臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　　資產證券化源自於1970年代，隨著1997年東南亞金融危機及1998年韓國的金融危機，造成許多公司紛紛倒閉。金融機構因此產生許多因信用違約而損失的借款，故各類型信用衍生性金融商品逐漸在市場上出現，以供作信用違約避險之用。2006年末，美國產生次級房貸風暴造成金融泡沫化，可見信用違約問題對總體環境影響的重要性，也讓擔保債權憑證(Collateralized debt obligations, CDO)此商品在市場上更受到關注。金融市場主要是利用Gaussian copula/base correlation 模型來對CDO進行評價，但從前的評價模型所得到之結果容易錯估違約損失，無法真實反映市場報價的波動情況，且客製化CDO因契約型態不具標準化，更是難以評價。因此，本研究採用Hull & White (2006)提出的implied copula來評價市場指數型CDO，因為直接使用隱含在市場報價的資訊找到相對應的copula，所以違約相關性(default correlation)也就隱含在其中，不需計算出correlation也能進行評價。本研究選定CDX NA.IG此信用違約交換指數(Credit Default Swaps Index, CDS Index)為標的之合成型CDO分券進行實證分析，此合成型CDO分券為一種標準型分券，因其標的資產相同且規格ㄧ致。本評價模型利用市場上流通性佳的標準型CDO分券之市場報價，故可完全反應市場上的情況，進而將此資訊運用在流通性較差的客製化CDO分券評價，像是bespoke CDOs 和CDO squareds等。經實證結果指出，本評價方法透過標準型CDO分券報價確實可找出符合市場報價波動的資訊。此評價方法不僅結果較為真實，且用法容易明白，因此對於評價、交易和風險控管等都是一個相當實用的工具。因為此方法不允許市場上存在有套利的機會，故此評價方法比Gaussian copula/base correlation 方法評價之結果更可靠。

　　Asset Securitization originated in the 1970’s. As Southeast Asia and Korea’s financial crises struck the financial market, financial institutions could not collect debts because of the credit defaults caused by the bankrupt companies, and therefore Credit Derivatives were used to hedge credit risks. The Subprime Mortgage crisis which is an ongoing global economic problem started in the United States in late 2006 and began with the bursting of the housing bubble. It made major financial institutions face significant losses from investments in Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) or Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO). The recent market turmoil highlights the importance of the theme about credit default risks. For the various approaches to the valuation of CDO, the standard market model is Gaussian copula or base correlation. The market quotes observed through past models can not accurately match the actual volatility in the market because of wrong estimates of the extent of the default losses. For this reason, we use the implied copula approach which was first applied by Hull and White (2006). We no longer find the default correlations from the copula model, but imply them from the market quotes directly. In this paper, we chose CDX NA.IG to demonstrate how to value standardized CDO tranches. Standardization applies to both the composition of the reference pool and the structure of the tranches. We confirm that our model fits the market quotes exactly and make it clear to be used for pricing, trading, and risk management. It also enables non-standard credit derivatives, such as bespoke CDOs and CDO squareds, to be priced directly with market quotes for standardized CDO tranches. The spreads we find are more stable than those given by Gaussian copula or base correlation because we don’t permit any arbitrage.

摘 要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 6
1.3 研究內容與範圍 7
1.4 研究方法與架構 8
1.5 研究流程與限制 10
第二章 資產證券化與評價模型演進 11
2.1 資產證券化 11
2.1.1 信用衍生性金融商品 12
2.1.2 信用違約交換(Credit Default Swaps, CDS) 13
2.1.3 總報酬交換(Total Return Swaps, TRS) 14
2.1.4 信用連結票券(Credit Link Notes, CLN) 15
2.1.5 擔保債權憑證(Collateralized Debt Obligations, CDO) 16
2.1.6 市場指數型CDO 18
2.2 評價模型演進 21
2.2.1 信用衍生性金融商品評價模型 21
2.2.2 CDO評價模型演進 23
第三章 市場指數型CDO評價模式之建構 27
3.1 CDS評價模式 27
3.2 CDO分券評價模式 30
3.3 各類型Copula評價模式 35
3.3.1 Copula 36
3.3.2 Factor Copula 38
3.4 Implied Copula評價模式 41
3.4.1 理論架構 41
3.4.2 執行流程 42
3.5 小結 45
第四章 市場指數型CDO設計實證分析 46
4.1 資料來源與研究對象 46
4.2 實證結果 47
4.3 討論與實質意涵 53
第五章 結論與建議 54
參考文獻 55

行政院金融監督管理委員會統計資料 http://www.fscey.gov.tw
經濟日報 http://udn.com/NEWS/main.html
SIFMA http://www.bondmarkets.com
廖四郎，擔保債權憑證(CDO)之評價與分析，演講投影片，民國九十七年
林哲群，金融資產證券化，二版，台北，財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會，民國九十四年
經濟部技術處，信用風險議題與資訊平台規劃，台北，著者發行，民國九十四年
Black, F. & J. C. Cox (1976), “Valuing Corporate Securities: Some Effects of Bond Indenture Provisions,” The Journal of Finance, 31(2): 351-367
Cifuentes, A. & G. O’Connor (1996), “The Binomial Expectation Method Applied to CBO/CLO Analysis,” Moody’s Special Report, Dec 13th, 1996, Moody’s Investors Service
Duffie, D. & K. J. Singleton (1999), “Modeling Term Structures of Defaultable Bonds,” The Review of Financial Studies, 12(4): 687-720
Duffie, D. & N. Garleanu (2001), “Risk and Valuation of Collateralized Debt Obligations,” Financial Analysts Journal, 57(1): 41-59
Duffie, D. (2004), “Irresistible reasons for better models of credit risk,” Financial Times, Apr 16th, 2004, p.17
Frey, R. & A. J. McNeil (2001), “Modeling Dependent Defaults,” working paper, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zurich
Garcia, J., T. Dwyspelaere, L. Leonard, T. Alderweireld & T. V. Gestel (2005), “Comparing BET and Copula for Cash Flows CDO’s,” working paper
Ghaplin, G. (2005), Credit derivatives: Risk Management, Trading and Investing, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Gregory, J. & J-P Laurent (2005), “Basket Default Swaps, CDOs, and Factor Copulas,” Journal of Risk, 7(4): 8-23
Gill, K., R. Gambel, R. V. Hrvatin, H. Katz, G. Ong & D. Carroll (2004), “Global Rating Criteria for Collateralized Debt Obligations,” structured finance, Fitchrating, Sep 13th, 2004
Hamilton, D. T., P. Varma, S. Ou & R. Cantor (2004), “Default and Recovery Rates of Corporate Bond Issuers,” Moody’s Investors Services, January, 2004
Hull, J. & A. White (2004), “Valuation of a CDO and n-th to Default CDS without Monte Carlo Simulation,” Journal of Derivatives, 12(2): 8-23
Hull, J. & A. White (2006), “Valuing Credit Derivatives Using an Implied Copula Approach,” Journal of Derivatives, 14(2): 8-28
Jarrow, R. & S. Turnbull (1995), “Pricing Derivatives on Financial Securities Subject to Credit Risk,” Journal of Finance, 50(1): 53-85
Jarrow, R., D. Lando & S. Turnbull (1997), “A Markov Model for the Term Structure of Credit Risk Spread,” Review of Financial Studies, 10(2): 481-523
Jarrow, R. & F. Yu (2001), “Counterparty Risk and the Pricing of Defaultable Securities,” Journal of Finance, 56(5): 1765-1799
Jeffery, D. A. & G. Jacob (2005), “CDS index tranches and the pricing of credit risk correlations,” BIS Quarterly Review, March, 2005: 73-87
Lando, D. (1998), “On Cox Processes and Credit Risky Securities,” Review of Derivatives Research, 2(2-3): 99-120
Laurie, S. G. (2002), “Synthetic CDOs: An Introduction,” Journal of Derivatives, 9(3): 60-72
Lee, C. W., C. K. Kuo & J. L. Urrutia (2004), “A Poisson Model with Common Shocks for CDO Valuation,” The Journal of Fixed Income, 14(3): 72-82
Li, D. X. (2000), “On Default Correlation: A Copula Function Approach,” The Journal of Fixed Income, 9(4): 43-54
Meneguzzo, D. & W. Vechiato (2004), “Copula Sensitivity in Collateralized Debt Obligations and Basket Default Swaps,” The Journal of Futures Markets, 24(1): 37-70
Merton, R. C. (1974), “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Finance, 29(2): 449-470
Rogge, E. & J. Schonbucher (2003), “Modeling Dynamic Portfolio Credit Risk,” working paper
Schonbucher, J. & D. Schubert (2001), “Copula-dependent default risk in intensity models,” working paper, Department of Statistics, Bonn University
Sklar, A. (1959), “Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges,” Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de L’Universite de Paris, 8: 229-231
Galiani, S. S. (2003), “Copula Functions and their Application in Pricing and Risk Managing Multiname Credit Derivative Products,” degree of MSc, Department of Financial Mathematics, King’s College London
Torresetti, R., D. Brigo & A. Pallavicini (2007), “Risk Neutral versus Objective Loss distribution and CDO valuation,” working paper
Vasicek, O. (1987), “Probability of Loss on a Loan Portfolio,” working paper, KMV Corporation (Published in Risk in Dec 2002 under the title “Loan Portfolio Value”.)
Zhou, C. (2001), “An analysis of default correlations and multiple defaults,” The Review of Financial Studies, 14(2): 555-576