臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

金控公司的主要利基在於金融產品的跨售。一般而言，金融相關行業進行跨業整合主要著眼於交叉銷售(Cross Selling)、成本縮減(Cost Saving)，及資本配置效率(Capital Efficiency)三大綜效目標。植基於此三大目標，如何整合跨銀行、證券、保險、基金等金融產品及服務並有效率的提升銷售業績，將是金控公司極須努力思考的問題。
C金控子公司壽險公司為台灣地區壽險業第一品牌，據點覆蓋率為全國金融機構之冠，有效契約市場佔有率第一名，具有龐大的客戶基礎與豐富的業務團隊管理經驗。本研究欲檢視進行交叉銷售對於主要壽險業務的影響，故選取C金控子公司之壽險公司為研究對象最為允當。擷取研究樣本公司「九十四年產能分析表」之資料，產出變數包括在壽險生產性、壽險平均件數、產險生產性、信用卡舉績率，運用資料包絡分析法（DEA）檢視相對效率。
C壽險公司擁有277個經營據點，遍佈於台灣地區。依經營的形態可分成兩類，一為專招型態，其主要工作為招攬新保單；另一為展業型態，主要工作為收取續年度保費。兩個型態之下又可以依照不同地域劃分成21個區域。藉由以上的區分方式可發展出三個研究模型：一為主要壽險效率值模型，二為交叉銷售效率值模型，三為加入交叉銷售後之整體效率值模型。本研究試圖以上述三個模型衡量C壽險公司在不同的經營型態與區域發展情況下，其經營效率是否會有差異。
本研究亦試圖透過Tobit迴歸分析，求算效率值與影響因素間之關係式，提供業者在無法取得同業資料進行比較的情況下，仍得以獲知影響本身相對效率的因素間，其相關之權重大小為何，以提供C壽險公司進行效率改善的參考。並藉由等級順序檢定，分析經營型態和區域發展在三個研究模型間的效率分析。研究結果顯示，不同經營型態間的效率值會有顯著的差異；加入交叉銷售的業務後，的確對壽險主業有所提升；不同的區域發展間的效率值會有顯著的差異。

Financial holding companies’ niche is the cross-selling of their own financial products. While performing cross-ownership, the financial-related businesses focus on three synergistic purposes, namely cross selling, cost saving, and capital efficiency. According to these synergistic purposes, the main issue of financial holding companies is to cross-integrate products and services (say banking, securities, insurances, funds, etc.) in order to boost business.
C company, affiliate operating insurance business of C financial holding, is the foremost of insurance industry in Taiwan. C company possesses large customer base and sophisticated business management, further, both division cover rate and valid policy market share are champion in the competitive insurance market of Taiwan. This paper tries to study the impact of life insurance affairs while firms are going to implement cross-selling, and, since C company is the bellwether of the industry in Taiwan, we select C company to be the research sample. In this paper, we apply the methodology of data envelopment analysis (DEA) to survey relative efficiency, and the output variables acquired from 2006 efficiency analysis table include life insurance efficiency ability, life insurance average document, product insurance efficiency ability, and credit card achievements rate.
C company owns 277 footholds which spread all over Taiwan. In accordance with business model, C has two operating patterns: one is specialized organization responsible for solicitations; the other is popularized organization responsible for collecting insurance premium. Furthermore, under these two business models, C company has 21 districts. Based on the above categorizations, we develop three empirical models, namely life insurance efficiency model, cross-selling efficiency model, the whole efficiency model. Our studying is trying through above 3 models to find out whether C company’s operating efficiency has difference or not under different business models and districts.
Moreover, we try to find out the relationship between efficient ratings and influence factors by tobit regression. Through tobit regression, one could obtain the weights of related factors under the circumstances of none reference resource. Besides, under different business models and districts, rank order test is used to compare relative efficiency among the three empirical models. The findings are:
1. Efficiency ratings exist significant differences between business models.
2. Implementing cross-selling operation would boost the business of life. Insurance.
3. Efficiency ratings exist significant differences among districts.

目 錄
第一章 緒 論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究流程 5
第二章 文 獻 探 討 6
第一節 交叉銷售或跨售(Cross-Selling) 6
第二節 金融控股公司的整合資源與交叉行銷 6
第三節 相對經營效率 9
第四節 經營型態對績效的影響 11
第五節 保險業績效評估相關文獻 12
第三章 研 究 設 計 19
第一節 研究架構 19
第二節 研究假說 20
第三節 研究方法 21
第四節 樣本及資料來源 25
第五節 研究變數 27
第四章 實證研究 30
第一節 經營型態和生產力指標對績效的影響 30
第二節 經營型態與區域發展對研究公司績效影響 36
第五章 結論與建議 44
第一節 研究結論與管理意涵 44
第二節 研究限制 47
第三節 後續研究建議 48
參 考 文 獻 49

參 考 文 獻
一、中 文 部 份
1.施敏雄，2001，「日本金融控股公司法立法背景與運用」，台灣金融財務季刊第2輯第2期，頁19-32。
2.紀琬琪，2003，「台灣地區產險公司再保險經營績效之研究」，碩士論文，淡江大學保險經營研究所。
3.高子荃、 陳振遠 、周建新，2004，「臺灣地區產險業經營效率之研究--資料包絡法與Malmquist生產力指數之應用」，輔仁管理評論，11:1，頁53-75。
4.高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki Sueyoshi，2003，「管理績效評估－資料包絡分析法」，台北：華泰。
5.張文武，1999，「保險業效率衡量方法之探討」，保險專刊，第56輯，頁75-102。
6.張保隆、陳澤義，1995，「台灣各縣市文化中心相對績效之評估」，中國行政57期，頁31-46。
7.張嗣聰，2004，「以DEA法探討我國金控公司行銷面與財務面經營效率」，碩士論文，國立中正大學企業管理研究所。
8.陳馨儀，2003，「金控公司顧客關係管理系統交叉銷售績效指標相關因素之研究」，碩士論文，國立台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所。
9.陸炳宏，2002，「金融控股公司之整合行銷對壽險從業人員業績成果效益之評估---- 以國泰人壽保險公司之業務體系為例」，碩士論文，國立高雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險所。
10.黃旭男、吳國華，2001，「台灣地區壽險業經營績效之衡量」，管理與系統，第八卷第四期，頁401-420。
11.黃旭男、高棟樑，2005，「台灣地區產險公司經營績效之評估：二階段資料包絡分析法之應用」，保險專刊，第21卷第1期，頁57-79。
12.黃琮祐，2002，「在J2EE 架構下金融資訊系統整合之研究」，碩士論文，國立政治大學資訊管理研究所。
13.葉立仁、許和鈞、鄭鎮樑，2000，「郵政壽險資金運用之研究」，保險專刊，第66輯，頁48-68。
14.葉彩蓮、陳澤義，2000，「壽險業資源使用效率之衡量」，台灣銀行季刊，51卷第1期，頁322-341。
15.劉純之，1994，「壽險公司經營效率評估－本國與外商公司的比較分析」，保險專刊，37，114-126。
16.劉純之、李君屏，1995，「經濟規模與壽險公司經營效率－兼論資料包絡分析」，壽險季刊，第15期，頁19-28。
17.蔡蕙鈺，2002，「應用資料包絡分析法與主成分分析法在國內產物保險業經營效率分析之研究」，碩士論文，長庚大學企業管理研究所。

二、英 文 部 分
1.Brockett, P. L. and Golany, B., 1996, “Using Rank Statistic for Determining Programmatic Efficiency Differences in Data Envelopment analysis,” Management Science, 42, 467-472.
2.Brockett, P. L., Cooper, W. W., Golden L. L., Rousseau, J. J. and Wang Y., 1998, “DEA evaluations of efficiency of organizational forms and distribution systems in the US property and liability insurance industry,” International Journal of Systems Science, 29, 1235-1247.
3.Chang, P. L., Hwang, S. N. and Chang, W. Y.（1995）, “Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure the Achievement and Change of Regional Development in Taiwan”, Journal of environmental management, Vol. 43, pp. 49-66.
4.Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., 1980, “Management Science Relations for Evaluation and Management Accountability,” Journal of Enterprise Management, 2, 160-162.
5.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E., 1978, “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
6.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L. and Stutz, J., 1985, “Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-koopmans efficient empirical production functions,” Journal of Econometrics, 30, 91-107.
7.Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone K. (2000), “Data Envelopment Analysis-a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
8.Cummins, J D., M. A. Weiss and Hongmin Zi, 1999, “Organizational Form and Efficiency: The Coexistence of Stock and Mutual Property-Liability Insurers”, Management Science, 45(9): 1254-1269.
9.Debbie, Nash and Alicia Sterna-Karwat（1996）, “An Application of DEA to measure branch cross selling efficiency, ” Computers Ops Res. Vol. 23, No 4, pp 385-392.
10.Donni, Olivier and Fabienne Fecher, 1997, “Efficiency and Productivity of the Insurance Industry in the OECD Countries”, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 22(84): 523-535.
11.Fama, E. and M.C. Jensen (1983a), “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
12.Fama, E. and M.C. Jensen (1983b), “Agency Problems and Residual Claims”, Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 327-349.
13.Farrell, M. J., 1957, “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, A 120, 253-28-.
14.Fecher, F., D. Kessler and P. Pestieau, 1993, “Productive Performance of the French Insurance Industry” , The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4: 77-93.
15.Hayes Grag, “Cross-selling services”, Australian CPA , 2002.
16.Hwang, S. N. and Chang, T. Y.（2003）, “Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure Hotel Managerial Efficiency Change in Taiwan,” Tourism Management, Vol. 24, pp. 357-369.
17.Ilene K. Kleinsorge, Philip B. Schary, and Ray D. Tanner, “Date Envelopment Analysis for Monitoring Customer-Supplier Relationships”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2002, 11, 357-372.
18.Kamakura, W. A., M. Wedel, F. D. Rosa and J. A. Mazzon, 2003, “Cross Selling through Database Marketing: A Mixed Data Factor Analyzer for Data Augmentation and Prediction”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(1): 45-65.
19.Lewin, A. Y. and Minton, J. W., 1986, “Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research,” Management Science, 32, 514-538.
20.Lewin, A. Y., Morey, R. C. and Cook, T. J., 1982, “Evaluating the Administrative Efficiency of Courts,” OMEGA, 10, 401-411.
21.Munroe Daniel, “Cross-Selling：Improves Retention,” National Underwriter, 2003 , p14.
22.Noulas, Athanasios G., Thomas Hatzigayios, John Lazaridis and Katerina Lyroudi, 2001 “Non-Parametric Production Frontier Approach to the study of Efficiency of Non-Life Companies in Greece”, Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, 14(1): 19-26.
23.Sueyoshi, T. and Aoki, S., 2001, “A use of a nonparametric statistic for DEA frontier shift: the Kruskal and Wallis rank test,” OMEGA, 29, 1-18.
24.Tina Harrison; Jake Ansell, “Academic papers: Customer Retention in the Insurance Industry: Using Survival Analysis to Predict Cross-Selling Opportunities”, Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Mar 2002, 6,3; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 229.
25.Wyner, G. A., 1996, “Customer Profitability: Linking Behavior to Economics”, Marketing Research, 8(2): 36-38.
26.Yasar F Jarrar; Andy Neely, “Cross-Selling in the Financial Sector: Customer Profitability is Key”, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing; Mar 2002; 10, 3; ABI/INFORM Global pg.282.