跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.23) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/09/10 15:14
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張凱鈞
研究生(外文):Kai-Chun Chang
論文名稱:探討鈦植入材表面利用天然交聯劑接合第一型膠原蛋白處理之表面特性與細胞反應
論文名稱(外文):Surface Characterizations and Cell responses of Titanium Surface Coated with Type I Collagen Using a Natural Cross-Linker for Implant Applications
指導教授:黃何雄
指導教授(外文):Her-Hsiung Huang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立陽明大學
系所名稱:口腔生物研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:牙醫學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:鈦金屬植體表面處理第一型膠原蛋白genipin交聯劑細胞反應
外文關鍵詞:titaniumimplantsurface treatmenttype I collagengenipincross-linkercell responses
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:424
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:7
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
鈦及鈦合金因為具有良好的機械性質、耐蝕性質以及生物相容性質,故廣泛的被運用在臨床骨科及牙科的植體材料上。臨床上使用骨植入材之目的是期望能與自然骨組織間達到良好的骨整合。目前,當鈦基植體植入人體後,因其表面仍屬於生物惰性,並不容易與組織形成良好的鍵結,長時間後可能造成植體鬆脫。因此利用表面處理方法以改善鈦金屬表面生物活性的研究仍然是生醫材料領域中重要的一環。
近年來,許多研究著重於將特定生物活性分子塗覆於植體材料表面,因為其能夠使材料表面促進骨母細胞生長或刺激特定的訊息傳遞以促進骨母細胞分化,得以較快速地達到骨整合作用。文獻已證實利用電漿處理搭配化學藥劑交聯處理將第一型膠原蛋白接合在鈦金屬表面上,其表面可促進骨細胞貼附與分化,然而此技術不但成本高、操作不易之外,亦具有潛在生物毒性的問題。因此,本研究改以參考組織工程中支架製程的概念,利用天然交聯劑- Genipin將第一型膠原蛋白接合固定在鈦金屬表面上,期望在低成本及避免化學藥劑使用的前提下,能夠大量生產具有第一型膠原白塗層的鈦金屬表面。
本研究利用Genipin將第一型膠原蛋白接合在鈦金屬表面上,製備出一具有生物活性分子且無毒性的表面,針對材料表面特性進行分析 (包括形貌、潤濕性、蛋白質吸附能力與生物活性),以及針對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞之細胞反應實驗 (包括細胞貼附、細胞移動、細胞增生與細胞分化)。研究結果顯示具有第一膠原蛋白的表面具有涵蓋次微米尺寸之孔洞且具有良好的親水性質。此外,細胞能縮短走向骨礦化的時間並且促進骨分化相關蛋白質的表現。另一方面,本研究為了因應臨床上的使用,增加植體與組織間機械性的互鎖效應,將鈦金屬表面先做噴砂處理後再進行第一型膠原蛋白的接合,結果顯示其對細胞有加速礦化的作用。本研究提利用天然交聯劑- Genipin接合第一型膠原蛋白的表面處理方法,有效地提升鈦金屬表面的生物活性,預期能加速骨整合作用,提供應用於臨床鈦金屬植體之表面處理技術。

Titanium (Ti) metal is widely used for biomedical applications. It owns good mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. However, Ti belongs to bioinert materials, which means it can’t initiate good responses or interactions to surrounding biological tissue. Many investigators developed several surface modification methods to enhance the surface bioactivity of Ti. One of the commonly used for surface modifications is immobilization of bioactive molecules on Ti surface, which can trigger the desired tissue responses, for example: recruiting osteoblasts to contact with implant and inducing osteoblasts differentiation to new bone tissue.
Type I collagen is one of the major structural proteins of bone tissue and it plays an important role in mediating the functions of osteogenic cells, including cell adhesion, differentiation and extracellular matrix secretion. Therefore, it has been extensively used as bioactive molecule immobilized on Ti surface. However, the previous methods of immobilizing collagen on Ti used high-cost plasma treatment and/or toxic-potential chemical reagents to enhance collagen conjugation on Ti. The purpose of this study was to resolve the drawbacks of previous methods, we propose to use a natural compound “Genipin” as cross-linker to immobilize type I collagen on Ti surface. This method is not only costing less, but also producing a bioactive Ti surface in a safer way.
In this study, type I collagen was successfully coated on machined Ti surface by natural cross-linker, genipin. The surface of type I collagen layer was performed as a network structure with submicron-scale pores. This surface showed excellent hydrophilicity, which facilitated cell attachment on surface. Type I collagen was probably recognized by integrins transducing signals to affect cell adhesion, proliferation and enhancement of differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. The bioactivity of Ti surface was also improved through the presence of type I collagen coated layer. On the other hand, type I collagen was immobilized on sand-blasted Ti for further clinical applications concern, increasing the mechanical interlocking between implant surface and surrounding bone. The cell responses to sand-blasted Ti group showed as good as machined Ti group. This study provides a novel, easy and inexpensive method to immobilize type I collagen on Ti surface for clinical implant application.

致謝………………………………………………………………. i
中文摘要…………………………………………………………. ii
英文摘要…………………………………………………………. iv
目錄………………………………………………………………. vi
圖目錄……………………………………………………………. ix
表目錄……………………………………………………………. xiii

第一章 緒論……………………………………………………... 1
1.1文獻回顧…………………………………………………….... 1
1.1.1骨組織成分與功能……………………………………….....1
1.1.2骨整合與植體特性間之關係……………………………....3
1.1.3鈦金屬之特性……………………………………………..... 5
1.1.4鈦金屬表面處理技術對生物相容性的影響……………6
1.1.5第一型膠原蛋白塗層之表面處理與生物相容性之研究…9
1.1.6 Genipin之特性與應用…………………………………....11
1.2研究動機……………………………………………………... 13
第二章 實驗材料與方法………………………………………... 15
2.1材料製備……………………………………………………... 16
2.2材料製程設計………………………………………………... 16
2.3材料表面處理………………………………………………... 16
2.4材料表面特性分析…………………………………………... 18
2.5細胞培養……………………………………………………... 21
2.6細胞反應評估………………………………………………... 25
2.7統計方法……………………………………………………... 31
第三章 實驗結果………………………………………………... 32
3.1材料表面特性分析…………………………………………... 32
3.1.1表面形貌分析……………………………………………… 32
3.1.2表面潤濕性分析…………………………………………… 33
3.1.3材料表面第一型膠原蛋白定性分析……………………..33
3.1.4表面粗糙度測量…………………………………………… 35
3.1.5表面第一型膠原蛋白塗層之附著性……………………… 36
3.1.6材料表面生物活性分析…………………………………… 36
3.2生物相容性質分析…………………………………………... 37
3.2.1細胞貼附觀察……………………………………………… 37
3.2.2細胞移動能力觀察………………………………………… 38
3.2.3細胞增生能力分析………………………………………… 38
3.2.4細胞分化能力分析………………………………………… 39
3.2.5材料表面處理後對細胞之毒性影響……………………..41
第四章 討論……………………………………………………... 42
4.1天然交聯劑Genipin接合第一型膠原蛋白處理之材料表面結構與表面特性的關係…………………………………………......................42
4.2天然交聯劑Genipin接合第一型膠原蛋白處理之材料表面結構與生物相容性的關係…………………………………........................46
第五章 結論…………………………………………………….......... 52
參考文獻…………………………………………………………........... 54
圖…………………………………………………………………............. 64
表……………………………………………………………….............. 90

圖1 鈦表面的OH基團經電子的轉移使Genipin行開環作用而鍵結在鈦表面上之機制…………………………………….. ................63
圖2 第一型膠原蛋白經交聯劑Genipin接合在鈦金屬表面上之製程設計示意圖……………………………………………............... 64
圖3 材料製備流程示意圖……………………………………….. 65
圖4 間葉幹細胞分化為骨細胞的過程中在不同的階段分泌不同的蛋白質………………………………………………….. ................66
圖5 酵素連結免疫分析原理…………………………………..67
圖6 經不同表面處理之鈦試片於場發射掃描式電子顯微鏡下觀察之表面形貌(10000X)………………………………….. ................68
圖7 經不同表面處理之鈦試片於場發射掃描式電子顯微鏡下觀察之表面形貌(20000X)………………………………….. ................69
圖8 不同表面處理之鈦試片以接觸角量測儀測量液滴與材料表面之接觸角角度並計算其表面能………………………..................70
圖9 以天狼星染色法確認第一型膠原蛋白塗覆之情形……….. 71
圖10 以X光光電子能譜儀分析經不同表面處理之鈦試片表面C1s與N1s之訊號………………………………………….......................72
圖11 以X光光電子能譜儀分析TiGC蝕刻不同深度之N1s訊號……………………………………………………………............... 73
圖12 以原子力顯微鏡觀察並測量經不同表面處理之鈦試片表面形貌與平均粗糙度………………………………………......................74
圖13 根據美國材料試驗協會ASTM 3359規範並以場發射掃描式電子顯微鏡觀察經兩個月低溫儲存下Genipin鍵結在材料表面上之表面形貌………………………………………........................75
圖14 根據美國材料試驗協會ASTM 3359規範並以場發射掃描式電子顯微鏡觀察經兩個月低溫儲存下第一型膠原蛋白鍵結在材料表面上之表面形貌……………………………............................76
圖15 以場發射掃描式電子顯微鏡觀察經不同表面處理之鈦試片表面鈣磷沉積之情形……………………………………......................77
圖16 於正立式螢光顯微鏡下觀察經不同表面處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (GFP-labeled hMSCs)貼附之影響…........78
圖17 於場發射掃描式電子顯微鏡觀察不同處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (GFP-labeled hMSCs)貼附之影響…… .........79
圖18 利用免疫螢光染色於螢光顯微鏡下觀察經不同表面處理之鈦試片對細胞貼附2小時之vinculin表現之影響...............80
圖19 利用免疫螢光染色於螢光顯微鏡下觀察經不同表面處理之鈦試片對細胞貼附2及6小時F-actin分布之影響…..... .........81
圖20 以正立式螢光顯微鏡與場發射掃描式電子顯微鏡觀察經過噴砂後給予不同表面處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (GFP-labeled hMSCs)貼附24小時之影響…………..............................82
圖21 於正立式螢光顯微鏡下觀察經過不同表面處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (GFP-labeled hMSCs)移動能力之影響………………………………………………………….................83
圖22 以MTT assay分析經不同表面處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (hMSCs & GFP-labeled hMSCs)增生能力之影響……………………...............................84
圖23 以MTT assay與茜素紅染色法分析不同表面處理之鈦試片經長期保存之後對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (hMSCs)增生能力與胞外基質礦化之影響………………………..............................85
圖24 以MTT assay分析經噴砂後不同表面處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (hMSCs)增生能力之影響…………….............86
圖25 以茜素紅染色法分析經不同表面處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (hMSCs)胞外基質鈣化之影響……………..............87
圖26 以茜素紅染色法分析經噴砂前處理後不同表面處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (hMSCs)胞外基質鈣化之影響…………………………88
圖27 以Western blot分析經不同表面處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞 (hMSCs)中骨細胞分化相關蛋白表現影響….......89
圖28 根據ISO 10993-5規範檢測經過不同表面處理之鈦
試片對細胞毒性之影響……………………………………………........90

表一 人體血漿 (blood plasma)與模擬人體體液 (SBF)中離子種類與濃度…………………………………………........................91
表二 以ELISA偵測經不同表面處理之鈦試片對人類骨髓間葉幹細胞分泌OPN之能力影響…………………...........................92

Albrektsson, T., and Wennerberg, A. (2004). Oral implant surfaces: Part 2--review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. International Journal of Prosthodontics 17, 554-564.

Anselme, K., Bigerelle, M., Noel, B., Dufresne, E., Judas, D., Iost, A., and Hardouin, P. (2000). Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 49, 155-166.

Ao, H., Xie, Y., Tan, H., Wu, X., Liu, G., Qin, A., Zheng, X., and Tang, T. (2014). Improved hMSC functions on titanium coatings by type I collagen immobilization. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 102, 204-214.

Auernheimer, J., Zukowski, D., Dahmen, C., Kantlehner, M., Enderle, A., Goodman, S.L., and Kessler, H. (2005). Titanium Implant Materials with Improved Biocompatibility through Coating with Phosphonate‐Anchored Cyclic RGD Peptides. Chembiochem 6, 2034-2040.

Bauer, S., Park, J., Mark, K.v.d., and Schmuki, P. (2008). Improved attachment of mesenchymal stem cells on super-hydrophobic TiO2 nanotubes. Acta Biomaterialia 4, 1576-1582.

Becker, D., Geißler, U., Hempel, U., Bierbaum, S., Scharnweber, D., Worch, H., and Wenzel, K.W. (2002). Proliferation and differentiation of rat calvarial osteoblasts on type I collagen-coated titanium alloy. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 59, 516-527.

Beutner, R., Michael, J., Schwenzer, B., and Scharnweber, D. (2010). Biological nano-functionalization of titanium-based biomaterial surfaces: a flexible toolbox. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface Suppl 1, S93-S105.

Bi, L., Cao, Z., Hu, Y., Song, Y., Yu, L., Yang, B., Mu, J., Huang, Z., and Han, Y. (2011). Effects of different cross-linking conditions on the properties of genipin-cross-linked chitosan/collagen scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 22, 51-62.

Bornstein, M.M., Valderrama, P., Jones, A.A., Wilson, T.G., Seibl, R., and Cochran, D.L. (2008). Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid‐etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19, 233-241.

Boskey, A. (2003). Bone mineral crystal size. Osteoporosis International 14, S16-S21.

Brånemark, R., Öhrnell, L.-O., Nilsson, P., and Thomsen, P. (1997). Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration during healing: an experimental in vivo study in the rat. Biomaterials 18, 969-978.

Brammer, K.S., Oh, S., Cobb, C.J., Bjursten, L.M., Heyde, H.v.d., and Jin, S. (2009). Improved bone-forming functionality on diameter-controlled TiO2 nanotube surface. Acta Biomaterialia 5, 3215-3223.

Buser, D., Broggini, N., Wieland, M., Schenk, R.K., Denzer, A.J., Cochran, D.L., Hoffmann, B., Lussi, A., and Steinemann, S.G. (2004). Enhanced Bone Apposition to a Chemically Modified SLA Titanium Surface. Journal of Dental Research 83, 529-533.

Chen, Y.-S., Chang, J.-Y., Cheng, C.-Y., Tsai, F.-J., Yao, C.-H., and Liu, B.-S. (2005). An in vivo evaluation of a biodegradable genipin-cross-linked gelatin peripheral nerve guide conduit material. Biomaterials 26, 3911-3918.

Cofino, B., Fogarassy, P., Millet, P., and Lodini, A. (2004). Thermal residual stresses near the interface between plasma‐sprayed hydroxyapatite coating and titanium substrate: Finite element analysis and synchrotron radiation measurements. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 70, 20-27.

Cooper, L.F. (2000). A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84, 522-534.

Djerassi, C., Nakano, T., James, A., Zalkow, L., Eisenbraun, E., and Shoolery, J. (1961).Terpenoids. XLVII. 1 The structure of genipin2. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 26, 1192-1206.

Downey, P.A., and Siegel, M.I. (2006). Bone Biology and the Clinical Implications for Osteoporosis. Physical Therapy 86, 77-91.
Elmengaard, B., Bechtold, J.E., and Søballe, K. (2005). In vivo study of the effect of RGD treatment on bone ongrowth on press-fit titanium alloy implants. Biomaterials 26, 3521-3526.

Eriksson, C., Nygren, H., and Ohlson, K. (2004). Implantation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium discs in rat tibia: cellular reactions on the surfaces during the first 3 weeks in bone. Biomaterials 25, 4759-4766.

Galante, J.O., Lemons, J., Spector, M., Wilson, P.D., and Wright, T.M. (1991). The biologic effects of implant materials. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 9, 760-775.

Geißler, U., Hempel, U., Wolf, C., Scharnweber, D., Worch, H., and Wenzel, K.W. (2000). Collagen type I-coating of Ti6Al4V promotes adhesion of osteoblasts. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 51, 752-760.

Hanawa, T. (1999). In vivo metallic biomaterials and surface modification. Materials Science and Engineering: A 267, 260-266.

Hanawa, T. (2011). A comprehensive review of techniques for biofunctionalization of titanium. Journal of Periodontal Implant Science 41, 263-272.

Hauser, J., Koeller, M., Bensch, S., Halfmann, H., Awakowicz, P., Steinau, H.-U., and Esenwein, S. (2010). Plasma mediated collagen-I-coating of metal implant materials to improve biocompatibility. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 94A, 19-26.

Huang, H.-H., Ho, C.-T., Lee, T.-H., Lee, T.-L., Liao, K.-K., and Chen, F.-L. (2004). Effect of surface roughness of ground titanium on initial cell adhesion. Biomolecular Engineering 21, 93-97.

Hynes, R.O. (2002). Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110, 673-687.

Jäger, M., Zilkens, C., Zanger, K., and Krauspe, R. (2007). Significance of Nano- and Microtopography for Cell-Surface Interactions in Orthopaedic Implants. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2007.

Jacobs, J.J., Gilbert, J.L., and Urban, R.M. (1998). Current Concepts Review-Corrosion of Metal Orthopaedic Implants*. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 80, 268-282.

Kempen, D.H., Lu, L., Heijink, A., Hefferan, T.E., Creemers, L.B., Maran, A., Yaszemski, M.J., and Dhert, W.J. (2009). Effect of local sequential VEGF and BMP-2 delivery on ectopic and orthotopic bone regeneration. Biomaterials 30, 2816-2825.

Kim, H.-W., Li, L.-H., Lee, E.-J., Lee, S.-H., and Kim, H.-E. (2005). Fibrillar assembly and stability of collagen coating on titanium for improved osteoblast responses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 75A, 629-638.

Klein, M.O., Bijelic, A., Ziebart, T., Koch, F., Kammerer, P.W., Wieland, M., Konerding, M.A., and Al-Nawas, B. (2013). Submicron scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces promote early osteogenic gene response for cell adhesion and cell differentiation. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 15, 166-175.

Koo, H.-J., Song, Y.S., Kim, H.-J., Lee, Y.-H., Hong, S.-M., Kim, S.-J., Kim, B.-C., Jin, C., Lim, C.-J., and Park, E.-H. (2004). Antiinflammatory effects of genipin, an active principle of gardenia. European Journal of Pharmacology 495, 201-208.

Kornberg, L., Earp, H.S., Parsons, J.T., Schaller, M., and Juliano, R.L. (1992). Cell adhesion or integrin clustering increases phosphorylation of a focal adhesion-associated tyrosine kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267, 23439-23442.

Ladoux, B., and Nicolas, A. (2012). Physically based principles of cell adhesion mechanosensitivity in tissues. Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 116601.

Liu, Y., De Groot, K., and Hunziker, E. (2005). BMP-2 liberated from biomimetic implant coatings induces and sustains direct ossification in an ectopic rat model. Bone 36, 745-757.

Long, M., and Rack, H.J. (1998). Titanium alloys in total joint replacement—a materials science perspective. Biomaterials 19, 1621-1639.

Müller, R., Abke, J., Schnell, E., Macionczyk, F., Gbureck, U., Mehrl, R., Ruszczak, Z., Kujat, R., Englert, C., Nerlich, M., et al. (2005). Surface engineering of stainless steel materials by covalent collagen immobilization to improve implant biocompatibility. Biomaterials 26, 6962-6972.

Mark, K., Park, J., Bauer, S., and Schmuki, P. (2010). Nanoscale engineering of biomimetic surfaces: cues from the extracellular matrix. Cell and Tissue Research 339, 131-153.

Marks, S.C., and Popoff, S.N. (1988). Bone cell biology: the regulation of development, structure, and function in the skeleton. American Journal of Anatomy 183, 1-44.

Martin, J.Y., Schwartz, Z., Hummert, T.W., Schraub, D.M., Simpson, J., Lankford, J., Dean, D.D., Cochran, D.L., and Boyan, B.D. (1995). Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 29, 389-401.

McBeath, R., Pirone, D.M., Nelson, C.M., Bhadriraju, K., and Chen, C.S. (2004). Cell Shape, Cytoskeletal Tension, and RhoA Regulate Stem Cell Lineage Commitment. Developmental Cell 6, 483-495.

Mitra, S.K., Hanson, D.A., and Schlaepfer, D.D. (2005). Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 6, 56-68.

Morra, M., Cassinelli, C., Cascardo, G., Mazzucco, L., Borzini, P., Fini, M., Giavaresi, G., and Giardino, R. (2006). Collagen I-coated titanium surfaces: Mesenchymal cell adhesion and in vivo evaluation in trabecular bone implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 78A, 449-458.

Moshnikova, A.B., Afanasyev, V.N., Proussakova, O.V., Chernyshov, S., Gogvadze, V., and Beletsky, I.P. (2006). Cytotoxic activity of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide is underlain by DNA interchain cross-linking. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 63, 229-234.

Mu, C., Zhang, K., Lin, W., and Li, D. (2013). Ring-opening polymerization of genipin and its long-range crosslinking effect on collagen hydrogel. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 101A, 385-393.

Murai, K., Takeshita, F., Ayukawa, Y., Kiyoshima, T., Suetsugu, T., and Tanaka, T. (1996). Light and electron microscopic studies of bone-titanium interface in the tibiae of young and mature rats. Journal of Biomedical Materaterial Research 30, 523-533.

Mustafa, K., Wroblewski, J., Hultenby, K., Silva Lopez, B., and Arvidson, K. (2000). Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with TiO2 particles on the initial attachment of cells derived from human mandibular bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research 11, 116-128.

Nayak, S., Dey, T., Naskar, D., and Kundu, S.C. (2013). The promotion of osseointegration of titanium surfaces by coating with silk protein sericin. Biomaterials 34, 2855-2864.

Oh, S., Brammer, K.S., Li, Y.S.J., Teng, D., Engler, A.J., Chien, S., and Jin, S. (2009). Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 2130-2135.

Oh, S., and Jin, S. (2006). Titanium oxide nanotubes with controlled morphology for enhanced bone growth. Materials Science and Engineering: C 26, 1301-1306.

Osborn, J. (1979). [Biomaterials and their application to implantation]. Schweizerische Monatsschrift fur Zahnheilkunde Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie/SSO 89, 1138-1139.

Parfitt, A. (1990). Bone-forming cells in clinical conditions. Bone 1, 351-429.

Park, J.-W., Kurashima, K., Tustusmi, Y., An, C.-H., Suh, J.-Y., Doi, H., Nomura, N., Noda, K., and Hanawa, T. (2011). Bone healing of commercial oral implants with RGD immobilization through electrodeposited poly(ethylene glycol) in rabbit cancellous bone. Acta Biomaterialia 7, 3222-3229.

Park, J., Bauer, S., von der Mark, K., and Schmuki, P. (2007). Nanosize and Vitality:  TiO2 Nanotube Diameter Directs Cell Fate. Nano Letters 7, 1686-1691.

Peng, Z., Li, Z., and Shen, Y. (2012). Influence of Chemical Cross-Linking on Properties of Gelatin/Chitosan Microspheres. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering 51, 381-385.

Perng, C.K., Kao, C.L., Yang, Y.P., Lin, H.T., Lin, W.B., Chu, Y.R., Wang, H.J., Ma, H., Ku, H.H., and Chiou, S.H. (2008). Culturing adult human bone marrow stem cells on gelatin scaffold with pNIPAAm as transplanted grafts for skin regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 84, 622-630.

Petrie, T.A., Raynor, J.E., Reyes, C.D., Burns, K.L., Collard, D.M., and García, A.J. (2008). The effect of integrin-specific bioactive coatings on tissue healing and implant osseointegration. Biomaterials 29, 2849-2857.

Puleo, D., and Nanci, A. (1999). Understanding and controlling the bone–implant interface. Biomaterials 20, 2311-2321.

Rammelt, S., Illert, T., Bierbaum, S., Scharnweber, D., Zwipp, H., and Schneiders, W. (2006). Coating of titanium implants with collagen, RGD peptide and chondroitin sulfate. Biomaterials 27, 5561-5571.

Rammelt, S., Schulze, E., Bernhardt, R., Hanisch, U., Scharnweber, D., Worch, H., Zwipp, H., and Biewener, A. (2004). Coating of titanium implants with type-I collagen. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 22, 1025-1034.

Rausch-fan, X., Qu, Z., Wieland, M., Matejka, M., and Schedle, A. (2008). Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. Dental Materials 24, 102-110.

Ruoslahti, E., and Pierschbacher, M.D. (1987). New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science 238, 491-497.

Savige, J., Tabone, T., Cotton, R., Mathew, N., and Parkin, J.D. (2010). A novel detection method for heteroduplex DNA using carbodiimide-induced interrupted primer extension. Journal of Nucleic Acids Investigation 1,e5

Schliephake, H., Aref, A., Scharnweber, D., Bierbaum, S., Roessler, S., and Sewing, A. (2005). Effect of immobilized bone morphogenic protein 2 coating of titanium implants on peri‐implant bone formation. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16, 563-569.

Schliephake, H., Aref, A., Scharnweber, D., Bierbaum, S., and Sewing, A. (2009). Effect of modifications of dual acid-etched implant surfaces on peri-implant bone formation. Part I: organic coatings. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20, 31-37.

Sennerby, L., Thomsen, P., and Ericson, L.E. (1992). A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 7, 62-71.

Shalabi, M.M., Gortemaker, A., Hof, M.A.V.t., Jansen, J.A., and Creugers, N.H.J. (2006). Implant Surface Roughness and Bone Healing: a Systematic Review. Journal of Dental Research 85, 496-500.

Taton, T.A. (2001). Nanotechnology: Boning up on biology. Nature 412, 491-492.

Uchida, M., Kim, H.M., Kokubo, T., Fujibayashi, S., and Nakamura, T. (2002). Effect of water treatment on the apatite‐forming ability of NaOH‐treated titanium metal. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 63, 522-530.

Van Luyn, M., Van Wachem, P., Damink, L., Dijkstra, P., Feijen, J., and Nieuwenhuis, P. (1992). Secondary cytotoxicity of cross-linked dermal sheep collagens during repeated exposure to human fibroblasts. Biomaterials 13, 1017-1024.

Wang, C., Lau, T.T., Loh, W.L., Su, K., and Wang, D.-A. (2011a). Cytocompatibility study of a natural biomaterial crosslinker—Genipin with therapeutic model cells. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 97B, 58-65.

Wang, Q.Q., Li, W., and Yang, B.C. (2011b). Regulation on the biocompatibility of bioactive titanium metals by type I collagen. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 99A, 125-134.

Xia, H., Nho, R.S., Kahm, J., Kleidon, J., and Henke, C.A. (2004). Focal Adhesion Kinase Is Upstream of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt in Regulating Fibroblast Survival in Response to Contraction of Type I Collagen Matrices via a β1 Integrin Viability Signaling Pathway. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 33024-33034.

Yamamoto, M., Miura, N., Ohtake, N., Amagaya, S., Ishige, A., Sasaki, H., Komatsu, Y., Fukuda, K., Ito, T., and Terasawa, K. (2000). Genipin, a metabolite derived from the herbal medicine Inchin-ko-to, and suppression of Fas-induced lethal liver apoptosis in mice. Gastroenterology 118, 380-389.

Yamazaki, M., Sakura, N., Chiba, K., and Mohri, T. (2001). Prevention of the Neurotoxicity of the Amyloid β Protein by Genipin. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 24, 1454-1455.

Yaszemski, M.J., Payne, R.G., Hayes, W.C., Langer, R., and Mikos, A.G. (1996). Evolution of bone transplantation: molecular, cellular and tissue strategies to engineer human bone. Biomaterials 17, 175-185.

Zaidi, M., Pazianas, M., Shankar, V., Bax, B., Bax, C., Bevis, P., Stevens, C., Huang, C., Blake, D., Moonga, B., et al. (1993). Osteoclast function and its control. Experimental Physiology 78, 721-739.

Zhao, G., Raines, A.L., Wieland, M., Schwartz, Z., and Boyan, B.D. (2007). Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 28, 2821-2829.

Zhao, G., Schwartz, Z., Wieland, M., Rupp, F., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., Cochran, D.L., and Boyan, B.D. (2005). High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 74A, 49-58.

Zhao, L., Liu, L., Wu, Z., Zhang, Y., and Chu, P.K. (2012). Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials 33, 2629-2641.

Zhu, X., Chen, J., Scheideler, L., Reichl, R., and Geis-Gerstorfer, J. (2004). Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 25, 4087-4103.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊