburgh: RWS publications.
32. Schreurs, M. A. (2012). Breaking the impasse in the international climate negotiations: The potential of green technologies. Energy Policy, 48, 5-12.
33. Scott-Young, C., & Samson, D. (2008). Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 749-766.
34. Stanojević, M., Vraneš, S., & Gökalp, I. (2010). Green accounting for greener energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 2473-2491.
35. Tawfek, H. S., Mohammed, H. E. D. H., & Razek, M. E. A. (2012). Assessment of the expected cost of quality (COQ) in construction projects in Egypt using artificial neural network model. HBRC Journal, 8(2), 132-143.
36. To W.M. and Lee P.K.C. (2014). Diffusion of ISO 14001 environmental management system: global, regional and country-level analyses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 489-498.
37. Turk, A. M. (2009). The benefits associated with ISO 14001 certification for construction firms: Turkish case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(5), 559-569.
38. United Nations. (1987). Our Common Future. New York: United Nations.
39. United Nations. (2000). Handbook of national accounting integrated environmental and economic accounting an operational manual: Studies in Methods Series F, New York: United Nations.
40. WBCSD. (2009).Transforming the market: energy efficiency in buildings. Geneva:World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
41. Xu P. and Chan E. H. (2013). ANP model for sustainable Building Energy Efficiency Retrofit (BEER) using Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) for hotel buildings in China. Habitat International, 37, 104-112.
42. Ying, Z., Gao, M., Liu, J., Wen, Y., & Song, W. (2011). Green accounting for forest and green policies in China—A pilot national assessment. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(7), 513-519.
43. Zhao, Z. Y., Zhao, X. J., Davidson, K., & Zuo, J. (2012). A corporate social responsibility indicator system for construction enterprises. Journal of cleaner production, 29, 277-289.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 3.胡天鐘、傅雲瑄(2012)。以新混合式多評準決策模式建構改善網路銀行績效之策略。運籌與管理學刊,11(1),35-49。
2. 3.胡天鐘、傅雲瑄(2012)。以新混合式多評準決策模式建構改善網路銀行績效之策略。運籌與管理學刊,11(1),35-49。
3. 4.黃詩穆、王健良、陳中獎(2012)。庇護工場導入ISO14001 環境管理制度之探討。崑山科技大學學報,9,82-93。
4. 4.黃詩穆、王健良、陳中獎(2012)。庇護工場導入ISO14001 環境管理制度之探討。崑山科技大學學報,9,82-93。
5. 5.葉芊玟、林家立(2013)。網路知識分享服務之策略改善模式。運籌與管理學刊,11(1),13-34。
6. 5.葉芊玟、林家立(2013)。網路知識分享服務之策略改善模式。運籌與管理學刊,11(1),13-34。
7. 6.管孟忠、張紫雲、黃三麟(2010)。結合DANP之MCDM模型探討公部門之專案執行關鍵成功因素-以文官制度興革規劃方案為例。運籌與管理學刊,9(1),1-19。
8. 6.管孟忠、張紫雲、黃三麟(2010)。結合DANP之MCDM模型探討公部門之專案執行關鍵成功因素-以文官制度興革規劃方案為例。運籌與管理學刊,9(1),1-19。
9. 7.管孟忠、陳以明、邵秀文(2013)。應用混合式多評準決策方法建構技術創新專案管理能力評價模式。管理資訊計算,2(1),199-220。
10. 7.管孟忠、陳以明、邵秀文(2013)。應用混合式多評準決策方法建構技術創新專案管理能力評價模式。管理資訊計算,2(1),199-220。
11. 8.劉建浩、葉怡廷、莊哲維(2012)。混合模式於航空公司維修外包商選擇。運輸計劃季刊,4(2),135-164。
12. 8.劉建浩、葉怡廷、莊哲維(2012)。混合模式於航空公司維修外包商選擇。運輸計劃季刊,4(2),135-164。
13. 9.謝浩明、李冠頡(2011)。應用新型多評準決策方法於生活通勤型自行車道系統評估改善之研究-以桃園縣為例。都市交通半年刊,26(1),24-38。
14. 9.謝浩明、李冠頡(2011)。應用新型多評準決策方法於生活通勤型自行車道系統評估改善之研究-以桃園縣為例。都市交通半年刊,26(1),24-38。