跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.136) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/20 22:57
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張哲維
研究生(外文):Che-wei Chang
論文名稱:台灣娛樂式拍賣網站之探索性研究
論文名稱(外文):An Exploratory Research of Penny Auction Websites in Taiwan
指導教授:林芬慧林芬慧引用關係
指導教授(外文):Fen-Hui Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系研究所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:76
中文關鍵詞:娛樂式拍賣群體行為探索性研究文本論述分析多個案研究消費者偏好
外文關鍵詞:consumer preferencesmulti-case study researchnarrative analysispenny auctionexploratory researchgroup behaviors
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:418
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:74
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本論文針對一種近年來新興的電子商務模式---結合賭博投機性質的拍賣模式:娛樂式拍賣(國外稱為一分錢拍賣( Penny Auction)做台灣市場的探索性研究,同時亦為各家類似網站之間求異同的多個案研究。在既有文獻中已有學者運用賽局理論評估買方(競標者)的最佳決策、賣方(網站業者)的營運策略,並輔以實證資料觀察競標行為中的學習效應等,然而該網站之競標行為,並非單純僅止於買賣雙方交易的層面,實際上伴隨著競標者共謀圍標的氾濫現象。因此本研究側重於觀察群體合作行為,依質性研究精神深入相關論壇,擷取並篩選網友討論串文本做論述分析,窺探該次文化現象及對市場有何影響,以及從中歸納出消費者偏好;另一方面,亦利用各娛樂式拍賣網站所提供之歷史拍賣資訊等實證資料,輔以觀察法試著了解消費者偏好在高流量的代表性網站及受歡迎的新興網站間營運策略上的差異(如商品種類、促銷手法、競爭狀況和拍賣制度等)有何連結,以釐清該產業至今及未來之發展脈絡。
This Paper concerns with the development of a brand-new e-auction type called penny auction in Taiwan for its high reputation of foreign market (Europe, American and Japan). Penny auction websites feature their colorful and gambling-like rules or mechanism, which attracts many people but often, leads to unbalance of beneficial obtainment between auctioneer and bidders. Previous studies focused on using theoretical mathematical models and empirical data to analyze rational bidders’ behaviors, or to estimate websites’ revenue. Some of them highlighted learning effect may influenced a single bidder’s strategy or behavior but still never considered bidding collusion at group level. Our exploratory research found bidding collision commonly exists in Taiwan’s penny auction websites and significantly disadvantages general bidders. Therefore, we highlight to use qualitative data, such as bidders’ discussing articles or comments, to explore their collusive bidding behaviors and consumer preferences by narrative analysis; besides, we also utilize observation method via historical auction data offered from websites, to engage in doing multi-case study research, comparing the differences of operating strategies between similar penny auction websites, in order to track the progress toward future.
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
第一章 、前言 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究目的與研究貢獻 8
第三節 章節安排與順序 9
第二章、文獻探討 10
第一節 Penny Auction之研究面向 10
第二節 Penny Auction 數學理論模型 (Theoretical) 12
第三節 Penny Auction 資料觀察分析 (Empirical) 15
第三章、研究方法 17
第一節 研究設計說明(多個案研究) 17
第二節 資料來源與收集 18
第四章、娛樂式拍賣之競標模式 20
第一節 英式拍賣型模式 20
第二節 荷式拍賣/樂透型模式 23
第三節 受歡迎的程度 25
第五章、競標行為與網站營運策略 26
第一節 競標者的類型 26
第二節 個人競標策略類型 28
第三節 群體合作圍標行為 32
第四節 Penny Auction 網站吸引競標者之因素 34
第五節 競爭激烈程度之衡量 36
第六節 商品種類多樣性觀察 47
第七節 Penny Auction 各家網站競標制度的差異 50
第六章、研究結果與討論 61
參考文獻 65
參考文獻
Avinash K. Dixit, David H. Reiley, Susan Skeath (2009).Games of Strategy (3rd ed).Cengage South-Western.

Byron J. Finch (2007).Customer expectations in online auction environments: An exploratory study of customer feedback and risk. Journal of Operations Management, 25(5), 985–997.

Chaochang Chiu, Yungchang Ku, Ting Lie, Yuchi Chen (2011).Internet auction fraud detection using social network analysis and classification tree approaches. International Journal of Electronic Commerce/Spring, 15(3), 123-147.

Eric Stix (2012).An empirical study of online penny auctions. Unpublished.

Kenneth Hendricks, Robert H. Porter (1989).Collusion in auctions. Discussion Papers, No.817.

Lili Liu, Qian Chen (2011).Bidding behavior and profits in pay-per-bid auctions. Unpublished.

Marc S. Robinson (1985).Collusion and the choice of auction. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1), 141-145.

Martin Dufwenberga, Uri Gneezy (2002).Information disclosure in auctions: An experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior &; Organization, 48, 431-444.
Michael Caldara (2012).Bidding behavior in pay-to-bid auctions: An experimental study. Working Paper.

Ned Augenblick (2011).Consumer and producer behavior in the market for penny auctions: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

Roger A. McCain (2003).Game theory: A non-technical introduction to the analysis of strategy. South Western Educational Publishing.

Stefano DellaVigna (2009). Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315-372.

Subhajyoti Bandyopadhyay, Seema Bandyopadhyay (2009).Estimating time required to reach bid levels in online auctions. Journal of Management Information, 26(3), 275-301.

Sonal Mittal (2010).Equilibrium analysis of generalized penny auctions. Unpublished.

Toomas Hinnosaar (2010).Penny Auctions are Unpredictable. Unpublished.

Tai Lam (2011).Pay-per-bid auctions with an exit option: An experimental and empirical investigation. Unpublished.

Yaron Raviv, Gabor Virag (2009).Gambling by auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(3), 369-378.
Young Han Lee, Ulrike Malmendier (2011).The bidder’s curse. American Economic Review, 101(2), 749-87.

Zhongmin Wang, Minbo Xu (2012).Learning and strategic sophistication in games:
Evidence from penny auctions on the Internet. Working Paper.

All penny auctions.com(www.allpennyauctions.com).

Bidfun競拍討論狂論壇(www.bidfun.com.tw).

Bid &; Buy (www.bidandbuy.com.tw).

Fabulaz (www.fabulaz.com.tw).

GodBid (www.godbid.com.tw).

HappyBid (www.happybid.com.tw).

QuickBid (www.quickbid.com.tw).

Y-Bid (ybid.ytower.com.tw).

哇!拍賣(auction.agito.com.tw).
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文