跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.35) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/17 12:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:邱國維
研究生(外文):Kuo-Wei Chiu
論文名稱:公司治理、信用評等與資產減損關係之研究
論文名稱(外文):Corporate Governance, Credit Ratings and Asset Impairments
指導教授:林美倫林美倫引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:台南應用科技大學
系所名稱:國際企業經營系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:75
中文關鍵詞:資產減損盈餘管理公司治理信用評等
外文關鍵詞:Asset ImpairmentEarnings ManagementCorporate GovernanceCredit Rating
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:260
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
我國為提升企業長期資產的經濟價值及財務報表資訊的透明度,因而制定第35號財務會計準則公報『資產減損之會計處理』。然而此公報涉及許多假設與判斷,因而賦予管理當局自由裁量空間,使得資產減損遭質疑將成為管理當局操弄盈餘的新工具。故本研究探討資產減損與報導動機因素、經濟決定因素、公司治理機制及信用評等之關係。

研究結果顯示:盈餘管理之洗大澡及盈餘平穩化、高階管理者變動之報導動機因素對資產減損認列行為存在顯著影響;而在經濟決定因素方面,發現會計績效、盈餘不好的企業,會提列較多的資產減損。研究發現公司治理機制在資產的認列上確實扮演了一個相當重要的角色;在良好的公司治理機制下,管理當局主要係基於經濟實質進行資產減損金額之認列,且資產減損的認列能提高盈餘資訊性。而本研究所建構之綜合公司治理指標更能實質反映資產減損的情況,管理當局可藉由公司治理機制的強化,限制管理當局投機性認列資產減損之行為,使減損數字更能反映經濟實質。此外,當企業信用評等越差的企業,越傾向認列資產減損。


In order to enhance the economic value of long-term assets in corporate and information transparency in financial statements, the Taiwan Accounting Research and Development Foundation issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 35 (SFAS No. 35) "Accounting for Impairment of Assets". However, this bulletin involves many assumptions and judgments, which give management’s discretionary space. To recognize asset impairment may be questioned as a new tool for management to manipulate earnings. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of news-reported stimulation factors, economic determinant factors, corporate governance mechanism and credit rating on asset impairment.

The results showed:Big Bath and income smoothing in earnings management, and the change of upper management in the news-reported stimulation factors showed significant effects on the behavior of asset impairment; regarding to economic determinant factors, indicated that corporate with poor accounting and earning performance will recognize more asset impairments. Moreover, the results in this study indicated that corporate governance mechanism indeed plays a very important role in recognizing assets: under good corporate governance mechanism, the management certainly recognized the amounts of asset impairment which is based on the economic conditions; furthermore to enhance the earnings information by recognizing asset impairment. The index of cooperate governance built in this study can reflect the condition of asset impairment more essentially. The management can restrict the behavior of recognizing asset impairment speculatively by strengthening the mechanism of cooperate governance to reflect substantial economic conditions from the value of asset impairment. In addition, the study showed also the worse credit rating of enterprise which the more recognizing asset impairments.

摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝辭 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 3
第三節 研究流程與全文架構 4
第貳章 文獻探討 6
第一節 資產減損之探討 6
第二節 公司治理之探討分析 15
第三節 信用風險評等之探討 27
第參章 研究方法 30
第一節 研究期間、樣本選取與資料來源 30
第二節 變數之衡量 34
第三節 實證模型 46
第四節 研究方法 51
第肆章 實證結果 52
第一節 敘述性統計分析 52
第二節 差異分析 55
第三節 相關分析 57
第四節 迴歸分析 59
第五節 認列資產減損動機與公司治理之實證結果 62
第伍章 結論與建議 67
第一節 結論 67
第二節 研究建議 68
參考文獻 69
一、中文部分 69
二、英文部分 71


一、中文部分
1.林文祥,2007,公司治理特質對自願性資產價值減損認列機率之影響
,文大商管學報,第12 卷第1 期,165-186。
2.林美鳳、金成隆與林良楓,2009,股權結構、會計保守性與信用評等關係之研
究,台大管理論叢,第20卷,第一期,289-330。
3.林有志與廖宜鋒,2006,提前採用資產減損公報之公司特性及盈餘管理動機,文
大商管學報,第11卷,第一期,11-28。
4.高蘭芬、盧正壽、黃冠智與陳安琳,2012,公司治理、公司績效與投資策略,中
山管理評論,第20卷,第3期,851-880。
5.張文瀞、汪瑞芝與林鴻儒,2008,未分配盈餘加徵10%營利事業所得稅對企業提
前適用財務會計準則公報第35 號之影響,會計評論,第47 期,61–88。
6.張文瀞、陳瑞斌與蘇俊瑋,2010,市場認知管理對財務會計準則公報第35 號之
影響-提前適用之分析,管理與系統,第17卷,311-338。
7.陳雪如、黃劭彥與詹淇文,2010,財務危機公司之資產減損之關聯性研究,會計
與財金研究,第3卷,46-63。
8.陳錦村、郭碧雲、許正昇與陸韻茹,2006,台灣上市櫃公司認列資產減損之決定
因素-以所有權結構、成長機會、營運績效、債務規模與盈餘管理動機五大構面
作探討,2006 年會計理論與實務研討會,東吳大學會計系與中華會計教育學
會。
9.曾小青、李貴富、王全三與黃秋冬,2012,盈餘管理動機與資產減損會計:中國
證據,臺大管理論叢,第22 卷,1-30。
10.曾凱逸,2012,歐債危機中信用評等及系統性風險探討,貨幣觀測與信用評
等,94,74-82。
11.楊朝旭與吳幸蓁,2009,資產減損之決定因素與盈餘資訊性後果:論公司治理
之角色,會計評論,第48期,67-114。
12.葉銀華、李存修與柯承恩,2002,公司治理與評等系統,初版,台北:商智文
化出版社。
13.鄭桂蕙與林宛瑩,2007,公司治理結構對資產減損決策行為之影響,2007 年
會計理論與實務研討會,台北大學會計系與中華會計教育學會。
14.蕭慧玲、賴淑妙與賴淑伶,2006,資產減損認列之決定因素、融券放空行為與
市場反應之探討,2006 年會計理論與實務研討會,東吳大學會計系與中華會計
教育學會。
15.顏信輝與丁緯,2006,企業認列資產減損之考量:控制經濟因素的不對稱效果
及查核事務所規模之影響 ,2006 年會計理論與實務研討會,東吳大學會計系
與中華會計教育學會。
二、英文部分
1.Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant
analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The
Journal of Finance, 23, 589-609.
2.Ahmed, A. S., and S. Duellman. (2007). Evidence on the
role of accounting conservatism in corporate governance.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43, 411-437
3.Alciatore, M, C. C. Dee, P. Easton and N. Spear. (1998).
Asset write-downs:a decade of research. Journal of
Accounting Literature, 17, 1-39.
4.Ashbaugh-Skaifea, H., D. W. Collinsb, and R. LaFondc.
(2006). The effects of corporate governance on firm’s
credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42,
(1-2) , 203-243.
5.Ball, R. (2001). Infrastructure requirements for an
economically efficient system of public financial
reporting and disclosure. Brookings-Wharton Papers on
Financial Services , 127-169.
6.Berkson. (1944). Application of the logistic function to
bio-Assay . Journal of the American Statistical
Association, 39, 357-365.
7.Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the
relation between the board of director composition and
financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-
465.
8.Bradley, M. Chen, G. Dallas, and E. Snyderwine. (2007).
The relation between corporate governance and credit risk,
bond yield and firm valuation . Working paper Duke
University.
9.Bushman, R. M., Chen, Q., Engel, E., and Smith, A. (2004).
Financial accounting information organizational complexity
and corporate governance systems. Journal of Accounting
and Economics, 37(2), 167-201.
10.Bushman, R., and Piotroski, J. (2006). Financial
reporting incentives for conservative accounting: the
influence of legal and political institutions. Journal of
Accounting and Economics, 42 (1/2), 107-148.
11.Chen, C. J. P., S. Chen, X. Su, and Y. Wang. (2004).
Incentives for and consequences of initial voluntary
asset write-downs in the emerging chinese market. Journal
of International Accounting Research, 3(1), 43–61.
12.Claessens, S., Djankov, S, and Lang, L. (2000). The
separation of ownership and control in East asia
corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81-112.
13.Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., and Lang, L.
H. P.(2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment
effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance,
57, 2741-2771.
14.Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. (1999).
Corporate governance, chief executive officer
compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial
Economics, 51, 371-406.
15.Dechow, P. M., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. (1996). Causes
and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis
of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, Spring, 1-36.
16.Dichev, I. D., and J. D. Piotroski. (2001). The long-run
stock returns following bond ratings changes. Journal of
Finance, 56, 173-203.
17.Elliott, J. A., and W. H. Shaw. (1988). Write-offs as
accounting procedures to manage perceptions. Journal of
Accounting Research, 26, 91-119.
18.Edwards J., and A. Weichenrieder. (1999). Ownership
concentration and share valuation: evidence from
germany. CESifo Working Paper, No. 193.
19.Frost, C. A. (2007). Credit Rating agencies in capital
markets: a review of research evidence on selected
criticisms of the agencies. Journal of Accounting,
Auditing and Finance, 22, 469-492.
20.Francis, J.,J. Hanna, L. Vincent. (1996). Cause and
effects of discretionary asset write-offs. Journal of
Accounting Research, 34, Supplement, 117-134.
21.Gompers, P., Ishii, J., and Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate
governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 118, 107-156.
22.Hanna, J. D. (1999). Analysts’ earnings forecasts and the
recognition of special items. Working paper, University
of Chicago.
23.Healy, Paul M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on
accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics
, 7 ,85-107.
24.Hsieh, W. T., and T. Z. Wu. (2005). Determinants and
market reaction of assets impairment in Taiwan. Taiwan
Accounting Review , 6(1) , 59-95.
25.Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the
firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership
structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 ,305-360.
26.Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback. (1983). The market for
corporate control: the scientific evidence. Journal of
Financial Economics, 11(1–4), 5-50.
27.La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer.
(1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of
Finance , 54, 471-517.
28.Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core
rigidities: a paradox in managing new product
development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, Special,
111-125.
29.Le Bras, A ., Andrews, D. (2004). Bank rating methodology
. fitch ratings Ltd. New York.
30.Lemmon, M.L., Lin, K.V. (2003). Ownership structure,
corporate governance, and firm value: evidence from the
east asian financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 58,
1445-1468.
31.Lipton, M., and Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal
for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer,
48(1), 59-77.
32.Minnick, K. (2004). Write-offs and corporate governance.
Working Paper, University of Maryland.
33.Ohlson, J. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic
prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting
Research, 18, 109-131.
34.Pasiouras, F. and K. Kosmidou. (2006). Factors
influencing the profitability of domestic and foreign
commercial banks in the european union. Research In
International Business and Finance, 21, 222-237.
35.Peasnell, K. V., P. F. Pope, and S. Young. (2001). Board
monitoring and earnings management:do outside directors
influence abnormal accruals? Working paper, Lancaster
University.
36.Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of
shareholders oversight. Journal of Financial Economics,
20, 237-256.
37.Rees, L., S. Gill, and R. Gore. (1996). An investigation
of asset write-downs and concurrent abnormal accruals.
Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 157-169.
38.Richards, V. D., and Eugene, J. L. (1980). A cash
conversion cycle approach to liquidity analysis.
Financial Management, 9(1), 32-38.
39.Riedl, J. (2004). An examination of long-lived asset
impairments. The Accounting Review, 79 (3), 823-852.
40.Scott, W. R. (2006). Financial accounting theory: 4th
edition. Prentice-Hall.
41.Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny. (1986). Large shareholders
and corporate control, Journal of Political Economy, l,
94, 461-488.
42.Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. (1997). A survey of
corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 52,
737-783.
43.Strong, J., and J. Meyer. (1987). Asset write-down:
managerial incentives and security returns. Journal of
Finance, 42, 643-661.
44.Subramanyam, K. R. (1996). The pricing of discretionary
accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22 , 249-
281.
45.Watts, R. and J. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive accounting
theory. Prentice-Hall Company, 200-238.
46.Xavier, G., and Holger, M. M. (2012). Corporate
governance, product market competition, and equity
prices. Journal of Finance, 66(2), 563-600.
47.Zaima, J., and J. McCarthy. (1988). The impact of bond
rating changes on common stocks and bonds: tests of the
wealth redistribution hypothesis. The Financial Review,
23(4), 483-498.
48.Zucca, L., and D. Campbell. (1992) A closer look at
discretionary write-downs of impaired assets. Accounting
Horizons, 6, 30-41.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 林榮森:〈兒女情長.英雄氣盛-李安《臥虎藏龍》的美學世界〉,刊《師友月刊》436期,57-61頁,2003年10月
2. 林保淳:〈觀千劍而後識器-評「武俠小說談藝錄-葉洪生論劍」〉,刊《文訊》,16-19頁,1995年2月
3. 林保淳:〈民國以來「武俠小說研究」評議〉,刊《古典文學》第13期,259-288頁,1995年9月
4. 李歐梵:〈臥虎藏龍為何迷倒美國〉,刊《亞洲週刊》,10頁,2001年3月
5. 王蘊:〈毛共清算鴛鴦蝴蝶派的思想影響〉,刊《問題與研究》,53-55頁,1965年1月
6. 邱怡瑄:〈武俠小說問卷調查報告〉,刊《文訊》第193期,73-74頁,2001年
7. 金明琨:〈從武俠小說看大眾審美心理的變遷〉,刊《文訊》第259期,19-22頁,2007年5月
8. 范伯群:〈鴛鴦蝴蝶-《禮拜六》派〉,刊《國文天地》第5卷第6期,82-88頁,1989年11月
9. 黃建業:〈臥虎藏龍中的「江湖」〉,刊《文訊》186期,6-7頁,2001年4月
10. 葉洪生:〈觀千劍而後識器-淺談近代武俠小說之流變〉,刊《聯合文學》第23期,7-17頁,1986年9月
11. 蔡秀粧:〈自由女「俠」?試論李安和王度廬的《臥虎藏龍》中的女性意識〉,刊《電影欣賞學刊》132期,174-191頁,2007年7-9月
12. 簡政珍:〈臥虎藏龍-悲劇與映象的律動〉,刊《聯合文學》198期,10-26頁,2001年
13. 龔鵬程:〈民初的大眾通俗文學鴛鴦蝴蝶派〉,刊《文訊》第26期,107-124頁,1986年10月
14. 龔鵬程:〈鴛鴦蝴蝶與武俠小說〉,刊《聯合文學》第23期,24-28頁,1986年9月
15. 林保淳:〈成人的童話世界──武俠小說的「本體論」〉,《政大中文學報》第9期,189-212頁,2008年6月