臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

回首台灣經濟發展的歷程，並不是靠著大型企業推升經濟動能，而是以中小企業為主體的經濟發展模式，面對日益激烈的國際貿易競爭，唯有發展產業聚落、產業體系才能結合上中游的供應鏈體系發揮綜效，與國際大廠進行競爭，而中衛體系則是企業網絡中經典的作法，本研究主要以金屬製品業中衛體系為個案研究，藉由深度訪談參與中衛體系運作的協力廠觀點探討中衛體系運作過程中，其運作關鍵成功要素、體系運作產生的價值與競爭優勢，經由訪談結果，不僅驗證中衛體系其作法不僅藉由網絡關係而有更多層次的溝通、而且在體系運作中產生許多有形與無形的價值、進而帶動整體供應鏈相較同業更具競爭優勢，但是同樣地在訪談過程中得到關於體系運作的負面評價，而能進一步地整理出中衛體系運作過程中重要的潛規則，這些潛規則不僅是關係體系運作良窳，在未來可能引導體系走向成功抑或是失敗，這也是本研究最重要的價值。

With reviewing the history of economic development in Taiwan, we shall well known the truth: The power of economic development in Taiwan mostly depends on Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) rather than Large-sized enterprises. Facing severely global trading competition, there is no way but developing industrial clusters and industrial system. The only way to compete with multinational enterprises is the synergy of supply chain system. Center-satellite system is the typical practice within industrial strategic networks. With the case study of center –satellite system in the metal finish-goods industry, we in depth interview the managers of subcontractors who participates the activities of center –satellite system. We shall explore key successful factors of center-satellite system operation, the tangible and invisible values of center-satellite system and competitive advantages as well. Through the consequence of the interview, we verify that center-satellite system have multi-level communication by networking. The tangible and invisible values created in the operations of center –satellite system cause unsurpassable competitive advantages. At the same time, we investigate negative comments of center –satellite system operation as well. We conclude that the most important unspoken rules in center –satellite system operation. The most important value of this study is the output of unspoken rules which are not only related with the achievement of the system operation, but also led the future of system.

第壹章 緒論...........................1
第一節 研究動機與背景..................1
第二節 研究問題及研究目的...............2
第三節 研究流程........................3
第貳章 文獻探討........................4
第一節 產業網絡........................4
第二節 台灣產業網絡之類型...............7
第三節 網絡之競爭優勢.................. 8
第四節 關係套繫........................9
第?章 研究方法........................11
第一節 研究流程與研究對象...............11
第二節 資料蒐集方式....................12
第三節 研究方法........................14
第肆章 產業與個案訪談分析...............18
第一節 工業安全配件產業結構之五力分析....18
第二節 工業安全配件體系成立背景.........21
第三節 個案公司訪談結果.................29
第伍章 結論與建議......................35
第一節 研究結果........................35
第二節 策略意涵........................41
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議...........43
參考書目...............................45

中衛發展中心（民 103)。Yoke-Team運作說明。YOKE-Team誓師大會簡報
中衛發展中心（民 103)。經濟部工業局103年度三業四化暨中堅企業示範輔導計畫。經濟部委託之專案計畫計畫書。
方世榮，方世杰（民 97）。組織間統治—回歸組織間關係研究之本賥，兼論國內期刊相關之研究。管理評論，27(1)，25-56。
吳德進（民 95）。產業集群論。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
洪榮德（民 103)。攜手共同打造吊鉤王國。YOKE-Team誓師大會簡報
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究理論：方法及本土女性研究實例，初版。台北：巨流圖書公司。
胡宇辰（民 94）。產業集群支持體系。北京：經濟管理出版社。
張苙雲（民 88）。網絡台灣：企業的人情關係與經濟理性。台北市：遠流出版公司。
郭國慶、郭曉凌（民 90）。論臺商在祖國大陸的投資現狀與環境優化。福建行政學院福建經濟管理干部學院學報，3。
陳創立(2000)。高科技產業跨國知識移轉策略之研究。臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系學位論文，1-106。
陳雅美（民 91）。產業合作網絡形成原因的─以台灣半導體產業為例。開南管理學院運籌研究集刊，1，123-152。
黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。台北: 心理出版社有限公司。
經濟部工業局(1994)。建立中心衛星工廠制度推動簡介。台北:經濟部工業局。
劉仁傑(1999)。分工網路：剖析台灣工具機產業競爭力的奧秘。台北：聯經出版。
劉仲冬(1996)。量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路。見胡幼慧主編，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流圖書公司。
蔡政安、溫肇東（民 98）。關係鑲嵌性與公司興業精神之關聯：台灣廠商大陸子公司的實證研究。管理評論，28(3)，1-20。
謝耀龍(1998)。壽險行銷，第二版。台北：華泰文化事業有限公司。
鍾琴、李華夏、呂慧敏、吳明澤(1998)。中小企業國際化：現況、問題與展望
簡春安、鄒平儀(2001)。社會工作研究法。台北：巨流圖書公司
Andersson, U., Holm, D. B., & Johanson, M. (2007). Moving or doing? Knowledge flow, problem solving, and change in industrial networks. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 32-40.
Babbie, E. (1998). The Practice of Social Research (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).
Burt, R. S. (1992).Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chung, S., Singh, H., & Lee, K. (2000). Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic management journal, 1-22.
Duncan, T., & Moriarty, S. E. (1998). A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. The Journal of marketing, 1-13.
Fontenot, R. J., & Wilson, E. J. (1997). Relational exchange: a review of selected models for a prediction matrix of relationship activities. Journal of Business Research, 39(1), 5-12.
Ford, D., Gadde, L. -E., Ha°kansson, H., Lundgren, A., Snehota, I., Turnbull, P., & Wilson, D. (1988). Managing business relationships. West Sussex, England’ John Wiley and Sons.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Gupta, A. K. & Govindarajan V. (2000). Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal , 21(4), 473
Hemphill, T. A., & Vonortas, N. S.(2003). Strategic research partnerships: a managerial perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(2), 255.
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165.
Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2004). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217-237.
Larson, A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 76–104.
Low, B. K. H. (1997) Managing business relationships and positions in industrial networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(2), 189-202.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Applied social research methods series, Vol. 41. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic management journal, 1133-1156.
Mitchell, J. C. (1969). Social network in urban situations: Analysis of personal relationships in central African towns. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Neuman, W. Lawrence (2000), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 4th ed. Allyn and Bacon
Porter, M. E. and Fuller, M. B. (1986). Competition in Global Industries. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Porter, M.E. (1979). How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy: Harvard Business Review, March/April 1979.
Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(1), 101-133.
Schulz, M.(2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: organizational learning and knowledge flow. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4),661-681.
Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management science, 51(5), 756-770.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J.(1990). Basic of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory procedures & techniques. Thous &s Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thorelli, H.B.(1986). Network: Between Market and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 37-51
Walker, R. (1985). Applied qualitative research. Gower Pub Co.
Wang, Y., & Xiang, Z. (2007). Toward a theoretical framework of collaborative destination marketing. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 75-85.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods, Revised ed. Applied Social Research Series, 5.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage Publications.