臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究的目的在探討符合建構主義的學習模式，在融入網路化教學的特性後是否能夠協助學生建構較完整的力的概念。研究結果顯示，實驗組學生在後測及延宕測均高於前測成績且達顯著差異，顯示使用建構主義式的網路科學學習模式，確實可以讓在自然科成績不論高成就或低成就的學生都可以學得很好，而且學習保持也有不錯的效果；另外不論在後測及延宕測成績實驗組都優於對照組，代表建構主義式的網路科學學習模式不論在學習成效或學習效果的保持都優於傳統的教學方式。另外在傳統教學模式只有高分組的學生在後測成績達顯著，低分組的學生甚至後測及延宕測成績均低於前測成績，由此顯示，傳統的教學方式只對自然科成績高成就的學生的學習有效，但是對一般或低成就的學生就沒有多大的效果。
學習網站的學習路徑分析方面，在各單元除了在「力的測量」單元，高、中、低分組三組學生錯誤的概念差不多及「力的分類」單元，中分組錯誤的概念較高分組少外，其餘的都是高分組學生錯誤的概念較少，中分組次之，低分組的學生錯誤的概念較多。而在學習成效方面，在「力的測量」、「兩力平衡」、「力的合成」、「力的分類」及「摩擦力」的成就後測方面，高分組的學生成績均高於與中分組及低分組的學生且均達顯著差異。另外在延宕測驗，在高分組的學生延宕測驗成績與低、中分組的學生成績除了「力的測量」及「摩擦力」兩個單元外都達到顯著差異。
而在網路學習動機與成就測驗相關研究，顯示網路學習動機的各向度與延宕測驗成正相關。網路環境問卷方面，發現學生知覺學習網站有較高的學習彈性與學生的學習成效成負相關。而「學習知識重整」因素與學生的學習成就成正相關且具預測力。網路學習環境與學習動機相關分析方面，網路學習環境的四個向度，對於學習動機的每一個向度都有相關。觀察標準迴歸係數(standardized regression coefficient β)，顯示網路學習環境的「網路課程的結構」對學生「功課作業價值」及「對學習與成績的自我效能」此二個學習動機向度有較大的預測力。

This research aims to investigate the use of constructivist-oriented web-based science learning would bring students more scientific view of force concepts. Results show that experimental group (use of constructivist-oriented web-based science learning) performed better on both post-test and retention-test of force concepts than control group (traditional teaching). In addition, experimental group’s students made statistical significant progress on both of post-test and retention-test, regardless of high or low achieving students. In other word, the use of constructivist-oriented web-based science learning would bring students better immediate performance and retention effect than traditional instruction. On the other hand, only control group’s high achieving students made statistically significant progress on their post-test, and low achieving students’ did not make any progress after traditional instruction. It indicates that traditional instruction is only effective for high achieving students.
The results of the students’ learning path analysis show that high achieving students had lesser misconceptions than middle or low achieving students on most sections, except the measurement of force and classification of force. It also shows that high achieving students made statistic significant greater progress than middle and low achieving students on the post-test of the section of measurement of force, balanced force, force in combination, classification of force, and friction; and retention test on the section of balanced force, force in combination and classification of force.
This study also shows that five scales of web-learning motivation questionniare had negative correlation with students’ retention test. Students’ perception of the scale of learning flexibility on web-learning environment questionnaire had negative correlation with their post-test and retention-test. However, students’ perception of the scale of reorganization on web-learning environment had positive correlation with students post-test and retention-test. Moreover, each scales of web-based learning quesitonniare had positive correlation with each scales of web-learning motivation questionnaire.

中文摘要 ………………………………………………………… i
英文摘要 ………………………………………………………… ii
致謝 ………………………………………………………… iii
目錄 ………………………………………………………… iv
表次 ………………………………………………………… v
圖次 ………………………………………………………… viii
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究背景和研究動機………………………………… 1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………… 4
第三節 研究問題與假說……………………………………… 5
第四節 名詞解釋……………………………………………… 6
第五節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………… 7
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………… 8
第一節 網路學習相關理論…………………………………… 8
第二節 建構主義相關理論…………………………………… 13
第三節 概念改變相關理論…………………………………… 21
第四節 學習動機……………………………………………… 35
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………… 37
第一節 研究對象……………………………………………… 37
第二節 研究設計……………………………………………… 38
第三節 研究流程……………………………………………… 40
第四節 研究工具……………………………………………… 41
第五節 教學設計……………………………………………… 51
第六節 資料蒐集與分析……………………………………… 54
第四章 研究結果與討論……………………………………… 55
第一節 常見的力單元成就測驗……………………………… 55
第二節 學習路徑成效分析…………………………………… 59
第三節 網路學習動機問卷…………………………………… 95
第四節 網路學習環境問卷…………………………………… 96
第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………… 100
第一節 研究發現與討論……………………………………… 100
第二節 研究建議……………………………………………… 107
參考文獻 中文…………………………………………………… 110
參考文獻 英文…………………………………………………… 113
附錄一 常見的力成就測驗…………………………………… 118
附錄二 網路學習環境問卷…………………………………… 123
附錄三 網路學習動機問卷…………………………………… 125

中文
王佳如 (2003)。探究活動在網路上實施之可行性研究。國立高雄師範大學化學系碩士論文。
王千倖 (2000)。全球資訊網在教育上的應用。電腦與教學。269-283。台北：正中書局。
王美芬 (1996)。建構者的科學學習觀。科學學習心理學。台北市。心理出版社。
佘曉清 (1997)。二十一世紀的科學教育-科技如何豐富科學教育。教學科技與媒體。33，12-19。
林奇賢 (1999)。網路學習環境的設計與應用。資訊與教育雜誌，67期，34-49頁。
林家弘 (2000)。我國大學生網路學習滿意度之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
行者數位學園 (2004). 取自2004年3月15日。網址：http://pathfinder.ntntc.edu.tw/pathfinder/1-2.htm。
朱則剛 (1994)。建構主義知識論與情境認知的迷思：兼論其對認知心理學的意義。教學科技與媒體，13，1-14。
郭重吉 (1992)。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教育改進。科學教育月刊，20(5)，279-320。
郭重吉 (1997)。迎接二十一世紀的科學教育。教學科技與媒體，33，
3-11。
郭重吉 (1998)。漫談建構主義在數理教學上的應用。建構與教學，16，1-5。
郭重吉 (2000)。從理論到實務談建構主義。台中市小班教學研習會。
洪啟元 (1995)。建構主義取向的電腦輔助合作學習設計之研究。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
范毓娟 (1994)。在國中理化課程中試行建構主義教學之個案研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
朱湘吉 (1992)。新觀念、新挑戰—建構主義的教學系統。教學科技與媒體。2，15-20。
韓善民 (1997)。資訊教育基礎建設簡介。取自2004年3月15日。網址：http://140.111.1.22/moecc/art/8609/8609a5.htm
藍瑋煥 (2002)。國一生在網路環境學習「水」的統整課程之研究。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
葉艷靜 (2003)。網路學習(e-Learning)環境對國中生學習生物之成效分析─以生物界分類：「植物界」與「動物界」分類單元為例。國立彰化師範大學生物研究所碩士論文。
楊龍立 (1997)。建構主義的檢討。教育資料與研究。18，1-6。
楊龍立 (1998)。建構教學研究。台北市立師院學院學報。29，21-37。
張芝萱 (1995)。國民小學資優生學習動機、學習認知、學習方式偏好與學校生活素質感之相關研究。國立新竹師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。
張史如 (1997)。從「建構主義的觀點探討網路超文件、超媒體應用於教學上的意義」。資訊與教育雜誌，58，39~48。
張靜嚳 (1995a)。建構教學：何謂建構主義？。建構與教學，3，彰化師大科教中心。
張靜嚳 (1995b)。問題中心教學在國中發展之經過、效果及可行性之探討。科學教育學刊，3(2)，139-165。
張靜嚳 (1996)。建構教學：採用建構主義如何教學？。建構與教學，7，彰化師大科教中心。
游文楓，佘曉清 (2003)。網路化問題解決教學策略對學生生物學習成效的影響 (The Web-based Problem Solving Instruction on Students’ Biology Learning)。第十九屆科學教育學術研討會論文發表。
游淑燕 (1987)。年級、性別、自我統整與成敗歸因之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文
陳淑筠 (2002)。國內學生自然科學迷思概念研究之後設研究。國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
陳春興 (2000)。網路教學與傳統教學之比較分析。2000年五月十八日在中正大學的演講稿。
陳慶至 (2002)。高職機件原理CAI教材設計分析。國立中正大學機械系碩士論文。
陳福慶 (1999)。淺談「WWW 上CAI 之設計」-以國小自然科電路單元為例。視聽教育雙月刊，40(4)，46-48。
蔡朝洋 (2002)。問題解決教學策略對高職電機科學生「電子實習」課程學習成效之研究。彰化師範大學工業教育學系在職進修專班碩士論文。
廖經宏(2002)。建構取向教學模式對國小學童光學相關概念之影響。國立花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所。
廖雯玲 (1999)。建構主義取向教學法對國小六年級學生在「地球運動」單元學習之影響。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
黃淑敏 (2000)。電腦網路學習對學生學習成效之後設分析。新竹師範院校國民教育研究所碩士論文。
黃有川 (2003)。高職程式設計課程網路學習環境建置與應用。銘傳大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
鄭守杰 (2002)。網路同儕互評對國小學童學習成效之影響。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
教育部 (1997)。資訊教育基礎建設計畫。取自2004年3月15日教育部。網址：http://www.edu.tw/information/infpln/bascont.htm
教育部 (1998)。教育改革行動方案。取自2004年3月13日教育部。網址：http://www.edu.tw/minister/action87/action87.htm
教育部 (2001)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖。取自2004年3月15日教育部。網址：
http://www.edu.tw/moecc/information/itpolicy/itprojects/itmasterplan.htm
教育部 (2002)。九年一貫課程綱要。取自2004年3月15日九年一貫課程與教學網。網址：http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/fields/2003/language.php



英文
Ali, E. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students' misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(10) ,1001 – 1015.
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & H.A (1997) Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance, Educational Researcher, 26(1), 18-21.
Ausubel, D. P.(1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brown, D. E. (1993). Refocusing core intuitions: a concretizing role for analogy in conceptual change. Instructional Science , 30,1273-1290.
Brown, D.E. & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction. Instructional Science, 18,237-261.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist, 1, 1123-1130.
Chan, T. W., & Chou, C. Y. (1997). Exploring the design of computer supports for reciprocal tutoring. International Journal of Artifical Intelligence in Education, 8(1), 1-29.
Chang, C. Y., & Barufaldi, J. P. (1999). “The use of a problem-solving-based instructional model in iniating change in students’ achievement and alternative frameworks.” International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 373-388.
Chang, V., Fisher, D. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In Khine, M. S., & Fisher, D. (Eds.), Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective, 1-20. Singapore: World Scientific.
Chi, M.T.H., Slotta, J.D., & deLeeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: Atheory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.
Chinn, C. & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49.
Clement, J. (1991). Nonformal reasoning in science: The use of analogies, extreme case, and physical intuition. In J. Voss, D. Perkings, & J. Segal(Eds.). Informal reasoning and education. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1241-1257.
Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer. 2(9), 17-41.
David H. P. , Ross B. F. (1998). Readiness to Change the Conception That“Motion-Implies-Force”: A Comparison of 12-Year-Old and 16-Year-Old Students. Science Education, 81(3) ,317-331.
Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985a). Some features of children’s ideas and their implications for teaching. In R. Driver, E.Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science. Open University Press: Milton Keynes.
Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985b). Children’s ideas and the learning of science. In R. Driver, E.Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science. Open University Press: Milton Keynes.
Driver R. and Oldham, V. (1986). A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
Driver R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11,481-490.
Duit, R. (1999). Conceptual change approaches in science education. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change. Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Fraser, B.J., Treagust, D.F., & Dennis, N.c.(1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment in universities and colleges. Studies in higher Education, 11(1), 43-54.
Gabel, D. L., Samuel ,K.V. & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education. 63, 623-633.
Hewson, P.W. & Hewson, M.G. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 731-743.
KIE (2004). Knowledge Integration Environment. Retrieved June 10, 2004, from http://kie.berkeley.edu/KIE/curriculum/curriculum.html
Kruger, C., Palacio, D., & Summer, M. (1992). Survey of English primary teachers; conceptions of force, energy and materials. Science Education, 76(4), 339-351.
Liem, T.L. (1987). Invitation to inquiry. Lexington, MA:Ginn.
Marchionini, G. (1988). Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos. Educational Technology, 28(11), 8~12.
Marcia C. Linn, Douglas Clark, & James D. Slotta. (2003). WISE Design for Knowledge Integration. Science Education, 87,517-538.
Mark, G., Rick, W. (1996). Overview and summary: Research in the union of computer science and education. Workshop report, NSF, 1996. Educational Technology Workshop: Setting a Research Agenda for Computer Science in Educational Technology.
McConnell, D. (1994). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. London: Kogan Page.
Mulopo, M. M., & Fowler, H. S. (1987). “Effects of traditional and discovery instruction approaches on learning outcomes for learners of different intellectual development.” A study of chemistry students in Zambia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 217-227.
Murray, T. S., K. Brown, D. & Clement, J. (1990). An analogy-based computer tutor for remediating physics misconceptions. Interactive Learning Enviornments, 1,79-101.
Novak, J.D. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6,167-193.
Osborne, R. & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Child’s conceptions of the change of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 825-838.
Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science. The Implication of Children’s Science (Auckland:Heinemann).
Osborne, R. & Gilbert, J. (1980). A method for investigating concept understanding in science. European Journal of Science Education, 2, 311-321.
Pintrich, P. R. & DeGroot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P.R. & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–200.
Pintrich, P.R. (1999). Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on conceptual change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadon, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change. Kindlington, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
Pfundt, F. & Duit, R. (1991). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education. (3rd ed.). Kiel, West Germany: IPN.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66,211-227.
She, H.C. (2002). Concepts of a higher hierarchical level require more dual situated learning events for conceptual change: a study of air pressure and buoyancy. International journal of science education, 24(9), 981-996.
She, H. C.(2003). DSLM Instructional Approach to Conceptual Change Involving Thermal Expansion. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(1),43-54.
She, H.C. & Fisher, D. (2003). Web-based E-learning Envrionment in Taiwan: The impact of the online science flash program on students’ learning. In Khine, M. S., & Fisher, D. (Eds.), Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective. Singapore: World Scientific.
She, H.C. (2004a, Aug.16-18). Facilitating students’ learning of difficult science concepts through integrating a metacognitive approach into a web-based multimedia science learning program. Accepted by the International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (CATE), Kaiwai, Hawaii.
She, H.C.(2004b). Fostering radical conceptual change through dual-situated learning model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(2), 142-164.
Slavin, R.E. (1990). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning, Educational Leadership, 48(2), 71-82.
Stead, K., & Osborne, R. (1980). Friction. Learning in science project, Mankato University, Hamilton. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 235027.
Steinberg, M. & Clement, J. (1997). Constructive model evolution in the study of electric circuits. In R. Abrams (Ed.), Proceeding of the Fourth International Seminar on Misconceptions Research. Santa Cruz, CA:Meaningful Learning Research Group.
Stepans, J.I., Beiswenger, R.E., & Dyche, S. (1986). Misconceptions die hard. Science Teacher, September, 65-69.
Stofflett, R.T. (1994). The accommodation of science pedagogical knowledge: The application of conceptual change constructs to teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 787-810.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolution. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
Thijs, G. D. (1992). Evaluation of an introductory course on “force” considering students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 76(2), 155-174.
Tsai, C. C. (1998). Science learning and constructivism. Curriculum and Teaching, 13, 31-52.
Tsai, C. C. (2000). Enhancing science instruction: The use of ‘conflict maps’. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 285-302.
Trumper, R., & Gorsky, P. (1997). A survey of biology students’ conceptions of force in pre-service training for high school teachers. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15(2), 133-147.
Twigger, D., Byard, M., Driver, R., Draper, S., & Hartley, R. (1994). The conception of force and motion of students aged between 10 and 15 years: an interview study designed to guide instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 215-229.
Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W.F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research, 57,51-67.
WISE(2004).The Web-based Inquiry Science Environment. Retrieved June 10, 2004, from http://wise.berkeley.edu/welcome.php
Wang, S.L. & Lin, S.S. (2000). Crose culture validation of Motivation Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. The 2000 annual meeting of American Psychological Association.
Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Educational psychology, 5th ed.,Allyn & Bacon., Boston.