跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.176) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/08 07:11
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李宗修
研究生(外文):tsunghsiu.lee
論文名稱:從品牌知名度、產品特性、認知價值對顧客購買意願之影響-以國外服飾零售業ZARA、UNIQLO為例
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Brand Awareness, Product Characteristic, Perceived Value on Consumers' Purchasing Intention–A Case Study on ZARA and UNIQLO
指導教授:施坤壽施坤壽引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:南台科技大學
系所名稱:行銷與流通管理系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:行銷與流通學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:125
中文關鍵詞:快速時尚品牌知名度產品特性認知價值購買意願
外文關鍵詞:Fast FashionBrand AwarenessProduct CharacteristicsPerceived ValuePurchase Intention
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:7336
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:2563
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:8
本研究構建與驗證品牌知名度、產品特性、認知價值模式,並探討對顧客購買意願之模式,以台灣購買服飾之消費者為研究對象,並使用結構方程式來驗證服飾品牌的品牌知名度、產品特性、知覺價值、購買意願之間四者的關聯。

本研究透過問卷調查的方式,以國內15~60歲之消費者為調查對象,將研究範圍設定於台灣北部、中部、南部等三個人口密集的都會區,進行抽樣調查,問卷總共發放300份,有效問卷275份。

透過LISREL模式分析,作本研究假說之驗證分析,結果顯示:(1)品牌知名度對認知價值具有不顯著影響;(2)品牌知名度對購買意願呈現正向顯著影響;(3)產品特性對認知價值具有正向顯著影響;(4)產品特性對購買意願呈現正向顯著影響;(5)認知價值對購買意願具有正向顯著影響。
This research emphasizes with developing and verifying the model of brand awareness , Product Characteristic,Perceived Value and discusses its relationship with consumer Purchase intention.On consumers’ apparels purchasing intention in Taiwan. And adopts structural equation modeling to verifying the relationship among brand apparels brand awareness, Product Characteristic, Perceived Value, and purchasing intention.

This research is through the questionnaire method,15~60 years old of consumer for investigate the object on domestic, The research will scope is set to consumers located in Northern、Central and Southern Taiwan,survey issued to 300 copies, the final usable responses were,Carry on the sampling,the structure equation model is used to test the hypotheses in this study.
The results of the study were as follows:
1. brand awareness hasn't significantly positive effect on Product Characteristic.
2. brand awareness has significantly positive effect on purchasing intention.
3. Product Characteristic has significantly positive effect on Perceived Value.

4. Product Characteristic has significantly positive effect on purchasing intention.
5. Perceived Value has significantly positive effect on purchasing intention.
表目錄III
圖目錄VI
第一章 緒論1
1.1 研究背景與動機1
1.2 研究目的2
1.3 研究範圍3
1.4研究流程3
第二章 文獻探討與假設推論5
2.1 服飾零售業5
2.2 品牌知名度13
2.3 產品特性18
2.4 認知價值22
2.5 購買意願26
2.6 各構面間關係31
第三章 研究方法35
3.1 研究架構35
3.2 研究假設36
3.3 研究變數操作定義與衡量36
3.4 問卷設計39
3.5 資料蒐集40
3.6 資料分析方法41
3.7 資料前測43
第四章 資料分析結果49
4.1樣本結構敘述性統計分析49
4.2衡量題項描述性統計分析53
4.3因素分析55
4.4信度分析59
4.5效度分析62
4.6相關分析64
4.7 LISREL模式分析66
4.8 ZARA、UNIQLO在各構面因素之差異分析92
第五章 結論與未來研究方向93
5.1 研究結論93
5.2 管理意涵96
5.3 研究限制99
5.4 後續研究建議100
參考文獻101
附錄110
1.Aaker, D. A.,Managing Brand Equity—Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name,The Free Press, New York, NY,1991.
2.Aaker, D. A.,“Measuring brand equity across products and markets,”California Management Review, Vol.38, No.3, pp.102-120,1996.
3.Aaker, D. A.,“Should you take your brand to where the action is?” Harvard Business Review., Vol.75, No.5, pp.135-144,1997.
4.Aaker,D.A.and Keller,K. L.,“Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,”Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, pp.27-41,1990.
5.Bauer, R. A.,“Consumer behavior as risk taking,”Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Edited by American Marketing Association, pp.389-398, Chicago, IL,1960.
6.Berry, L.L. (2000), “Cultivating Service Brand Equity”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.28, (1), pp. 128-37
7.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi,Y. (1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal ofthe Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
8.Christopher, M., Lowson, R., & Peck, H. 2004. Creating agile supply chains in the fashion industry. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management,32(8): 367-376.
9.Chematony, L. D., & McWilliam, G.(1989). Branding terminology the real debate. Marketing Intelligence & Planning.
10.Chang, Tung-Zong, and Albert R. Wildt. “Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An empirical Study. ” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Volume 22, Number 1,pp. 16-27, 1994.
11.Dodds, William B., Kent B. Monroe and Dhruv Grewal, (1991), “Effects of Price,Brand and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.28, pp.307-319.
12.Dickson, Peter R. and Alan G. Sawyer(1990),“The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers,”Journal of Marketing,42(July),42-53.
13.Dodds, B. W., K. B. Monroe, and D. Grewal, 1991. Effect of Price, Band, and Store Information on Buybers Product Evaluation, Journal of Marketing, Research , 28(3) , pp.307-319.
14.Engel. J. F., R. D. Blackwell and P. W. Miniard (1996). Consumer Behavior, 8th ed,Dryden Press, pp.793-817.
15.Engel, James F., Roger D. Blackwell and Paul W. Miniard, ( 2001 ). ,Harcourt Broce Joranovich College Publishers,The Dryden Press. Consumer Behavior, 8th ed.
16.Engel, James F., Blackwell, Roger D. and Miniard, Paul W.(1984), ” ConsumerBehaviour “6th ed ,The Dryden Press. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
17.Farquhar,PeterH.(1989),“ManagingBrandEquity,”MarketingResearch,1(September), 24-33.
18.Fareena,Sultan(1999),“Consumer Preferences for Forthcoming Innovations: the Case of High Definition Television,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing 16 (1): 24-41.
19.Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
20.Geistfeld, L. V., Sproles, G. B., & Badenhop, S. B. (1977). The concept and measurement of a hierarchy of product characteristics. In W. D. Perreault, Jr. (ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 302-307). MI: Association for Consumer Research.
21.Gary Hamel & C.K. Prahalad, (1989), Strategic Intent,Harward Business Review, May-June, pp.63-76.
22.Hoyer,W.D. and Brown, S. P.,“Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.17, No.2,pp.141-148,1990.
23.Howard and Sheth, (1969), The Theory of Buyer Behavior, New York:John Willey & Sons.
24.Howard, John A. (1989), Consumer Behavior in Marketing Strategy,New York: Prentice-Hall.
25.Hirschman, E. C. and Holbrook, M. B.(1982), Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions, Journal of Marketing, 46, pp. 92-101.
26.Ioannidis, C., & Silver, M. (1997). Estimating the worth of product Characteristics. Journal of the Marketing Research Society, 39(4), 559-570.
27.Jacoby, J.,and Olson, J. C.,“Consumer Response to Price: An Attitudinal Information Processing Perspective. in Moving Ahead in Attitude Research,” Yoram Wind and Marshall Greenbery, eds. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp.73-86,1997.
28.Kaiser, Susan B. (1997), The Social Psychology of Clothing: Symbolic Appearance in Context, Revised, New York: Fairchild.
29.Kotler, P., Ang, S. H., Leong S. M. and Tan, C. T., Marketing Managemnet: an Asian Perspective, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall,1999.
30.Kotler,P.&A.R.Andreasen(1991),Strategic Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations.
31.Kotler,P.(1991).Marketing Management :Analysis, Planning, Implementation,and Control, 7th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
32.Kotler (1996). “Marketing Management:An Asian Perspective,” Singapore:Prentice Hall, 55.
33.Kotler,(2003), Marketing Management, Ninth Edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
34.Kotler,Philip(2000),Marketing Management : Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 10th Edition, New Jesey, Prentice-Hill Conmpany.
35.Keller,K.L.,“Conceptualizing, measuring,managing customer-based brand equity,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.57, No.1, pp.1-22,1993.
36.Keller,K.L.,“Building customer-based brand equity (cover story),” Marketing Management, Vol.10, No.2, pp.14-19,2001.
37.Kamins, M. A., & Marks, L. J., “The Perception of Kosher as a Third Party Certification Claim in Advertising for Familiar & Unfamiliar Brands,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 1991:177-185.
38.Laurent, G., Kapferer, J.N. and Roussel, F. (1995), “The Underlying Structure of Brand Awareness Scores”, Marketing Science, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp 170-179
39.Levy, M. (1999). Revolutionizing the retail pricing game, Discount Store News, Sept.
40.Laroche, M., C. Kim and L. Zhou, 1996. Brand Familiarity and Confidence as Determinants of Purchase Intention: An Empirical Test in a Multiple Brand Context. Journal of Business Research, 37(2): 115-120.
41.Mason and Bequette (1998), Product experience and consumer product attribute.
42.Morwitz Vicki G. and Schmittlein David (1992), “Using Segmentation to Improve Sales Forecasts Based on Purchase Intent: Which Intenders Actually Buy,” Journal of Marketing Research, Nov. pp. 391-405.
43.Moorman, Zaltman, and Deshpande (1992), Relationships Between Providerrsvand Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 314-328.
44.McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human Motivation. Ill.: Scott, Foresman.
45.Onkvisit&Shaw(1991),The interational Dimension of Branding:
Strategic Consideration & Decisions , International Marketing Review, 6, 3, 22-34.
46.Park, C.W., Jaworski, B.J., and Maclnnis, D.J. ( 1986), “Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.50, October, pp.135-145.
47.Priest, A. 2005. Uniformity and differentiation in fashion. Internaitonal Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Vol.17 (No.3/4): pp.253-263.
48.Rita D, Folkes, Valerie; Wheat, (1995)“Consumers' price perceptions of promotedproducts.”Journal of Retailing,Fall95, Vol. 71.
49.Ross M.(1956), “Brand Loyalty-What, Where, How Much?,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.34(January-February), pp. 116-128.
50.Ratchford, B. T. (1987), “New Insights About the FCB Grid,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.27, 4, pp.24-38.
51.Sapir, E. (1931). Fashion. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 6. New York: Philosophical Library.
52.Sproles, George B.(1986), “The Concept of Quality and the Efficiency of Markets: Issues and Comments,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.13(June), pp.146-147.
53.Swan and Combs(1976), "Product Performance and Consumer Satisfaction: A New Concept." J.M. Vol.40,pp.25-33.
54.Strahilevitz (1999), “The Effects of Product Type and Donation Magnitude on Willingness to Pay More for a Charity-linked Brand,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.8, p.215-241.
55.Strahilevitz, M. A. and Myers, J. G. (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434-446.
56.Sheth, Bruce I. Newman, and Barbara L. Gross, (1991), Consumption Values and MarketChoices:Theory and Applications, Cincinnati, OH: SouthwesternPublishing.
57.Strauss, Judy and Raymond Frost (2001), E-Marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58.Sweeney and Soutar (2001), “Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale”, Journal of Retailing 77, p.203–220.
59.Schiffman, L .G. and L. L. Kanuk, 2000. Consumer Behavior, Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
60.Vantrappen, H. (1992), "Creating Consumer Value by Streamlining Business Processes", Long Range Planning, Vol. 25, Feb., pp. 53-62.
61.Wilson, R(1985), “Reputations in Games and Markets. In A. E. Roth(Ed.),” Game-theoretic models of bargaining: 65-84. New York: Cambridge University Press
62.Young, S., L. Ott and B. Feign (1978), “Some Practical Considerations in Market Segmentation,” Journal of Marketing Research, August, pp. 405-412.
63.Zeithaml, V. A., (1988), Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence, Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊