跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.75) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/20 07:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:游忠軒
研究生(外文):Chung-Hsuan Yu
論文名稱:應用多目標粒子群演算法於電動機車能源補充站設址問題之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Location Decision of Electric Scooter Refuel Stations Based on Algorithm Development
指導教授:陳怡文陳怡文引用關係鄭辰仰鄭辰仰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yi-Wen ChenChen-Yang Cheng
口試委員:黃欽印陳怡文鄭辰仰陳子立
口試委員(外文):Chin‐Yin HuangYi-Wen ChenChen-Yang ChengTzu-Li Chen
口試日期:2015-05-23
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:工業工程與經營資訊學系
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:75
中文關鍵詞:電動機車充電站電池交換站區位指派問題多目標粒子群演算法
外文關鍵詞:E-ScooterBattery Exchange StationCharging Station,Location-Allocation Problem,Multi -Object Particle Swarm Optimization
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:479
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:86
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
由於電動機車與傳統機車最大的不同就在於其續航力的不足,而完善的基礎設施是成功推動電動機車的必要條件,本研究探討混合式電動機車能源補充站最佳化設址規劃問題,此問題屬於區位指派問題,其中能源補充站有充電站與電池交換站,若只考慮單一類型之設站模式,會導致能源補充站之使用率低或無法服務到更多電動機車使用者。在不同之人口密度以及高地價與低地價之比下,會造成設站比例的差異,而本研究根據不同之人口密度與地價比,在有限之預選設施數量下,達到最大服務量以及最小成本之雙目標。本研究依據能源補充站之服務量以及距離之限制設計數學模型,並使用Cplex驗證數學模型;根據誤差率、最大延展度、分布性與差異性,找出適合之多目標粒子群演算法的學習因子,此學習因子能使多目標粒子群演算法求出之柏拉圖前緣解更接近最佳解,並從柏拉圖前緣解中,透過多服務一位電動機車使用者所增加之平均成本,分析出在人口密度高時應設置交換站,與在人口密度低時應設置充電站,能夠更有效益的服務到電動機車使用者,最後將使用角度聚焦法與使用率,分別找出在人口密集度高與人口密集度低之城市中,充電站與交換站的最佳之設站比例。
The difference between electric scooters and traditional scooters was the durability. Setting the infrastructure completely was a necessary factor to promote electric scooters successfully. Our research discuss the optimal location problem of setting refuel stations. This issue is classified as a location-allocation problem. There were two types of refuel stations, recharge station and battery exchange station. The singular setting mold would decrease the utility of refuel stations or could not serve the most user. Different population density and land cost might cause the difference of setting pattern. Our research is based on different population density and land cost, and the multi - object are maximum utility and minimum cost under the limit of facility numbers. Our research design a mathematical mold which considered the limit of capacity and distance, and use Cplex to validate if the logic of mathematical mold and multi-object particle swarm optimization are correspond to each other or not. Our research use generational distance、maximum spread、spacing and diversity metric to find an optimal parameter of particle swarm optimization. Finally, our research use angle based focus method and utilization to find an optimal proportion of charge stations and battery exchange stations.
摘 要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 3
1.3 研究目的 5
1.4 研究架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
2.1 電動機車能源補充設施 7
2.2 區位問題介紹 8
2.3 多目標粒子群聚演算法(Multi-Object Particle Swarm Optimization; MOPSO) 13
第三章 電動機車能源補充站模型規劃 15
3.1 問題描述 15
3.2 混合式電動機車能源補充站數學模型 15
3.3 多目標粒子群演算法 18
第四章 驗證與柏拉圖前緣解分析 23
4.1 驗證與參數設計 23
4.2 柏拉圖前緣解分析 28
第五章 結論 38
5.1結論 38
5.2未來研究方向 38
參考文獻 40
附錄 43

中文文獻
1.中華民國交通部公路總局 (2014)。台灣機動車登記數。取自: http://www.thb.gov.tw/TM/Default.aspx
2.行政院環保署 (2012)。電動機車電池交換系統補助辦法。取自: http://w3.epa.gov.tw/epalaw/search/LordiDispFull.aspx?ltype=04&lname=0666
3.林鄉邑 (2013)。應用人工智慧法於電動機車充電站設址問題。虎尾科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文,雲林縣。
4.胡明輝、鄭宗正、陳永勳和曾美境 (2006年10月)。機車年平均行駛里程調查統計分析。台灣環境資源永續發展研討會,中壢市南台科技大學。
5.黃台生(2011)。綠色運輸之內涵與推動,環保資訊月刊,158,56~59。
6.葉日豪. (2014)。電動機車電池交換站與充電站混合設址規劃問題。東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所碩士論文,台中市。
7.經濟部工業局(2012)。電動機車需求調查報告。電動機車產業發展推動計畫。台北市:經濟部工業局。
英文文獻
1.Branke, J., Deb, K., Dierolf, H., & Osswald, M. (2004). Finding knees in multi-objective optimization. Paper presented at the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN VIII.
2.Chen, C., & Hua, G. (2014). A New Model for Optimal Deployment of Electric Vehicle Charging and Battery Swapping Stations. International Journal of Control & Automation, 8(5).
3.Church, R. L., Stoms, D. M., & Davis, F. W. (1996). Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological conservation, 76(2), 105-112.
4.Coello, C. A. C., Van Veldhuizen, D. A., & Lamont, G. B. (2002). Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems (Vol. 242): Springer.
5.Cooper, L. (1963). Location-allocation problems. Operations Research, 11(3), 331-343.
6.Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 6(2), 182-197.
7.Doong, S.-H., Lai, C.-C., & Wu, C.-H. (2007). Genetic subgradient method for solving location–allocation problems. Applied Soft Computing, 7(1), 373-386. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2005.06.008
8.Energy Trends insiders (2014). Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Retrieved from http://www.energytrendsinsider.com/2012/07/02/global-carbon-dioxide-emissions-facts-and-figures/.
9.Gang, J., Tu, Y., Lev, B., Xu, J., Shen, W., & Yao, L. (2015). A multi-objective bi-level location planning problem for stone industrial parks. Computers & Operations Research, 56, 8-21.
10.Gavranović, H., Barut, A., Ertek, G., Yüzbaşıoğlu, O. B., Pekpostalcı, O., & Tombuş, Ö. (2014). Optimizing the electric charge station network of EŞARJ. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 15-21.
11.Gołębiewski, B., Trajer, J., Jaros, M., & Winiczenko, R. (2013). Modelling of the location of vehicle recycling facilities: A case study in Poland. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 80, 10-20.
12.Hakimi, S. (1965). Optimum distribution of switching centers in a communication network and some related graph theoretic problems. Operations Research, 13(3), 462-475.
13.Hanabusa, H., & Horiguchi, R. (2011). A Study of the Analytical Method for the Location Planning of Charging Stations for Electric Vehicles. In A. König, A. Dengel, K. Hinkelmann, K. Kise, R. Howlett, & L. Jain (Eds.), Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (Vol. 6883, pp. 596-605): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
14.IPCC. Climate Change (2014). Mitigation of Climate Change. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/.
15.Kuby, M., & Lim, S. (2005). The flow-refueling location problem for alternative-fuel vehicles. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 39(2), 125-145. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2004.03.001
16.Li, X. (2003). A non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimizer for multiobjective optimization. Paper presented at the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation—GECCO 2003.
17.Nguyen, S., Ai, T., & Kachitvichyanukul, V. (2010). Object library for evolutionary techniques ETLib: user’s guide. High Performance Computing Group, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.
18.Rahman, S.-u., & Smith, D. K. (2000). Use of location-allocation models in health service development planning in developing nations. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(3), 437-452. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00289-1
19.Schott, J. R. (1995). Fault Tolerant Design Using Single and Multicriteria Genetic Algorithm Optimization: DTIC Document.
20.Shariff, S. S. R., Moin, N. H., & Omar, M. (2012). Location allocation modeling for healthcare facility planning in Malaysia. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(4), 1000-1010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.12.026
21.Shen, Y., Wang, Q., Yan, W., & Wang, J. (2015). A transportation-location problem model for pedestrian evacuation in chemical industrial parks disasters. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 33, 29-38.
22.Sultana, S., & Roy, P. K. (2014). Multi-objective quasi-oppositional teaching learning based optimization for optimal location of distributed generator in radial distribution systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 63, 534-545.
23.Tan, K. C., Yang, Y., & Goh, C. K. (2006). A distributed cooperative coevolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 10(5), 527-549.
24.Toregas, C., Swain, R., ReVelle, C., & Bergman, L. (1971). The location of emergency service facilities. Operations Research, 19(6), 1363-1373.
25.The Asan Institute for Policy Stydies (2014, Jan 08). Which Countries does South Korea Share Commonality with on the Environment? Retrieved from http://en.asaninst.org/contents/which-countries-does-south-korea-share-commonality-with-on-the-environment/
26.Upchurch, C., & Kuby, M. (2010). Comparing the p-median and flow-refueling models for locating alternative-fuel stations. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(6), 750-758. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.06.015
27.Van Veldhuizen, D. A. (1999). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: classifications, analyses, and new innovations: DTIC Document.
28.Wang, Y.-W., & Lin, C.-C. (2009). Locating road-vehicle refueling stations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(5), 821-829. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2009.03.002
29.Wang, Y.-W., & Lin, C.-C. (2013). Locating multiple types of recharging stations for battery-powered electric vehicle transport. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 58, 76-87.
30.You, P.-S., & Hsieh, Y.-C. (2014). A hybrid heuristic approach to the problem of the location of vehicle charging stations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 70, 195-204.
31.Zeinalzadeh, A., Mohammadi, Y., & Moradi, M. H. (2015). Optimal multi objective placement and sizing of multiple DGs and shunt capacitor banks simultaneously considering load uncertainty via MOPSO approach. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 67, 336-349.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊