跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.134) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/19 23:19
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:郭乃文
研究生(外文):Nai-wen, Guo (also Kuo)
論文名稱:以Cohen認知神經心理學概念探討注意力功能測量研究
論文名稱(外文):Cognitive Neuropsychology on the assessment model of attention-A study on the Cohen-based model
指導教授:花 茂 棽 博 士葉 怡 玉 博 士
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:心理學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:心理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:148
中文關鍵詞:注意力功能認知神經心理測驗Cohen
外文關鍵詞:attentioncognitive neuropsychological assessmentCohen model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:2278
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究從認知神經心理學出發,探究在復健心理學之領域,如何建立注意力衡鑑模式。注意力功能不足是臨床上最常見之認知受損後遺症,一套配合受損病理與認知訓練的衡鑑系統亟為所需。本研究從注意力的認知神經理論模式、生理與神經系統、臨床上常見注意力受損功能、以及注意力發展等四方面著手,探討注意力衡鑑之重要面相。根據這些理論基礎,回應傳統測驗理論之要求,研究者認為注意力衡鑑應具備下述四點效度驗證歷程,其一,回應建構理論;其二,具有發展實質;其三,具有臨床實質;其四,具效標效度。本研究以三個子研究分別探討之。
研究者以Cohen(1993,1998)之理論為主軸,選定感官選擇、反應之選擇與控制、影響注意力資源、以及注意力持續等四部件為衡鑑重點,並參考其他研究者之建議,發展了廣泛性非語文注意力測驗組(Comprehensive Non-verbal Attention Test Battery, 以下簡稱CNAT),包含六個層次作業,共建立了三十三個指標、二十七項指標間的假設考驗。
子研究一以六百名正常兒童與青少年檢驗 CNAT 各項建構假設和發展趨勢。以ANOVA考驗組間變項效果(年齡變項)和組內變項效果(注意力各指標假設)。子研究二以 CNAT 衡鑑六十六名創傷性腦傷患者,檢驗各指標能否呈現患者之受損;討論中重度受損腦傷患者在 CNAT 各指標上受損之比例,並嘗試由患者受傷時的神經生理檢查指標來預估患者注意力之預後。子研究三分別以一百六十六名和六十名兩組正常青少年為受試者,以傳統單項性注意力衡鑑工具(Knox''s木塊測驗、數字廣度測驗、注意力和速度測驗)、具層次特質之神經心理注意力測驗(自編修正Stroop作業)以及魏氏兒童智力測驗(第三版)為效標,探討 CNAT 之區辨效度。
子研究一結果發現,所建立來檢驗 CNAT 建構效度的二十七項假設全部與原假設符合,年齡組變項也全部顯著。不過,當中有十九項達顯著的互動效果,事後比較的結果發現,主要來由十六歲組到十九歲組的發展方向不如預期,以及其中三個指標的發展在年齡層中出現非線性變化所致。研究中發現各年齡層受試者都沒有使用精確/速度互換策略。此外,以能完成分配注意力作業為認知組高低之分類,發現以因素分析討論建構效度,高低認知組的結構略有不同。其中,在動作選擇與控制和知覺選擇兩方面的指標較為穩定地各在一個因子內。而原假設的注意力資源與持續指標,可能含有注意力資源的「結構因素」和「執行策略」兩因子,和注意力持續的「警覺程度」和「時間上持續」兩因子,與Cohen的理論也具相互呼應之功。唯反應時間平均數和標準差兩類指標,尚無法區辨。
子研究二結果發現,與七歲組、十一歲組以及十九歲組比較,中重度創傷性腦傷患者在各層次作業上都有相當比例的無法完成作業、反應時間緩慢以及高錯誤率的患者,在四種注意力部件指標上也都有相當的受損比例。以人口學變項和神經學檢查變項來預測患者在 CNAT 各指標的受損程度,結果唯有視覺昏迷指數達到顯著。此外,因為中重度患者在反應時間平均數和標準差指標上的受損模式不盡相同,回應子研究一之建構討論,此二類指標應該各具不同注意力意涵。
子研究三結果發現,CNAT 各指標與效標測驗都只達到低到中等的相關,經過以逐步複回歸、因素分析、典型相關分析等,發現 CNAT 指標和這些測驗部份重疊但典型相關係數不高,顯示臨床上應用 CNAT 自有其貢獻。此外,再次發現反應時間平均數和標準差指標與效標中的相關模式並不類似。
最後,討論 CNAT 的評價和回應Cohen的理論,並說明未來研究的方向。
目錄
第一章 研究背景 1
一、認知神經心理學對注意力功能之定義與解說 1
1.1 注意力功能之定義與相對生理基礎 2
1.1.1 由生理與神經系統衍生的觀念 2
1.1.2 由忽略現象衍生的注意力理論 3
1.1.3 認知神經心理學的統整性理論 7
1.1.4 認知神經心理學研究中的注意力監控與動作反應 18
1.2 神經系統受損患者之注意力功能缺損 20
1.2.1 局部性受損患者 21
1.2.2 全面性受損患者 22
1.2.3 發展性受損患者 24
1.2.4 共病與其他臨床上常見注意力不足之疾患 26
1.3 注意力功能之發展實質性與神經系統實質性 27
1.3.1 注意力功能之發展與神經系統成熟之關係 27
1.3.2 認知功能衡鑑與神經系統運作之關聯性 31
二、注意力衡鑑於神經心理復健之必要性與衡鑑工具探討 33
2.1 神經心理復健模式:神經心理衡鑑與認知復健時機 33
2.1.1 神經心理學衡鑑為認知復健之基礎 34
2.1.2 注意力衡鑑為認知神經功能衡鑑之基礎 35
2.2 傳統臨床神經心理衡鑑常用之注意力衡鑑工具之定位與分析 36
2.3 臨床衡鑑注意力功能的困境與新的方向 41
2.3.1 定義與理論層面的問題與討論 41
2.3.2 衡鑑方法與實際臨床狀態的問題與討論 44
2.3.3 注意力衡鑑的新主張(多向度、多層次、發展性) 46
第二章 研究目的與研究內容 49
一、子研究一:統整性、多層次注意力功能的衡鑑與假設檢驗 51
1.1 研究目的 51
1.2 研究方法 52
1.2.1 廣泛性注意力測驗組之作業設計理念與評量重點 52
1.2.2 受試者 61
1.2.3 假設檢驗 65
1.3 結果分析 65
1.3.1 檢驗各作業部件間指標的關係假設 65
1.3.2 檢驗各作業部件間指標分數之相對內涵 66
1.3.3 檢驗各作業部件間指標分數之因素結構 71
1.3.4 檢驗各作業部件間指標分數之發展趨勢 77
1.4 討論 84
1.4.1 討論各作業部件間指標的關係假設 84
1.4.2 討論各作業部件間指標的發展趨勢 89
二、子研究二:多層次注意力衡鑑在TBI患者上之應用研究 93
2.1 研究目的 89
2.2 研究方法 90
2.2.1 研究工具 90
2.2.2 受試者 94
2.2.3 施測 98
2.2.4 假設檢驗 98
2.3 結果分析 99
2.3.1 檢驗TBI患者在CNAT各作業部件間指標的表現 99
2.3.2 檢驗中重度TBI患者在CNAT各作業部件間指標上的表現差異
105
2.4 討論 111
三、子研究三:以多層次注意力衡鑑與其他注意力測驗之效度研究
3.1 研究目的 114
3.2 研究方法: 114
3.2.1研究工具 114
3.2.2 受試者 115
3.2.3 假設檢驗 116
3.3 結果分析 117
3.3.1. 檢驗CNAT之各類注意力指標與其他傳統單項性注意力測驗和多層次神經心理測驗指標間的相關研究 117
3.3.2 . 檢驗CNAT之各類注意力指標與魏氏智力測驗測驗的關連 124
3.4 討論 127
第三章 再探注意力的定義、衡鑑以及應用 128
參考資料 134
附錄 142
林清山(民71)。艾德華斯個人興趣量表與修訂石爾斯頓性格量表分數的因素分析及典型相關分析─多種量尺測驗之效度考驗的可行途徑。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,29,1-10。
林清山(民82)。多變項統計分析法近十幾年來的發展與應用。於『心理測驗的發展與應用』中國測驗學會主編,301-384。台北:心理出版社。
葉怡玉。注意力研究的回顧與前瞻,張昭鼎紀念研討會專文,民八十五年,嘉義市。
鄭昭明。認知心理學。台北,大洋出版社,民八十二年。
黃瑞瑛。注意力疾患兒童在注意力向度表現上之初探,碩士論文。民八十五年,台北市:輔仁大學應用心理學系。
洪儷瑜。注意力和速度測驗實施辦法,民七十九年,台北市,著者自印。
郭乃文、劉秀枝、周碧瑟、郭育良。探討認知功能表現與人口學特質之關係--以MMSE和3RT為工具之分析,健康與社會政策研討會報告,1992年,7月。高雄。
郭乃文、余麗樺、黃惠玲、莊妙芬(民86)。非語文性注意力與記憶力測驗編製研究。教育部社教司研究報告。
郭乃文(民90)。臨床心理人力政策建言書(III)復健心理學。 我國醫事人力規劃與預測研討會。由中國心理學會提出, 2001,3月。
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. (1993). Working memory or working attention? In A. Baddeley & L . Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, Awareness and Control. A Tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp.152-171). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baumann, J. E. (1998). Assessment of the neuropsychological spectrum, and use of the PC synthetic work environment in predicting employment for acquired brain injury patients. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering,59(6-B), Dec 1998, 3110, US: Univ Microfilms International.
Becker, M. G., Isaac, W., Hynd, G. W. (1987). Neuropsychological development of nonverbal behaviors attributed to “frontal lobe” functioning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 3(3&4), 275-298.
Benson, D. F. (1994). The Neurology of Thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, R. G. & Marsden, C. D.(1988). Internal versus external cues and the control of attention in Parkinson''s Disease. Brain,111,323-345.
Burke, W. H., Wesolowski, M. D., Buyer, D. M., Zawlocki, R. J.(1990). The rehabilitation of adolescents with traumatic brain injury: outcome and follow-up. Brain Injury,4,371-378.
Chang, Y. C., Guo, N. W., Huang, C. C., Wang, S. T., Tsai, J. J.(2000) Neurocognitive attention and aehavior outcome of school-age children with a history of febrile convulsions: A population study. Epilepsia,41(4),412-420.
Christensen, A.L. (1975). Luria''s neuropsychological investigation. New York: Spectrum.
Cohen, A. R. (1993). The Neuropsychology of Attention. New York: Plenum Press.
Cohen, R. A., Malloy, P. F. & Jenkins, M. A.(1998). Disorders of attention. In P. J. Snyder & P. D. Nussbaum (Eds.), Clinical Neuropsychology (pp.541-572). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Cooley, E. L. & Morris, R. D.(1990). Attention in children: a neuropsychologically based model for assessment. Developmental Neuropsychology, 6(3), 239-274.
Crosson, B. (1994) Application of neuropsychological assessment results. In R. D. Vanderploeg(Ed.), Clinician’s Guide to Neuropsychological Assessment (pp.113-163). Hillsdale, New jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Cummings, J. L.(1993). Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior. Archives of Neurology,50,873-880.
Dikmen, S. S., Machamer, J. E., Winn, H. R., Temkin, N. R. (1995). Neuorpsychological outcome at 1-year post head injury. Neuropsychology,9,80-90.
Drewe, E. A. (1975). Go-No go learning after frontal lobe lesions in humans. Cortex, 11, 8-16.
Elsass, P. & Hartelius, H. (1985). Reaction time and brain disease: relations to location, etiology and progression of cerebral dysfunction. Acta Neurologia Scandinaric, 71, 11-19.
Enns, J. T. (1990). Relations between components of visual attention. In J. T. Enns (Ed.), The Development of Attention : Research and Theory (pp.139-158), North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Enns, J. T. & Akhtar, N. (1988). A development study of filtering mechanisms for selective visual attention. Child Development, 60, 1188-1199.
Enns, J. T. & Cameron, S. (1987). Selective attention in young children: the relations between visual search, filtering, and priming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44,38-63.
Fenwick, T., Anderson, V. (1999) Impairments of attention following childhood traumatic brain injury. Child Neuropsychology,5(4),213-223.
Fisher, K. W. & Rose, S. P. (1994). Dynamic development of coordination of components in brain and behavior: A framework for theory and research. In G. Dawson & K. W. Fisher (Eds.), Human Behavior and the Development Brain (pp.3-66). London: The Guilford Press .
Foster, J. K., Eskes, G. A., Stuss, D. T. (1994). The cognitive neuropsychology of attention: A frontal lobe perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(2), 133-147.
Gerring, J., Brady, K., Chen, A., Quinn, C., Herskovits, E., et al. (2000). Neuroimaging variables related to development of Secondary Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder after closed head injury in children and adolescents. Brain Injury,14(3),205-218.
Giedd, J. N., Castellanos, F. X., Casey, B. J., Kozuch, P., King, A. C., Hambuger, S. D., et al.(1994). Quantitative morphology of the corpus callosum in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry,151(5),665-669
Golden, C.J., Hammeke, T.A., Purisch, A.D., Berg, R.A., Moses,J.A., Newlin, D.B., Wilkening, G.N., & Puente, A.E. (1982). Item interpretation of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Golden, C,J., Purisch, A.D., & Hammeke, T.A. (1985). Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Forms Ⅰ and Ⅱ (Manual). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Goodwin, D. M. (1989). A Dictionary of Neuropsychology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Greenberg, L. M. & Waldman, I. D. (1993). Developmental normative data on the test of variables of attention (T.O.V.A.). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatary, 34(6),1019-1030.
Greve, K.W., Sherwin, E., Stanford, M.S., Mathias, C., Love, J. Ramzinski, P. (2001). Personality and neurocognitive correlates of impulsive aggression in long-term survivors of severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury,15(3),255-262.
Haier, R. J. (1994) Quoted in: B. Bower, Images of Intellect. Science News,146,236-237.
Hazeltine, E., Grafton, S. T., Ivry, R. (1997). Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. Brain,120,123-140.
Heliman, K. H., Watson, R. T., Valenstein, E. (1993). Neglect and related disorders. In K. H. Heliman & E. Valenstein (Ed.), Clinical Neuropsychology(3nd)(pp.279-336). New York: Oxford University Press.
Holland, B. A., Haas, D. K., Norman, D., Brant-Zawadzki, M., Newton, T. H. (1986). MRI of normal brain maturation. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 7,201-208.
Honda, M., Deiber, M. P., Ibanez, V., Zhuang, P. and Hallett, M.(1998). Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning: A PET study. Brain,121,2159-2173.
Howes, D. & Boller, F. (1975). Simple reaction time: Evidence for focal impairment from lesions of the right hemisphere. Brain, 98, 317-332.
Hynd, G. W., Hern, K. L., Voeller, K. K., Marshall, R. M. (1991). Neurobiological Basis of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). School Psychology Review,20(2), 174-186.
Hynd, G. W., Nieves, N., Connor, R. T., Stone, P., Town, P., Becker, M. G., Lahey, B. B. & Lorys, A. R. (1989). Attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity: Reaction time and speed of cognitive processing. Jounal of Learning Disabilities, 22(9), 573-580.
Jernigan, T. L., Trauner, D. A., Hesselink, J. R., Tallal, P. A. (1991). Maturation of human cerebrum observed in vivo during adolescence. Brain,114,2037-2049.
Johnson, M. H.(Ed).(1993). Brain Development and Cognition: A Reader. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Joseph, R. (1996). Neuropsychology, Neuropsychiatry, and Behavioral Neurology. New York: Plenum Press.
Kaye, D. B., Toys, M., Ruskin, E. M. (1990). The development of attentional control mechanisms. In J. T. Enns (Ed.), The Development of Attention : Research and Theory (pp.227-244). North-Holland:Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Kinsbourne, M. (1992). Development of attention and metacognition. In S. J. Segalowitz & I. Rapin (vol. Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol 7: Child Neuropsychology (pp.261-277). New-York: Elsevier.
Kinsella, G. J. (1998). Assesment of attention following traumatic brain injury: a review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 8(3), 351-375.
Konrad, K., Gauggel, S., Manz, A., Scholl, M. (2000). Lack of inhibition: a motivational deficit in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and children with traumatic brain injury. Child Neuropsychology, 6(4),286-296.
Leahey, T. H. (1980). A History of Psychology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Leimkuhler, M. E., Mesulam, M. M. (1985). Reversible go-no go deficits in a case of frontal lobe tumor. Annals of Neurology,18,617-619.
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychoogical Assessment. (3th edition). New York:Oxford University Press.
Little, A. J. & Templer, D. I. (1996). Feasibility of the neuropsychological spectrum in prediction of outcome following head injury. Journal of Clinical Psychology,52(4),455-460.
Luria, A. R. (1973). The Working Brain (pp.187-225). New York: Basic Books.
Matochik, J. A., Liebenauer, L. L., King, A. C., Szymanski, H. V., Cohen, R. M., Zametkin, A. J., et al. (1994). Cerebral glucose metabolism in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder after chronic stimulant treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(5),658-664.
Max, J. E., Fox, P. T., Lancaster, J. L., Kochunov, P., Mathews, K. et.al. (2002). Putamen lesions and the development of attention-deficit/hyperactivity symptomatology. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,41(5),563-571.
McKay, K. E., Halperin, J. M., Schwartz, S. T., & Sharma, V. (1994). Developmental analysis of three aspects of information processing: sustained attention, selective attention, and response organization. Developmental Neuropsychology, 10(2), 121-132.
Mesulam, M. M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology,10,309-327.
Mesulam, M. M. (1985). Attention, confusional state and neglect. In M. M. Mesulam (Ed.), Principles of Behavioral Neurology (pp.125-168). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
Niemann, H., Ruff, R. M., Kramer, J. H. (1996). An attempt towards differentiating attentional deficits in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology Review,6(1),11-46.
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwatz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.) Consciousness and Self-regulation, vol. 4,1-18. New York: Plenum Press.
O’Donnell, J. P., Macgregor, L. A., Dabrowski, J., Oestreicher, J. M. and Romero, J. J. (1994). Construct validity of neuropsychological tests of conceptual and attentional abilities. Journal of clinical psychology,50(4),596-600.
Park, N. W., Ingles J. L. (2001). Effiectiveness of attention rehabilition after an acquired brain injury: a meta-anlysis. Neuropsychology,15(2),199-210.
Passingham, R. (1993). The Frontal Lobes and Voluntary Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press:Oxford University Press.
Passler, M. A., Isaac, W. & Hynd, G. W. (1985) Neuropsychological development of behavior attributed to frontal lobe functioning in children. Developmental Neuropsychology,1(4),349-370.
Posner, M. I. (1995). Attention in cognitive neuroscience: An overview. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (pp.615-624). Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press.
Posner, M. I. (1997). Attention. In M. S. Gazzaniga. (Ed.), Conversations in the Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press.
Posner, M. I., & Petersen S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neurosciences,13,182-196.
Ponsford, J., Kinsella, G. (1991). The use of rating scale of attentional behavior. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1,241-257.
Ponsford, J., Kinsella, G. (1992). Attentional deficits following closed head injury. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 822-838.
Prior, M., Sanaon, A. (1986). Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity: a critigue. Journal of Child Psychololigical Psychiatry, 307, 319.
Riccio, C. A., Hynd, G. W., Cohen, M. J., Gonzalez, J. J. (1993). Neurological basis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Exceptional Children,60(2),118-124.
Robertson, I. H. & Murre, J. M. J. (1999). Rehabilitation of brain damage: Brain plasticity and priciples of guided recovery. Psycological Bulletin, 125,544-575.
Roeltgen, M. G. & Roeltgen, D. P. (1990). Asymmetric lateralized attention in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 6(1), 25-37.
Ruff, H. A. & Rothbart, M. K. (1996). Attention in Early Development. Yew York: Oxford University Press.
Sbordone, R. J. (1987). A neuropsychological approach to cognitive rehabilitation within a private practice setting. In B. Caplan (Ed.), Rehabilitation Psychology Desk Reference (pp323-340). Rockville, Maryland: An Aspen Publication.
Schachar, R. J. (1991). Children hyperactivity. Journal of Child Psychololigical Psychiatry,32, 155-191.
Schachar, R. J. & Logan, G. D. (1990). Impulsivity and inhibitory control in development and psychopothology. Developmental Psychology, 26, 710-720.
Schachar, W. , Dumais, S. T., Shiffrin, R. M. (1984) Automatic and control in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies(Eds), Varieties of Attention(1-27). Orlando:Academic Press,Inc.
Schiff, A. R., Knopf, I. J. (1985). The effect of task demands on attention allocation in children of different ages. Child Development, 56,621-630.
Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2001). Traumatic Brain Injury in Cildren and Adolescent- Assessment and Intervention. New York: The Guilford Press.
Sergeant, J. (1988). Functional deficits in attentional deficit disorder? In L. M. Bloomingdale (Ed.), Attention deficit disorder: New research in attention, treatment, and psychopharmacology (pp.1-19). New York:Pergamon Press.
Sergeant, J., Scholten, C. A. (1985). On data limitations in hyperactivity. Journal of Child Psychololigical Psychiatry, 26, 111-124.
Shallice T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. In D. E. Broadbent & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), The Neuropsychology of Cognitive Function (pp.199-209). London:The Royal Society.
Shallice T. (1994). Multiple levels of control processes. In C. Utilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV -- Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing (pp.395-420). London: The MIT Press .
Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. (1991). Higher-order cognitive impairments and frontal lobe lesions in man. In H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, A. L. Benton (Eds.) Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, M. B., Morris, R. D., Morris M. K., Flowers, C., Jones, R. W. (1998). A neuropsychologically based assessment model of the structure of attention children. Developmental Neuropsychology,14(4),657-677.
Shiffrin, R. M., Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. Ⅱ: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological review, 84, 127-190.
Shue, K. L., Douglas, V. I. (1992). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and the frontal lobe syndrome. Brain and Cognition,20,104-124
Shum, D., McFarland, K., Bain, J. D. (1994). Assessment of attention: relationship between psychological testing and information processing approaches. Journal of clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16(4),531-538.
Sohlberg, M. M., Mateer, C. A. (1989). Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation : Theory & Practice. New York:The Guilford Press.
Sohlberg, M. M., Mateer, C. A. (2001). Cognitive Rehabilitation: An Integrative Neuropsychoogical Approach. New York:The Guilford Press.
Sowell, E. R., Jernigan, T. L. (1998). Further MRI evidence of late brain maturation: limbic volume increases and changing asymmetries during childhood and adolescence. Developmental Neuropsychology,14(4),599-618.
Stone, M. H., Wright, B. D. (1980). Knox''s Cube Test (Junior and senior version). Wood Dale:Stoelting.
Stringer, A. (1995). A Guild to Adult Neuropsychological Diagnosis. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.
Stuss, D. T., Ely, P., Hugenholtz, M. D., Richard, M. D., LaRochelle, S., et. al. (1985). Subtle neuropsychological deficits in patients with good recovery after close head injury. Neurosurgery, 17,41-47.
Sunderland, A., Curry, S. H., Das, S., Enderby, P. M., et al. (1992). Monitoring information processing efficiency after stroke or head injury: A comparison of four computerised tests for use in single case experiments. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation,2(2),137-149.
Taylor, E. (1995). Dysfunctions of attention. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.) Developmental Psychopathology, Vol 2, Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation (pp. 243-273).
Trataglione, A., Bino, G., Manzino, M., Spadavecchia, L., Favale, E. (1986). Simple reaction time changes in patients with unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 24(5),649-658.
Trataglione, A., Oneto, A., Manzino, M., Favale, E. (1987). Further evidence for focal effect of right hemisphere damage on simple reaction time. Cortex, 23,285-292.
van Zomeren, A. H. & Brouwer, W. H. (1994). Clinical Neuropsychology of Attention. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vendrell, P., Junque, C., Pujol, J., Jurado, M. A., Molet, J., & Grafman, J. (1995). The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop Task. Neuropsychologia, 33(3), 341-352.
Voeller, K. K. S. (1991). What can neurological models of attention, intention, and arousal tell us about Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder? Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 3(2),209-217.
Webster, M. J., Ungerleider, L. G. (1998). Neuroanatomy of visual attention. In R. Parasuraman (Ed), The Attentive Brain (pp.19-34). Cambridge:The MIT Press.
Welsh, M. C. & Pennington, B. F. (1988). Assissing frontal lobe functioning in children: Views from developmental psychology. Developmental Neuropsychology,4,199-230.
Wickens, C. D. (1984) Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies(Eds), Varieties of Attention(63-102). Orlando:Academic Press,Inc.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 陸傳籍(1938)。抗戰建國中小學各科作業要項的設計。教育雜誌,28卷12期,67-70。
2. 袁汝儀(1994)。由戰後台灣的五種視覺藝術教育趨勢探討視覺藝術教師自主性之重要性與培養。美育,54期,39-49。
3. 邱兆偉(1987)。國民中小學美育教學的努力方向。教育文粹,16期,1-11。
4. 林曼麗(1995)。解構視覺藝術教育知識體─探討台灣視覺藝術教育之主體性。美育,62期,38-47。
5. 吳鼎(1938)。抗戰時期小學課程及教材之研究。教育雜誌,28卷5期,41-44。
6. 呂燕卿(1989)。當今國小美勞教學之新趨勢。國教世紀,25卷2期,18-22。
7. 丁重宣(1938)。戰時小學課程應如何改變。教育雜誌,28卷8期,13-14。
8. 陳俠(1939)。戰時小學教育的經驗。教育雜誌,29卷7期,33-40。
9. 陳朝平(1989)。學科本位藝術教育:發展、概念、課程、方法、批評及應用。國教天地,84期。屏東:屏東師範學院,10-14。
10. 郭禎祥(1999)。二十一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育,106期,1~2。
11. 教育部(1969)。中華民國教育文化現況。教與學,3卷12期,9-13。
12. 黃覺民(1938)。戰時課程問題。教育雜誌,28卷3期,1-8。
13. 黃光男(1985)。包浩斯美術設計教育初探。國教天地,64期12月,22-25。
14. 溫肇桐(1938)。戰時小學美術教學問題。教育雜誌,28卷3期。51-53。
15. 楊馥如(2001)。從「藝術與人文」領域課程綱要中美術課程的改變─談美術教師的因應策略。美育,119期。91-96。