跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.176) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/06 05:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:何俊傑
研究生(外文):CHUN-CHIEH HO
論文名稱:負面爭議性話題與產品類型、品牌知名度對品牌態度影響之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Negative Controversial Topic, Product Type and Brand Awareness on Brand Attitude
指導教授:李曉青李曉青引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lee, Hsiao-Ching
口試委員:張純端留淑芳王崇昱
口試委員(外文):CHUN-TUNG CHANG
口試日期:2017-07-28
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:國際企業系碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:85
中文關鍵詞:品牌態度負面爭議性話題產品類型品牌知名度
外文關鍵詞:Negative controversial topicProduct typeBrand awarenessBrand attitude
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:867
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:16
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在這個網路社群平台興盛的年代,許多話題事件透過新聞媒體、FACEBOOK以及PTT等平台快速散播,尤其負面的爭議性話題又是人們最為關注的的焦點。而許多企業也嘗試透過會引起社會大眾爭議的廣告以及新聞事件來提升產品知名度。
由文獻中我們發現,負面爭議性話題主要有兩種分類,也就是表現面以及價值面爭議性話題。而本研究主要的研究目的就是探討這兩種負面爭議性話題是否會影響品牌態度。此外,本研究採用產品種類和品牌知名度作為干擾變數。
本研究中,我們透過組間設計實驗的方式來研討2(負面爭議性話題:表現面VS價值面)×2(產品類型:實用型VS享樂型)實驗,以及另一組2(負面爭議性話題:表現面VS價值面)×2(品牌知名度:高VS低)實驗。研究結果發現:
(1)負面爭議性話題中,表現面爭議性話題與價值面爭議性話題之間,對品牌態度的影響差異並不顯著。
(2)當發生表現面爭議性話題時,實用型產品的品牌態度比享樂型產品的品牌態度低;而當發生價值面爭議性話題時,實用型以及享樂型產品之間的品牌態度沒有顯著的差異。
(3)當發生價值面爭議性話題時,低知名度品牌的品牌態度顯著比高知名度品牌低。

With the online community and websites arising like Facebook and PTT, it speeds up the spread of negative controversial topics and the influence become more powerful. More enterprises start choosing this channel to promote their new products and services.
Based on the literature, there are two types of negative controversial topics: performance-related and value-related. The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of negative controversial topic on brand attitude. Also, the product type and brand awareness are two moderators.
We conducted two experiments, a 2 (controversial topic type: performance-related vs. values-related) x 2 (product type: utilitarian attributes vs. hedonic attributes), and a 2 (controversial topic type: performance-related vs. value-related) x 2 (brand awareness: high vs. low) between-subjects designs were developed.
By using ANCOVA, the result came up as the following:
(1) There are no differences in brand attitude between performance-related and
value-related negative controversial topic.
(2) Consumers’ brand attitudes toward utilitarian products with performance-related negative controversial topic are lower than hedonic products; however, consumers’ brand attitudes toward utilitarian products and hedonic products with value-related negative controversial topic are no differences.
(3) consumers’ brand attitudes toward low brand awareness with value related negative controversial topic are lower than high brand awareness.

i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
致謝 iv
目錄 v
表目錄 ix
圖目錄 xi
第壹章 緒論 - 1 -
前言 - 1 -
第一節 研究背景 - 1 -
第二節 研究動機 - 5 -
第三節 研究目的 - 9 -
第四節 研究步驟 - 10 -
第貳章 文獻探討 11
第一節 負面爭議性話題 11
第二節 產品類型 12
第三節 品牌知名度 13
第叁章 研究方法 15
第一節 前言 15
第二節 研究假說 15
第三節 研究架構 19
第肆章 實驗一設計與分析 20
第一節 前言 20
第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 20
第三節 研究設計 23
第四節 實驗一結果分析 28
第伍章 實驗二設計與分析 35
第一節 前言 35
第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 35
第三節 研究設計 37
第四節 實驗二結果分析 42
第陸章 結論與建議 49
第一節 前言 49
第二節 研究結果討論 49
第三節 實務貢獻 51
第四節 研究限制 52
第五節 未來研究及建議 53
第六節 小結 53
參考文獻 54
附錄 58
一、 中文部分
Chen, Y. H.和陳逸慧. (2015). 品牌擬人化在負面事件中之影響.
林素吟. (2007). 影響消費者購買意願的外部線索策略之研究.台南市: 遠東科技大學企業管理系, 行銷評論, 4(1), 103-126.
陳炳宏和鄭麗琪. (2003). 台灣電視產業市場結構與經營績效關係之研究. 新聞學研究, (75), 37-71.
黃子豪. (2010).社群認同與消費者知識對於負面口碑接收者購買意圖及資訊傳播行為之影響 (Docto.ral dissertation).
榮泰生和林建宏. (2008). 負面口碑傳播與消費者轉換意願之關係探討. Journal of Data Analysis, 3(5), 83-108.
廖淑伶, 沈永正和朱家賢. (2008). 提醒式衝動購買決策-特性及促銷, 產品與人格因子的影響. 交大管理學報, 2, 131-162.

二、 英文部分
Aaker, D. A., & Equity, M. B. (1991). Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of consumer research, 20(4), 644-656.
Bagdikian, B. (2000). The Media monopoly 6th ed. Boston: Beacon.
Blackston, M. (2000). Observations: Building brand equity by managing the brand's relationships. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(6), 101-105.
Chattopadhyay, A., & Nedungadi, P. (1990). Ad affect, brand attitude, and choice: The moderating roles of delay and involvement.
Cobb-Walgren, C. J., Ruble, C. A., & Donthu, N. (1995). Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent. Journal of advertising, 24(3), 25-40.
Farquhar, P. H. (1989). Managing brand equity. Marketing research, 1(3).
Feick, L., & Higie, R. A. (1992). The effects of preference heterogeneity and source characteristics on ad processing and judgements about endorsers. Journal of Advertising, 21(2), 9-24.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. The Journal of Marketing, 92-101.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. The Journal of Marketing, 50-68.
Kamins, M. A., & Marks, L. J. (1991). The perception of kosher as a third party certification claim in advertising for familiar and unfamiliar brands. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 177-185.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. the Journal of Marketing, 1-22.
Khan, U., Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). A behavioral decision theory perspective on hedonic and utilitarian choice. Inside consumption: Frontiers of research on consumer motives, goals, and desires, 1, 144-165.
Kotler, P., Saliba, S., & Wrenn, B. (1991). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, and control: Instructor's Manual. Prentice-hall.


Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2005). Cause–brand alliances: does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause?. Journal of business research, 58(4), 423-429.
Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer research, 20(3), 451-466.
Marcus, A. A., and Goodman, R. S. (1991). Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis.Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 281-305.
Money, R. B., Shimp, T. A., and Sakano, T. (2006). Celebrity endorsements in Japan and the United States: Is negative information all that harmful? Journal of Advertising Research, 46(1), 113.
Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 366-387.
Pullig, C., Netemeyer, R. G., and Biswas, A. (2006). Attitude basis, certainty, and challenge alignment: A case of negative brand publicity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 528-542.
Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1987). Advertising and promotion management. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Scarpi, D. (2005). Hedonic and utilitarian behaviour in specialty shops. The Marketing Review, 5(1), 31-44.
Sean Huang. (2013). Https://readandanalyse.blogspot.tw/2013/05/a.html
Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (1999). Revisiting marketing’s lawlike generalizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 71-87.
Shrivastava, P., and Mitroff, I. I. (1987). Strategic management of corporate crises. Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(1), 5-11.
Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 434-446.
26. Votola, N. L., and Unnava, H. R. (2006). Spillover of negative information on brand alliances. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 196-202.
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of marketing research, 40(3), 310-320.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top